IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/pal/assmgt/v19y2018i6d10.1057_s41260-018-0092-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Robo Advisors: quantitative methods inside the robots

Author

Listed:
  • Mikhail Beketov

    (Deloitte GmbH)

  • Kevin Lehmann

    (Deloitte GmbH)

  • Manuel Wittke

    (Deloitte GmbH)

Abstract

Robo Advisors (RAs) are perhaps the most important disruptive trend in wealth and asset management today. There is an immense amount of information about RA systems, but still little is known about the core portfolio optimization and asset allocation methods applied within such systems. Thus, to date, there is no comprehensive analysis of the methods used in RAs, their occurrences in these systems, the respective volumes of assets under management (AuM), and the future methodological prospects of the RAs. We analyzed 219 existing RAs worldwide and showed that Modern Portfolio Theory remains the main framework used in RAs. The current trend is to improve and augment this framework rather than applying and developing entirely new approaches. However, we also revealed that the AuM volumes tend to be higher for the systems applying newer and more sophisticated methods. In general, there is a clear gap between the predominant methods applied in RAs and new methodological developments. In the future, as the RA services mature, we can expect that the RAs system will adopt many of the new approaches since they promise good performance and have certain marketing potential.

Suggested Citation

  • Mikhail Beketov & Kevin Lehmann & Manuel Wittke, 2018. "Robo Advisors: quantitative methods inside the robots," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(6), pages 363-370, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:assmgt:v:19:y:2018:i:6:d:10.1057_s41260-018-0092-9
    DOI: 10.1057/s41260-018-0092-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41260-018-0092-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1057/s41260-018-0092-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Best, Michael J & Grauer, Robert R, 1991. "On the Sensitivity of Mean-Variance-Efficient Portfolios to Changes in Asset Means: Some Analytical and Computational Results," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 4(2), pages 315-342.
    2. William F. Sharpe, 1964. "Capital Asset Prices: A Theory Of Market Equilibrium Under Conditions Of Risk," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 19(3), pages 425-442, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xusen Cheng & Fei Guo & Jin Chen & Kejiang Li & Yihui Zhang & Peng Gao, 2019. "Exploring the Trust Influencing Mechanism of Robo-Advisor Service: A Mixed Method Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Bai, Zefeng, 2021. "Does robo-advisory help reduce the likelihood of carrying a credit card debt? Evidence from an instrumental variable approach," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 29(C).
    3. Agostino Capponi & Sveinn Ólafsson & Thaleia Zariphopoulou, 2022. "Personalized Robo-Advising: Enhancing Investment Through Client Interaction," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(4), pages 2485-2512, April.
    4. Nourallah, Mustafa, 2023. "One size does not fit all: Young retail investors’ initial trust in financial robo-advisors," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    5. Krzysztof Waliszewski & Anna Warchlewska, 2020. "Socio-Demographic Factors Determining Expectation Experienced while Using Modern Technologies in Personal Financial Management (PFM and robo-advice): A Polish Case," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 2), pages 893-904.
    6. Bhatia, Ankita & Chandani, Arti & Chhateja, Jagriti, 2020. "Robo advisory and its potential in addressing the behavioral biases of investors — A qualitative study in Indian context," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 25(C).
    7. Mike K. P. So, 2021. "Robo-Advising Risk Profiling through Content Analysis for Sustainable Development in the Hong Kong Financial Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-15, January.
    8. Bernd Scherer & Sebastian Lehner, 2023. "Trust me, I am a Robo-advisor," Journal of Asset Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(2), pages 85-96, March.
    9. Bartram, Söhnke & Branke, Jürgen & Motahari, Mehrshad, 2020. "Artificial Intelligence in Asset Management," CEPR Discussion Papers 14525, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    10. Haoran Wang & Shi Yu, 2021. "Robo-Advising: Enhancing Investment with Inverse Optimization and Deep Reinforcement Learning," Papers 2105.09264, arXiv.org.
    11. Yongjae Lee & Woo Chang Kim & Jang Ho Kim, 2020. "Achieving Portfolio Diversification for Individuals with Low Financial Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-16, August.
    12. Tan Zi Yi & Noor Ashikin Mohd Rom & Nurbani Md. Hassan & Mohamad Shaharudin Samsurijan & Andrew Ebekozien, 2023. "The Adoption of Robo-Advisory among Millennials in the 21st Century: Trust, Usability and Knowledge Perception," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-16, March.
