IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i21p9490-d1779293.html

Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Carbon Sequestration Potential Across South Korea: A CASA Model-Based Assessment of NPP, Heterotrophic Respiration, and NEP

Author

Listed:
  • Nam-Shin Kim

    (National Institute of Ecology, Seocheon 33657, Republic of Korea)

  • Jae-Ho Lee

    (National Institute of Ecology, Seocheon 33657, Republic of Korea)

  • Chang-Seok Lee

    (National Institute of Ecology, Seocheon 33657, Republic of Korea
    Department Bio and Environmental Technology, Seoul Women’s University, Seoul 01797, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

Achieving carbon neutrality requires a comprehensive understanding of terrestrial carbon dynamics, particularly the capacity of ecosystems to act as carbon sinks. This study quantified the temporal and spatial variability of net primary production (NPP) and net ecosystem production (NEP) across South Korea from 2010 to 2024, assessing long-term carbon sink trends and their implications for carbon neutrality and nature-based solutions (NbSs). Using the Carnegie–Ames–Stanford Approach (CASA) model driven by Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) satellite data and climate variables, we estimated ecosystem carbon fluxes at high spatial and temporal resolutions. In 2024, national NPP totaled 78.63 Mt CO 2 yr −1 , with a mean value of 1956.63 t CO 2 ha −1 yr −1 . High productivity was concentrated in upland forests of Gangwon-do, Mt. Jirisan, and northern Gyeongsangbuk-do, where favorable vegetation indices and climatic conditions enhanced photosynthesis. Lower productivity occurred in urbanized areas and intensively farmed lowlands. Heterotrophic respiration (RH) was estimated at 15.35 Mt CO 2 yr −1 , with elevated rates in warm, humid lowlands and reduced values in high-elevation forests. The resulting NEP in 2024 was 63.29 Mt CO 2 yr −1 , with strong sinks along the Baekdudaegan Range and localized negative NEP pockets in lowlands dominated by urban development or agriculture. From 2010 to 2024, the spatially averaged NPP increased from 1170 to 1543 g C m −2 yr −1 , indicating a general upward trend in ecosystem productivity. However, interannual variability was influenced by climatic fluctuations, land-cover changes, and data masking adjustments. These findings provide critical insights into the spatiotemporal dynamics of terrestrial carbon sinks in South Korea, offering essential baseline data for national greenhouse gas inventories and the strategic integration of NbSs into carbon-neutral policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Nam-Shin Kim & Jae-Ho Lee & Chang-Seok Lee, 2025. "Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Carbon Sequestration Potential Across South Korea: A CASA Model-Based Assessment of NPP, Heterotrophic Respiration, and NEP," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-17, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:21:p:9490-:d:1779293
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/21/9490/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/21/9490/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peng Wang & Yong Xue & Zhigang Yan & Wenping Yin & Botao He & Pei Li, 2024. "Study of Regional Spatial and Temporal Changes of Net Ecosystem Productivity of Crops from Remotely Sensed Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, January.
    2. Gulinigaer Yisilayili & Baozhong He & Yaning Song & Xuefeng Luo & Wen Yang & Yuqian Chen, 2025. "Simulation of Vegetation NPP in Typical Arid Regions Based on the CASA Model and Quantification of Its Driving Factors," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-23, February.
    3. Niklas Höhne & Matthew J. Gidden & Michel Elzen & Frederic Hans & Claire Fyson & Andreas Geiges & M. Louise Jeffery & Sofia Gonzales-Zuñiga & Silke Mooldijk & William Hare & Joeri Rogelj, 2021. "Wave of net zero emission targets opens window to meeting the Paris Agreement," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 11(10), pages 820-822, October.
    4. Israa Al Khaffaf & Adil Tamimi & Vian Ahmed, 2024. "Pathways to Carbon Neutrality: A Review of Strategies and Technologies Across Sectors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-38, December.
    5. Robinson, Caleb & Dilkina, Bistra & Hubbs, Jeffrey & Zhang, Wenwen & Guhathakurta, Subhrajit & Brown, Marilyn A. & Pendyala, Ram M., 2017. "Machine learning approaches for estimating commercial building energy consumption," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 889-904.
