IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i8p3583-d1635715.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding the Contribution of the Green Climate Fund (GCF) in Mangrove Forest Conservation: A Case Study on Sundarbans Mangrove Forest, Bangladesh

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad Sayed Momen Majumdar

    (Doctoral Program in Sustainable Environmental Studies, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8577, Japan)

  • Kenichi Matsui

    (Faculty of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8577, Japan)

Abstract

The Green Climate Fund (GCF) is mandated to undertake evidence-based and impactful climate change mitigation/adaptation projects in vulnerable countries. However, project effectiveness has often been questioned by some experts and countries. This study investigates recent trends and characteristics of GCF funding practices with the focus on project cost-effectiveness. Data were collected from GCF’s single-country project documents from 2016 to 2023. Given the potential contribution mangrove forest-rich tropical countries like Bangladesh can make to CO 2 emission reduction through forest conservation, this research attempts to highlight forest/mangrove-related projects. These data were then analyzed by sectors, project themes, financing types, and cost-effectiveness in terms of local economic benefits and CO 2 emission reduction. This investigation revealed that among a total of USD 7.5 billion GCF investment or 187 single-country projects for 89 countries, the investment in forests and land use was found to be one of the most cost effective among other sectors for both adaptation and mitigation although only six dedicated mangrove forest projects were undertaken. Despite the 50-50 rule for funding mitigation and adaptation efforts, GCF projects were focused more on mitigation, especially the energy sector. For Bangladesh, the third largest GCF investment destination in Asia after Mongolia and India, the conservation of the Sundarbans mangrove forest, the largest in the world, received only scant attention whereas vegetation reduction has raised serious concerns in the area. Two GCF projects that are relevant to Bangladesh’s mangrove-dependent communities emphasized livelihood developments for non-mangrove-dependent communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammad Sayed Momen Majumdar & Kenichi Matsui, 2025. "Understanding the Contribution of the Green Climate Fund (GCF) in Mangrove Forest Conservation: A Case Study on Sundarbans Mangrove Forest, Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-15, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3583-:d:1635715
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3583/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3583/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas Kalinowski, 2024. "The Green Climate Fund and private sector climate finance in the Global South," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(3), pages 281-296, March.
    2. Simon L. Lewis & Charlotte E. Wheeler & Edward T. A. Mitchard & Alexander Koch, 2019. "Restoring natural forests is the best way to remove atmospheric carbon," Nature, Nature, vol. 568(7750), pages 25-28, April.
    3. William M. Fonta & Elias T. Ayuk & Tiff van Huysen, 2018. "Africa and the Green Climate Fund: current challenges and future opportunities," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(9), pages 1210-1225, October.
    4. Thomas Kalinowski, 2020. "Institutional Innovations and Their Challenges in the Green Climate Fund: Country Ownership, Civil Society Participation and Private Sector Engagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-13, October.
    5. Omukuti, Jessica & Barrett, Sam & White, Piran C.L. & Marchant, Robert & Averchenkova, Alina, 2022. "The green climate fund and its shortcomings in local delivery of adaptation finance," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 115623, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Abrar Chaudhury, 2020. "Role of Intermediaries in Shaping Climate Finance in Developing Countries—Lessons from the Green Climate Fund," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-17, July.
    7. Rahman, Md Saifur & Sadath, Md. Nazmus & Giessen, Lukas, 2016. "Foreign donors driving policy change in recipient countries: Three decades of development aid towards community-based forest policy in Bangladesh," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 39-53.
    8. Jessica Omukuti & Sam Barrett & Piran C. L. White & Robert Marchant & Alina Averchenkova, 2022. "The green climate fund and its shortcomings in local delivery of adaptation finance," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(9-10), pages 1225-1240, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tilly Alcayna & Devin O’Donnell & Sarina Chandaria, 2023. "How much bilateral and multilateral climate adaptation finance is targeting the health sector? A scoping review of official development assistance data between 2009–2019," PLOS Global Public Health, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(6), pages 1-19, June.
