IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i23p16144-d991747.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-Scale Assessment and Spatio-Temporal Interaction Characteristics of Ecosystem Health in the Middle Reaches of the Yellow River of China

Author

Listed:
  • Wei Shen

    (College of Land and Tourism, Luoyang Normal University, Luoyang 471022, China
    College of Geography and Environmental Science, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China)

  • Yang Li

    (College of Geography and Environmental Science, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China
    Key Laboratory of Geospatial Technology for the Middle and Lower Yellow River Regions, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China)

Abstract

Exploring the assessment methods and multi-scale spatiotemporal interaction characteristics of ecosystem health is of great significance for current ecosystem health theory and application research. Based on the regional differentiation theory and ecosystem service flow theory, the spatial weight coefficient and the modified coefficient of spatial proximity effect were introduced to improve the regional ecosystem health assessment model. Then, the improved VORS model was used to evaluate the ecosystem health level in the Middle Reaches of the Yellow River (MRYR) in China at multiple scales, and the ESTDA method was used to reveal the multi-scale spatiotemporal interaction characteristics of ecosystem health. The results show that: (1) From 1990 to 2018, the ecosystem health level at grid and county scale in the MRYR showed a trend of first decline and then increase, and experienced a slow decline and a steady rise from 1990 to 2005 and 2005 to 2018, respectively. The ecosystem health level at the grid and county scale presented a spatially hierarchical structure with alternating low-value and high-value zones. (2) Compared with the county scale, the grid scale can describe the spatial distribution characteristics of ecosystem health more refined, indicating the existence of spatial scale effects in ecosystem health assessment. (3) The rapid urbanization areas, the ecologically fragile areas in the central and western regions and the transitional zone between mountain and basin have more dynamic spatial structure, and stronger spatio-temporal interaction process. (4) In terms of LISA spatio-temporal transition, the regional system as a whole had strong path-dependent and lock-in characteristics, and the local spatial correlation structure of ecosystem health gradually tended to be stable during the study period. (5) In terms of spatio-temporal interaction network, there were strong spatio-temporal competition in the process of time evolution in six typical regions, such as the surrounding cities of provincial capitals, the fringe areas of cities, the transitional zone between mountain and basin, the transitional zone of ecologically fragile regions, the mountainous areas of western Henan Province, and the areas along rivers.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Shen & Yang Li, 2022. "Multi-Scale Assessment and Spatio-Temporal Interaction Characteristics of Ecosystem Health in the Middle Reaches of the Yellow River of China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-21, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:16144-:d:991747
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/16144/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/23/16144/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xinyue Ye & Sergio Rey, 2013. "A framework for exploratory space-time analysis of economic data," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 50(1), pages 315-339, February.
    2. Yi Xiao & Luo Guo & Weiguo Sang, 2020. "Impact of Fast Urbanization on Ecosystem Health in Mountainous Regions of Southwest China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-16, January.
    3. Costanza, Robert & de Groot, Rudolf & Braat, Leon & Kubiszewski, Ida & Fioramonti, Lorenzo & Sutton, Paul & Farber, Steve & Grasso, Monica, 2017. "Twenty years of ecosystem services: How far have we come and how far do we still need to go?," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 28(PA), pages 1-16.
    4. Wei Shen & Zhicheng Zheng & Yaochen Qin & Yang Li, 2020. "Spatiotemporal Characteristics and Driving Force of Ecosystem Health in an Important Ecological Function Region in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-19, July.
    5. Yu Shi & Rui Han & Luo Guo, 2020. "Temporal–Spatial Distribution of Ecosystem Health and Its Response to Human Interference Based on Different Terrain Gradients: A Case Study in Gannan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-17, February.
    6. Bagstad, Kenneth J. & Johnson, Gary W. & Voigt, Brian & Villa, Ferdinando, 2013. "Spatial dynamics of ecosystem service flows: A comprehensive approach to quantifying actual services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 4(C), pages 117-125.
    7. Md Mamun & Jeong-Eun Kim & Kwang-Guk An, 2022. "Land Cover and Human Disturbance Impact on Water Chemistry and Ecological Health in an Asian Temperate Lotic System," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-18, August.
