IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2022i1p691-d1020737.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does Product Eco-design Promote Remanufacturing: Application of a Stylized Game-theoretic Model

Author

Listed:
  • Qixiang Wang

    (College of Economics and Management, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China)

  • Xiaobo Wang

    (Business School, Nanjing Xiaozhuang University, Nanjing 211171, China)

Abstract

As an effective approach to reduce resource waste and production costs, remanufacturing has elicited extensive attention from the industry and academia. Many electronic original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) have increasingly begun to incorporate product eco-design (PED) into their remanufacturing processes since take-back regulations that hold OEMs responsible for handling their own end-of-life products have gradually become more stringent. The investment costs for the PED implementation vary across different PED effort levels (i.e., high, medium, and low) chosen by the OEM, and different PED effort levels may yield different remanufacturing strategies. In this paper, we develop a stylized game-theoretic model to investigate the impact of PED effort levels on the OEM’s equilibrium decisions (which include production quantities of new and remanufactured products) and supply chain performance in the context of take-back legislation. Our results demonstrate that high PED effort levels do not imply more remanufacturing and that the OEM’s choice of remanufacturing strategies depends on the trade-off between cost savings from remanufacturing and deterministic risks. Interestingly, we find that new products should have a certain level of profitability to ensure the validity of take-back legislation. Due to the substitution and complementary effects between new and remanufactured products, the optimal decisions exhibit different characteristics in remanufacturing strategies. Through a numerical study, we observe that the economic performance decreases with increases in the PED effort level under take-back legislation, but the change in the total environmental impact depends on the PED effort level and the production cost of new products.

