IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i21p9496-d1779446.html

Unveiling and Evaluating Residential Satisfaction at Community and Housing Levels in China: Based on Large-Scale Surveys

Author

Listed:
  • Caiqing Zhu

    (School of Architecture, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China
    China Real Estate Association-Council of Human Settlement, Beijing 100037, China)

  • Zheng Ji

    (Graduate School of Agriculture, Meiji University, Kawasaki 214-8571, Japan)

  • Sijie Liu

    (School of Architecture, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China)

  • Hong Zhang

    (School of Architecture, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China)

  • Juan Liu

    (China Real Estate Association-Council of Human Settlement, Beijing 100037, China)

Abstract

In recent decades, China has witnessed remarkable growth in housing construction, yet housing-related complaints have not declined significantly, highlighting the gap between housing quality and public expectations. Against this background, this study analyzes 32,277 national surveys to unpack residential satisfaction with green-livable communities in China. Entropy and standard-deviation weighting identified 16 priority indicators; artificial neural networks revealed weak direct influence of basic demographics on satisfaction, highlighting non-linear demand patterns. While 65–75% of respondents are satisfied with most attributes, significant city-level gaps persist—Beijing peaks near 90%, Chongqing falls below 50%. Dissatisfaction converges on three domains: infrastructure (parking, barrier-free access), building performance (leakage, noise, thermal defects) and smart systems (security, energy, health monitoring). Residents’ improvement priorities have shifted from basic shelter to health safety, smart technology, humanistic care and ecological amenities. A “basic-security + quality-upgrade” strategy is proposed: short-term repairs of common defects, medium-term smart-sustainable upgrades and long-term participatory governance. The findings not only enrich the theoretical framework of community satisfaction research but also provide practical guidance for enhancing community quality and meeting residents’ expectations in the context of China’s rapid urbanization and housing development.

