IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v14y2022i16p10020-d887119.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Contribution of Environmental and Cultural Aspects of Pastoralism in the Provision of Ecosystem Services: The Case of the Silesian Beskid Mts (Southern Poland)

Author

Listed:
  • Anna Salachna

    (Faculty of Materials, Civil and Environment Engineering, University of Bielsko-Biala, 43-309 Bielsko-Biala, Poland)

  • Katarzyna Marcol

    (Institute of Culture Sciences, University of Silesia, Plac Sejmu Śląskiego 1, 40-001 Katowice, Poland)

  • Jan Broda

    (Faculty of Materials, Civil and Environment Engineering, University of Bielsko-Biala, 43-309 Bielsko-Biala, Poland)

  • Damian Chmura

    (Faculty of Materials, Civil and Environment Engineering, University of Bielsko-Biala, 43-309 Bielsko-Biala, Poland)

Abstract

Grazing has proven to be a successful management tool in terms of the maintenance and restoration of biodiversity. Sheep and pastoralism can provide a various set of ecosystem services, i.e., benefits for humans from the environment. The Silesian Beskids, the westernmost part of the Carpathian Mountains, is an area with a long tradition of pastoralism. Since the 13th century, sheep have grazed clearings located in forests and in large areas of grasslands in mountains. In this study, we tried to identify all possible aspects of provisional, regulating and cultural services provided by sheep and the pasturage tradition bearing in mind the specificity of this region. The biodiversity maintenance and habitat creation due to grazing and the cultural values of pastoralism was illustrated using a literature review of data concerning cultural heritage, tourism and education and using our own phytosociological field studies performed in nine vegetation types within grazing sites. In order to examine the impact of grazing, an observation of sheep’s daily grazing activity during the vegetation season using tractive GPS locators was conducted. The results showed that grazing has a positive impact on the maintenance of vegetation including EU-protected habitats. In addition, the pastoral activity introduced to the Beskids by the Vlachs contributed to the development of a specific highlander culture that continues to this day. Not all potential ecosystem services associated with the use of sheep are realized in the study area. Amongst the provisional services, sheep bones are not used while dairy is the most popular followed by meat. In turn, the cultural heritage of pastoralism is one of the most important drivers for the touristic attraction of Silesian Beskid.

