IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i20p9129-d1771733.html

Use of Project Management Knowledge Areas in Civil Infrastructure Projects: Implications for Sustainability Assessment and Risk Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Abdullah Emre Keleş

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Adana Alparslan Türkeş Science and Technology University, 01250 Adana, Türkiye)

  • Gizem Görkem Gülek

    (Department of Civil Engineering, Adana Alparslan Türkeş Science and Technology University, 01250 Adana, Türkiye)

  • Jarosław Górecki

    (Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Architecture, Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland)

Abstract

The success of civil infrastructure projects hinges on effective project management. Building on the PMBOK ® Guide framework, this study investigates how project management knowledge areas are used in practice and how their use relates to the integration of sustainability and risk-management principles. 272 construction professionals in Türkiye were surveyed and their responses were analyzed using reliability testing, normality checks, and a combination of non-parametric tests (Mann–Whitney U, Kruskal–Wallis) and ANOVA. There were found significant differences in perceived use of knowledge areas by education level, project role, project profile, and prior project-management training; in applied practice, company profile explains variation, whereas project type does not. The results indicate that wider, more systematic adoption—particularly in integration, schedule/time, quality, and risk—supports transparent, traceable processes aligned with sustainability objectives. These behavioral determinants were interpreted as enablers of life-cycle sustainability assessment and risk-informed decision making across civil-infrastructure contexts. There were discussed managerial and policy implications for asset owners and contractors, identifying leverage points for training and capability building, and outlining how standardized use of PMBOK knowledge areas can accelerate sustainability assessment and risk analysis in practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdullah Emre Keleş & Gizem Görkem Gülek & Jarosław Górecki, 2025. "Use of Project Management Knowledge Areas in Civil Infrastructure Projects: Implications for Sustainability Assessment and Risk Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-22, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9129-:d:1771733
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9129/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9129/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Engwall, Mats, 2003. "No project is an island: linking projects to history and context," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(5), pages 789-808, May.
    2. Reza Kiani Mavi & Denise Gengatharen & Neda Kiani Mavi & Richard Hughes & Alistair Campbell & Ross Yates, 2021. "Sustainability in Construction Projects: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-24, February.
    3. Shabnam Arabpour & Gilbert Silvius, 2023. "Sustainability Interventions of Construction Project Managers—Establishing a Minimum Baseline," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-22, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Manning, Stephan, 2017. "The rise of project network organizations: Building core teams and flexible partner pools for interorganizational projects," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(8), pages 1399-1415.
    2. Busscher, Tim & Tillema, Taede & Arts, Jos, 2015. "In search of sustainable road infrastructure planning: How can we build on historical policy shifts?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 42-51.
    3. Blindenbach-Driessen, Floortje & van den Ende, Jan, 2006. "Innovation in project-based firms: The context dependency of success factors," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 545-561, May.
    4. Muhammad Irfan & Wesam Salah Alaloul & Maria Ghufran & Ghulam Yaseen & Muhammad Jamaluddin Thaheem & Abdul Hannan Qureshi & Muhammad Bilal, 2024. "Analyzing the impact of organizational culture on social sustainability: a perspective of the construction industry," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 1103-1133, January.
    5. Xiaozhen Guo & Meena Bhatia & Bhumika Gupta & Enrico Battisti, 2026. "Green project investments and corporate responsibilities: enablers, challenges, and strategies for mitigating risks," Post-Print hal-05280243, HAL.
    6. James R. Faulconbridge, 2009. "The Regulation of Design in Global Architecture Firms: Embedding and Emplacing Buildings," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 46(12), pages 2537-2554, November.
    7. Andrew J. Grandage & David Mitchell, 2023. "Who has turned the project management lights on? A comparative analysis of transportation and information technology in US state governments," Public Budgeting & Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(3), pages 21-38, September.
    8. Pärli, Rea & Byamungu, Moustapha & Fischer, Manuel & Kantengwa, Speciose & Kintche, Kokou & Konlambigue, Matieyedou & Lieberherr, Eva & Six, Johan & Wilde, Benjamin & Späth, Leonhard, 2024. "“The reality in the DRC is just not the reality in Rwanda” – How context factors affect transdisciplinary research projects," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(7).
    9. Hugo Priemus & Marian Bosch-Rekveldt & Mendel Giezen, 2013. "Dealing with the complexity, uncertainties and risk of megaprojects: redundancy, resilience and adaptivity," Chapters, in: Hugo Priemus & Bert van Wee (ed.), International Handbook on Mega-Projects, chapter 5, pages 83-110, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    10. Hermano, Víctor & Martín-Cruz, Natalia, 2016. "The role of top management involvement in firms performing projects: A dynamic capabilities approach," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 3447-3458.
    11. Javier Orozco-Messana & Milagro Iborra-Lucas & Raimon Calabuig-Moreno, 2021. "Neighbourhood Modelling for Urban Sustainability Assessment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-10, April.
    12. Meng Lv & Shaohong Feng, 2021. "Temporary teams: current research focus and future directions," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 55(1), pages 1-18, February.
    13. Nuno Oliveira & Fabrice Lumineau, 2017. "How Coordination Trajectories Influence the Performance of Interorganizational Project Networks," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(6), pages 1029-1060, December.
    14. Burgers, J.H. & van den Bosch, F.A.J. & Volberda, H.W., 2007. "Why New Business Development Projects Fail: Coping with the Differences of Technological versus Market Knowledge," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2007-072-STR, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    15. Sylvain Lenfle, 2018. "Projects, Agency and the Multi-Level Perspective: Insights from Numerical Weather Prediction," Post-Print hal-03640771, HAL.
    16. Jatta Pitkänen & Hanna Lehtimäki & Ari Jokinen, 2023. "Sustainability Project Champions as Environmental Leaders in a City Organization: Driving the Urban Circular Economy," South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, , vol. 12(1), pages 52-64, April.
    17. Sylvain Lenfle & Jonas Söderlund, 2019. "Large-Scale Innovative Projects as Temporary Trading Zones: Toward an Interlanguage Theory," Post-Print hal-02390158, HAL.
    18. Raluca Buzatu & Viorel Ungureanu & Adrian Ciutina & Mihăiţă Gireadă & Daniel Vitan & Ioan Petran, 2021. "Experimental Evaluation of Energy-Efficiency in a Holistically Designed Building," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-22, August.
    19. de Vaan, Mathijs, 2014. "Interfirm networks in periods of technological turbulence and stability," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(10), pages 1666-1680.
    20. van Bekkum, Sjoerd & Pennings, Enrico & Smit, Han, 2009. "A real options perspective on R&D portfolio diversification," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(7), pages 1150-1158, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9129-:d:1771733. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.