IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v6y2013i1p1-17d31516.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Critical Sustainability: Setting the Limits to Growth and Responsibility in Tourism

Author

Listed:
  • Jarkko Saarinen

    (Department of Geography, P.O. Box 3000, FI-90014 University of Oulu, Finland
    School of Tourism and Hospitality, University of Johannesburg, P.O. Box 524, Auckland Park, Johannesburg, South Africa)

Abstract

The idea of sustainable development has been discussed in tourism research for almost a quarter of a century. During that time, sustainability has become an important policy framework for tourism and regional developers guiding their planning and development thinking. Sustainability has also emerged academically as an important field of research with an emphasis on defining the limits to growth and responsibilities in tourism. However, while there are urgent needs to incorporate sustainability into tourism, there is also a growing amount of frustration among scholars on the conceptual nature of sustainability and how tourism as a private-driven economic activity relates to the ideals of sustainable development. This has created an increasing need to understand and potentially reframe the concept. The purpose of this paper is to overview the conceptual dimensions of sustainable tourism and discuss some of the main sources of frustration. Based on this, it is concluded that while a conceptual plurality seems to be unavoidable, there is a need to re-frame i.e ., rescale and decentralize tourism in policy frameworks and practices aiming towards sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Jarkko Saarinen, 2013. "Critical Sustainability: Setting the Limits to Growth and Responsibility in Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-17, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:6:y:2013:i:1:p:1-17:d:31516
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/6/1/1/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/6/1/1/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gossling, Stefan & Hansson, Carina Borgstrom & Horstmeier, Oliver & Saggel, Stefan, 2002. "Ecological footprint analysis as a tool to assess tourism sustainability," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(2-3), pages 199-211, December.
    2. World Commission on Environment and Development,, 1987. "Our Common Future," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780192820808.
    3. Blaikie, Piers, 2006. "Is Small Really Beautiful? Community-based Natural Resource Management in Malawi and Botswana," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 34(11), pages 1942-1957, November.
    4. Joachim H. Spangenberg, 2005. "Will the information society be sustainable? Towards criteria and indicators for a sustainable knowledge society," International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 1(1/2), pages 85-102.
    5. Andy Pike & Andrés Rodriguez-Pose & John Tomaney, 2008. "Local and Regional Development," Economic Geography, Clark University, vol. 84(2), pages 241-242, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ulrika Persson-Fischer & Shuangqi Liu, 2021. "The Impact of a Global Crisis on Areas and Topics of Tourism Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-26, January.
    2. Álvaro Dias & Inês Aldana & Leandro Pereira & Renato Lopes da Costa & Nelson António, 2021. "A Measure of Tourist Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-20, March.
    3. Mengyi Lin & Fu-Yuan Li & Haibin Zhou, 2020. "A Research on the Combination of Oblique Photography and Mobile Applications Based on the Sustainable Development of Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-19, April.
    4. Ulrika Persson-Fischer & Shuangqi Liu, 2021. "What Is Interdisciplinarity in the Study of Sustainable Destination Development?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-28, March.
    5. Rannveig Ólafsdóttir, 2020. "The Role of Public Participation for Determining Sustainability Indicators for Arctic Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, December.
    6. Libertad Moreno-Luna & Rafael Robina-Ramírez & Marcelo Sánchez-Oro & José Castro Serrano, 2021. "Drivers for Sustainability Awareness Development in Tourism Curricula: The Case of Spanish Universities," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, September.
    7. Hussam Hussein & Filippo Menga & Francesca Greco, 2018. "Monitoring Transboundary Water Cooperation in SDG 6.5.2: How a Critical Hydropolitics Approach Can Spot Inequitable Outcomes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-9, October.