Suggested Citation

  • Anna Salachna & Katarzyna Marcol & Jan Broda & Damian Chmura, 2022. "The Contribution of Environmental and Cultural Aspects of Pastoralism in the Provision of Ecosystem Services: The Case of the Silesian Beskid Mts (Southern Poland)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-14, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:16:p:10020-:d:887119
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/16/10020/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/16/10020/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Havstad, Kris M. & Peters, Debra P.C. & Skaggs, Rhonda & Brown, Joel & Bestelmeyer, Brandon & Fredrickson, Ed & Herrick, Jeffrey & Wright, Jack, 2007. "Ecological services to and from rangelands of the United States," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(2), pages 261-268, December.
    2. Affek, Andrzej Norbert & Kowalska, Anna, 2017. "Ecosystem potentials to provide services in the view of direct users," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 26(PA), pages 183-196.
    3. Nathan F. Sayre & Diana K. Davis & Brandon Bestelmeyer & Jeb C. Williamson, 2017. "Rangelands: Where Anthromes Meet Their Limits," Land, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-11, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hailey Wilmer & María E. Fernández-Giménez & Shayan Ghajar & Peter Leigh Taylor & Caridad Souza & Justin D. Derner, 2020. "Managing for the middle: rancher care ethics under uncertainty on Western Great Plains rangelands," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 37(3), pages 699-718, September.
    2. Benavides, Raúl Andrés Molina & Gaona, Rómulo Campos & Atzori, Alberto Stanislao & Sánchez, Luisa Fernanda & Guerrero, Hugo Sánchez, 2023. "Application of a system dynamics model to evaluate the implementation of payment for environmental services as a reconversion mechanism in high mountain farming," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 484(C).
    3. Subash Dahal & Dorcas Franklin & Anish Subedi & Miguel Cabrera & Dennis Hancock & Kishan Mahmud & Laura Ney & Cheolwoo Park & Deepak Mishra, 2020. "Strategic Grazing in Beef-Pastures for Improved Soil Health and Reduced Runoff-Nitrate-A Step towards Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-15, January.
    4. Mireille Chiroleu-Assouline & Sébastien Roussel, 2010. "Contract Design to Sequester Carbon in Agricultural Soils," Documents de travail du Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne 10060, Université Panthéon-Sorbonne (Paris 1), Centre d'Economie de la Sorbonne.
    5. Sekela Twisa & Mohamed Mwabumba & Mathew Kurian & Manfred F. Buchroithner, 2020. "Impact of Land-Use/Land-Cover Change on Drinking Water Ecosystem Services in Wami River Basin, Tanzania," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-18, April.
    6. Engler, John-Oliver & von Wehrden, Henrik & Baumgärtner, Stefan, 2019. "Determinants of farm size and stocking rate in Namibian commercial cattle farming," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 232-246.
    7. Engler, John-Oliver & von Wehrden, Henrik, 2018. "Global assessment of the non-equilibrium theory of rangelands: Revisited and refined," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 479-484.
    8. Lingling Hou & Pengfei Liu & Xiaohui Tian, 2023. "Grassland tenure reform and grassland quality in China," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 105(5), pages 1388-1404, October.
    9. Barbara Wróbel & Waldemar Zielewicz & Mariola Staniak, 2023. "Challenges of Pasture Feeding Systems—Opportunities and Constraints," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-31, April.
    10. Hailey Wilmer & J. Bret Taylor & Daniel Macon & Matthew C. Reeves & Carrie S. Wilson & Jacalyn Mara Beck & Nicole K. Strong, 2025. "Loss of seasonal ranges reshapes transhumant adaptive capacity: Thirty-five years at the US Sheep Experiment Station," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 42(1), pages 545-563, March.
    11. Liqun Shao & Haibin Chen & Chen Zhang & Xuexi Huo, 2017. "Effects of Major Grassland Conservation Programs Implemented in Inner Mongolia since 2000 on Vegetation Restoration and Natural and Anthropogenic Disturbances to Their Success," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-15, March.
    12. Wang, Zhifang & Fu, Hongpeng & Jian, Yuqing & Qureshi, Salman & Jie, Hua & Wang, Lu, 2022. "On the comparative use of social media data and survey data in prioritizing ecosystem services for cost-effective governance," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    13. Silva-Olaya, Adriana M. & Ortíz-Morea, Fausto A. & España-Cetina, Gina P. & Olaya-Montes, Andrés & Grados, Daniel & Gasparatos, Alexandros & Cherubin, Mauricio Roberto, 2022. "Composite index for soil-related ecosystem services assessment: Insights from rainforest-pasture transitions in the Colombian Amazon," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    14. Erle C. Ellis & Arthur H.W. Beusen & Kees Klein Goldewijk, 2020. "Anthropogenic Biomes: 10,000 BCE to 2015 CE," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-19, April.
    15. Ted L Gragson & Michael R. Coughlan & David S. Leigh, 2020. "Contingency and Agency in the Mountain Landscapes of the Western Pyrenees: A Place-Based Approach to the Long Anthropocene," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-22, May.
    16. D Richard Cameron & Jaymee Marty & Robert F Holland, 2014. "Whither the Rangeland?: Protection and Conversion in California's Rangeland Ecosystems," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(8), pages 1-12, August.
    17. Taylor, Michael H. & Rollins, Kimberly, 2012. "Using Ecological Models to Coordinate Valuation of Ecological Change on Western Rangelands for ex post Application to Policy Analysis," Western Economics Forum, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 11(01), pages 1-9.
    18. Rose A Graves & Ryan D Haugo & Andrés Holz & Max Nielsen-Pincus & Aaron Jones & Bryce Kellogg & Cathy Macdonald & Kenneth Popper & Michael Schindel, 2020. "Potential greenhouse gas reductions from Natural Climate Solutions in Oregon, USA," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(4), pages 1-30, April.
    19. Engler, John-Oliver & Wesche, Karsten & Kaczensky, Petra & Dhakal, Prabesh & Chuluunkhuyag, Oyundari & von Wehrden, Henrik, 2021. "Biophysical variability and politico-economic singularity: Responses of livestock numbers in South Mongolian nomadic pastoralism," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    20. Laura M. Norman & Miguel L. Villarreal & Rewati Niraula & Mark Haberstich & Natalie R. Wilson, 2019. "Modelling Development of Riparian Ranchlands Using Ecosystem Services at the Aravaipa Watershed, SE Arizona," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-21, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:14:y:2022:i:16:p:10020-:d:887119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.