IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i3p1296-d1584329.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Overview of the Carbon Emission Standard Management System in China: Weaknesses and a Way Forward

Author

Listed:
  • Miaomiao Lu

    (Beijing Climate Change Response Research and Education Center, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China)

  • Huimin Li

    (Beijing Climate Change Response Research and Education Center, Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Beijing 100044, China)

  • Xiu Yang

    (Institute of Climate Change and Sustainable Development, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

Abstract

The carbon emission standard is a critical policy instrument for mitigating greenhouse gas emissions and plays a pivotal role in the climate policy framework. This study employs content analysis to quantitatively examine China’s standard documents on carbon emissions management from 2012 to 2023. The translation and adaptation of international standards serve as the foundation for China’s carbon emissions management standard system, while the establishment of carbon markets and the pursuit of carbon peak and carbon neutrality objectives have significantly propelled the development of the standard system. In 2012–2023, the number of carbon emissions management standards witnessed a significant surge. China’s current carbon emissions management standards mainly focus on local and group standards, accounting and evaluation standards, and regional/project, product/equipment, and industry standards. These aspects highlight the distinctive characteristics of the system. This study also examines the inherent deficiencies in China’s carbon emissions management standard system, including the following: the absence of technical standards to reduce emissions effectively; redundancies in accounting standards that hinder the establishment of a nationwide unified system; the lack of an evaluation mechanism to assess the quality and effectiveness of standards; and inappropriate incentives solely focused on quantity, leading to a rapid proliferation of standards, among others. Future efforts should be made to improve standard quality and implementation evaluation, streamline the incentive mechanism for standards, and maximize the role of standards in achieving the “dual carbon” goal.

Suggested Citation

  • Miaomiao Lu & Huimin Li & Xiu Yang, 2025. "An Overview of the Carbon Emission Standard Management System in China: Weaknesses and a Way Forward," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-21, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:1296-:d:1584329
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/3/1296/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/3/1296/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lepitzki, Justin & Axsen, Jonn, 2018. "The role of a low carbon fuel standard in achieving long-term GHG reduction targets," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 423-440.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bhardwaj, Chandan & Axsen, Jonn & Kern, Florian & McCollum, David, 2020. "Why have multiple climate policies for light-duty vehicles? Policy mix rationales, interactions and research gaps," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 309-326.
    2. Ye, Hui & Wu, Fei & Yan, Tiantian & Li, Zexuan & Zheng, Zhengnan & Zhou, Dequn & Wang, Qunwei, 2024. "Decarbonizing urban passenger transportation: Policy effectiveness and interactions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    3. Hoyle, Aaron & Peters, Jotham & Jaccard, Mark & Rhodes, Ekaterina, 2024. "Additional or accidental? Simulating interactions between a low-carbon fuel standard and other climate policy instruments in Canada," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    4. Hensher, David A. & Wei, Edward, 2024. "Energy and environmental costs in transitioning to zero and low emission trucks for the Australian truck Fleet: An industry perspective," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    5. Mandegari, Mohsen & Ebadian, Mahmood & Saddler, Jack (John), 2023. "The need for effective life cycle assessment (LCA) to enhance the effectiveness of policies such as low carbon fuel standards (LCFS's)," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    6. Axsen, Jonn & Wolinetz, Michael, 2023. "What does a low-carbon fuel standard contribute to a policy mix? An interdisciplinary review of evidence and research gaps," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 54-63.
    7. Scott, William A., 2024. "Cost, innovation, and emissions leakage from overlapping climate policy," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    8. Li, Weiqing & Chien, Fengsheng & Ngo, Quang-Thanh & Nguyen, Tien-Dung & Iqbal, Sajid & Bilal, Ahmad Raza, 2021. "Vertical financial disparity, energy prices and emission reduction: Empirical insights from Pakistan," MPRA Paper 109672, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Clara Ma & Cristina Peñasco & Laura Díaz Anadón, 2025. "Technology innovation and environmental outcomes of road transportation policy instruments," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-15, December.
    10. Abbas, Jawad & Wang, Lisu & Ben Belgacem, Samira & Pawar, Puja Sunil & Najam, Hina & Abbas, Jaffar, 2023. "Investment in renewable energy and electricity output: Role of green finance, environmental tax, and geopolitical risk: Empirical evidence from China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    11. Long, Zoe & Axsen, Jonn & Kitt, Shelby, 2020. "Public support for supply-focused transport policies: Vehicle emissions, low-carbon fuels, and ZEV sales standards in Canada and California," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 98-115.
    12. Nikas, A. & Koasidis, K. & Köberle, A.C. & Kourtesi, G. & Doukas, H., 2022. "A comparative study of biodiesel in Brazil and Argentina: An integrated systems of innovation perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    13. Benjamin Dachis, 2018. "Speed Bump Ahead: Ottawa Should Drive Slowly on Clean Fuel Standards," e-briefs 279, C.D. Howe Institute.
    14. Li, Weiqing & Chien, Fengsheng & Hsu, Ching-Chi & Zhang, YunQian & Nawaz, Muhammad Atif & Iqbal, Sajid & Mohsin, Muhammad, 2021. "Nexus between energy poverty and energy efficiency: Estimating the long-run dynamics," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    15. Maxwell Woody & Gregory A. Keoleian & Parth Vaishnav, 2023. "Decarbonization potential of electrifying 50% of U.S. light-duty vehicle sales by 2030," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, December.
    16. Kitt, Shelby & Axsen, Jonn & Long, Zoe & Rhodes, Ekaterina, 2021. "The role of trust in citizen acceptance of climate policy: Comparing perceptions of government competence, integrity and value similarity," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    17. Siskos, Pelopidas & Moysoglou, Yannis, 2019. "Assessing the impacts of setting CO2 emission targets on truck manufacturers: A model implementation and application for the EU," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 123-138.
    18. Mark Purdon & Julie Witcover & Colin Murphy & Sonya Ziaja & Mark Winfield & Genevieve Giuliano & Charles Séguin & Colleen Kaiser & Jacques Papy & Lewis Fulton, 2021. "Climate and transportation policy sequencing in California and Quebec," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 38(5), pages 596-630, September.
    19. Liu, Zipeng & Zhang, Meixi & Bauer, Christian & McKenna, Russell, 2025. "The role of low carbon fuels towards net-zero in integrated assessment models and energy system models: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    20. Long, Zoe & Kitt, Shelby & Axsen, Jonn, 2021. "Who supports which low-carbon transport policies? Characterizing heterogeneity among Canadian citizens," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:1296-:d:1584329. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.