    8. P Vysušilová, 2024. "Approaches To Overtourism In The Area Of Destination Management Marketing," Economics Working Papers 2024-04, University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Faculty of Economics, revised 14 May 2024.
    9. Marek Więckowski, 2021. "Will the Consequences of Covid-19 Trigger a Redefining of the Role of Transport in the Development of Sustainable Tourism?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-15, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. White, Thomas J., 2007. "Sharing resources: The global distribution of the Ecological Footprint," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 402-410, December.
    2. Angeliki N. Menegaki, 2025. "How Do Tourism and Environmental Theories Intersect?," Tourism and Hospitality, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-10, February.
    3. Derrick M. Anderson & Andrew B. Whitford, 2015. "Developing Knowledge States: Technology and the Enhancement of National Statistical Capacity," Papers 1502.07625, arXiv.org.
    4. Betsy Donald & Mia Gray & Centre for Business Research, 2018. "The Double Crisis: In What Sense A Regional Problem?," Working Papers wp507, Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.
    5. Xiaoxu Dong & Cheon Yu & Yun Seop Hwang, 2021. "The Effects of Reverse Knowledge Spillover on China’s Sustainable Development: Sustainable Development Indicators Based on Institutional Quality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, February.
    6. Sharma, Ravi & Fantin, Arul-Raj & Prabhu, Navin & Guan, Chong & Dattakumar, Ambica, 2016. "Digital literacy and knowledge societies: A grounded theory investigation of sustainable development," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(7), pages 628-643.
    7. Hall, Derek, 2010. "Transport geography and new European realities: a critique," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 1-13.
    8. Orenstein, Daniel E. & Shach-Pinsley, Dalit, 2017. "A Comparative Framework for Assessing Sustainability Initiatives at the Regional Scale," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 245-256.
    9. Fabio Iraldo & Benedetta Nucci, 2016. "Proactive environmental management in hotels: What difference does it make?," ECONOMICS AND POLICY OF ENERGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(2), pages 81-106.
    10. Julia Brown, 2014. "Evaluating Participatory Initiatives in South Africa," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(2), pages 21582440145, April.
    11. CHEN, Helen S.Y., 2020. "Designing Sustainable Humanitarian Supply Chains," OSF Preprints m82ar, Center for Open Science.
    12. Denise Ravet, 2011. "Lean production: the link between supply chain and sustainable development in an international environment," Post-Print hal-00691666, HAL.
    13. Mara Del Baldo, 2012. "Corporate social responsibility and corporate governance in Italian SMEs: the experience of some “spirited businesses”," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 16(1), pages 1-36, February.
    14. Michael Howes & Liana Wortley & Ruth Potts & Aysin Dedekorkut-Howes & Silvia Serrao-Neumann & Julie Davidson & Timothy Smith & Patrick Nunn, 2017. "Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-17, January.
    15. Parnphumeesup, Piya & Kerr, Sandy A., 2011. "Stakeholder preferences towards the sustainable development of CDM projects: Lessons from biomass (rice husk) CDM project in Thailand," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 3591-3601, June.
    16. Chin-Shan Lu & Kuo-Chung Shang & Chi-Chang Lin, 2016. "Examining sustainability performance at ports: port managers’ perspectives on developing sustainable supply chains," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(8), pages 909-927, November.
    17. Kebede, Yohannes, 1993. "The Limits to Common Resource Management: The Bypassed Commons or Commons without Tragedy," MPRA Paper 662, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 01 May 1993.
    18. John Stanley & Janet Stanley, 2023. "Improving Appraisal Methodology for Land Use Transport Measures to Reduce Risk of Social Exclusion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-18, August.
    19. Nora Mzavanadze, 2009. "Building A Framework For National Sustainable Development Assessment And Application For Lithuania: Sustainability In Transition," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 11(01), pages 97-130.
    20. Pishchulov, Grigory & Trautrims, Alexander & Chesney, Thomas & Gold, Stefan & Schwab, Leila, 2019. "The Voting Analytic Hierarchy Process revisited: A revised method with application to sustainable supplier selection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 166-179.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:6:y:2013:i:1:p:1-17:d:31516. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.