IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i9p4009-d1645732.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analyzing the Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Employee Satisfaction Using a Hybrid SEM-ANN Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Anđelka Stojanović

    (Engineering Management Department, Technical Faculty in Bor, University of Belgrade, 19210 Bor, Serbia)

  • Sanela Arsić

    (Engineering Management Department, Technical Faculty in Bor, University of Belgrade, 19210 Bor, Serbia)

  • Isidora Milošević

    (Engineering Management Department, Technical Faculty in Bor, University of Belgrade, 19210 Bor, Serbia)

  • Ivan Mihajlović

    (Industrial Engineering Department, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Vesna Spasojević Brkić

    (Industrial Engineering Department, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia)

Abstract

In the conditions of modern market dynamics, corporate social responsibility (CSR) is increasingly evolving from a formal ethical principle into a powerful strategic instrument, key to achieving sustainable growth and long-term competitive advantage. Companies that integrate CSR into their business not only affirm the values of social responsibility, but also position themselves as reliable and ethically oriented actors, thereby winning the trust of investors, motivating employees and building a stable base of loyal consumers. Hence, the aim of this research is to determine, through empirical analysis, to what extent and in what way individual aspects of corporate social responsibility influence employee perception and satisfaction, as well as to develop a predictive model of their mutual connection. The specific hybrid SEM-ANN methodology in the CSR field was applied to obtain more precise results than standard data analysis methods, which fulfilled the literature gap in this research field. The detailed hypotheses designed were empirically tested using SEM methodology and indicated a positive association between the social and stakeholder aspects with employee satisfaction. These outcomes were confirmed by the results of the ANN models. The findings obtained are not only theoretical, but also have a useful application in the real business environment, which is reflected in the development of strategies that can serve as a road map for organizations in achieving employee satisfaction. This could lead to a change in organizational culture with an emphasis on ethical business and greater responsibility towards society and stakeholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Anđelka Stojanović & Sanela Arsić & Isidora Milošević & Ivan Mihajlović & Vesna Spasojević Brkić, 2025. "Analyzing the Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Employee Satisfaction Using a Hybrid SEM-ANN Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-20, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:4009-:d:1645732
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/4009/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/4009/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ameeta Jain & Monica Keneley & Dianne Thomson, 2015. "Voluntary CSR disclosure works! Evidence from Asia-Pacific banks," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 11(1), pages 2-18, March.
    2. Eunil Park & Sanghoon Lee & Sang Jib Kwon & Angel P. Del Pobil, 2015. "Determinants of Behavioral Intention to Use South Korean Airline Services: Effects of Service Quality and Corporate Social Responsibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-16, September.
    3. Patrick Velte, 2022. "Meta-analyses on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): a literature review," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 72(3), pages 627-675, September.
    4. Mariam Farooq & Omer Farooq & Walid Cheffi, 2019. "How Do Employees Respond to the CSR Initiatives of their Organizations: Empirical Evidence from Developing Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-14, May.
    5. Chu-Hsuan Chang & Hsiou-Wei Lin & Wen-Hsien Tsai & Wei-Liang Wang & Cheng-Tsu Huang, 2021. "Employee Satisfaction, Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-26, September.
    6. Justyna Fijałkowska & Beata Zyznarska-Dworczak & Przemysław Garsztka, 2018. "Corporate Social-Environmental Performance versus Financial Performance of Banks in Central and Eastern European Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-22, March.
    7. Lee Cronbach, 1951. "Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 16(3), pages 297-334, September.
    8. Glavas, Ante & Kelley, Ken, 2014. "The Effects of Perceived Corporate Social Responsibility on Employee Attitudes," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(2), pages 165-202, April.
    9. Antonio Martos-Pedrero & Francisco Joaquín Cortés-García & David Jiménez-Castillo, 2019. "The Relationship between Social Responsibility and Business Performance: An Analysis of the Agri-Food Sector of Southeast Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-23, November.
    10. Yueling Xu & Wenyu Zhang & Haijun Bao & Shuai Zhang & Ying Xiang, 2019. "A SEM–Neural Network Approach to Predict Customers’ Intention to Purchase Battery Electric Vehicles in China’s Zhejiang Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-19, June.
    11. Muddassar Sarfraz & Wang Qun & Muhammad Ibrahim Abdullah & Adnan Tariq Alvi, 2018. "Employees’ Perception of Corporate Social Responsibility Impact on Employee Outcomes: Mediating Role of Organizational Justice for Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, July.
    12. Mehran Nejati & Yashar Salamzadeh & Cheng Kong Loke, 2019. "Can ethical leaders drive employees’ CSR engagement?," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 16(5), pages 655-669, July.
    13. David Benjamin Billedeau & Jeffrey Wilson & Naima Samuel, 2022. "From Responsibility to Requirement: COVID, Cars, and the Future of Corporate Social Responsibility in Canada," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-16, May.
    14. Seunghee Im & Yang Woon Chung & Ji Yeon Yang, 2016. "Employees’ Participation in Corporate Social Responsibility and Organizational Outcomes: The Moderating Role of Person–CSR Fit," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-14, December.
    15. Ameeta Jain & Monica Keneley & Dianne Thomson, 2015. "Voluntary CSR disclosure works! Evidence from Asia-Pacific banks," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 11(1), pages 2-18, March.
