IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i17p7628-d1731295.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating Corporate Carbon Emissions Reporting: Assessing Transparency and Completeness with the Carbon Integrity Index

Author

Listed:
  • José Traub

    (Department of Land Morphology and Engineering, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • Carlos Morillas

    (Department of Land Morphology and Engineering, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • Rodrigo Gil

    (Department of Land Morphology and Engineering, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • Sergio Álvarez

    (Department of Land Morphology and Engineering, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • Sara Martínez

    (Department of Land Morphology and Engineering, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

Corporate carbon emissions reporting is central to climate accountability, yet significant gaps remain in transparency, completeness, and methodological rigor. This study introduces the Carbon Integrity Index (CIX), a structured framework for assessing disclosure quality through ten indicators covering Scopes 1, 2, and 3. Unlike existing standards focused on reporting requirements, the CIX evaluates how well emissions are reported, addressing methodological transparency, scope coverage, and treatment of uncertainty. Applied to 2022 sustainability reports from companies listed in Spain’s IBEX 35 index, the framework reveals an average score of 5.7/10, with 69% of firms achieving passing results. While Scope 2 reporting was generally robust (mean: 0.82), Scope 3 disclosures—often representing the majority of emissions—and uncertainty assessments were systematically weak (mean: 0.08). Findings provide empirical support for legitimacy and institutional theory, showing how formal compliance can mask performative compliance that limits meaningful accountability. Sectoral differences suggest that institutional pressures and operational complexity shape divergent transparency pathways, raising concerns that universal standards may entrench reporting disparities. The CIX offers regulators, investors, and companies a practical tool for distinguishing symbolic from substantive disclosure, enabling more informed decision-making and strengthening the role of reporting in driving the transition to net-zero business models.

Suggested Citation

  • José Traub & Carlos Morillas & Rodrigo Gil & Sergio Álvarez & Sara Martínez, 2025. "Evaluating Corporate Carbon Emissions Reporting: Assessing Transparency and Completeness with the Carbon Integrity Index," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-23, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7628-:d:1731295
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7628/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7628/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7628-:d:1731295. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.