IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i8p3643-d1637046.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social and Economic Aspects of Sustainable Development: Intensity of Collaboration as a Key Driver of Team Work Engagement

Author

Listed:
  • Marta Moczulska

    (Institute of Management and Quality Sciences, University of Zielona Góra, 65-246 Zielona Gora, Poland)

  • Renata Winkler

    (Management Institute, Krakow University of Economics, 31-510 Kraków, Poland)

  • Katarzyna Tarnowska

    (Institute of Food Sciences, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, 02-776 Warszawa, Poland)

Abstract

Collaboration among employees is critical to achieving sustainability goals. This article explains how employee engagement fosters the socio-economic dimension of sustainability, both for the organization and society. As is well known, there is a constant search for factors that enhance engagement. Given that one of the important requirements for its formation is affiliation, it is assumed that cooperation can foster engagement. It should be noted that it is also an important element of social sustainability, as it enables the building of lasting relationships and social capital. After all, employees may, in fact, perform tasks in different ways, and this affects not only the relationship between them, but also their performance (work results achieved). While there are studies on collaboration as well as on the determinants of employee engagement, there is a lack of research on the kind of collaboration in the context of team engagement. This article aims to help reduce this gap. The goal of our research was to determine whether and how the intensity of collaboration is related to the level of team work engagement. The intensity of collaboration is analyzed through the level of behavioral, structural, and functional interdependence, and the engagement is understood according to the Schaufeli and Bakker approach. Taking this into account, 12 teams operating in various industries, who carry out various scopes of tasks, were invited to participate in the study. The assumption was confirmed. At the same time, the importance of relational aspects for team work engagement, i.e., behavioral interdependence, the method of contact between team members, and the difficulty of performing tasks, was highlighted . Based on the research results, it was indicated that leadership and environmental conditions (centralization, formalization) are crucial for working in teams in the context of team work engagement. It should be emphasized that this study is a valuable guideline for managers and organizations that want to nurture the engagement of the whole team. At the same time, like the aspect of team autonomy, it suggests a direction for further research to support the long-term sustainability of the organization.

