IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i17p8051-d1744085.html

Does Biodiversity Conservation Pay Off? An Empirical Analysis of Japanese Firms

Author

Listed:
  • Sayaka Watanabe

    (Graduate School of Economics, Kyoto University, Yoshida-Honmachi, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan)

  • Nobuyuki Isagawa

    (Graduate School of Management, Kyoto University, Yoshida-Honmachi, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan)

  • Tomoki Sekiguchi

    (Graduate School of Management, Kyoto University, Yoshida-Honmachi, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan)

Abstract

This study investigates the bidirectional relationship between biodiversity conservation, an increasingly important dimension of corporate social responsibility (CSR), and corporate financial performance (CFP). Specifically, it compares the manufacturing sector, which has substantial environmental impact and close ties to ecosystems, and the nonmanufacturing sector. The analysis draws on 1079 firm-year observations of Japanese companies from 2017 to 2022, employing the ratio of biodiversity-related expenditures to total environmental costs as the independent variable. CFP is measured by return on assets (ROA) and the price-to-book ratio (PBR). The results show that the effects on ROA significantly differ between manufacturing and nonmanufacturing sectors, with more positive impacts in manufacturing. In contrast, no clear sectoral differences are identified for the PBR. The reverse analysis suggests that, in the nonmanufacturing sector, firms with a higher PBR tend to allocate less to biodiversity conservation, whereas in manufacturing firms, both ROA and the PBR indicate positive effects, although statistical significance was not established. These findings indicate that biodiversity conservation in the manufacturing sector can be regarded as a strategic investment that contributes to profitability, and that its effects differ across industries. The study further suggests that investors and policymakers should consider industry-specific characteristics when evaluating corporate initiatives and designing institutional frameworks.

