IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i8p3305-d1630280.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Temporal–Spatial Evolution and Driving Mechanism for an Ecosystem Health Service Based on the GD-MGWR-XGBOOT-SEM Model: A Case Study in Guangxi Region

Author

Listed:
  • Zhenfeng Wei

    (Economic and Trade College, Guangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanning 530007, China)

  • Dong Chen

    (China-ASEAN Institute of Statistics, Guangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanning 530007, China)

  • Qunying Huang

    (Economic and Trade College, Guangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanning 530007, China)

  • Qifeng Chen

    (China-ASEAN Institute of Statistics, Guangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanning 530007, China)

  • Chunxia Wei

    (Guangxi Institute of Meteorological Science, Nanning 530015, China)

Abstract

With the expansion of urbanization in China, ecological environments are becoming more and more prominent. Uncovering driving factors and ways of regulating ecosystem health has become a hot topic for regional sustainable development. This paper adopted the improved vigor–organization–resilience service (VORS) model to diagnose the regional ecosystem health status in Guangxi from 2000 to 2020 and verify the main factors affecting ecosystem health. Considering the influencing factors (including vegetation, terrain, climate and human activities), the mechanism of driving factors associated with regional ecosystem health was analyzed by using a geographic detector (GD), a multiscale geographically weighted regression model (MGWR), and the XGBOOTS-SHAP model. The results show that the spatial distribution of ecosystem health is characterized by low values in the central region and high values in the northern and eastern regions with higher elevations from 2000 to 2020. The spatial agglomeration evolution changes from agglomeration to dispersion, and the regional urbanization distribution and evolution are consistent. The interaction of driving factors for ecosystem health and vegetation is enhanced significantly, while the interaction of climate factors is relatively weak. And most of the impacts of human activities on the ecological environment are negative. The vegetation factor has a dominant positive effect on ecosystem health, while human activity elements have a weak negative effect on ecosystem health. Meanwhile, climate factors are complex and changeable, and their impacts on ecosystem health are changeable, leading to corresponding changes in other factors. This study provides scientific reference for the harmonious and sustainable development of humans and nature in southern China.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhenfeng Wei & Dong Chen & Qunying Huang & Qifeng Chen & Chunxia Wei, 2025. "Temporal–Spatial Evolution and Driving Mechanism for an Ecosystem Health Service Based on the GD-MGWR-XGBOOT-SEM Model: A Case Study in Guangxi Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-20, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3305-:d:1630280
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3305/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3305/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chaojie Tian & Liheng Pang & Quanzhi Yuan & Wei Deng & Ping Ren, 2024. "Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Ecosystem Services and Their Trade-Offs and Synergies in Response to Natural and Social Factors: Evidence from Yibin, Upper Yangtze River," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-33, July.
    2. Yi Xiao & Luo Guo & Weiguo Sang, 2020. "Impact of Fast Urbanization on Ecosystem Health in Mountainous Regions of Southwest China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-16, January.
    3. John C. Dernbach & Joel A. Mintz, 2011. "Environmental Laws and Sustainability: An Introduction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-10, March.
    4. Costanza, Robert & de Groot, Rudolf & Braat, Leon & Kubiszewski, Ida & Fioramonti, Lorenzo & Sutton, Paul & Farber, Steve & Grasso, Monica, 2017. "Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go?," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 28(PA), pages 1-16.
    5. Jonathan M. Chase & Shane A. Blowes & Tiffany M. Knight & Katharina Gerstner & Felix May, 2020. "Ecosystem decay exacerbates biodiversity loss with habitat loss," Nature, Nature, vol. 584(7820), pages 238-243, August.
    6. Wenbo Cai & Chengji Shu & Li Lin, 2024. "Integrating Ecosystem Service Values into Urban Planning for Sustainable Development," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-20, November.
    7. Yan Wu & Yingmei Wu & Chen Li & Binpin Gao & Kejun Zheng & Mengjiao Wang & Yuhong Deng & Xin Fan, 2022. "Spatial Relationships and Impact Effects between Urbanization and Ecosystem Health in Urban Agglomerations along the Belt and Road: A Case Study of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-20, November.
    8. Yongqiang Liu & Shuang Wang & Zipeng Chen & Shuangshuang Tu, 2022. "Research on the Response of Ecosystem Service Function to Landscape Pattern Changes Caused by Land Use Transition: A Case Study of the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-20, May.
    9. Onggarbek Alipbeki & Pavel Grossul & Daniyar Rakhimov & Przemyslaw Kupidura & Chaimgul Alipbekova & Gauhar Musaif & Rimma Turekeldiyeva & Kairat Augambaev & Maira Begaliyeva, 2025. "Ecosystem Health Assessment of the Zerendy District, Kazakhstan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-25, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kai Li & Ying Hou & Ruhong Xin & Yuejing Rong & Xiang Pan & Zihan Gao & Ting Wang & Bingyang Lyu & Baimeng Guo & Haocheng Wang & Xi Li, 2024. "Integrating Ecosystem Services and Health into Landscape Functional Zoning: A Case Study of the Jinan Southern Mountainous Area, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-22, September.
