IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i19p8665-d1758927.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Housing Market Responses to Landslide Hazards: A Three-Stage Hierarchical Linear Analysis of Urban Scale and Temporal Dynamics

Author

Listed:
  • Seungil Yum

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, Cheongju University, Cheongju 28503, Republic of Korea)

  • Jun Woo Kim

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, Cheongju University, Cheongju 28503, Republic of Korea)

  • Ho Gul Kim

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, Cheongju University, Cheongju 28503, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

This study hypothesizes that the impacts of landslides on housing prices are not uniform but instead vary depending on their spatial proximity to hazard zones, as well as on neighborhood, urban, and temporal characteristics of each city. To test this hypothesis, we analyze APT price responses to landslides across three South Korean cities with distinct urban characteristics: Seoul (capital city), Busan (metropolitan city), and Gunsan (medium-sized local city). Using 120 three-stage hierarchical linear regression (HLR) models, the analysis incorporates housing characteristics, neighborhood attributes, and urban–temporal factors to capture multilevel variations in price dynamics. The results reveal distinct spatial and temporal patterns. At the national level, immediate post-event changes are not uniformly negative: within 250 m of landslide zones, prices increase by 0.8%, while 500-m and 750-m groups rise by 0.5% and 1.9%, respectively, and only the 1000-m group declines by 0.9%. However, in the following year, the 250-m and 500-m groups experience notable declines before showing partial recovery in the second year. City-specific trajectories further underscore regional heterogeneity. In Seoul, medium- and long-term declines dominate, with post-event decreases of 1.9%, 4.2%, and 3.5% in the 500-m, 750-m, and 1000-m groups, respectively. Busan exhibits the sharpest and most persistent declines, with immediate decreases of 3.2% to 4.1% across distance bands, followed by sustained downturns in subsequent years. In contrast, Gunsan shows mixed but relatively faster recovery, as the 750-m group increases by 3.6% post-event and eventually surpasses pre-landslide levels.

