IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jlands/v14y2025i5p1012-d1650571.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Revealing the Spatiotemporal Changes in Land Use and Landscape Patterns and Their Effects on Ecosystem Services: A Case Study in the Western Sichuan Urban Agglomeration, China

Author

Listed:
  • Jing Wang

    (College of Geography and Planning, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China)

  • Peihao Peng

    (College of Geography and Planning, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China)

  • Tao Liu

    (Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Earth System Modeling, Department of Earth System Science, Institute for Global Change Studies, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Juan Wang

    (College of Geography and Planning, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China)

  • Shiqi Zhang

    (School of Emergency Management, Xihua University, Chengdu 610039, China)

  • Pengtao Niu

    (College of Geography and Planning, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China
    School of Surveying Engineering and Environment, Henan Polytechnic Institute, Nanyang 473009, China)

Abstract

Land use change significantly influences landscape pattern adjustments, thereby altering ecosystem functions and service flows, ultimately impacting ecosystem service value (ESV). However, previous studies have often examined the impacts of land use change and landscape patterns on ecosystem services from a one-dimensional perspective, overlooking the complex interactions among these factors. This study proposes a “process–structure–value” response framework and applies it to a case study of the western Sichuan urban agglomeration. Its aim is to identify the spatial and temporal characteristics of land use and landscape pattern evolution. Additionally, it quantitatively evaluates the synergistic effects of these changes on ESV evolution from 2000 to 2020 using a correlation analysis. The results show that, over the past 20 years, the study area experienced a significant expansion of construction land by 184,729.41 hm 2 , leading to the dispersion and fragmentation of arable land, grassland, and waters, resulting in an overall trend of fragmentation and diversification in landscape patterns. The ESV increased by CNY 2.619 billion, primarily due to the increased ESV associated with forest land and waters. This study found that the synergistic effects of land use processes and landscape pattern structures significantly enhanced ESV. The transition from construction land and arable land to forest land and waters notably improved the ESV. Meanwhile, increased landscape diversity and patch connectivity further enhanced the ecosystem service function. Furthermore, the ecological environment of the study area remained vulnerable despite the increased ESV. Overall, the results highlight the significant correlation between changes in land use processes, landscape patterns, and ESV, emphasizing the necessity of integrating the “process–structure–value” framework in future research to comprehensively assess the responses of land use and landscape patterns to ESV, providing a more comprehensive reference for land use planning and policy development.

