IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i1p277-d1559078.html

Ecosystem Health Assessment of the Zerendy District, Kazakhstan

Author

Listed:
  • Onggarbek Alipbeki

    (Department of Geodesy and Geoinformatics, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Farabi Avenue 71, Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan)

  • Pavel Grossul

    (Department of Geodesy and Cartography, S. Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical Research University, Astana 001011, Kazakhstan)

  • Daniyar Rakhimov

    (Department of Geodesy and Geoinformatics, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Farabi Avenue 71, Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan)

  • Przemyslaw Kupidura

    (Faculty of Geodesy and Cartography, Warsaw University of Technology, Pl. Politechniki 1, 00-661 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Chaimgul Alipbekova

    (Department of Biology, Kazakh National Women’s Teacher Training University, A05C9Y7Almaty, St. Gogol 114 k1, Almaty 050000, Kazakhstan)

  • Gauhar Musaif

    (Department of Geodesy and Cartography, S. Seifullin Kazakh Agrotechnical Research University, Astana 001011, Kazakhstan)

  • Rimma Turekeldiyeva

    (Department of Ecology, M.H.Dulaty Taraz Regional University, Taraz 160000, Kazakhstan)

  • Kairat Augambaev

    (Department of Geodesy and Geoinformatics, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Farabi Avenue 71, Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan)

  • Maira Begaliyeva

    (Department of Geography, Land Management and Cadaster, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Farabi Avenue 71, Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan)

Abstract

An ecosystem health assessment (EHA) is essential for comprehensively improving the ecological environment and socio-economic conditions, thereby promoting the sustainable development of a specific area. Most previous EHA studies have focused on urbanized regions, paying insufficient attention to rural areas with urban enclaves and national natural parks. This study employed the Basic Pressure–State–Response methodological approach. The composition of indicators (35) encompassed both spatiotemporal data and socio-economic information. The random forest algorithm was used on the Google Earth Engine platform to classify and evaluate changes in land use and land cover (LULC). In addition, weighting coefficients were calculated, and driving factors were subsequently identified. The analysis revealed that the rural administrative divisions in the central part of Zerendy district, where the city of Kokshetau is situated, exhibited a relatively low level of ecosystem health (EH). The southwestern rural administrative divisions of the studied district, where the national nature park and the reserve territories are located, exhibited a higher level of EH. Other rural administrative divisions located in the eastern parts of the district generally exhibited a moderate level of EH. Interested managers can use the results of our assessment to implement adequate measures aimed at improving the health of the Zerendy district ecosystem.