    13. Tao, Ran & Su, Chi-Wei & Xiao, Yidong & Dai, Ke & Khalid, Fahad, 2021. "Robo advisors, algorithmic trading and investment management: Wonders of fourth industrial revolution in financial markets," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    14. Agostino Capponi & Sveinn Olafsson & Thaleia Zariphopoulou, 2019. "Personalized Robo-Advising: Enhancing Investment through Client Interaction," Papers 1911.01391, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2020.
    15. Gechun Liang & Moris S. Strub & Yuwei Wang, 2021. "Predictable Forward Performance Processes: Infrequent Evaluation and Applications to Human-Machine Interactions," Papers 2110.08900, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2023.
    16. Filiz, Ibrahim & Judek, Jan René & Lorenz, Marco & Spiwoks, Markus, 2021. "Reducing algorithm aversion through experience," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 31(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eckhard Platen & Renata Rendek, 2017. "Market Efficiency and Growth Optimal Portfolio," Papers 1706.06832, arXiv.org.
    2. Mishra, Anil V., 2016. "Foreign bias in Australian-domiciled mutual fund holdings," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 101-123.
    3. Adil Rengim Cetingoz & Jean-David Fermanian & Olivier Gu'eant, 2022. "Risk Budgeting Portfolios: Existence and Computation," Papers 2211.07212, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2023.
    4. Carmine De Franco & Johann Nicolle & Huyên Pham, 2019. "Dealing with Drift Uncertainty: A Bayesian Learning Approach," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-18, January.
    5. Wang, Christina Dan & Chen, Zhao & Lian, Yimin & Chen, Min, 2022. "Asset selection based on high frequency Sharpe ratio," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 227(1), pages 168-188.
    6. Napat Rujeerapaiboon & Daniel Kuhn & Wolfram Wiesemann, 2016. "Robust Growth-Optimal Portfolios," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(7), pages 2090-2109, July.
    7. Marie Brière & Bastien Drut & Valérie Mignon & Kim Oosterlinck & Ariane Szafarz, 2011. "Is the Market Portfolio Efficient? A New Test to Revisit the Roll (1977) versus Levy and Roll (2010) Controversy," EconomiX Working Papers 2011-20, University of Paris Nanterre, EconomiX.
    8. Tze Leung Lai & Haipeng Xing & Zehao Chen, 2011. "Mean--variance portfolio optimization when means and covariances are unknown," Papers 1108.0996, arXiv.org.
    9. Qi, Yue & Liao, Kezhi & Liu, Tongyang & Zhang, Yu, 2022. "Originating multiple-objective portfolio selection by counter-COVID measures and analytically instigating robust optimization by mean-parameterized nondominated paths," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 9(C).
    10. Jacoby, Gady & Li, Shi & Wang, Yan, 2018. "Mean-variance theory with imprecise accounting information," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 156-161.
    11. Pınar, Mustafa Ç., 2014. "Equilibrium in an ambiguity-averse mean–variance investors market," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(3), pages 957-965.
    12. Yi Huang & Wei Zhu & Duan Li & Shushang Zhu & Shikun Wang, 2023. "Integrating Different Informations for Portfolio Selection," Papers 2305.17881, arXiv.org.
    13. Markus Ebner & Thorsten Neumann, 2008. "Time-varying factor models for equity portfolio construction," The European Journal of Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(5), pages 381-395.
    14. Yuki Shigeta, 2016. "Optimality of Naive Investment Strategies in Dynamic MeanVariance Optimization Problems with Multiple Priors," Discussion papers e-16-004, Graduate School of Economics , Kyoto University.
    15. Cardinali Alessandro & Nason Guy P, 2011. "Costationarity of Locally Stationary Time Series," Journal of Time Series Econometrics, De Gruyter, vol. 2(2), pages 1-35, January.
    16. Mishra, Anil V., 2015. "Measures of equity home bias puzzle," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 293-312.
    17. Thomas J. Brennan & Andrew W. Lo, 2010. "Impossible Frontiers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 56(6), pages 905-923, June.
    18. Karagiannidis, Iordanis & Vozlyublennaia, Nadia, 2016. "Limits to mutual funds' ability to rely on mean/variance optimization," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 282-292.
    19. Eom, Cheoljun, 2017. "Two-faced property of a market factor in asset pricing and diversification effect," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 471(C), pages 190-199.
    20. Penaranda, Francisco, 2007. "Portfolio choice beyond the traditional approach," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 24481, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:assmgt:v:19:y:2018:i:6:d:10.1057_s41260-018-0092-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave-journals.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.