IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i8p3593-d1635977.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How Should e-Product OEMs Invest in Design for Remanufacturing Under the Take-Back Regulation in a Competitive Environment?

Author

Listed:
  • Ning Zhang

    (College of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Liecheng Wang

    (Queen’s Business School, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast BT9 5EE, UK
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Yunxia Shu

    (College of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China
    Jiangsu Province High-Tech Innovation Service Center, Nanjing 210008, China)

Abstract

This study investigates the effects of take-back regulations and remanufacturing competition on e-product OEM design for remanufacturing (DfR) strategies and remanufacturing decisions within a closed-loop supply chain. Considering the monopolistic remanufacturing scenario where the remanufacturer does not enter the remanufacturing market as a benchmark model, we establish a Stackelberg game model involving an OEM and a remanufacturer to explore the OEM’s optimal DfR decisions under take-back regulations and in a competitive environment. The Lagrangian function and Karush–Kuhn–Tucker conditions are formulated to identify the optimal solutions. The findings reveal the following: (i) Whether the remanufacturer engages in remanufacturing activity or not, take-back regulation consistently prompts OEMs to increase DfR investment. (ii) DfR investment level is lower in competitive markets compared to monopolistic scenarios, while remanufactured product output is higher. (iii) While consumer welfare improves with remanufacturer entry, environmental benefits deteriorate due to potential increased competition. Notably, competitive remanufacturing is advantageous for OEMs only when take-back regulation is stringent and the cost savings of remanufactured products are relatively low.