    2. Joseph Earsom, 2024. "Fit for purpose? Just Energy Transition Partnerships and accountability in international climate governance," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(1), pages 135-141, February.
    3. Philips, Abiodun S., 2023. "Institutional enforcement of environmental fiscal stance and energy stock markets performance: Evaluating for returns and risk among connected markets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PE).
    4. Park, Mi Sun & Lee, Hyowon, 2019. "Accountability and reciprocal interests of bilateral forest cooperation under the global forest regime," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 32-44.
    5. Nina Tiel & Fabian Fopp & Philipp Brun & Johan Hoogen & Dirk Nikolaus Karger & Cecilia M. Casadei & Lisha Lyu & Devis Tuia & Niklaus E. Zimmermann & Thomas W. Crowther & Loïc Pellissier, 2024. "Regional uniqueness of tree species composition and response to forest loss and climate change," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.
    6. Raissa Sorgho & Carlos A. Montenegro Quiñonez & Valérie R. Louis & Volker Winkler & Peter Dambach & Rainer Sauerborn & Olaf Horstick, 2020. "Climate Change Policies in 16 West African Countries: A Systematic Review of Adaptation with a Focus on Agriculture, Food Security, and Nutrition," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-21, November.
    7. Hasnaoui, Ameni & Krott, Max, 2019. "Forest governance and the Arab spring: A case study of state forests in Tunisia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 99-111.
    8. Md Saifur Rahman & Md Faisal Abedin Khan & Lukas Giessen, 2024. "Analysing policy changes for achieving sustainable development goals: Insights from forest, environment and climate change action plan in Bangladesh," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 48(2), pages 508-524, May.
    9. Satish Kumar & Dipasha Sharma & Sandeep Rao & Weng Marc Lim & Sachin Kumar Mangla, 2025. "Past, present, and future of sustainable finance: insights from big data analytics through machine learning of scholarly research," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 345(2), pages 1061-1104, February.
    10. Kristina Fidali & Ofusina Toamua & Hemah Aquillah & Sereima Lomaloma & Placida Riah Mauriasi & Steve Nasiu & Aliti Vunisea & Sangeeta Mangubhai, 2023. "Can civil society organizations and faith‐based organizations in Fiji, Samoa, and Solomon Islands access climate finance?," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 41(S2), December.
    11. Luis H. Zamarioli & Pieter Pauw & Christine Grüning, 2020. "Country Ownership as the Means for Paradigm Shift: The Case of the Green Climate Fund," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-18, July.
    12. Hameeda A. AlMalki & Christopher M. Durugbo, 2023. "Systematic review of institutional innovation literature: towards a multi-level management model," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 73(2), pages 731-785, June.
    13. Arts, Bas & Brockhaus, Maria & Giessen, Lukas & McDermott, Constance L., 2024. "The performance of global forest governance: Three contrasting perspectives," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    14. Islam, Kazi Nazrul & Rahman, Mohammad Mahfuzur & Jashimuddin, Mohammed & Hossain, Mohammad Mosharraf & Islam, Kamrul & Faroque, Mohiuddin Al, 2019. "Analyzing multi-temporal satellite imagery and stakeholders' perceptions to have an insight into how forest co-management is changing the protected area landscapes in Bangladesh," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 70-80.
    15. Kai Cheng & Haitao Yang & Shengli Tao & Yanjun Su & Hongcan Guan & Yu Ren & Tianyu Hu & Wenkai Li & Guangcai Xu & Mengxi Chen & Xiancheng Lu & Zekun Yang & Yanhong Tang & Keping Ma & Jingyun Fang & Qi, 2024. "Carbon storage through China’s planted forest expansion," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
    16. Khan, Md Faisal Abedin & Uddin, Md Sazib & Giessen, Lukas, 2021. "Microcredit expansion and informal donor interests: Experiences from local NGOs in the Sundarbans Mangrove Forest, Bangladesh," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 21(C).
    17. Danchen Liang & Ganlin Huang, 2023. "Influence of Urban Tree Traits on Their Ecosystem Services: A Literature Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-14, August.
    18. Ullah, S M Asik & Tani, Masakazu & Tsuchiya, Jun & Rahman, M.Abiar & Moriyama, Masao, 2022. "Impact of protected areas and co-management on forest cover: A case study from Teknaf Wildlife Sanctuary, Bangladesh," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    19. Kleinschmit, Daniela & Böcher, Michael & Giessen, Lukas, 2016. "Forest Policy Analysis: Advancing the analytical approach," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 1-6.
    20. Gergely Buda & Judit Ricz, 2023. "Industrial symbiosis and industrial policy for sustainable development in Uganda," Review of Evolutionary Political Economy, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 165-189, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3583-:d:1635715. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.