IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/proeco/v235y2021ics0925527321000670.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Remanufacturing strategies under product take-back regulation

Author

Listed:
  • Xu, Jie
  • Ng, C.T.
  • Cheng, T.C.E.

Abstract

We consider a profit-maximizing original equipment manufacturer (OEM) that produces a new product for the primary market. At the end of the first stage of product use, the OEM collects the used products (cores) and remanufactures them if they are eligible for remanufacturing; otherwise, the OEM sends them to material recycling. In the US and most European countries, the product take-back regulation mandated by the government holds the OEM accountable for the proper and safe treatment of end-of-life products in order to reduce their harmful environmental effects, and sets a collection rate target. In this paper, we take the collection rate of used products as an endogenous variable satisfying the set target and consider the uncertainty of the amount of collected cores qualified for remanufacturing. We formulate the problem and derive several optimal remanufacturing strategies for the OEM, depending on the inverse operating cost and new product manufacturing cost with and without the take-back regulation. Our major findings are: (i) The OEM should adopt the maximum (minimum) collection rate when the inverse operating cost is extremely low (high). (ii) A combination of the inverse operating cost and new product manufacturing cost leads to the optimal collection rate, thereby determining the new and remanufactured product prices, and remanufacturing quantity. (iii) A comparison between the cases with and without the take-back regulation indicates that, counter-intuitively, regulating the collection rate may not necessarily hurt the OEM.

