IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i20p9066-d1770227.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Application of Regenerative Agriculture: A Review and Case Study in an Agrosilvopastoral Region

Author

Listed:
  • Raimundo Jiménez-Ballesta

    (Department of Geology and Geochemistry, Autónoma University of Madrid, 28049 Madrid, Spain)

  • Jorge Mongil-Manso

    (Department of Environment and Agroforestry, Faculty of Sciences and Arts, Forest, Water & Soil Research Group, Catholic University of Ávila, 05005 Ávila, Spain)

  • Adrián Jiménez-Sánchez

    (Kerbest Foundation, 05005 Ávila, Spain)

Abstract

While agriculture is experiencing localized crises, its indispensable role as the foundation of humanity’s food supply requires its uninterrupted functioning. This conventional system is therefore in a state of competition with alternative models, particularly agroecology, which offers a different paradigm for food production. Given this situation and the need to gather reliable information on regenerative agriculture (RA), this article provides a literature review on its principles, objectives, and edaphic benefits. Additionally, it presents a case study that offers practical knowledge of the techniques and actions implemented by an agroforestry farm in central Spain. With this goal, this article addresses key aspects of RA, such as the use of cover crops, and the integration of livestock, emphasizing its role in improving soil quality and increasing biodiversity, among other benefits. After reviewing numerous scientific articles, and despite widespread interest in RA, there is no commonly accepted definition, so there is a wide range of ways to define RA. Until a generalized definition is accepted, we advocate making proposals and implementing methods with extreme caution and based on the regional or local context in which it is defined. In this sense, based on the implementation of RA at the Kerbest Foundation farm, we propose regenerative agriculture as a set of agroecological actions and processes that fundamentally provide functional soil quality, food quality, ecosystem services, and, especially, healthy and economically profitable livestock farming. Based on all of the above, we can argue that RA is no longer merely a commitment made by farmers but, rather, an environmentally, economically, and socially sustainable solution grounded in scientific knowledge and technical experience.