    16. Mohammad Alnehabi & Al-Baraa Abdulrahman Al-Mekhlafi, 2023. "The Association between Corporate Social Responsibility, Employee Performance, and Turnover Intention Moderated by Organizational Identification and Commitment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-25, September.
    17. Margaret Brunton & Gabriel Eweje & Nazim Taskin, 2017. "Communicating Corporate Social Responsibility to Internal Stakeholders: Walking the Walk or Just Talking the Talk?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(1), pages 31-48, January.
    18. Hongqing He & Yameng Zhang & Yaqi Ding, 2022. "When Does CSR Fail to Incentive Employees’ Affective Organizational Commitment? Exploring the Moderating Effects Based on the C-S-R Concerns Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-20, July.
    19. Assâad El Akremi & Jean-Pascal Gond & Valérie Swaen & Kenneth de Roeck & Jacques Igalens, 2018. "How Do Employees Perceive Corporate Responsibility? Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Corporate Stakeholder Responsibility Scale," Post-Print halshs-01520959, HAL.
    20. Jose Benitez & Laura Ruiz & Ana Castillo & Javier Llorens, 2020. "How corporate social responsibility activities influence employer reputation: The role of social media capability," Post-Print hal-02462583, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fasilat Aramide Sanusi & Satirenjit Kaur Johl, 2020. "A proposed framework for assessing the influence of internal corporate social responsibility belief on employee intention to job continuity," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(6), pages 2437-2449, November.
    2. Tehreem Fatima & Kamal Badar & Muhammad Waqas & Arslan Ayub & Muhammad Haris, 2023. "CSR Communication Matters! An Examination of CSR, Organisational Pride, and Task-Related Pro-Environmental Behaviour Nexus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-13, June.
    3. Marc Scholten & Manuela Faia Correia & Teresa Esteves & Sónia P. Gonçalves, 2022. "No Place for Pointless Jobs: How Social Responsibility Impacts Job Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-25, September.
    4. Erifili-Christina Chatzopoulou & Dimitris Manolopoulos & Vasia Agapitou, 2022. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Employee Outcomes: Interrelations of External and Internal Orientations with Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(3), pages 795-817, September.
    5. Nejla Ould Daoud Ellili & Haitham Nobanee, 2023. "Impact of economic, environmental, and corporate social responsibility reporting on financial performance of UAE banks," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 3967-3983, May.
    6. Aaron T. McDonald & Catalin Ratiu & Beverlee B. Anderson, 2023. "Reputational Considerations in Firm Response to Social Issues," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 26(3), pages 192-202, August.
    7. Boban Melovic & Nikola Milovic & Tamara Backovic-Vulic & Branislav Dudic & Peter Bajzik, 2019. "Attitudes and Perceptions of Employees toward Corporate Social Responsibility in Western Balkan Countries: Importance and Relevance for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-37, November.
    8. Castaldo, Sandro & Ciacci, Andrea & Penco, Lara, 2023. "Perceived corporate social responsibility and job satisfaction in grocery retail: A comparison between low- and high-productivity stores," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    9. María Luisa Pajuelo Moreno & Teresa Duarte-Atoche, 2019. "Relationship between Sustainable Disclosure and Performance—An Extension of Ullmann’s Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-33, August.
    10. David A. Jones & Alexander Newman & Ruodan Shao & Fang Lee Cooke, 2019. "Advances in Employee-Focused Micro-Level Research on Corporate Social Responsibility: Situating New Contributions Within the Current State of the Literature," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 157(2), pages 293-302, June.
    11. Saskia Crucke & Marie Servaes & Tom Kluijtmans & Shana Mertens & Eveline Schollaert, 2022. "Linking environmentally‐specific transformational leadership and employees' green advocacy: The influence of leadership integrity," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(2), pages 406-420, March.
    12. Bilal Afsar & Waheed Ali Umrani, 2020. "Corporate social responsibility and pro‐environmental behavior at workplace: The role of moral reflectiveness, coworker advocacy, and environmental commitment," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1), pages 109-125, January.
    13. Martha E. Theron & Michael C. Cant & Johannes A. Wiid, 2023. "Corporate Social Responsibility In The South African Retail Sector: Are Employees Aware Of What Their Employers Are Doing?," Economic Review: Journal of Economics and Business, University of Tuzla, Faculty of Economics, vol. 21(1), pages 41-52, May.
    14. Kenneth Roeck & François Maon, 2018. "Building the Theoretical Puzzle of Employees’ Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility: An Integrative Conceptual Framework and Research Agenda," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 149(3), pages 609-625, May.
    15. Faiza Manzoor & Longbao Wei & Mohammad Nurunnabi & Qazi Abdul Subhan & Syed Irshad Ali Shah & Samaher Fallatah, 2019. "The Impact of Transformational Leadership on Job Performance and CSR as Mediator in SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-14, January.
    16. Chol-Jung Park & Soo-Yong Kim & Minh V. Nguyen, 2021. "Fuzzy TOPSIS Application to Rank Determinants of Employee Retention in Construction Companies: South Korean Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-16, May.
    17. Tiina Onkila & Bhavesh Sarna, 2022. "A systematic literature review on employee relations with CSR: State of art and future research agenda," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(2), pages 435-447, March.
    18. Leibao Zhang & Liming Sheng & Wenyu Zhang & Shuai Zhang, 2020. "Do Personal Norms Predict Citizens’ Acceptance of Green Transport Policies in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-16, June.
    19. Barros, Victor & Verga Matos, Pedro & Miranda Sarmento, Joaquim & Rino Vieira, Pedro, 2022. "M&A activity as a driver for better ESG performance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    20. Francesco Paolone & Matteo Pozzoli & Nicola Cucari & Rosario Bianco, 2023. "Longer board tenure and audit committee tenure. How do they impact environmental performance? A European study," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1), pages 358-368, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:4009-:d:1645732. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.