Suggested Citation

  • Marta Moczulska & Renata Winkler & Katarzyna Tarnowska, 2025. "Social and Economic Aspects of Sustainable Development: Intensity of Collaboration as a Key Driver of Team Work Engagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-19, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3643-:d:1637046
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3643/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3643/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiaomeng Zhang & Ho Kwong Kwan, 2019. "Team behavioral integration links team interdependence with team performance: an empirical investigation in R&D teams," Frontiers of Business Research in China, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.
    2. Alice Canavesi & Eliana Alessandra Minelli, 2021. "Servant leadership and employee engagement: a qualitative study," LIUC Papers in Economics 2021-11, Cattaneo University (LIUC).
    3. Lea Fobbe, 2020. "Analysing Organisational Collaboration Practices for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-21, March.
    4. Jane Boeske, 2023. "Leadership towards Sustainability: A Review of Sustainable, Sustainability, and Environmental Leadership," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-18, August.
    5. Ana Nesic & Slavica Mitrovic Veljkovic, & Maja Mesko & Tine Bertoncel, 2020. "Correlation of Trust and Work Engagement: a Modern Organizational Approach," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 22(Special 1), pages 1283-1283, November.
    6. Andrew Mao & Winter Mason & Siddharth Suri & Duncan J Watts, 2016. "An Experimental Study of Team Size and Performance on a Complex Task," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-22, April.
    7. Zeki Simsek & John F. Veiga & Michael Lubatkin & Richard N. Dino, 2005. "Modeling the Multilevel Determinants of Top management Team Behavorial Integration," Post-Print hal-02311805, HAL.
    8. Frémeaux, Sandrine & Mercier, Guillaume & Grevin, Anouk, 2025. "The Free-Riding Issue in Contemporary Organizations: Lessons from the Common Good Perspective," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 35(1), pages 28-53, January.
    9. Marlow, Shannon L. & Lacerenza, Christina N. & Paoletti, Jensine & Burke, C. Shawn & Salas, Eduardo, 2018. "Does team communication represent a one-size-fits-all approach?: A meta-analysis of team communication and performance," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 145-170.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thys, Kris & Vandekerkhof, Pieter & Steijvers, Tensie & Corten, Maarten, 2024. "Top management team and board of directors as the strategic leadership system: The effect of behavioral integration on strategic decision-making quality," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 42(5), pages 721-734.
    2. Yildiz, H. Emre & Murtic, Adis & Zander, Udo, 2024. "Re-conceptualizing absorptive capacity: The importance of teams as a meso-level context," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    3. Mammassis, Constantinos S. & Kostopoulos, Konstantinos C., 2019. "CEO goal orientations, environmental dynamism and organizational ambidexterity: An investigation in SMEs," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 577-588.
    4. Jiazhen Song & Xiaobao Peng & Sumran Ali & Emmanuel Mensah Horsey & Jiashun Huang, 2024. "The relationship between CEO narcissism and hybrid organising," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 23(5), pages 767-791, November.
    5. David Strutton & William Carter, 2013. "Reducing Biases in Cross-Cultural Top Management Team Decision-Making Processes," International Journal of Business Administration, International Journal of Business Administration, Sciedu Press, vol. 4(3), pages 1-13, May.
    6. Valentina Marano & Steve Sauerwald & Marc Essen, 2022. "The influence of culture on the relationship between women directors and corporate social performance," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(7), pages 1315-1342, September.
    7. Meissner, Philip & Wulf, Torsten, 2014. "Antecendents and effects of decision comprehensiveness: The role of decision quality and perceived uncertainty," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 625-635.
    8. Han Zhang & Shiying Shi & Fangfang Zhao & Xiaosu Ye & Hanyue Qi, 2023. "A Study on the Impact of Team Interdependence on Cooperative Performance in Public–Private Partnership Projects: The Moderating Effect of Government Equity Participation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-22, August.
    9. Hinterhuber, Andreas, 2017. "Value quantification capabilities in industrial markets," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 163-178.
    10. Oleg V. Petrenko & Federico Aime & Tessa Recendes & Jeffrey A. Chandler, 2019. "The case for humble expectations: CEO humility and market performance," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(12), pages 1938-1964, December.
    11. Giannoccaro, Ilaria & Galesic, Mirta & Massari, Giovanni Francesco & Barkoczi, Daniel & Carbone, Giuseppe, 2020. "Search behavior of individuals working in teams: A behavioral study on complex landscapes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 507-516.
    12. Ganga Sajeewani Karunathilaka, 2022. "Virtual Team Adaptation: Management Perspective on Individual Differences," Businesses, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-11, March.
    13. Albérico Travassos Rosário & Anna Carolina Boechat, 2025. "How Sustainable Leadership Can Leverage Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-27, April.
    14. Yetunde Anibaba & Godbless Akaighe, 2018. "Dynamics of Decision Making in Cross-Functional Teams," Contemporary Economics, University of Economics and Human Sciences in Warsaw., vol. 12(4), December.
    15. Gu, Yuandong & Zhang, Hong & Zhou, Wenli & Zhong, Weiguo, 2019. "Regional culture, top executive values, and corporate donation behaviors," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 1-13.
    16. Tekleab, Amanuel G. & Karaca, Ayse & Quigley, Narda R. & Tsang, Eric W.K., 2016. "Re-examining the functional diversity–performance relationship: The roles of behavioral integration, team cohesion, and team learning," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3500-3507.
    17. Xiaoming He & Yaqun Yi & Zelong Wei, 2019. "New product development capabilities in China: the moderating role of TMT cooperative behavior," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 18(2), pages 73-97, April.
    18. Priyanka, & Jain, Mahima & Dhir, Sanjay, 2022. "Antecedents of organization ambidexterity: A comparative study of public and private sector organizations," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    19. Linlin Jin & Kristen Madison & Nils D. Kraiczy & Franz W. Kellermanns & T. Russell Crook & Jing Xi, 2017. "Entrepreneurial Team Composition Characteristics and New Venture Performance: A Meta–Analysis," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 41(5), pages 743-771, September.
    20. Daniel Leunbach & Truls Erikson & Max Rapp-Ricciardi, 2020. "Muddling through Akerlofian and Knightian uncertainty: The role of sociobehavioral integration, positive affective tone, and polychronicity," Journal of International Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 145-164, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3643-:d:1637046. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.