    2. Zhijie Wang & Yan Liu & Yixin Li & Yuan Su, 2022. "Response of Ecosystem Health to Land Use Changes and Landscape Patterns in the Karst Mountainous Regions of Southwest China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-18, March.
    3. Wei Shen & Yang Li, 2022. "Multi-Scale Assessment and Spatio-Temporal Interaction Characteristics of Ecosystem Health in the Middle Reaches of the Yellow River of China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-21, December.
    4. Aryal, Kishor & Maraseni, Tek & Apan, Armando, 2023. "Examining policy−institution−program (PIP) responses against the drivers of ecosystem dynamics. A chronological review (1960–2020) from Nepal," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    5. Liu, Duan & Tang, Runcheng & Xie, Jun & Tian, Jingjing & Shi, Rui & Zhang, Kai, 2020. "Valuation of ecosystem services of rice–fish coculture systems in Ruyuan County, China," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    6. Busch, Christin & Specht, Kathrin & Inostroza, Luis & Falke, Matthias & Zepp, Harald, 2024. "Disentangling cultural ecosystem services co-production in urban green spaces through social media reviews," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    7. Simin He & Yusong Xie & Jing Zhang & Yanyun Luo & Qianna Wang, 2025. "Heterogeneity of Ecosystem Service Interactions Through Scale Effects and Time Effects and Their Social-Ecological Determinants in the Tuo River Basin," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-23, January.
    8. Yajing Shao & Xuefeng Yuan & Chaoqun Ma & Ruifang Ma & Zhaoxia Ren, 2020. "Quantifying the Spatial Association between Land Use Change and Ecosystem Services Value: A Case Study in Xi’an, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-20, May.
    9. Pietrzyk-Kaszyńska, Agata & Olszańska, Agnieszka & Rechciński, Marcin & Tusznio, Joanna & Grodzińska-Jurczak, Małgorzata, 2022. "Divergent or convergent? Prioritization and spatial representation of ecosystem services as perceived by conservation professionals and local leaders," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    10. Wenjie Zhu & Xiaobin Jin & Xiaolin Zhang & Jingping Liu & Yinkang Zhou, 2024. "Ecosystem services to support sustainable development: The modifiable areal unit problem in the transition between evaluation and management units," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(6), pages 6253-6273, December.
    11. Robbie Maris & Mark Holmes, 2023. "Economic Growth Theory and Natural Resource Constraints: A Stocktake and Critical Assessment," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 56(2), pages 255-268, June.
    12. Shuzhen Song & Xingyan Chen & Yuehua Song & Yongkuan Chi, 2024. "Vegetation Restoration Patterns Influence the Supply and Interrelations of Grassland Ecosystem Services in Karst Desertification Control," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-16, November.
    13. van der Hoff, Richard & Nascimento, Nathália & Fabrício-Neto, Ailton & Jaramillo-Giraldo, Carolina & Ambrosio, Geanderson & Arieira, Julia & Afonso Nobre, Carlos & Rajão, Raoni, 2022. "Policy-oriented ecosystem services research on tropical forests in South America: A systematic literature review," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    14. Joel C. Creed & Laura Sol Aranda & Júlia Gomes de Sousa & Caio Barros Brito do Bem & Beatriz Sant’Anna Vasconcelos Marafiga Dutra & Marianna Lanari & Virgínia Eduarda de Sousa & Karine M. Magalhães & , 2023. "A Synthesis of Provision and Impact in Seagrass Ecosystem Services in the Brazilian Southwest Atlantic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-19, October.
    15. Wanxu Chen & Guangqing Chi & Jiangfeng Li, 2020. "Ecosystem Services and Their Driving Forces in the Middle Reaches of the Yangtze River Urban Agglomerations, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-19, May.
    16. O'Sullivan, Jane N., 2020. "The social and environmental influences of population growth rate and demographic pressure deserve greater attention in ecological economics," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    17. Nicolás Ruiz, Néstor & Suárez Alonso, María Luisa & Vidal-Abarca, María Rosario, 2021. "Contributions of dry rivers to human well-being: A global review for future research," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    18. Silva, Daiane Vitória da & Pavan, Ana Laura Raymundo & Faria, Luiz Carlos de & Piekarski, Cassiano Moro & Saavedra, Yovana María Barrera & Lopes Silva, Diogo A., 2024. "Opportunities to integrate Ecosystem Services into Life Cycle Assessment (LCA): a case study of milk production in Brazil," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    19. Moreno-Llorca, R. & Vaz, A.S. & Herrero, J. & Millares, A. & Bonet-García, F.J. & Alcaraz-Segura, D., 2020. "Multi-scale evolution of ecosystem services’ supply in Sierra Nevada (Spain): An assessment over the last half-century," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 46(C).
    20. Xiaoyu Li & Shudan Gong & Qingdong Shi & Yuan Fang, 2023. "A Review of Ecosystem Services Based on Bibliometric Analysis: Progress, Challenges, and Future Directions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-18, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3305-:d:1630280. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.