    6. Sam Fankhauser & Stephen M. Smith & Myles Allen & Kaya Axelsson & Thomas Hale & Cameron Hepburn & J. Michael Kendall & Radhika Khosla & Javier Lezaun & Eli Mitchell-Larson & Michael Obersteiner & Lava, 2022. "The meaning of net zero and how to get it right," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 15-21, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hemmings, Peter & Mulheron, Michael & Murphy, Richard J. & Prescott, Matt, 2023. "Investigating the robustness of UK airport net zero plans," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    2. Yan, Jin & Liu, Lancui & Gao, Xue & Yan, Haoben & Kuang, Shiyi, 2025. "Talk or walk? Evidence from 59 countries on the impact of the net-zero target on low-carbon technology innovation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    3. Leonardo Nascimento & Takeshi Kuramochi & Niklas Höhne, 2022. "The G20 emission projections to 2030 improved since the Paris Agreement, but only slightly," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 27(6), pages 1-24, August.
    4. Gong, Huiwen & Andersen, Allan Dahl, 2024. "The role of material resources for rapid technology diffusion in net-zero transitions: Insights from EV lithium-ion battery Technological Innovation System in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    5. Liping Zhao & Xincheng Li & Xiangmei Li & Chenyang Ai, 2022. "Dynamic Changes and Regional Differences of Net Carbon Sequestration of Food Crops in the Yangtze River Economic Belt of China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-16, October.
    6. Jiang, Kai & Xin, Baogui & Santibanez Gonzalez, Ernesto D.R., 2025. "Can industrial intelligence promote net-zero development? An analysis of resource dependence," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    7. Hasret Sahin & A. A. Solomon & Arman Aghahosseini & Christian Breyer, 2024. "Systemwide energy return on investment in a sustainable transition towards net zero power systems," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, December.
    8. Gen Li & Yong Tao & Yining Gao & Roland J.-M. Pellenq & Peiliang Shen & Xiong Qian & Chi Sun Poon, 2025. "Surface chemistry-mediated porewater fluctuations boost CO2 docking in calcium silicate hydrates," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-11, December.
    9. Li, Yuanshun & Liu, Liang & Li, Xinyuan & Zhang, Aoran, 2025. "From social networks to sustainable solutions: Unpacking the influence of social capital on green innovation," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    10. Qiang Wang & Yuanfan Li & Rongrong Li, 2024. "Rethinking the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis across 214 countries: the impacts of 12 economic, institutional, technological, resource, and social factors," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-19, December.
    11. Kılkış, Şiir & Ulpiani, Giulia & Vetters, Nadja, 2024. "Visions for climate neutrality and opportunities for co-learning in European cities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    12. Campiglio, Emanuele & Lamperti, Francesco & Terranova, Roberta, 2024. "Believe me when I say green! Heterogeneous expectations and climate policy uncertainty," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    13. Ren, Junjie & Zeng, Siyu & Chen, Daoyi & Yang, Mingjun & Linga, Praveen & Yin, Zhenyuan, 2023. "Roles of montmorillonite clay on the kinetics and morphology of CO2 hydrate in hydrate-based CO2 sequestration1," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 340(C).
    14. Dora Almeida & Luísa Carvalho & Paulo Ferreira & Andreia Dionísio & Inzamam Ul Haq, 2024. "Global Dynamics of Environmental Kuznets Curve: A Cross-Correlation Analysis of Income and CO 2 Emissions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-35, October.
    15. Aditi S. Saha & Rakesh D. Raut & Vinay Surendra Yadav & Abhijit Majumdar, 2022. "Blockchain Changing the Outlook of the Sustainable Food Supply Chain to Achieve Net Zero?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-21, December.
    16. Leonel Prieto & Md Farid Talukder, 2023. "Resilient Agility: A Necessary Condition for Employee and Organizational Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-24, January.
    17. Effie Kesidou & Anastasia Ri & Stephen Roper, 2026. "Balancing act or two roads to travel: Evaluating the trade-offs between digitalization and net zero innovation in SMEs," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 66(2), pages 797-826, February.
    18. Shasha Chai & Fanjie Kong & Yu Liu & Mengyin Liang & Quanfeng Liu, 2024. "Photovoltaic Solar Farms Site Selection through “Policy Constraints–Construction Suitability”: A Case Study of Qilian County, Qinghai," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, September.
    19. D'Orazio, Paola & Hertel, Tobias & Kasbrink, Fynn, 2022. "No need to worry? Estimating the exposure of the German banking sector to climate-related transition risks," Ruhr Economic Papers 946, RWI - Leibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-University Bochum, TU Dortmund University, University of Duisburg-Essen.
    20. Thomas Hickmann & Christoph Bertram & Frank Biermann & Elina Brutschin & Elmar Kriegler & Jasmine E. Livingston & Silvia Pianta & Keywan Riahi & Bas van Ruijven & Detlef van Vuuren, 2022. "Exploring Global Climate Policy Futures and Their Representation in Integrated Assessment Models," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(3), pages 171-185.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:21:p:9490-:d:1779293. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.