IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i9p3897-d1642786.html

Unveiling the Nexus Between Use of AI-Enabled Robo-Advisors, Behavioural Intention and Sustainable Investment Decisions Using PLS-SEM

Author

Listed:
  • Nargis Mohapatra

    (School of Economics and Commerce (KSEC), Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology (KIIT), Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar 751024, India)

  • Sameer Shekhar

    (School of Economics and Commerce (KSEC), Kalinga Institute of Industrial Technology (KIIT), Deemed to be University, Bhubaneswar 751024, India)

  • Rubee Singh

    (Institute of Business Management, GLA University, Mathura 281406, India)

  • Shahbaz Khan

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, University of Tabuk, Tabuk 71491, Saudi Arabia)

  • Gilberto Santos

    (Design School, Polytechnic Institute Cavado Ave, Campus do IPCA, 4750-810 Barcelos, Portugal)

  • Sandro Carvalho

    (Technological School, 2Ai—Applied Artificial Intelligence Laboratory Polytechnic Institute of Cavado and Ave, 4750-810 Barcelos, Portugal)

Abstract

The study examines the nexus between AI-driven technology, i.e., robo-advisors, and the behavioural intention of investors towards sustainable investment decisions considering government regulations and sustainable investment awareness as the moderating variables. A total of 372 responses were collected from across India through a structured questionnaire along identified variables from the TAM and UTAUT theories under the select constructs, i.e., trust, perceived risk, user-friendliness, perceived usefulness, and emotional arousal. This is with reference to the use of robo-advisors to unearth the extent to which they influence the behavioural intention and finally the sustainable investment decisions taking into account government regulations and sustainable investment awareness as the moderating variables. The results derived by using PLS-SEM reveal that all the five factors are having a significant impact on the behavioural intention for sustainable investment decisions of the investors. Further, both sustainable investment awareness and government regulations have been found to have a moderating impact on shaping the behavioural intention of the investors with respect to most of the variables. The results of the study come up with significant suggestions for the government, financial institutions, and the investors as well as the academicians, and therefore, have policy implications, managerial implications, and theoretical implications. The constructs and moderating variables considered here can further be used for studying the behavioural intentions. The robo-advisory service providers may emphasize developing the algo ensuring trust, usability, and friendly interface in a manner that tends to minimize the perceived risk and emotional arousal leading to the use of robo-advisors pushing the intention of the investors towards sustainable investment.

