IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i3p1082-d1579280.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Configuration Paths for High-Quality Development of Listed Companies Based on the TOE Framework: Evidence from China’s High-Tech Enterprises

Author

Listed:
  • Min Qian

    (College of Economics and Management, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)

  • Jiameng Yang

    (College of Economics and Management, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)

  • Mengyuan Qiu

    (College of Economics and Management, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)

Abstract

In the context of dual-carbon goals, high-quality development has become an inevitable trend for technology enterprises. This study employs a dynamic Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) method, based on the technology, organization, and environment (TOE) framework theory, and a configurational analysis perspective. Using panel data from Chinese listed high- and new-technology enterprises from 2013 to 2022 as the research sample, this study explores the combinatorial paths that drive high-quality development. The research findings are as follows: (1) The antecedent factors for high-quality development exhibit “multiple concurrent” characteristics, and a single condition does not constitute a necessary condition. (2) Based on the three driving paths for high-quality development, three models can be summarized under the synergistic effects of different antecedent conditions: “multi-factor influence type”, “green-innovation-led type”, and “digital-technology-driven type”. Regardless of the path, R&D investment and enterprise scale are indispensable driving factors. (3) Under specific objective endowment conditions, continuous digital transformation by enterprises can alleviate the challenges caused by market competition deficiencies. When enterprise executives possess a high level of green cognition, they can compensate for inadequate environmental regulations. Therefore, enterprises need to enhance scale and R&D investment, based on existing endowments, and shift from a single-factor influence concept to a comprehensive selection approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Min Qian & Jiameng Yang & Mengyuan Qiu, 2025. "Configuration Paths for High-Quality Development of Listed Companies Based on the TOE Framework: Evidence from China’s High-Tech Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-29, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:1082-:d:1579280
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/3/1082/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/3/1082/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lina Ma & Tianci Wang, 2024. "The Impact of Digital Economy on the High Quality Development of Agricultural Enterprises: Evidence From Listed Agricultural Enterprises in China," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, June.
    2. Jun Xie & Wataru Nozawa & Michiyuki Yagi & Hidemichi Fujii & Shunsuke Managi, 2019. "Do environmental, social, and governance activities improve corporate financial performance?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 286-300, February.
    3. Dingqi Xue & Yili Ding & Lu Yu & Xinghua Deng, 2023. "The Impact of Green Institutional Pressure from Local Governments on Corporate Innovation: An Empirical Evidence from Foreign-Invested Enterprises in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-18, July.
    4. Amil Petrin & Brian P. Poi & James Levinsohn, 2004. "Production function estimation in Stata using inputs to control for unobservables," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 4(2), pages 113-123, June.
    5. Yaoguo Wu & Yuegang Song & Guoying Deng, 2017. "Institutional Environment, OFDI, and TFP Growth: Evidence from China," Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(9), pages 2020-2038, September.
    6. Beynon, Malcolm J. & Jones, Paul & Pickernell, David, 2020. "Country-level entrepreneurial attitudes and activity through the years: A panel data analysis using fsQCA," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 443-455.
    7. Healy, Paul M. & Palepu, Krishna G., 2001. "Information asymmetry, corporate disclosure, and the capital markets: A review of the empirical disclosure literature," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(1-3), pages 405-440, September.
    8. Ekaterina Blinova & Tatyana Ponomarenko & Valentin Knysh, 2022. "Analyzing the Concept of Corporate Sustainability in the Context of Sustainable Business Development in the Mining Sector with Elements of Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-30, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yangyang Zhao & Bojun Gu & Xin Xu & Dingding Yang, 2025. "The Role of Green Patents in Innovation: An fsQCA Study of Chinese Listed Agricultural Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-14, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maha Faisal Alsayegh & Rashidah Abdul Rahman & Saeid Homayoun, 2020. "Corporate Economic, Environmental, and Social Sustainability Performance Transformation through ESG Disclosure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-20, May.
    2. Azmi, Wajahat & Hassan, M. Kabir & Houston, Reza & Karim, Mohammad Sydul, 2021. "ESG activities and banking performance: International evidence from emerging economies," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    3. Sun, Weizheng & Chen, Shuning & Jiao, Yuqing & Feng, Xu, 2024. "How does ESG constrain corporate earnings management? Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    4. Ali Meftah Gerged & Eshani Beddewela & Christopher J. Cowton, 2021. "Is corporate environmental disclosure associated with firm value? A multicountry study of Gulf Cooperation Council firms," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 185-203, January.
    5. Raymond Kwong & Man Lung Jonathan Kwok & Helen S. M. Wong, 2023. "Green FinTech Innovation as a Future Research Direction: A Bibliometric Analysis on Green Finance and FinTech," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-27, October.
    6. Kuo Zhou & Xianghui Jin & Xinru Li & Yunqing Tao, 2024. "Enhancing sustainable development through effective disclosure: Corporate environmental performance and readability," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(1), pages 274-291, January.
    7. Cannizzaro, Anthony P. & Weiner, Robert J., 2015. "Multinational investment and voluntary disclosure: Project-level evidence from the petroleum industry," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 32-47.
    8. Nguyen, Thu Ha & Lan, Yihui & Treepongkaruna, Sirimon & Zhong, Rui, 2023. "Credit rating downgrades and stock price crash risk: International evidence," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 55(PB).
    9. Wang Wenge, 2018. "Board Independence of Listed Companies in the US and China," Asian Journal of Law and Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 9(3), pages 1-21, December.
    10. Ginger Zhe Jin & Andrew Kato & John A. List, 2010. "That’S News To Me! Information Revelation In Professional Certification Markets," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 48(1), pages 104-122, January.
    11. Eunsoo Kim & Suyon Kim & Jaehong Lee, 2021. "Do Foreign Investors Affect Carbon Emission Disclosure? Evidence from South Korea," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-14, September.
    12. Fereshteh Mahmoudian & Johnny Jermias, 2022. "The influence of governance structure on the relationship between pay ratio and environmental and social performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 2992-3013, November.
    13. Stephen A. Hillegeist & James P. Kavourakis & Matthew Pinnuck, 2023. "The association between quarter length, forecast errors, and firms’ voluntary disclosures," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(2), pages 1885-1918, June.
    14. Caroline Flammer & Michael W. Toffel & Kala Viswanathan, 2021. "Shareholder activism and firms' voluntary disclosure of climate change risks," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(10), pages 1850-1879, October.
    15. Florian Meier, 2020. "The Age of Cheap Money and Passive Investing: Are Pro Forma Earnings Value Relevant?," Journal of Finance and Investment Analysis, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 9(2), pages 1-1.
    16. Rodríguez-Pose, Andrés & Tselios, Vassilis & Winkler, Deborah & Farole, Thomas, 2013. "Geography and the Determinants of Firm Exports in Indonesia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 225-240.
    17. Mohamed Amara & Khaled Thabet, 2019. "Firm and regional factors of productivity: a multilevel analysis of Tunisian manufacturing," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 63(1), pages 25-51, August.
    18. Martin, Philippe & Mayer, Thierry & Mayneris, Florian, 2011. "Public support to clusters: A firm level study of French "Local Productive Systems"," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 108-123, March.
    19. Bikki Jaggi & Alessandra Allini & Riccardo Macchioni & Annamaria Zampella, 2018. "Do investors find carbon information useful? Evidence from Italian firms," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 50(4), pages 1031-1056, May.
    20. Roberto Martino & Phu Nguyen-Van, 2014. "Labour market regulation and fiscal parameters: A structural model for European regions," Working Papers of BETA 2014-19, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:3:p:1082-:d:1579280. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.