Suggested Citation

  • Raimundo Jiménez-Ballesta & Jorge Mongil-Manso & Adrián Jiménez-Sánchez, 2025. "Application of Regenerative Agriculture: A Review and Case Study in an Agrosilvopastoral Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-15, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9066-:d:1770227
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9066/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9066/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Havstad, Kris M. & Peters, Debra P.C. & Skaggs, Rhonda & Brown, Joel & Bestelmeyer, Brandon & Fredrickson, Ed & Herrick, Jeffrey & Wright, Jack, 2007. "Ecological services to and from rangelands of the United States," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 261-268, December.
    2. María P. Alvarez-Castellanos & Laura Escudero-Campos & Jorge Mongil-Manso & Francisco J. San Jose & Adrián Jiménez-Sánchez & Raimundo Jiménez-Ballesta, 2024. "Organic Carbon Storage in Waterlogging Soils in Ávila, Spain: A Traditional Agrosilvopastoral Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-16, October.
    3. Ravjit Khangura & David Ferris & Cameron Wagg & Jamie Bowyer, 2023. "Regenerative Agriculture—A Literature Review on the Practices and Mechanisms Used to Improve Soil Health," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-41, January.
    4. Michał Dudek & Anna Rosa, 2023. "Regenerative Agriculture as a Sustainable System of Food Production: Concepts, Conditions, Perceptions and Initial Implementations in Poland, Czechia and Slovakia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-17, November.
    5. Craig R. Elevitch & D. Niki Mazaroli & Diane Ragone, 2018. "Agroforestry Standards for Regenerative Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-21, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jaime J. Coon & Mary Jo Easley & Jennifer L. Williams & Gene Hambrick, 2025. "Farmer perceptions of regenerative agriculture in the Corn Belt: exploring motivations and barriers to adoption," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 42(3), pages 1847-1864, September.
    2. Pradeep Rai & Sosheel S. Godfrey & Christine E. Storer & Karl Behrendt & Ryan H. L. Ip & Thomas L. Nordblom, 2025. "Unravelling Regenerative Agriculture’s Sustainability Benefits and Outcomes: A Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-19, January.
    3. Uzair Jamil & Joshua M. Pearce, 2025. "Regenerative Agrivoltaics: Integrating Photovoltaics and Regenerative Agriculture for Sustainable Food and Energy Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-16, May.
    4. Andrew L. Dabalen & Aparajita Goyal & Ruozi Song, 2024. "Regenerative Agriculture in Practice : A Review," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10919, The World Bank.
    5. André Eduardo Biscaia Lacerda & Ana Lúcia Hanisch & Evelyn Roberta Nimmo, 2020. "Leveraging Traditional Agroforestry Practices to Support Sustainable and Agrobiodiverse Landscapes in Southern Brazil," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-19, June.
    6. Dong Chen & Kangning Xiong & Juan Zhang, 2022. "Progress on the Integrity Protection in the Natural World Heritage Site and Agroforestry Development in the Buffer Zone: An Implications for the World Heritage Karst," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-18, December.
    7. Angelica Melone & Leah L. Bremer & Susan E. Crow & Zoe Hastings & Kawika B. Winter & Tamara Ticktin & Yoshimi M. Rii & Maile Wong & Kānekoa Kukea-Shultz & Sheree J. Watson & Clay Trauernicht, 2021. "Assessing Baseline Carbon Stocks for Forest Transitions: A Case Study of Agroforestry Restoration from Hawaiʻi," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, February.
    8. Kelly R. Wilson & Robert L. Myers & Mary K. Hendrickson & Emily A. Heaton, 2022. "Different Stakeholders’ Conceptualizations and Perspectives of Regenerative Agriculture Reveals More Consensus Than Discord," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-14, November.
    9. Albert Amoakwah & Dr. Isaac Atta Kwenin & Asante George & Kingsford Ebenezer Appiah & Amoah Emmanuel, 2025. "Social Studies Teachers’ Knowledge of Climate Change: The Role of Social Studies Education," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(1), pages 2863-2873, January.
    10. Benavides, Raúl Andrés Molina & Gaona, Rómulo Campos & Atzori, Alberto Stanislao & Sánchez, Luisa Fernanda & Guerrero, Hugo Sánchez, 2023. "Application of a system dynamics model to evaluate the implementation of payment for environmental services as a reconversion mechanism in high mountain farming," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 484(C).
    11. Subash Dahal & Dorcas Franklin & Anish Subedi & Miguel Cabrera & Dennis Hancock & Kishan Mahmud & Laura Ney & Cheolwoo Park & Deepak Mishra, 2020. "Strategic Grazing in Beef-Pastures for Improved Soil Health and Reduced Runoff-Nitrate-A Step towards Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, January.
    12. Mireille Chiroleu-Assouline & Sébastien Roussel, 2010. "Contract Design to Sequester Carbon in Agricultural Soils," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 10060, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    13. Giulio Flavio Rizzo & Nicolas Al Achkar & Simone Treccarichi & Giuseppe Malgioglio & Matteo Giuseppe Infurna & Sebastian Nigro & Alessandro Tribulato & Ferdinando Branca, 2023. "Use of Bioinoculants Affects Variation in Snap Bean Yield Grown under Deficit Irrigation," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-13, April.
    14. Sekela Twisa & Mohamed Mwabumba & Mathew Kurian & Manfred F. Buchroithner, 2020. "Impact of Land-Use/Land-Cover Change on Drinking Water Ecosystem Services in Wami River Basin, Tanzania," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-18, April.
    15. Elsadig Omer & Dora Szlatenyi & Sándor Csenki & Jomana Alrwashdeh & Ivan Czako & Vince Láng, 2024. "Farming Practice Variability and Its Implications for Soil Health in Agriculture: A Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-27, November.
    16. Yeboah, Samuel, 2023. "Unlocking the Potential of Technological Innovations for Sustainable Agriculture in Developing Countries: Enhancing Resource Efficiency and Environmental Sustainability," MPRA Paper 118215, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 26 Jul 2023.
    17. Fernandez-Bou, Angel Santiago & Rodriguez-Flores, Jose M. & Ortiz-Partida, J. Pablo & Fencl, Amanda & Classen-Rodriguez, Leticia & Yang, Vivian & Williams, Emily & Schull, Val Zayden & Dobbin, Kristin, 2024. "Cropland repurposing as a tool for water sustainability and a just socioenvironmental transition in California: Review and Best Practices," OSF Preprints bvfsm, Center for Open Science.
    18. Anna Salachna & Katarzyna Marcol & Jan Broda & Damian Chmura, 2022. "The Contribution of Environmental and Cultural Aspects of Pastoralism in the Provision of Ecosystem Services: The Case of the Silesian Beskid Mts (Southern Poland)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-14, August.
    19. Lingling Hou & Pengfei Liu & Xiaohui Tian, 2023. "Grassland tenure reform and grassland quality in China," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 105(5), pages 1388-1404, October.
    20. Yudha Kristanto & Suria Tarigan & Tania June & Bambang Sulistyantara & Pini Wijayanti, 2024. "Indirect use value of improved soil health as natural capital that supports essential ecosystem services: A case study of cacao agroforestry," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 70(3), pages 137-154.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9066-:d:1770227. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.