IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i4p1534-d1589835.html

Does Carbon Trading Policy Enhance the Autonomy and Controllability of Green Enterprises in Supply Chains? A Study of the Chain-Mediating Effects of Green Ambidextrous Innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Wenjie Chen

    (Business College, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004, China)

  • Yisong Yang

    (Business College, Central South University of Forestry and Technology, Changsha 410004, China)

Abstract

Enhancing the Autonomy and Controllability of green enterprises is crucial for promoting the sustainable development of a green, low-carbon economy. Carbon trading policy has garnered widespread attention across China, offering a novel approach to enhancing the capabilities of Chinese green enterprises. This study aims to explore the impact of carbon trading policies on the Autonomy and Controllability of green enterprises. By introducing the mediating variable of Green ambidextrous innovation, the action mechanism between carbon trading policies and the Autonomy and Controllability of green enterprises is analyzed. In addition, the internal action mechanism of Green ambidextrous innovation is revealed, providing a reference for improving the Autonomy and Controllability of green enterprises and building a global safe and controllable green supply chain. Drawing on data from 126 publicly-listed green companies in China, this study constructs a chain mediation framework based on the logic of “Carbon Trading Policy—Green ambidextrous innovation—Autonomy and Controllability of Green Enterprises.” Utilizing the DID methodology, the analysis explores the impact and mechanisms of the carbon trading policy on green enterprises’ Autonomy and Controllability. The findings indicate that the carbon trading policy significantly enhances the Autonomy and Controllability of green enterprises. Mechanistic analysis reveals that the policy boosts the controllability of green enterprise customers through Green ambidextrous innovation, although its effect is not significant. Additionally, the study identifies internal mechanisms within Green ambidextrous innovation that influence these capabilities. Heterogeneity analysis shows that the carbon trading policy has a particularly pronounced effect on the Autonomy and Controllability of green enterprises in western China and is more impactful for green factories compared to green supply chain enterprises.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenjie Chen & Yisong Yang, 2025. "Does Carbon Trading Policy Enhance the Autonomy and Controllability of Green Enterprises in Supply Chains? A Study of the Chain-Mediating Effects of Green Ambidextrous Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-29, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1534-:d:1589835
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1534/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/4/1534/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert C. Fink & Linda F. Edelman & Kenneth J. Hatten & William L. James, 2006. "Transaction cost economics, resource dependence theory, and customer--supplier relationships," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 15(3), pages 497-529, June.
    2. Cui, Jingbo & Dai, Jing & Wang, Zhenxuan & Zhao, Xiande, 2022. "Does Environmental Regulation Induce Green Innovation? A Panel Study of Chinese Listed Firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    3. Nong, Duy & Nguyen, Trung H. & Wang, Can & Van Khuc, Quy, 2020. "The environmental and economic impact of the emissions trading scheme (ETS) in Vietnam," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
    4. Justin J. P. Jansen & Frans A. J. Van Den Bosch & Henk W. Volberda, 2006. "Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation, and Performance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(11), pages 1661-1674, November.
    5. Zi-Lin He & Poh-Kam Wong, 2004. "Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(4), pages 481-494, August.
    6. Arora, Ashish & Fosfuri, Andrea & Gambardella, Alfonso, 2001. "Markets for Technology and Their Implications for Corporate Strategy," Industrial and Corporate Change, Oxford University Press and the Associazione ICC, vol. 10(2), pages 419-451, June.
    7. Na Zhang & Yanran Bi & Wenyue Gao & Jia Deng & Erzi Tang, 2024. "Heterogeneous effects of environmental regulations on green technology innovation: measurement by using patents and evidence from China’s prefecture-level cities," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(12), pages 7667-7698, December.
    8. Requate, Till, 2005. "Dynamic incentives by environmental policy instruments--a survey," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(2-3), pages 175-195, August.
    9. Yinping Mu & Juan Zhao, 2023. "Production Strategy and Technology Innovation under Different Carbon Emission Polices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-17, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mammassis, Constantinos S. & Kostopoulos, Konstantinos C., 2019. "CEO goal orientations, environmental dynamism and organizational ambidexterity: An investigation in SMEs," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 37(5), pages 577-588.