Suggested Citation

  • Sayaka Watanabe & Nobuyuki Isagawa & Tomoki Sekiguchi, 2025. "Does Biodiversity Conservation Pay Off? An Empirical Analysis of Japanese Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-26, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:8051-:d:1744085
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/8051/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/8051/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sandra A. Waddock & Samuel B. Graves, 1997. "The Corporate Social Performance–Financial Performance Link," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(4), pages 303-319, April.
    2. Gunnar Friede & Timo Busch & Alexander Bassen, 2015. "ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies," Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(4), pages 210-233, October.
    3. Thang Ngoc Bach & Khanh Hoang & Thanh Le, 2025. "Biodiversity risk and firm performance: Evidence from US firms," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 1113-1132, January.
    4. Abeer Hassan & Lee Roberts & Kimberly Rodger, 2022. "Corporate accountability for biodiversity and species extinction: Evidence from organisations reporting on their impacts on nature," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 326-352, January.
    5. Clarkson, Peter M. & Li, Yue & Richardson, Gordon D. & Vasvari, Florin P., 2011. "Does it really pay to be green? Determinants and consequences of proactive environmental strategies," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 122-144, March.
    6. Omaima A.G. Hassan & Peter Romilly, 2018. "Relations between corporate economic performance, environmental disclosure and greenhouse gas emissions: New insights," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(7), pages 893-909, November.
    7. Abeer Mohamed Hassan & Lee Roberts & Jill Atkins, 2020. "Exploring factors relating to extinction disclosures: What motivates companies to report on biodiversity and species protection?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 1419-1436, March.
    8. Bradley J. Cardinale & J. Emmett Duffy & Andrew Gonzalez & David U. Hooper & Charles Perrings & Patrick Venail & Anita Narwani & Georgina M. Mace & David Tilman & David A. Wardle & Ann P. Kinzig & Gre, 2012. "Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity," Nature, Nature, vol. 486(7401), pages 59-67, June.
    9. Olivier Boiral, 2016. "Accounting for the Unaccountable: Biodiversity Reporting and Impression Management," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 135(4), pages 751-768, June.
    10. Costanza, Robert & d'Arge, Ralph & de Groot, Rudolf & Farber, Stephen & Grasso, Monica & Hannon, Bruce & Limburg, Karin & Naeem, Shahid & O'Neill, Robert V. & Paruelo, Jose, 1998. "The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 3-15, April.
    11. Andrew King & Michael Lenox, 2002. "Exploring the Locus of Profitable Pollution Reduction," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 48(2), pages 289-299, February.
    12. Bradley J. Cardinale & J. Emmett Duffy & Andrew Gonzalez & David U. Hooper & Charles Perrings & Patrick Venail & Anita Narwani & Georgina M. Mace & David Tilman & David A.Wardle & Ann P. Kinzig & Gret, 2012. "Correction: Corrigendum: Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity," Nature, Nature, vol. 489(7415), pages 326-326, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Yulei & Hu, Shiyang & Zhu, Bo, 2025. "Does ecology protection conflict with corporate development? Evidence from biodiversity and corporate total factor productivity in China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    2. Vashisht, Rupali & Calvo-Pardo, Hector & Olmo, Jose, 2025. "A causal analysis of environmental and financial performance: Differences between brown and green firms," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    3. Al-Shaer, Habiba & Uyar, Ali & Kuzey, Cemil & Karaman, Abdullah S., 2023. "Do shareholders punish or reward excessive CSR engagement? Moderating effect of cash flow and firm growth," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    4. Li, Mingchen & Li, Peigong & Zhu, Wanwan, 2025. "Greenhouse gas performance and disclosure-new global evidence," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    5. Linda Kusumaning Wedari & Amir Moradi‐Motlagh & Christine Jubb, 2023. "The moderating effect of innovation on the relationship between environmental and financial performance: Evidence from high emitters in Australia," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(1), pages 654-672, January.
    6. Lee Roberts & Monomita Nandy & Abeer Hassan & Suman Lodh & Ahmed A. Elamer, 2022. "Corporate Accountability Towards Species Extinction Protection: Insights from Ecologically Forward-Thinking Companies," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 178(3), pages 571-595, July.
    7. Lee Roberts & Nikoletta Georgiou & Abeer Mohamed Hassan, 2023. "Investigating biodiversity and circular economy disclosure practices: Insights from global firms," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(3), pages 1053-1069, May.
    8. Christian Dreyer & Nadja Guenster & Jakob Koegst, 2019. "Empirical Evidence on Environmental Performance and Operating Costs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-13, June.
    9. Amir Gholami & John Sands & Habib Ur Rahman, 2022. "Environmental, Social and Governance Disclosure and Value Generation: Is the Financial Industry Different?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-17, February.
    10. Xiaohua Meng & Saixing Zeng & Xuemei Xie & Hailiang Zou, 2019. "Beyond symbolic and substantive: Strategic disclosure of corporate environmental information in China," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 403-417, February.
    11. Damian Chmura & Andrzej M. Jagodziński & Agnieszka Hutniczak & Artur Dyczko & Gabriela Woźniak, 2022. "Novel Ecosystems in the Urban-Industrial Landscape–Interesting Aspects of Environmental Knowledge Requiring Broadening: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-16, August.
    12. Reed, James & van Vianen, Josh & Foli, Samson & Clendenning, Jessica & Yang, Kevin & MacDonald, Margaret & Petrokofsky, Gillian & Padoch, Christine & Sunderland, Terry, 2017. "Trees for life: The ecosystem service contribution of trees to food production and livelihoods in the tropics," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 62-71.
    13. Pan, Quan & Wen, Zhi & Wu, Tong & Zheng, Tianchen & Yang, Yanzheng & Li, Ruonan & Zheng, Hua, 2022. "Trade-offs and synergies of forest ecosystem services from the perspective of plant functional traits: A systematic review," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    14. Soh Young In & Young Joon Lee & Robert G. Eccles, 2024. "Looking back and looking forward: A scientometric analysis of the evolution of corporate sustainability research over 47 years," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 2225-2259, May.
    15. Christoph Trumpp & Thomas Guenther, 2017. "Too Little or too much? Exploring U‐shaped Relationships between Corporate Environmental Performance and Corporate Financial Performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(1), pages 49-68, January.
    16. Li, Peigong & Li, Mingchen & Zhu, Wanwan & Lucey, Brian M., 2025. "Whether voluntary GHG disclosure could help improve subsequent GHG performance-new global evidence," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    17. Blanco-Zaitegi, Goizeder & Álvarez Etxeberria, Igor & Moneva, José M., 2024. "Impression management of biodiversity reporting in the energy and utilities sectors: An assessment of transparency in the disclosure of negative events," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C).
    18. Liliana Nicoleta Simionescu & Ștefan Cristian Gherghina & Ziad Sheikha & Hiba Tawil, 2020. "Does Water, Waste, and Energy Consumption Influence Firm Performance? Panel Data Evidence from S&P 500 Information Technology Sector," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-31, July.
    19. Marina Brogi & Valentina Lagasio, 2019. "Environmental, social, and governance and company profitability: Are financial intermediaries different?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(3), pages 576-587, May.
    20. Talbot, David & Barbat, Guillaume & Boiral, Olivier & Ordonez-Ponce, Eduardo, 2023. "Failure to consider environmental risk: The case for biodiversity impact disclosure in the electricity sector," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:8051-:d:1744085. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.