Suggested Citation

  • Nargis Mohapatra & Sameer Shekhar & Rubee Singh & Shahbaz Khan & Gilberto Santos & Sandro Carvalho, 2025. "Unveiling the Nexus Between Use of AI-Enabled Robo-Advisors, Behavioural Intention and Sustainable Investment Decisions Using PLS-SEM," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-21, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:3897-:d:1642786
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/3897/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/3897/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Jun & Chang, Huihong & Forrest, Jeffrey Yi-Lin & Yang, Baohua, 2020. "Influence of artificial intelligence on technological innovation: Evidence from the panel data of china's manufacturing sectors," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    2. Utz, Sebastian & Wimmer, Maximilian & Steuer, Ralph E., 2015. "Tri-criterion modeling for constructing more-sustainable mutual funds," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(1), pages 331-338.
    3. Ming-Lang Tseng & Phan Anh Tan & Shiou-Yun Jeng & Chun-Wei Remen Lin & Yeneneh Tamirat Negash & Susilo Nur Aji Cokro Darsono, 2019. "Sustainable Investment: Interrelated among Corporate Governance, Economic Performance and Market Risks Using Investor Preference Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-15, April.
    4. Longbing Cao, 2021. "AI in Finance: Challenges, Techniques and Opportunities," Papers 2107.09051, arXiv.org.
    5. Shanmuganathan, Manchuna, 2020. "Behavioural finance in an era of artificial intelligence: Longitudinal case study of robo-advisors in investment decisions," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 27(C).
    6. Mikhail Beketov & Kevin Lehmann & Manuel Wittke, 2018. "Robo Advisors: quantitative methods inside the robots," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(6), pages 363-370, October.
    7. Jochen Wirtz & Johannes Hofmeister & Patricia Y. P. Chew & Xin (David) Ding, 2023. "Digital service technologies, service robots, AI, and the strategic pathways to cost-effective service excellence," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(15-16), pages 1173-1196, December.
    8. Gaurav Talan & Gagan Deep Sharma, 2019. "Doing Well by Doing Good: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda for Sustainable Investment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-16, January.
    9. Tan Zi Yi & Noor Ashikin Mohd Rom & Nurbani Md. Hassan & Mohamad Shaharudin Samsurijan & Andrew Ebekozien, 2023. "The Adoption of Robo-Advisory among Millennials in the 21st Century: Trust, Usability and Knowledge Perception," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-16, March.
    10. Aleksandrina Aleksandrova & Valentina Ninova & Zhelyo Zhelev, 2023. "A Survey on AI Implementation in Finance, (Cyber) Insurance and Financial Controlling," Risks, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-16, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ismah Osman & Norhasimah Shaharuddin & Roslina Hj Mohamad Shafi & Mohd Rahim Khamis & Nur Afizah Muhamad Ariffin & Hasni Abdullah, 2025. "Engaging Gen Z: Exploring TikTok’s Role in Teaching Fiqh Muamalat among Students," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(6), pages 1461-1473, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicole Maria Namyslo & Dominik Jung & Timo Sturm, 2025. "The state of robo-advisory design: A systematic consolidation of design requirements and recommendations," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 35(1), pages 1-29, December.
    2. Xiao-Guang Yue & Yan Han & Deimante Teresiene & Justina Merkyte & Wei Liu, 2020. "Sustainable Funds’ Performance Evaluation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-20, September.
    3. Mike K. P. So, 2021. "Robo-Advising Risk Profiling through Content Analysis for Sustainable Development in the Hong Kong Financial Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-15, January.
    4. Iqbal Owadally & Jean-René Mwizere & Neema Kalidas & Kalyanie Murugesu & Muhammad Kashif, 2021. "Long-Term Sustainable Investment for Retirement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-22, April.
    5. Che‐Wei Liu & Mochen Yang & Ming‐Hui Wen, 2023. "Judge me on my losers: Do robo‐advisors outperform human investors during the COVID‐19 financial market crash?," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 32(10), pages 3174-3192, October.
    6. Cardillo, Giovanni & Chiappini, Helen, 2024. "Robo-advisors: A systematic literature review," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 62(PA).
    7. Giudici, Paolo & Piergallini, Alessandro & Recchioni, Maria Cristina & Raffinetti, Emanuela, 2024. "Explainable Artificial Intelligence methods for financial time series," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 655(C).
    8. Ciurea Iulia-Cristina, 2024. "The Impact of the EU AI Act on the UN Sustainable Development Goals for 2030 – A Text Analysis," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 18(1), pages 2857-2870.
    9. David E. Allen & Michael McAleer & Abhay K. Singh, 2016. "A Multi-Criteria Portfolio Analysis of Hedge Fund Strategies," Documentos de Trabajo del ICAE 2017-03, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Instituto Complutense de Análisis Económico.
    10. Bhatia, Ankita & Chandani, Arti & Chhateja, Jagriti, 2020. "Robo advisory and its potential in addressing the behavioral biases of investors — A qualitative study in Indian context," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 25(C).
    11. Florian Methling & Rüdiger Nitzsch, 2019. "Thematic portfolio optimization: challenging the core satellite approach," Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, Springer;Swiss Society for Financial Market Research, vol. 33(2), pages 133-154, June.
    12. José Luis Miralles-Quirós & María Mar Miralles-Quirós & José Manuel Nogueira, 2020. "Sustainable Development Goals and Investment Strategies: The Profitability of Using Five-Factor Fama-French Alphas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-16, February.
    13. Genghua Tang & Hongxun Mai, 2022. "How Does Manufacturing Intelligentization Influence Innovation in China from a Nonlinear Perspective and Economic Servitization Background?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, October.
    14. Inese Mavlutova & Andris Fomins & Aivars Spilbergs & Dzintra Atstaja & Janis Brizga, 2021. "Opportunities to Increase Financial Well-Being by Investing in Environmental, Social and Governance with Respect to Improving Financial Literacy under COVID-19: The Case of Latvia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-25, December.
    15. Davide Antonioli & Alberto Marzucchi & Francesco Rentocchini & Simone Vannuccini, 2022. "Robot Adoption and Innovation Activities (last revised: December 2023)," Munich Papers in Political Economy 21, Munich School of Politics and Public Policy and the School of Management at the Technical University of Munich.
    16. Rao, Amar & Srivastava, Mrinalini & Parihar, Jaya Singh & Chavriya, Shubham & Hosen, Mosharrof, 2024. "Minerals at the crossroads: Economic policies, global trade, and renewable energy in the global South," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    17. Hanna Li & Yu Chen, 2025. "Does Artificial Intelligence Promote Firms’ Green Technological Innovation?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-24, May.
    18. Hui Guang & Ying Liu & Jiao Feng & Nan Wang, 2024. "Smart Manufacturing and Enterprise Breakthrough Innovation: Co-Existence Test of “U-Shaped” and Inverted “U-Shaped” Relationships in Chinese Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-19, July.
    19. Ding, Bin & Li, Yameng & Miah, Shah & Liu, Wei, 2024. "Customer acceptance of frontline social robots—Human-robot interaction as boundary condition," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    20. Steuer, Ralph E. & Utz, Sebastian, 2023. "Non-contour efficient fronts for identifying most preferred portfolios in sustainability investing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(2), pages 742-753.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:3897-:d:1642786. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.