Suggested Citation

  • Seungil Yum & Jun Woo Kim & Ho Gul Kim, 2025. "Sustainable Housing Market Responses to Landslide Hazards: A Three-Stage Hierarchical Linear Analysis of Urban Scale and Temporal Dynamics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-24, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8665-:d:1758927
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8665/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/19/8665/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. G. Sirmans & Lynn MacDonald & David Macpherson & Emily Zietz, 2006. "The Value of Housing Characteristics: A Meta Analysis," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 215-240, November.
    2. McMillen, Daniel P., 2008. "Changes in the distribution of house prices over time: Structural characteristics, neighborhood, or coefficients?," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(3), pages 573-589, November.
    3. Green, Richard & Hendershott, Patric H., 1996. "Age, housing demand, and real house prices," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(5), pages 465-480, August.
    4. Dubin, Robin A., 1992. "Spatial autocorrelation and neighborhood quality," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(3), pages 433-452, September.
    5. Basu, Sabyasachi & Thibodeau, Thomas G, 1998. "Analysis of Spatial Autocorrelation in House Prices," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 61-85, July.
    6. Caron Chess, 2001. "Organizational Theory and the Stages of Risk Communication," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(1), pages 179-188, February.
    7. Hee Jin Yang & Jihoon Song & Mack Joong Choi, 2016. "Measuring the Externality Effects of Commercial Land Use on Residential Land Value: A Case Study of Seoul," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(5), pages 1-15, April.
    8. Corina Höppner & Rebecca Whittle & Michael Bründl & Matthias Buchecker, 2012. "Linking social capacities and risk communication in Europe: a gap between theory and practice?," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 64(2), pages 1753-1778, November.
    9. Fan Liu & Min Min & Ke Zhao & Weiyan Hu, 2020. "Spatial-Temporal Variation in the Impacts of Urban Infrastructure on Housing Prices in Wuhan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-18, February.
    10. Dominic Balog‐Way & Katherine McComas & John Besley, 2020. "The Evolving Field of Risk Communication," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(S1), pages 2240-2262, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bello Musa Zango & Sanni Mohammed Lekan & Mohammed Jibrin Katun, 2020. "Conventional Methods in Housing Market Analysis: A Review of Literature," Baltic Journal of Real Estate Economics and Construction Management, Sciendo, vol. 8(1), pages 227-241, January.
    2. David Maddison, 2009. "A Spatio‐temporal Model of Farmland Values," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 60(1), pages 171-189, February.
    3. Raymond Y. C. Tse, 2002. "Estimating Neighbourhood Effects in House Prices: Towards a New Hedonic Model Approach," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 39(7), pages 1165-1180, June.
    4. Koen Koning & Tatiana Filatova & Okmyung Bin, 2018. "Improved Methods for Predicting Property Prices in Hazard Prone Dynamic Markets," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 69(2), pages 247-263, February.
    5. Antonio Páez & Fei Long & Steven Farber, 2008. "Moving Window Approaches for Hedonic Price Estimation: An Empirical Comparison of Modelling Techniques," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 45(8), pages 1565-1581, July.
    6. Liu, Sezhu & Hite, Diane, 2013. "Measuring the Effect of Green Space on Property Value: An Application of the Hedonic Spatial Quantile Regression," 2013 Annual Meeting, February 2-5, 2013, Orlando, Florida 143045, Southern Agricultural Economics Association.
    7. Mustafa Kahveci & Ernil Sabaj, 2017. "Determinant of Housing Rents in Urban Albania: An Empirical Hedonic Price Application with NSA Survey Data," Eurasian Journal of Economics and Finance, Eurasian Publications, vol. 5(2), pages 51-65.
    8. Jeffrey P. Cohen & Cletus C. Coughlin, 2008. "Spatial Hedonic Models Of Airport Noise, Proximity, And Housing Prices," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(5), pages 859-878, December.
    9. Seong-Hoon Cho & Dayton Lambert & Seung Kim & Roland Roberts & William Park, 2011. "Relationship between value of open space and distance from housing locations within a community," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 13(4), pages 393-414, December.
    10. Catherine Baumont, 2009. "Spatial effects of urban public policies on housing values," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 88(2), pages 301-326, June.
    11. David C. Wheeler & Antonio Páez & Jamie Spinney & Lance A. Waller, 2014. "A Bayesian approach to hedonic price analysis," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 93(3), pages 663-683, August.
    12. BAUMONT, Catherine, 2004. "Spatial effects in housing price models. Do housing prices capitalize urban development policies in the agglomeration of Dijon (1999)?," LEG - Document de travail - Economie 2004-04, LEG, Laboratoire d'Economie et de Gestion, CNRS, Université de Bourgogne.
    13. Kilgarriff, Paul & Charlton, Martin & Foley, Ronan & O'Donoghue, Cathal, 2019. "The impact of housing consumption value on the spatial distribution of welfare," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 118-130.
    14. Helen R. Neill & David M. Hassenzahl & Djeto D. Assane, 2007. "Estimating the Effect of Air Quality: Spatial versus Traditional Hedonic Price Models," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 73(4), pages 1088-1111, April.
    15. Fritsch, Markus & Haupt, Harry & Ng, Pin T., 2016. "Urban house price surfaces near a World Heritage Site: Modeling conditional price and spatial heterogeneity," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 260-275.
    16. Alice Barreca & Elena Fregonara & Diana Rolando, 2021. "EPC Labels and Building Features: Spatial Implications over Housing Prices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-21, March.
    17. Ka Shing Cheung & Chung Yim Yiu, 2022. "The economics of architectural aesthetics: Identifying price effect of urban ambiences by different house cohorts," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(6), pages 1741-1756, July.
    18. Catherine Baumont, 2004. "Spatial effects in housing price models : do housing prices capitalize urban development policies in the agglomeration of Dijon (1999) ?," Working Papers hal-01525664, HAL.
    19. Cordera, Ruben & Chiarazzo, Vincenza & Ottomanelli, Michele & dell’Olio, Luigi & Ibeas, Angel, 2019. "The impact of undesirable externalities on residential property values: spatial regressive models and an empirical study," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 177-187.
    20. Marc Francke & Alex Van de Minne, 2021. "Modeling unobserved heterogeneity in hedonic price models," Real Estate Economics, American Real Estate and Urban Economics Association, vol. 49(4), pages 1315-1339, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:19:p:8665-:d:1758927. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.