    8. Xie, Xue & Fang, Bin & Xu, Hanzeyu & He, Shasha & Li, Xin, 2021. "Study on the coordinated relationship between Urban Land use efficiency and ecosystem health in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hang Shu & Chunwang Xiao & Ting Ma & Weiguo Sang, 2021. "Ecological Health Assessment of Chinese National Parks Based on Landscape Pattern: A Case Study in Shennongjia National Park," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-15, October.
    2. Stephen C. L. Watson & Adrian C. Newton, 2018. "Dependency of Businesses on Flows of Ecosystem Services: A Case Study from the County of Dorset, UK," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-14, April.
    3. Xinyu Ouyang & Xiangyu Luo, 2022. "Models for Assessing Urban Ecosystem Services: Status and Outlooks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-20, April.
    4. Lin, Jingyu & Huang, Jinliang & Hadjikakou, Michalis & Huang, Yaling & Li, Kun & Bryan, Brett A., 2021. "Reframing water-related ecosystem services flows," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    5. Picchi, Paolo & van Lierop, Martina & Geneletti, Davide & Stremke, Sven, 2019. "Advancing the relationship between renewable energy and ecosystem services for landscape planning and design: A literature review," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 241-259.
    6. Kubiszewski, Ida & Concollato, Luke & Costanza, Robert & Stern, David I., 2023. "Changes in authorship, networks, and research topics in ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    7. Zhijie Wang & Yan Liu & Yixin Li & Yuan Su, 2022. "Response of Ecosystem Health to Land Use Changes and Landscape Patterns in the Karst Mountainous Regions of Southwest China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-18, March.
    8. Jun Fu & Rui Ding & Yilin Zhang & Tao Zhou & Yiming Du & Yuqi Zhu & Linyu Du & Lina Peng & Jian Zou & Wenqian Xiao, 2022. "The Spatial-Temporal Transition and Influencing Factors of Green and Low-Carbon Utilization Efficiency of Urban Land in China under the Goal of Carbon Neutralization," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-25, December.
    9. Brück, Maria & Abson, David J. & Fischer, Joern & Schultner, Jannik, 2022. "Broadening the scope of ecosystem services research: Disaggregation as a powerful concept for sustainable natural resource management," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 53(C).
    10. Wang, Zhuangzhuang & Zhang, Liwei & Li, Xupu & Li, Yingjie & Frans, Veronica F. & Yan, Junping, 2020. "A network perspective for mapping freshwater service flows at the watershed scale," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    11. Finisdore, John & Rhodes, Charles & Haines-Young, Roy & Maynard, Simone & Wielgus, Jeffrey & Dvarskas, Anthony & Houdet, Joel & Quétier, Fabien & Lamothe, Karl A. & Ding, Helen & Soulard, François &, 2020. "The 18 benefits of using ecosystem services classification systems," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    12. Huang, Qingxu & Yin, Dan & He, Chunyang & Yan, Jubo & Liu, Ziwen & Meng, Shiting & Ren, Qiang & Zhao, Rui & Inostroza, Luis, 2020. "Linking ecosystem services and subjective well-being in rapidly urbanizing watersheds: Insights from a multilevel linear model," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 43(C).
    13. Wang, Zhuangzhuang & Fu, Bojie & Zhang, Liwei & Wu, Xutong & Li, Yingjie, 2022. "Ecosystem service assessments across cascade levels: typology and an evidence map," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    14. Tasser, Erich & Schirpke, Uta & Zoderer, Brenda Maria & Tappeiner, Ulrike, 2020. "Towards an integrative assessment of land-use type values from the perspective of ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 42(C).
    15. Jie Xu & Yu Xiao & Gaodi Xie & Yangyang Wang & Yuan Jiang, 2018. "How to Guarantee the Sustainability of the Wind Prevention and Sand Fixation Service: An Ecosystem Service Flow Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-20, August.
    16. Aryal, Kishor & Maraseni, Tek & Apan, Armando, 2023. "Examining policy−institution−program (PIP) responses against the drivers of ecosystem dynamics. A chronological review (1960–2020) from Nepal," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    17. Liu, Duan & Tang, Runcheng & Xie, Jun & Tian, Jingjing & Shi, Rui & Zhang, Kai, 2020. "Valuation of ecosystem services of rice–fish coculture systems in Ruyuan County, China," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 41(C).
    18. Yajing Shao & Xuefeng Yuan & Chaoqun Ma & Ruifang Ma & Zhaoxia Ren, 2020. "Quantifying the Spatial Association between Land Use Change and Ecosystem Services Value: A Case Study in Xi’an, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-20, May.
    19. Pietrzyk-Kaszyńska, Agata & Olszańska, Agnieszka & Rechciński, Marcin & Tusznio, Joanna & Grodzińska-Jurczak, Małgorzata, 2022. "Divergent or convergent? Prioritization and spatial representation of ecosystem services as perceived by conservation professionals and local leaders," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    20. Robbie Maris & Mark Holmes, 2023. "Economic Growth Theory and Natural Resource Constraints: A Stocktake and Critical Assessment," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 56(2), pages 255-268, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:23:p:16144-:d:991747. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.