Suggested Citation

  • Xu, Jie & Ng, C.T. & Cheng, T.C.E., 2021. "Remanufacturing strategies under product take-back regulation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:235:y:2021:i:c:s0925527321000670
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108091
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925527321000670
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108091?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ximin (Natalie) Huang & Atalay Atasu & L. Beril Toktay, 2019. "Design Implications of Extended Producer Responsibility for Durable Products," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 2573-2590, June.
    2. Luyi Gui & Atalay Atasu & Özlem Ergun & L. Beril Toktay, 2018. "Design Incentives Under Collective Extended Producer Responsibility: A Network Perspective," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(11), pages 5083-5104, November.
    3. Gökçe Esenduran & Eda Kemahlıoğlu-Ziya & Jayashankar M. Swaminathan, 2017. "Impact of Take-Back Regulation on the Remanufacturing Industry," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(5), pages 924-944, May.
    4. Gökçe Esenduran & Atalay Atasu & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2019. "Valuable e-waste: Implications for extended producer responsibility," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 51(4), pages 382-396, April.
    5. Tian, Fang & Sošić, Greys & Debo, Laurens, 2020. "Stable recycling networks under the Extended Producer Responsibility," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(3), pages 989-1002.
    6. Gökçe Esenduran & Eda Kemahlıoğlu-Ziya, 2015. "A Comparison of Product Take-Back Compliance Schemes," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 24(1), pages 71-88, January.
    7. Fang Tian & Greys Sošić & Laurens Debo, 2019. "Manufacturers’ Competition and Cooperation in Sustainability: Stable Recycling Alliances," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 65(10), pages 4733-4753, October.
    8. Luyi Gui, 2020. "Recycling Infrastructure Development under Extended Producer Responsibility in Developing Economies," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(8), pages 1858-1877, August.
    9. Pazoki, Mostafa & Samarghandi, Hamed, 2020. "Take-back regulation: Remanufacturing or Eco-design?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    10. Shumail Mazahir & Vedat Verter & Tamer Boyaci & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2019. "Did Europe Move in the Right Direction on E‐waste Legislation?," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 28(1), pages 121-139, January.
    11. Zheng, Xiong & Govindan, Kannan & Deng, Qianzhou & Feng, Lipan, 2019. "Effects of design for the environment on firms’ production and remanufacturing strategies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 217-228.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dexiang Yang & Qin Yang & Lei Zhang, 2023. "Operational Decisions on Remanufacturing under the Product Innovation Race," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, March.
    2. Wang, Jian & He, Shulin, 2023. "Government interventions in closed-loop supply chains with modularity design," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    3. Zhou, Qin & Meng, Chao & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2021. "Remanufacturing authorization strategy for competition among OEM, authorized remanufacturer, and unauthorized remanufacturer," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    4. Zhao, Senlin & You, Zhuangzhuang & Zhu, Qinghua, 2022. "Effects of asymmetric cost information on collection outsourcing of used products for remanufacturing," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    5. Li, Jizi & Liu, Fangbing & Zhang, Justin Z. & Tong, Zeping, 2023. "Optimal configuration of electric vehicle battery recycling system under across-network cooperation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 338(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. De, Arijit & Ray, Ankita & Kundu, Tanmoy & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing, 2023. "Is it wise to compete or to collaborate? Remanufacturing business models under collective extended producer responsibility legislation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    2. Morvarid Rahmani & Luyi Gui & Atalay Atasu, 2021. "The Implications of Recycling Technology Choice on Extended Producer Responsibility," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(2), pages 522-542, February.
    3. Yue Wang & Baoying Xin & Zhe Wang & Bangyi Li, 2019. "Managing Supplier-Manufacturer Closed-Loop Supply Chain Considering Product Design and Take-Back Legislation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-26, February.
    4. Ma, Peng & Gong, Yeming & Mirchandani, Prakash, 2020. "Trade-in for remanufactured products: Pricing with double reference effects," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    5. Liu, Zhi & Li, Kevin W. & Tang, Juan & Gong, Bengang & Huang, Jun, 2021. "Optimal operations of a closed-loop supply chain under a dual regulation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    6. Ximin (Natalie) Huang & Atalay Atasu & L. Beril Toktay, 2019. "Design Implications of Extended Producer Responsibility for Durable Products," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 2573-2590, June.
    7. Yen-Ting Lin & Haoying Sun & Shouqiang Wang, 2020. "Designing Sustainable Products Under Coproduction Technology," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(6), pages 1181-1198, November.
    8. Cai, Ya-Jun & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Feng, Lipan & Li, Yongjian, 2022. "Producer's choice of design-for-environment under environmental taxation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(2), pages 532-544.
    9. Qixiang Wang & Xiaobo Wang, 2022. "Does Product Eco-design Promote Remanufacturing: Application of a Stylized Game-theoretic Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, December.
    10. Chen, Yuyu & Li, Bangyi & Zhang, Guoqing & Bai, Qingguo, 2020. "Quantity and collection decisions of the remanufacturing enterprise under both the take-back and carbon emission capacity regulations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    11. Xiao Jiang & Qiang Hu & Tingyuan Lou & Wenjin Zuo & Jicai Li, 2023. "Impact of Government Environmental Regulations on Remanufacturing Supply Chain with Multi-Subject Responsibility for Recycling and Disposal," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, April.
    12. Dexiang Yang & Qin Yang & Lei Zhang, 2023. "Operational Decisions on Remanufacturing under the Product Innovation Race," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, March.
    13. Liang Shen & Runjie Fan & Zhaoqing Yu & Yuyan Wang, 2021. "The Service Strategy and Influencing Factors of Online Recycling of Used Mobile Phones," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(21), pages 1-24, October.
    14. Xiaoxiao Chang & Guangye Xu & Qian Wang & Yongguang Zhong, 2020. "A Game Theoretic Approach for Eco-Design and Remanufacturing Considering Take-Back Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-21, September.
    15. Pazoki, Mostafa & Zaccour, Georges, 2019. "A mechanism to promote product recovery and environmental performance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(2), pages 601-614.
    16. Pazoki, Mostafa & Samarghandi, Hamed, 2020. "Take-back regulation: Remanufacturing or Eco-design?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    17. Gulzhazira Ilyassova & Aigul Nukusheva & Leila Arenova & Guldana Karzhassova & Marzhangul Akimzhanova, 2021. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Prospects of legal regulation in the field of electronic waste management in the context of a circular economy," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 367-388, September.
    18. Feryal Erhun & Tim Kraft & Sytske Wijnsma, 2021. "Sustainable Triple‐A Supply Chains," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(3), pages 644-655, March.
    19. Chen Jin & Luyi Yang & Cungen Zhu, 2023. "Right to Repair: Pricing, Welfare, and Environmental Implications," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 69(2), pages 1017-1036, February.
    20. Iyer, Ananth V. & Vedantam, Aditya & Lacourbe, Paul, 2023. "Recycled content claims under demand benefit and supply uncertainty: Multi-period model and application to glasswool insulation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 309(2), pages 745-761.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:proeco:v:235:y:2021:i:c:s0925527321000670. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ijpe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.