IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i20p9176-d1772910.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pre-Consumption Food Choice Priorities, Food Waste Concerns, and Incentive Strategies for Change—A Portuguese Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Paula Pinto

    (Santarém Polytechnic University, Faculty of Agriculture, Quinta do Galinheiro—S. Pedro, 2001-904 Santarém, Portugal
    Research Center in Natural Resources, Environment and Society (CERNAS), Santarém Polytechnic University, Quinta do Galinheiro—S. Pedro, 2001-904 Santarém, Portugal
    Life Quality Research Centre (CIEQV), Santarem Polytechnic University, Complexo Andaluz, Apartado 279, 2001-904 Santarém, Portugal)

  • Maria Figueiredo

    (Santarém Polytechnic University, Faculty of Agriculture, Quinta do Galinheiro—S. Pedro, 2001-904 Santarém, Portugal)

  • Inês Ferrão

    (Santarém Polytechnic University, Faculty of Agriculture, Quinta do Galinheiro—S. Pedro, 2001-904 Santarém, Portugal)

  • Renata Narciso

    (Santarém Polytechnic University, Faculty of Agriculture, Quinta do Galinheiro—S. Pedro, 2001-904 Santarém, Portugal)

  • Paula Ruivo

    (Santarém Polytechnic University, Faculty of Agriculture, Quinta do Galinheiro—S. Pedro, 2001-904 Santarém, Portugal
    Research Center in Natural Resources, Environment and Society (CERNAS), Santarém Polytechnic University, Quinta do Galinheiro—S. Pedro, 2001-904 Santarém, Portugal
    Life Quality Research Centre (CIEQV), Santarem Polytechnic University, Complexo Andaluz, Apartado 279, 2001-904 Santarém, Portugal)