Suggested Citation

  • Ning Zhang & Liecheng Wang & Yunxia Shu, 2025. "How Should e-Product OEMs Invest in Design for Remanufacturing Under the Take-Back Regulation in a Competitive Environment?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-23, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3593-:d:1635977
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3593/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3593/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dexiang Yang & Qin Yang & Lei Zhang, 2023. "Correction: Yang et al. Operational Decisions on Remanufacturing under the Product Innovation Race. Sustainability 2023, 15 , 4920," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-5, August.
    2. Jiaxin He & Wei Yan & Youwei Li & Danli Lu, 2024. "Recycling and/or reusing: when product innovation meets the recast of WEEE direct," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 62(19), pages 7018-7029, October.
    3. Panagiotidou, Sofia & Nenes, George & Zikopoulos, Christos & Tagaras, George, 2017. "Joint optimization of manufacturing/remanufacturing lot sizes under imperfect information on returns quality," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(2), pages 537-551.
    4. Yan Zhou & Miao Hou & Kar-Hung Wong, 2023. "The Optimal Remanufacturing Strategy of the Closed-Loop Supply Chain Network under Government Regulation and the Manufacturer’s Design for the Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-34, April.
    5. Cao, Jian & Wu, Sisi & Kumar, Sanjay, 2023. "Recovering and remanufacturing to fulfill EPR regulation in the presence of secondary market," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    6. Pazoki, Mostafa & Samarghandi, Hamed, 2020. "Take-back regulation: Remanufacturing or Eco-design?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    7. Liu, Zhi & Li, Kevin W. & Li, Bang-Yi & Huang, Jun & Tang, Juan, 2019. "Impact of product-design strategies on the operations of a closed-loop supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 75-91.
    8. Zhaofu Hong & Yunrong Zhang & Yugang Yu & Chengbin Chu, 2020. "Dynamic pricing for remanufacturing within socially environmental incentives," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(13), pages 3976-3997, July.
    9. Sasha Shahbazi & Kerstin Johansen & Erik Sundin, 2021. "Product Design for Automated Remanufacturing—A Case Study of Electric and Electronic Equipment in Sweden," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-19, August.
    10. Dexiang Yang & Qin Yang & Lei Zhang, 2023. "Operational Decisions on Remanufacturing under the Product Innovation Race," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, March.
    11. Yufei Hu & Lianghua Chen & Yingying Chi & Bowen Song, 2022. "Manufacturer encroachment on a closed‐loop supply chain with design for remanufacturing," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 43(6), pages 1941-1959, September.
    12. Gökçe Esenduran & Eda Kemahlıoğlu-Ziya & Jayashankar M. Swaminathan, 2017. "Impact of Take-Back Regulation on the Remanufacturing Industry," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(5), pages 924-944, May.
    13. Chang Fang & Zhuangzhuang You & Yudou Yang & Duomei Chen & Samar Mukhopadhyay, 2020. "Is third-party remanufacturing necessarily harmful to the original equipment manufacturer?," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 291(1), pages 317-338, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yang, Feng & Wang, Manman & Ang, Sheng, 2021. "Optimal remanufacturing decisions in supply chains considering consumers’ anticipated regret and power structures," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    2. Qixiang Wang & Xiaobo Wang, 2022. "Does Product Eco-design Promote Remanufacturing: Application of a Stylized Game-theoretic Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, December.
    3. Zhao, Senlin & You, Zhuangzhuang & Zhu, Qinghua, 2022. "Effects of asymmetric cost information on collection outsourcing of used products for remanufacturing," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    4. Chen, Yuyu & Li, Bangyi & Zhang, Guoqing & Bai, Qingguo, 2020. "Quantity and collection decisions of the remanufacturing enterprise under both the take-back and carbon emission capacity regulations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    5. Liu, Zhi & Li, Kevin W. & Tang, Juan & Gong, Bengang & Huang, Jun, 2021. "Optimal operations of a closed-loop supply chain under a dual regulation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    6. Wang, Jian & He, Shulin, 2023. "Government interventions in closed-loop supply chains with modularity design," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    7. Weisheng Deng, 2019. "Does Remanufacturing Always Benefit the Manufacturer and Hurt the Supplier?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-13, March.
    8. Zhang, Yunrong & Hong, Zhaofu & Chen, Zhixiang & Glock, Christoph H., 2020. "Tax or subsidy? Design and selection of regulatory policies for remanufacturing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(3), pages 885-900.
    9. Ponte, Borja & Cannella, Salvatore & Dominguez, Roberto & Naim, Mohamed M. & Syntetos, Aris A., 2021. "Quality grading of returns and the dynamics of remanufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 236(C).
    10. Junwu Chai & Zhifeng Qian & Feng Wang & Jing Zhu, 2024. "Process innovation for green product in a closed loop supply chain with remanufacturing," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 333(2), pages 533-557, February.
    11. Zhou, Qin & Meng, Chao & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2021. "Remanufacturing authorization strategy for competition among OEM, authorized remanufacturer, and unauthorized remanufacturer," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    12. Zhao, Senlin & Wang, Mengxiang & Zhu, Qinghua & Zhou, Qin & Mao, Rongrong, 2024. "Effects of information asymmetry on green advertising for remanufacturing within a closed-loop supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    13. Yan Zhou & Miao Hou & Kar-Hung Wong, 2023. "The Optimal Remanufacturing Strategy of the Closed-Loop Supply Chain Network under Government Regulation and the Manufacturer’s Design for the Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-34, April.
    14. Zhao, Senlin & You, Zhuangzhuang & Zhu, Qinghua, 2021. "Quality choice for product recovery considering a trade-in program and third-party remanufacturing competition," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    15. Luo, Li & Shan, Renbang & Xiang, Jie, 2024. "The government intervention effectiveness in promoting remanufacturing: Subsidy or remanufacturing target?," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    16. Dexiang Yang & Qin Yang & Lei Zhang, 2023. "Operational Decisions on Remanufacturing under the Product Innovation Race," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, March.
    17. Ehsan Shekarian & Simme Douwe Flapper, 2021. "Analyzing the Structure of Closed-Loop Supply Chains: A Game Theory Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-32, January.
    18. Xu, Jie & Ng, C.T. & Cheng, T.C.E., 2021. "Remanufacturing strategies under product take-back regulation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    19. Yan Zhang & Wen Zhang, 2023. "Optimal pricing and greening decisions in a supply chain when considering market segmentation," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 324(1), pages 93-130, May.
    20. Xiaoxiao Chang & Guangye Xu & Qian Wang & Yongguang Zhong, 2020. "A Game Theoretic Approach for Eco-Design and Remanufacturing Considering Take-Back Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-21, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3593-:d:1635977. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.