    2. Naomi Haefner & Maximilian Palmié & Petteri T. Leppänen, 2023. "With(Out) a Little Help From My Friends? Reconciling Incongruous Findings on Stakeholder Management, Innovation, and Firm Performance," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 47(1), pages 142-171, January.
    3. Dante I. Leyva-de la Hiz & J. Alberto Aragon-Correa & Andrew G. Earle, 2022. "Innovating for Good in Opportunistic Contexts: The Case for Firms’ Environmental Divergence," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 176(4), pages 705-721, April.
    4. Yuk, Hyeyeon & Garrett, Tony C., 2023. "Does customer participation moderate the effects of innovation on cost-based financial performance? An examination of different forms of customer participation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    5. Al-Atwi, Amer Ali & Amankwah-Amoah, Joseph & Khan, Zaheer, 2021. "Micro-foundations of organizational design and sustainability: The mediating role of learning ambidexterity," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 30(1).
    6. Koryak, Oksana & Lockett, Andy & Hayton, James & Nicolaou, Nicos & Mole, Kevin, 2018. "Disentangling the antecedents of ambidexterity: Exploration and exploitation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 413-427.
    7. Jatinder S. Sidhu & Harry R. Commandeur & Henk W. Volberda, 2007. "The Multifaceted Nature of Exploration and Exploitation: Value of Supply, Demand, and Spatial Search for Innovation," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(1), pages 20-38, February.
    8. Linda Argote & Sunkee Lee & Jisoo Park, 2021. "Organizational Learning Processes and Outcomes: Major Findings and Future Research Directions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(9), pages 5399-5429, September.
    9. Lee, Michael T. & Raschke, Robyn L. & Krishen, Anjala S., 2023. "Understanding ESG scores and firm performance: Are high-performing firms E, S, and G-balanced?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    10. Songsong Cheng & Qunpeng Fan & Yang Song, 2023. "Performance Gap and Innovation Ambidexterity: A Moderated Mediation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-22, February.
    11. Andreea N. Kiss & Dirk Libaers & Pamela S. Barr & Tang Wang & Miles A. Zachary, 2020. "CEO cognitive flexibility, information search, and organizational ambidexterity," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(12), pages 2200-2233, December.
    12. Hong Li, 2023. "Innovation and financial performance: An assessment of patenting strategies of Chinese listed firms," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(2), pages 1693-1712, April.
    13. Gatti, Corrado & Volpe, Loredana & Vagnani, Gianluca, 2015. "Interdependence among productive activities: Implications for exploration and exploitation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 711-722.
    14. José Andrade & Mário Franco & Luis Mendes, 2021. "Technological capacity and organisational ambidexterity: the moderating role of environmental dynamism on Portuguese technological SMEs," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(7), pages 2111-2136, October.
    15. Beibei Zhang & Yang Mei & Yuxin Xiong & Yan Liu, 2024. "Can Digital Transformation Promote Service Innovation Performance of Construction Enterprises? The Mediating Role of Dual Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-17, January.
    16. Oerlemans, Leon & Chan, K.Y. & Knoben, Joris & Vermeulen, P.A.M., 2018. "Structural and geographical conditions for exploitative innovation : Evidence from South African manufacturing firms," Other publications TiSEM 4abcf615-a0d4-49ef-ba25-c, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    17. Liu Li, 2020. "Trade-Off Exploration and Exploitation as Moderators: How does Technological Heterogeneity among Cooperators Affect Firms Financial Performance?," Asian Economic and Financial Review, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 10(4), pages 380-398, April.
    18. Atif Açıkgöz & Irem Demirkan & Gary P. Latham & Cemil Kuzey, 2021. "The Relationship Between Unlearning and Innovation Ambidexterity with the Performance of New Product Development Teams," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 945-982, August.
    19. Mihalache, Mashiho & Mihalache, Oli R., 2016. "Organizational ambidexterity and sustained performance in the tourism industry," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 142-144.
    20. Zhang, Yimeng & Ma, Xinyu & Pang, Jianing & Xing, Hailong & Wang, Jian, 2023. "The impact of digital transformation of manufacturing on corporate performance — The mediating effect of business model innovation and the moderating effect of innovation capability," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:4:p:1534-:d:1589835. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.