Suggested Citation

  • Jing Wang & Peihao Peng & Tao Liu & Juan Wang & Shiqi Zhang & Pengtao Niu, 2025. "Revealing the Spatiotemporal Changes in Land Use and Landscape Patterns and Their Effects on Ecosystem Services: A Case Study in the Western Sichuan Urban Agglomeration, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-36, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:5:p:1012-:d:1650571
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/5/1012/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-445X/14/5/1012/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Biao & Li, Wenhua & Xie, Gaodi, 2010. "Ecosystem services research in China: Progress and perspective," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(7), pages 1389-1395, May.
    2. Mendoza-González, G. & Martínez, M.L. & Lithgow, D. & Pérez-Maqueo, O. & Simonin, P., 2012. "Land use change and its effects on the value of ecosystem services along the coast of the Gulf of Mexico," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 23-32.
    3. Yongqiang Liu & Shuang Wang & Zipeng Chen & Shuangshuang Tu, 2022. "Research on the Response of Ecosystem Service Function to Landscape Pattern Changes Caused by Land Use Transition: A Case Study of the Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-20, May.
    4. Duveiller, Gregory & Caporaso, Luca & Abad-Viñas, Raul & Perugini, Lucia & Grassi, Giacomo & Arneth, Almut & Cescatti, Alessandro, 2020. "Local biophysical effects of land use and land cover change: towards an assessment tool for policy makers," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    5. Costanza, Robert & de Groot, Rudolf & Braat, Leon & Kubiszewski, Ida & Fioramonti, Lorenzo & Sutton, Paul & Farber, Steve & Grasso, Monica, 2017. "Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go?," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 28(PA), pages 1-16.
    6. Häyhä, Tiina & Franzese, Pier Paolo, 2014. "Ecosystem services assessment: A review under an ecological-economic and systems perspective," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 289(C), pages 124-132.
    7. Jian Zhang & Hengxing Xiang & Shizuka Hashimoto & Toshiya Okuro, 2021. "Observational Scale Matters for Ecosystem Services Interactions and Spatial Distributions: A Case Study of the Ussuri Watershed, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-16, September.
    8. Howarth, Richard B. & Farber, Stephen, 2002. "Accounting for the value of ecosystem services," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(3), pages 421-429, June.
    9. Kong, Xuesong & Fu, Mengxue & Zhao, Xiang & Wang, Jing & Jiang, Ping, 2022. "Ecological effects of land-use change on two sides of the Hu Huanyong Line in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    10. Ratanakuakangwan, Sudlop & Morita, Hiroshi, 2022. "An efficient energy planning model optimizing cost, emission, and social impact with different carbon tax scenarios," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 325(C).
    11. Kwadwo Kyenkyehene Kusi & Abdellatif Khattabi & Nadia Mhammdi, 2023. "Analyzing the impact of land use change on ecosystem service value in the main watersheds of Morocco," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 2688-2715, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaoyu Li & Shudan Gong & Qingdong Shi & Yuan Fang, 2023. "A Review of Ecosystem Services Based on Bibliometric Analysis: Progress, Challenges, and Future Directions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-18, November.
    2. Lili Zhang & Baoqing Hu & Ze Zhang & Gaodou Liang & Simin Huang, 2023. "Comprehensive Evaluation of Ecological-Economic Value of Guangxi Based on Land Consolidation," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-25, March.
    3. Alamanos, Angelos & Koundouri, Phoebe, 2022. "Economics of Incorporating Ecosystem Services into Water Resource Planning and Management," MPRA Paper 122046, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Häyhä, Tiina & Franzese, Pier Paolo & Paletto, Alessandro & Fath, Brian D., 2015. "Assessing, valuing, and mapping ecosystem services in Alpine forests," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 14(C), pages 12-23.
    5. Yuqing Xiong & Hong Li & Meichen Fu & Xiuhua Ma & Lei Wang, 2022. "Evaluation of Ecosystem Service Change Patterns in a Mining-Based City: A Case Study of Wu’an City," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-18, June.
    6. Ana Carolina V. Nadalini & Ricardo de Araujo Kalid & Ednildo Andrade Torres, 2021. "Emergy as a Tool to Evaluate Ecosystem Services: A Systematic Review of the Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-14, June.
    7. Raju Rai & Yili Zhang & Basanta Paudel & Bipin Kumar Acharya & Laxmi Basnet, 2018. "Land Use and Land Cover Dynamics and Assessing the Ecosystem Service Values in the Trans-Boundary Gandaki River Basin, Central Himalayas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-22, August.
    8. Zhou, Peng & Zhang, Haijie & Huang, Bei & Ji, Yongli & Peng, Shaolin & Zhou, Ting, 2022. "Are productivity and biodiversity adequate predictors for rapid assessment of forest ecosystem services values?," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    9. Sumarga, Elham & Hein, Lars & Edens, Bram & Suwarno, Aritta, 2015. "Mapping monetary values of ecosystem services in support of developing ecosystem accounts," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 12(C), pages 71-83.
    10. Hongjie Peng & Lei Hua & Xuesong Zhang & Xuying Yuan & Jianhao Li, 2021. "Evaluation of ESV Change under Urban Expansion Based on Ecological Sensitivity: A Case Study of Three Gorges Reservoir Area in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-23, July.
    11. Zhenfeng Wei & Dong Chen & Qunying Huang & Qifeng Chen & Chunxia Wei, 2025. "Temporal–Spatial Evolution and Driving Mechanism for an Ecosystem Health Service Based on the GD-MGWR-XGBOOT-SEM Model: A Case Study in Guangxi Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-20, April.
    12. Qinglan Li & Liu Yang & Hongzan Jiao & Qing He, 2024. "Spatiotemporal Analysis of the Impacts of Land Use Change on Ecosystem Service Value: A Case from Guiyang, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-19, February.
    13. Nikodinoska, Natasha & Paletto, Alessandro & Pastorella, Fabio & Granvik, Madeleine & Franzese, Pier Paolo, 2018. "Assessing, valuing and mapping ecosystem services at city level: The case of Uppsala (Sweden)," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 368(C), pages 411-424.
    14. Nicholas M. Holden & Andrew M. Neill & Jane C. Stout & Derek O’Brien & Michael A. Morris, 2023. "Biocircularity: a Framework to Define Sustainable, Circular Bioeconomy," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 3(1), pages 77-91, March.
    15. Yahong Liu & Hailian Sun & Lei Shi & Huimin Wang & Zhai Xiu & Xiao Qiu & Hong Chang & Yu Xie & Yang Wang & Chengjie Wang, 2021. "Spatial-Temporal Changes and Driving Factors of Land-Use Eco-Efficiency Incorporating Ecosystem Services in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-15, January.
    16. Hui Yang & Jiansheng Cao & Xianglong Hou, 2023. "Study on the Evaluation and Assessment of Ecosystem Service Spatial Differentiation at Different Scales in Mountainous Areas around the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-21, January.
    17. Shuo Yang & Hao Su, 2022. "Multi-Scenario Simulation of Ecosystem Service Values in the Guanzhong Plain Urban Agglomeration, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-23, July.
    18. Yang, Qing & Liu, Gengyuan & Giannetti, Biagio F. & Agostinho, Feni & M.V.B. Almeida, Cecília & Casazza, Marco, 2020. "Emergy-based ecosystem services valuation and classification management applied to China’s grasslands," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 42(C).
    19. Yingying Wu & Xuelu Liu & Qiqi Zhao & Hongyan Liu & Fei Qu & Miaomiao Zhang, 2024. "Impact of Land Use/Land Cover Change on Ecosystem Service Trade-Offs/Synergies—A Case Study of Gangu County, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-22, July.
    20. Buonocore, Elvira & Picone, Flavio & Donnarumma, Luigia & Russo, Giovanni F. & Franzese, Pier Paolo, 2019. "Modeling matter and energy flows in marine ecosystems using emergy and eco-exergy methods to account for natural capital value," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 392(C), pages 137-146.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jlands:v:14:y:2025:i:5:p:1012-:d:1650571. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.