Suggested Citation

  • Qixiang Wang & Xiaobo Wang, 2022. "Does Product Eco-design Promote Remanufacturing: Application of a Stylized Game-theoretic Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-20, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:691-:d:1020737
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/691/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/1/691/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Steeneck, Daniel W. & Sarin, Subhash C., 2018. "Product design for leased products under remanufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 132-144.
    2. Ravi Subramanian & Ramanath Subramanyam, 2012. "Key Factors in the Market for Remanufactured Products," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 14(2), pages 315-326, April.
    3. Fuqiang Zhang & Renyu Zhang, 2018. "Trade-in Remanufacturing, Customer Purchasing Behavior, and Government Policy," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 20(4), pages 601-616, October.
    4. Ximin (Natalie) Huang & Atalay Atasu & L. Beril Toktay, 2019. "Design Implications of Extended Producer Responsibility for Durable Products," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(6), pages 2573-2590, June.
    5. Yenipazarli, Arda, 2016. "Managing new and remanufactured products to mitigate environmental damage under emissions regulation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(1), pages 117-130.
    6. Chialin Chen, 2001. "Design for the Environment: A Quality-Based Model for Green Product Development," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 47(2), pages 250-263, February.
    7. Hong, Zhaofu & Chu, Chengbin & Yu, Yugang, 2016. "Dual-mode production planning for manufacturing with emission constraints," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(1), pages 96-106.
    8. Gökçe Esenduran & Eda Kemahlıoğlu-Ziya & Jayashankar M. Swaminathan, 2017. "Impact of Take-Back Regulation on the Remanufacturing Industry," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 26(5), pages 924-944, May.
    9. Wu, Cheng-Han, 2012. "Product-design and pricing strategies with remanufacturing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 222(2), pages 204-215.
    10. Xue, Yu & Caliskan-Demirag, Ozgun & Chen, Youhua (Frank) & Yu, Yugang, 2018. "Supporting customers to sell used goods: Profitability and environmental implications," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 220-232.
    11. Gouda, Sirish Kumar & Jonnalagedda, Sreelata & Saranga, Haritha, 2016. "Design for the environment: Impact of regulatory policies on product development," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(2), pages 558-570.
    12. Erica Plambeck & Qiong Wang, 2009. "Effects of E-Waste Regulation on New Product Introduction," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(3), pages 333-347, March.
    13. Pazoki, Mostafa & Samarghandi, Hamed, 2020. "Take-back regulation: Remanufacturing or Eco-design?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    14. Laurens G. Debo & L. Beril Toktay & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2005. "Market Segmentation and Product Technology Selection for Remanufacturable Products," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(8), pages 1193-1205, August.
    15. Liu, Zhi & Li, Kevin W. & Li, Bang-Yi & Huang, Jun & Tang, Juan, 2019. "Impact of product-design strategies on the operations of a closed-loop supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 75-91.
    16. R. Canan Savaskan & Shantanu Bhattacharya & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2004. "Closed-Loop Supply Chain Models with Product Remanufacturing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(2), pages 239-252, February.
    17. Wu, Cheng-Han, 2013. "OEM product design in a price competition with remanufactured product," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 287-298.
    18. Luyi Gui & Atalay Atasu & Özlem Ergun & L. Beril Toktay, 2016. "Efficient Implementation of Collective Extended Producer Responsibility Legislation," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 62(4), pages 1098-1123, April.
    19. Jackson, Sherry Avery & Gopalakrishna-Remani, Venugopal & Mishra, Rajat & Napier, Randy, 2016. "Examining the impact of design for environment and the mediating effect of quality management innovation on firm performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 142-152.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zheng, Xiong & Govindan, Kannan & Deng, Qianzhou & Feng, Lipan, 2019. "Effects of design for the environment on firms’ production and remanufacturing strategies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 217-228.
    2. Xiaoxiao Chang & Guangye Xu & Qian Wang & Yongguang Zhong, 2020. "A Game Theoretic Approach for Eco-Design and Remanufacturing Considering Take-Back Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-21, September.
    3. Dexiang Yang & Qin Yang & Lei Zhang, 2023. "Operational Decisions on Remanufacturing under the Product Innovation Race," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-18, March.
    4. Liu, Zhi & Li, Kevin W. & Li, Bang-Yi & Huang, Jun & Tang, Juan, 2019. "Impact of product-design strategies on the operations of a closed-loop supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 75-91.
    5. Ehsan Shekarian & Simme Douwe Flapper, 2021. "Analyzing the Structure of Closed-Loop Supply Chains: A Game Theory Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-32, January.
    6. He, Qidong & Wang, Nengmin & Browning, Tyson R. & Jiang, Bin, 2022. "Competitive collection with convenience-perceived customers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(1), pages 239-254.
    7. Pazoki, Mostafa & Samarghandi, Hamed, 2020. "Take-back regulation: Remanufacturing or Eco-design?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    8. Cheng-Han Wu, 2021. "Production-quality policy for a make-from-stock remanufacturing system," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 425-456, June.
    9. Shuiye Niu & Honglong Zhuo & Kelei Xue, 2019. "DfRem-Driven Closed-Loop Supply Chain Decision-Making: A Systematic Framework for Modeling Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-19, June.
    10. Zhou, Qin & Meng, Chao & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2021. "Remanufacturing authorization strategy for competition among OEM, authorized remanufacturer, and unauthorized remanufacturer," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    11. De, Arijit & Ray, Ankita & Kundu, Tanmoy & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing, 2023. "Is it wise to compete or to collaborate? Remanufacturing business models under collective extended producer responsibility legislation," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    12. Zhao, Senlin & You, Zhuangzhuang & Zhu, Qinghua, 2021. "Quality choice for product recovery considering a trade-in program and third-party remanufacturing competition," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    13. Ma, Peng & Gong, Yeming & Mirchandani, Prakash, 2020. "Trade-in for remanufactured products: Pricing with double reference effects," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    14. Liu, Zhi & Li, Kevin W. & Tang, Juan & Gong, Bengang & Huang, Jun, 2021. "Optimal operations of a closed-loop supply chain under a dual regulation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    15. Xiaohua Han & Ying Shen & Yiwen Bian, 2020. "Optimal recovery strategy of manufacturers: Remanufacturing products or recycling materials?," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 290(1), pages 463-489, July.
    16. Kleber, Rainer & Quariguasi Frota Neto, João & Reimann, Marc, 2020. "Proprietary parts as a secondary market strategy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(3), pages 929-941.
    17. Xia, Yu & Tan, Dan & Wang, Bolin, 2021. "Use of a product service system in a competing remanufacturing market," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    18. Xiaofeng Long & Tong Shu & Shou Chen & Shouyang Wang & Kin Keung Lai & Yan Yang, 2017. "Strategy Analysis of Recycling and Remanufacturing by Remanufacturers in Closed-Loop Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-29, October.
    19. Chen, Chialin & Liu, Lucy Qian, 2014. "Pricing and quality decisions and financial incentives for sustainable product design with recycled material content under price leadership," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PC), pages 666-677.
    20. Qiao, Haike & Su, Qin, 2021. "Distribution channel and licensing strategy choice considering consumer online reviews in a closed-loop supply chain," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2022:i:1:p:691-:d:1020737. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.