Suggested Citation

  • Caiqing Zhu & Zheng Ji & Sijie Liu & Hong Zhang & Juan Liu, 2025. "Unveiling and Evaluating Residential Satisfaction at Community and Housing Levels in China: Based on Large-Scale Surveys," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-34, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:21:p:9496-:d:1779446
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/21/9496/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/21/9496/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sunwoong Yoon & Kyusang Kwon, 2024. "Spatial Distribution and Influencing Factors of Single-Person Households with Social Isolation in Seoul, South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-17, February.
    2. Siqi Yang & Taoping Bai & Lin Feng & Jialu Zhang & Wentao Jiang, 2025. "Indoor Environmental Quality in Aged Housing and Its Impact on Residential Satisfaction Among Older Adults: A Case Study of Five Clusters in Sichuan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-21, May.
    3. Alden Speare, 1974. "Residential satisfaction as an intervening variable in residential mobility," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 11(2), pages 173-188, May.
    4. Yang Zhou & Lirong Xue & Zhengyu Shi & Libo Wu & Jianqing Fan, 2022. "Measuring Housing Vitality from Multi-Source Big Data and Machine Learning," Journal of the American Statistical Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 117(539), pages 1045-1059, September.
    5. George Galster, 1985. "Evaluating indicators for housing policy: Residential satisfaction vs marginal improvement priorities," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 415-448, May.
    6. Nimesh Akalanka & Nayomi Kankanamge & Jagath Munasinghe & Tan Yigitcanlar, 2024. "Urban Big Data Analytics: A Novel Approach for Tracking Urbanization Trends in Sri Lanka," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-45, June.
    7. Haoyu Deng & Li Zhu & Xiaokang Wang & Ni Zhang & Yue Tang, 2025. "Renewal Strategies for Older Hospital-Adjacent Communities Based on Residential Satisfaction: A Case Study of Xiangya Hospital," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-23, May.
    8. Wu, Wenjie & Dong, Guanpeng & SUN, Yeran & Yun, Yanwen, 2020. "Contextualized effects of Park access and usage on residential satisfaction: A spatial approach," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    9. Yihong Wang & Da Chen & Pingye Tian, 2022. "Research on the Impact Path of the Sustainable Development of Green Buildings: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-23, October.
    10. Yuxin Zhu & Dazuo Tian & Feng Yan, 2020. "Effectiveness of Entropy Weight Method in Decision-Making," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2020, pages 1-5, March.
    11. Tingting Liu & Xiaoqi Shen & Tiansheng Xia, 2025. "Mediating Power of Place Attachment for Urban Residents’ Well-Being in Community Cohesion," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-23, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tina Davoodi & Balkiz Yapicoglu & Uğur Ulaş Dağlı, 2023. "Measuring Residential Satisfaction in Historic Areas Using Actual–Aspiration Gap Theory: The Case of Famagusta, Northern Cyprus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-24, February.
    2. Xiaosi Zhang & Jizhong Shao, 2024. "Evaluation of the Suitability of Street Vending Planning in Urban Public Space in the Post-COVID-19 Era," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-26, April.
    3. M. Sirgy & Robin Widgery & Dong-Jin Lee & Grace Yu, 2010. "Developing a Measure of Community Well-Being Based on Perceptions of Impact in Various Life Domains," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 96(2), pages 295-311, April.
    4. Wu, Libo & Zhou, Yang, 2025. "Social norms and energy conservation in China," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    5. Mai, Nhat Chi, 2018. "도이모이 이후 베트남의 주거 이동, 선택, 가격 결정요인 연구: 호치민시 사례 중심으로," OSF Preprints 6kdfy, Center for Open Science.
    6. Nijkamp, Peter & Poot, Jacques, 2015. "Cultural Diversity: A Matter of Measurement," IZA Discussion Papers 8782, IZA Network @ LISER.
    7. Shi Yin & Yudan Zhao, 2024. "An agent-based evolutionary system model of the transformation from building material industry (BMI) to green intelligent BMI under supply chain management," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    8. Tineke Fokkema & Jenny Gierveld & Peter Nijkamp, 1996. "Big Cities, Big Problems: Reason for the Elderly to Move?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 33(2), pages 353-377, March.
    9. Koubi, Vally & Spilker, Gabriele & Schaffer, Lena & Bernauer, Thomas, 2016. "Environmental Stressors and Migration: Evidence from Vietnam," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 197-210.
    10. Tilman Brück & Neil T. N. Ferguson, 2020. "Money can’t buy love but can it buy peace? Evidence from the EU Programme for Peace and Reconciliation (PEACE II)," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 37(5), pages 536-558, September.
    11. Yuemei Zhu & Junxiang Ding & Qing Zhu & Yang Cheng & Qiuchen Ma & Xuze Ji, 2017. "The Impact of Green Open Space on Community Attachment—A Case Study of Three Communities in Beijing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-14, April.
    12. Robert Konopaske & Chet Robie & John M. Ivancevich, 2009. "Managerial Willingness to Assume Traveling, Short-term and Long-term Global Assignments," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 49(3), pages 359-387, June.
    13. Stoyan V. Sgourev & Ezra W. Zuckerman, 2011. "Breaking up is hard to do: Irrational inconsistency in commitment to an industry peer network," Rationality and Society, , vol. 23(1), pages 3-34, February.
    14. Shi, Zhengyu & Wu, Libo & Zhou, Yang, 2023. "Predicting household energy consumption in an aging society," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 352(C).
    15. Alfred Nucci & Charles Tolbert & Troy Blanchard & Michael Irwin, 2002. "Leaving Home: Modeling the Effect of Civic and Economic Structure on Individual Migration Patterns," Working Papers 02-16, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    16. Zhao, Yingrui & Hu, Songhua & Zhang, Ming, 2024. "Evaluating equitable Transit-Oriented development (TOD) via the Node-Place-People model," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    17. Li, Mengying & Johnson, Sara B. & Newman, Sandra & Riley, Anne W., 2019. "Residential mobility and long-term exposure to neighborhood poverty among children born in poor families: A U.S. longitudinal cohort study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 69-76.
    18. Frank Kalter & Gisela Will, 2016. "Social Capital in Polish-German Migration Decision-Making," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 666(1), pages 46-63, July.
    19. Feilong Yang & Yunxiao Dang & Li Chen & Dongsheng Zhan & Wenzhong Zhang, 2025. "How does neighbourhood satisfaction impact relocation intentions? The mediating effects of housing costs and socioeconomic status," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 62(12), pages 2473-2490, September.
    20. Danxue Fan & Meiyue Li, 2025. "Coupling and Coordinated Development Analysis of Digital Economy, Economic Resilience, and Ecological Protection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-25, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:21:p:9496-:d:1779446. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.