Suggested Citation

  • Onggarbek Alipbeki & Pavel Grossul & Daniyar Rakhimov & Przemyslaw Kupidura & Chaimgul Alipbekova & Gauhar Musaif & Rimma Turekeldiyeva & Kairat Augambaev & Maira Begaliyeva, 2025. "Ecosystem Health Assessment of the Zerendy District, Kazakhstan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-25, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:1:p:277-:d:1559078
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/1/277/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/1/277/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. World Commission on Environment and Development,, 1987. "Our Common Future," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780192820808.
    2. Qian Yang & Aiwen Lin & Zhenzhen Zhao & Ling Zou & Cheng Sun, 2016. "Assessment of Urban Ecosystem Health Based on Entropy Weight Extension Decision Model in Urban Agglomeration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-17, August.
    3. Gregory, Amanda J. & Atkins, Jonathan P. & Burdon, Daryl & Elliott, Michael, 2013. "A problem structuring method for ecosystem-based management: The DPSIR modelling process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(3), pages 558-569.
    4. Fan Wu & Xiaoke Wang & Yufen Ren, 2021. "Urbanization’s Impacts on Ecosystem Health Dynamics in the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-15, January.
    5. Rohne Till, Emelie & Schwaag Serger, Sylvia & Axelsson, Tobias & Andersson, Martin, 2024. "Transformation and resilience in times of change: A historical perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    6. Ji Zhang & Shiqi Yang & Shengtian Yang & Li Fan & Xu Zhou, 2023. "Spatio-Temporal Variations of Ecosystem Water Use Efficiency and Its Drivers in Southwest China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, February.
    7. Ziyan Wang & Lina Tang & Quanyi Qiu & Huaxiang Chen & Tong Wu & Guofan Shao, 2018. "Assessment of Regional Ecosystem Health—A Case Study of the Golden Triangle of Southern Fujian Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, April.
    8. Subhasis Das & Biswajeet Pradhan & Pravat Kumar Shit & Abdullah M. Alamri, 2020. "Assessment of Wetland Ecosystem Health Using the Pressure–State–Response (PSR) Model: A Case Study of Mursidabad District of West Bengal (India)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-18, July.
    9. Dan Ye & Liu Yang & Min Zhou, 2023. "Spatiotemporal Variation in Ecosystem Health and Its Driving Factors in Guizhou Province," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-23, July.
    10. Yuxia Xu & Qian Chen & Hui Zeng, 2024. "Rural Ecosystem Health Assessment and Spatial Divergence—A Case Study of Rural Areas around Qinling Mountain, Shaanxi Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-23, July.
    11. Ting Li & Yu Ren & Zemin Ai & Zhihong Qiao & Yanjiao Ren & Liyang Ma & Yadong Yang, 2024. "Revealing the Spatial Interactions and Driving Factors of Ecosystem Services: Enlightenments under Vegetation Restoration," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-23, April.
    12. Jinlong Hu & Guo Qing & Yingxue Wang & Sicheng Qiu & Nan Luo, 2024. "Landscape Ecological Security of the Lijiang River Basin in China: Spatiotemporal Evolution and Pattern Optimization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-22, July.
    13. Hang Shu & Chunwang Xiao & Ting Ma & Weiguo Sang, 2021. "Ecological Health Assessment of Chinese National Parks Based on Landscape Pattern: A Case Study in Shennongjia National Park," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-15, October.
    14. Bell, Simon, 2012. "DPSIR=A Problem Structuring Method? An exploration from the “Imagine” approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 222(2), pages 350-360.
    15. Yingbing Liu & Wenying Du & Nengcheng Chen & Xiaolei Wang, 2020. "Construction and Evaluation of the Integrated Perception Ecological Environment Indicator (IPEEI) Based on the DPSIR Framework for Smart Sustainable Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-25, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zhenfeng Wei & Dong Chen & Qunying Huang & Qifeng Chen & Chunxia Wei, 2025. "Temporal–Spatial Evolution and Driving Mechanism for an Ecosystem Health Service Based on the GD-MGWR-XGBOOT-SEM Model: A Case Study in Guangxi Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-20, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hejie Wei & Qing Han & Yu Ma & Wenfeng Ji & Weiguo Fan & Mengxue Liu & Junchang Huang & Ling Li, 2024. "Multi-Scenario Simulating the Effects of Land Use Change on Ecosystem Health for Rural Ecological Management in the Zheng–Bian–Luo Rural Area, Central China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-28, October.
    2. Shaokang Fu & Lin Zhao & Zhi Qiao & Tong Sun & Meng Sun & Yuying Hao & Siyu Hu & Yanchang Zhang, 2021. "Development of Ecosystem Health Assessment (EHA) and Application Method: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, October.
    3. Lhermie, Guillaume & Wernli, Didier & Jørgensen, Peter Søgaard & Kenkel, Donald & Lin Lawell, C.-Y. Cynthia & Tauer, Loren William & Gröhn, Yrjo Tapio, 2019. "Tradeoffs between resistance to antimicrobials in public health and their use in agriculture: Moving towards sustainability assessment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 1-1.
    4. Zhijie Wang & Yan Liu & Yixin Li & Yuan Su, 2022. "Response of Ecosystem Health to Land Use Changes and Landscape Patterns in the Karst Mountainous Regions of Southwest China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-18, March.
    5. Durugbo, Christopher M., 2020. "Affordance-based problem structuring for workplace innovation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(2), pages 617-631.
    6. Yearworth, Mike & White, Leroy, 2014. "The non-codified use of problem structuring methods and the need for a generic constitutive definition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 237(3), pages 932-945.
    7. White, Leroy, 2026. "Fifty years of Soft Operational Research: The contribution of EURO and EJOR to its foundation and development," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 328(3), pages 735-748.
    8. Guillaume Lhermie, 2021. "Shaping Agricultural Policies in the Anthropocene Era: What Can We Learn from the DPSIR Framework?," SPP Briefing Papers, The School of Public Policy, University of Calgary, vol. 14(25), October.
    9. Amorocho-Daza, Henry & Sušnik, Janez & van der Zaag, Pieter & Slinger, Jill H., 2025. "A model-based policy analysis framework for social-ecological systems: Integrating uncertainty and participation in system dynamics modelling," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 499(C).
    10. Alexandre de A. Gomes Júnior & Vanessa B. Schramm & Fernando Schramm, 2023. "Problem Structuring Methods in Social-Ecological Systems," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 36(3), pages 461-478, June.
    11. Alexandre de A. Gomes Júnior & Vanessa B. Schramm, 2022. "Problem Structuring Methods: A Review of Advances Over the Last Decade," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 35(1), pages 55-88, February.
    12. Jingwei Wang & Jinhe Zhang & Peijia Wang & Xiaobin Ma & Liangjian Yang & Leying Zhou, 2022. "Progress in Ecosystem Health Research and Future Prospects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-22, November.
    13. Qiangsheng Hu & Xiaorong He, 2018. "An Integrated Approach to Evaluate Urban Adaptive Capacity to Climate Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-17, April.
    14. CHEN, Helen S.Y., 2020. "Designing Sustainable Humanitarian Supply Chains," OSF Preprints m82ar, Center for Open Science.
    15. Denise Ravet, 2011. "Lean production: the link between supply chain and sustainable development in an international environment," Post-Print hal-00691666, HAL.
    16. Aryal, Kishor & Maraseni, Tek & Apan, Armando, 2023. "Examining policy−institution−program (PIP) responses against the drivers of ecosystem dynamics. A chronological review (1960–2020) from Nepal," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    17. Mara Del Baldo, 2012. "Corporate social responsibility and corporate governance in Italian SMEs: the experience of some “spirited businesses”," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 16(1), pages 1-36, February.
    18. Michael Howes & Liana Wortley & Ruth Potts & Aysin Dedekorkut-Howes & Silvia Serrao-Neumann & Julie Davidson & Timothy Smith & Patrick Nunn, 2017. "Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-17, January.
    19. Parnphumeesup, Piya & Kerr, Sandy A., 2011. "Stakeholder preferences towards the sustainable development of CDM projects: Lessons from biomass (rice husk) CDM project in Thailand," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 3591-3601, June.
    20. Chin-Shan Lu & Kuo-Chung Shang & Chi-Chang Lin, 2016. "Examining sustainability performance at ports: port managers’ perspectives on developing sustainable supply chains," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(8), pages 909-927, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:1:p:277-:d:1559078. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.