Abstract

Sustainability and the reduction of food waste are inseparable themes. In Portugal, 17% of annual food production is wasted, much of it at household level. The main aim of this study was to explore associations of food choices with sociodemographic factors and health and food waste concerns, and explore the acceptance of potential reward systems that may encourage more sustainable dietary behaviors among consumers. Data was collected from Portuguese adults through an online questionnaire during the month of November 2023, obtaining 366 responses. The results showed that the main criterion when buying food was price (reported by 82% participants). As sustainable food buying practices, 55.5% of the participants reported buying fresh food and 33% reported buying locally, which were significantly positively associated with the age and income of the participants. Regarding food consumption, 87% of the participants reported having health concerns and 63% food waste concerns. Age and income were significantly negatively associated with food waste concerns, while health concerns were positively associated with income. Most respondents reported little or no weekly meal plans to reduce food waste. Within the possible rewards for more sustainable food choices, 52% of the participants chose the monetary reward, which was significantly and inversely associated with age and income. Other chosen options were discounts or offers on local or organic food products, and sustainable personal and home hygiene products, suggesting an interest on the part of consumers in changing their consumption habits toward more sustainable habits in areas beyond food. This study provides insights into how sociodemographic and economic factors interact with food choice criteria and sustainability-related concerns in Portuguese adults, highlighting context-specific drivers of sustainable behavior. The findings may be used to design consumer-targeted interventions, such as tailored reward systems, to promote healthier and more sustainable food purchasing and consumption practices. This could be a starting point to create a society oriented toward more sustainable consumption choices, both in terms of food and the environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Paula Pinto & Maria Figueiredo & Inês Ferrão & Renata Narciso & Paula Ruivo, 2025. "Pre-Consumption Food Choice Priorities, Food Waste Concerns, and Incentive Strategies for Change—A Portuguese Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-13, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9176-:d:1772910
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9176/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9176/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. United Nations UN, 2015. "Transforming our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development," Working Papers id:7559, eSocialSciences.
    2. Magdalena Raftowicz & Krzysztof Solarz & Agnieszka Dradrach, 2024. "Short Food Supply Chains as a Practical Implication of Sustainable Development Ideas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-14, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paulina Schiappacasse & Bernhard Müller & Le Thuy Linh, 2019. "Towards Responsible Aggregate Mining in Vietnam," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-15, August.
    2. Pina Puntillo, 2023. "Circular economy business models: Towards achieving sustainable development goals in the waste management sector—Empirical evidence and theoretical implications," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(2), pages 941-954, March.
    3. R. Ebrahimi & S. Choobchian & H. Farhadian & I. Goli & E. Farmandeh & H. Azadi, 2022. "Investigating the effect of vocational education and training on rural women’s empowerment," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-11, December.
    4. repec:bdu:ojjppa:v:10:y:2025:i:1:p:46-62:id:3297 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Bárbara Galleli & Elder Semprebon & Joyce Aparecida Ramos dos Santos & Noah Emanuel Brito Teles & Mateus Santos de Freitas-Martins & Raquel Teodoro da Silva Onevetch, 2021. "Institutional Pressures, Sustainable Development Goals and COVID-19: How Are Organisations Engaging?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-21, November.
    6. Anna Napiórkowska & Piotr Zaborek & Marzanna Katarzyna Witek-Hajduk & Anna Grudecka, 2025. "Individual Cultural Values and Charitable Crowdfunding: Driving Social Sustainability Through Consumer Engagement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-26, June.
    7. Sagarika Dey & Priyanka Devi, 2019. "Impact of TVET on Labour Market Outcomes and Women’s Empowerment in Rural Areas: A Case Study from Cachar District, Assam," Indian Journal of Human Development, , vol. 13(3), pages 357-371, December.
    8. Maria Sassi, 2020. "A SEM Approach to the Direct and Indirect Links between WaSH Services and Access to Food in Countries in Protracted Crises: The Case of Western Bahr-el-Ghazal State, South Sudan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-13, November.
    9. Olga Stepanova & Magdalena Romanov, 2021. "Urban Planning as a Strategy to Implement Social Sustainability Policy Goals? The Case of Temporary Housing for Immigrants in Gothenburg, Sweden," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, February.
    10. Michel, Hanno, 2020. "From local to global: The role of knowledge, transfer, and capacity building for successful energy transitions," Discussion Papers, Research Group Digital Mobility and Social Differentiation SP III 2020-603, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    11. Hervé Corvellec & Johan Hultman & Anne Jerneck & Susanne Arvidsson & Johan Ekroos & Niklas Wahlberg & Timothy W. Luke, 2021. "Resourcification: A non‐essentialist theory of resources for sustainable development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(6), pages 1249-1256, November.
    12. Wilson Charles Wilson & Maja Slingerland & Frederick P. Baijukya & Hannah Zanten & Simon Oosting & Ken E. Giller, 2021. "Integrating the soybean-maize-chicken value chains to attain nutritious diets in Tanzania," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 13(6), pages 1595-1612, December.
    13. Jones, Lindsey & d'Errico, Marco, 2019. "Whose resilience matters? Like-for-like comparison of objective and subjective evaluations of resilience," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 1-1.
    14. Bin Xue & Bingsheng Liu & Tao Liang & Dong Zhao & Tao Wang & Xingbin Chen, 2022. "A heterogeneous decision criteria system evaluating sustainable infrastructure development: From the lens of multidisciplinary stakeholder engagement," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(4), pages 556-579, August.
    15. Sudheesh Ramapurath Chemmencheri, 2016. "Social Protection as a Human Right in South Asia," Indian Journal of Human Development, , vol. 10(2), pages 236-252, August.
    16. Ingrid Boas & Frank Biermann & Norichika Kanie, 2016. "Cross-sectoral strategies in global sustainability governance: towards a nexus approach," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 449-464, June.
    17. Joyeeta Gupta & Louis Lebel, 0. "Access and allocation in earth system governance: lessons learnt in the context of the Sustainable Development Goals," International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-18.
    18. Guo, Jiaqi & Wang, Qiang & Li, Rongrong, 2024. "Can official development assistance promote renewable energy in sub-Saharan Africa countries? A matter of institutional transparency of recipient countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    19. Kinyondo, Abel Alfred & Ntegwa, Magashi Joseph & Masawe, Cresencia Apolinary, . "Socioeconomic Inequality in Maternal Healthcare Services: The Case of Tanzania," African Journal of Economic Review, African Journal of Economic Review, vol. 10(01).
    20. Francesco Bandarin & Enrico Ciciotti & Marco Cremaschi & Giovanna Madera & Paolo Perulli & Diana Shendrikova, 2020. "Which Future for Cities after COVID-19 An international Survey," Reports, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei, October.
    21. Thore, Sten, 2022. "Sustainable development goal deficits and the Covid 19 pandemic," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9176-:d:1772910. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.