IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v51y2005i8p1193-1205.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Market Segmentation and Product Technology Selection for Remanufacturable Products

Author

Listed:
  • Laurens G. Debo

    (Tepper School of Business, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213)

  • L. Beril Toktay

    (College of Management, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30308)

  • Luk N. Van Wassenhove

    (Technology and Operations Management, INSEAD, 77305 Fontainebleau, France)

Abstract

Remanufacturing is a production strategy whose goal is to recover the residual value of used products. Used products can be remanufactured at a lower cost than the initial production cost, but consumers value remanufactured products less than new products. The choice of production technology influences the value that can be recovered from a used product. In this paper, we solve the joint pricing and production technology selection problem faced by a manufacturer that considers introducing a remanufacturable product in a market that consists of heterogeneous consumers. Our analysis discusses the market and technology drivers of product remanufacturability and identifies some phenomena of managerial importance that are typical of a remanufacturing environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Laurens G. Debo & L. Beril Toktay & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2005. "Market Segmentation and Product Technology Selection for Remanufacturable Products," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 51(8), pages 1193-1205, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:51:y:2005:i:8:p:1193-1205
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1050.0369
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0369
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0369?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. L. Beril Toktay & Lawrence M. Wein & Stefanos A. Zenios, 2000. "Inventory Management of Remanufacturable Products," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(11), pages 1412-1426, November.
    2. Mussa, Michael & Rosen, Sherwin, 1978. "Monopoly and product quality," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 301-317, August.
    3. Erwin van der Laan & Marc Salomon & Rommert Dekker & Luk Van Wassenhove, 1999. "Inventory Control in Hybrid Systems with Remanufacturing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 45(5), pages 733-747, May.
    4. Markus Klausner & Wolfgang M. Grimm & Chris Hendrickson, 1998. "Reuse of Electric Motors in Consumer Products," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 2(2), pages 89-102, April.
    5. Seungjin Whang, 1995. "Market Provision of Custom Software: Learning Effects and Low Balling," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 41(8), pages 1343-1352, August.
    6. Fleischmann, Moritz & Bloemhof-Ruwaard, Jacqueline M. & Dekker, Rommert & van der Laan, Erwin & van Nunen, Jo A. E. E. & Van Wassenhove, Luk N., 1997. "Quantitative models for reverse logistics: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(1), pages 1-17, November.
    7. R. Canan Savaskan & Shantanu Bhattacharya & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2004. "Closed-Loop Supply Chain Models with Product Remanufacturing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(2), pages 239-252, February.
    8. Inderfurth, Karl, 2004. "Optimal policies in hybrid manufacturing/remanufacturing systems with product substitution," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 90(3), pages 325-343, August.
    9. K. Sridhar Moorthy, 1984. "Market Segmentation, Self-Selection, and Product Line Design," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 3(4), pages 288-307.
    10. Anirudh Dhebar & Shmuel S. Oren, 1985. "Optimal Dynamic Pricing For Expanding Networks," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 4(4), pages 336-351.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pokharel, Shaligram & Mutha, Akshay, 2009. "Perspectives in reverse logistics: A review," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 53(4), pages 175-182.
    2. Liao, Haolan & Zhang, Qingyu & Shen, Neng & Nie, Yongyou & Li, Lu, 2021. "Coordination between forward and reverse production streams for maximum profitability," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    3. Jeffrey D. Shulman & Anne T. Coughlan & R. Canan Savaskan, 2009. "Optimal Restocking Fees and Information Provision in an Integrated Demand-Supply Model of Product Returns," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 11(4), pages 577-594, December.
    4. Tang, Christopher S. & Zhou, Sean, 2012. "Research advances in environmentally and socially sustainable operations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 223(3), pages 585-594.
    5. Kaya, Onur, 2010. "Incentive and production decisions for remanufacturing operations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(2), pages 442-453, March.
    6. Gu, Wenjun & Chhajed, Dilip & Petruzzi, Nicholas C. & Yalabik, Baris, 2015. "Quality design and environmental implications of green consumerism in remanufacturing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 55-69.
    7. Liu, Wenjie & Liu, Wei & Shen, Ningning & Xu, Zhitao & Xie, Naiming & Chen, Jian & Zhou, Huiyu, 2022. "Pricing and collection decisions of a closed-loop supply chain with fuzzy demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    8. A. K. Gaula & J. K. Jha, 2024. "Pricing strategy with quality improvement in a dual collection channel closed-loop supply chain under return uncertainty," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 1-40, June.
    9. repec:grz:wpsses:2013-01 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Sungwook Yoon & Sukjae Jeong, 2017. "Investment Strategy in a Closed Loop Supply Chain: The Case of a Market with Competition between Two Retailers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-32, September.
    11. Xiting Gong & Xiuli Chao, 2013. "Technical Note---Optimal Control Policy for Capacitated Inventory Systems with Remanufacturing," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 61(3), pages 603-611, June.
    12. Felix T.S. Chan & Nan Li & S.H. Chung & Mozafar Saadat, 2017. "Management of sustainable manufacturing systems-a review on mathematical problems," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(4), pages 1210-1225, February.
    13. Chen, Jen-Ming & Chang, Chia-I, 2012. "The co-opetitive strategy of a closed-loop supply chain with remanufacturing," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(2), pages 387-400.
    14. V. Daniel R. Guide, Jr. & Ruud H. Teunter & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2003. "Matching Demand and Supply to Maximize Profits from Remanufacturing," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 5(4), pages 303-316, October.
    15. Wei, Cansheng & Li, Yongjian & Cai, Xiaoqiang, 2011. "Robust optimal policies of production and inventory with uncertain returns and demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(2), pages 357-367, December.
    16. de Koster, M.B.M. & de Brito, M.P. & van de Vendel, M.A., 2002. "How to organise return handling; an exploratory study with nine retailer warehouses," Econometric Institute Research Papers EI 2002-11, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Erasmus School of Economics (ESE), Econometric Institute.
    17. Zhou, Tao & Li, Kai, 2024. "Designing manufacturer’s new product technology for a closed-loop supply chain with consumer context effect," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    18. de Brito, Marisa P. & van der Laan, Erwin A., 2009. "Inventory control with product returns: The impact of imperfect information," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 194(1), pages 85-101, April.
    19. Lin, Yizhong & Leung, Janny M.Y. & Zhang, Lianmin & Gu, Jia-Wen, 2020. "Single-item repairable inventory system with stochastic new and warranty demands," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    20. Sunder Kekre & Uday S. Rao & Jayashankar M. Swaminathan & Jun Zhang, 2003. "Reconfiguring a Remanufacturing Line at Visteon, Mexico," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 33(6), pages 30-43, December.
    21. Andre P. Calmon & Stephen C. Graves, 2017. "Inventory Management in a Consumer Electronics Closed-Loop Supply Chain," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 19(4), pages 568-585, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:51:y:2005:i:8:p:1193-1205. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.