IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i16p7462-d1727032.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on Government–Enterprise Collaborative Recycling Strategies: An Examination of Consumer Value Perception in the Context of Carbon Generalized System of Preferences

Author

Listed:
  • Xueying Ma

    (School of Economics and Management, North University of China, Taiyuan 030051, China)

  • Keyong Zhang

    (School of Economics and Management, North University of China, Taiyuan 030051, China)

  • Ting Li

    (School of Economics and Management, North University of China, Taiyuan 030051, China)

Abstract

In the context of the Carbon Generalized System of Preferences (CGSP), this paper develops a three-tier reverse supply chain model comprising the government, recyclers, and consumers. Differential game analysis is employed to investigate the evolutionary dynamics of consumers’ perceived recycling value and to examine how government recycling efforts and recyclers’ point rewards levels influence this perception. Furthermore, the study explores the dynamic trajectory of consumers’ perceived recycling value across three decision-making models—collaborative-driven, government-driven, and market-driven—and evaluates its impact on supply chain efficiency. The research shows that (1) enhanced recycling efforts by both the government and recyclers significantly improve consumers’ perceived recycling value, thereby promoting the recycling of waste electrical and electronic equipment, with the most pronounced improvement observed under the collaborative-driven strategy; (2) in the government-driven model, the government’s subsidy rate affects recyclers’ decisions regarding point-based incentives but does not influence the government’s own recycling effort; (3) the evolutionary trajectories of consumers’ perceived recycling value and system efficiency differ among the models, with the highest levels achieved under the collaborative-driven model, followed by the government-driven model, and the lowest under the market-driven model. This study fully accounts for the dynamic nature of consumers’ perceived recycling value, offering theoretical and practical guidelines for effective WEEE recycling.

Suggested Citation

  • Xueying Ma & Keyong Zhang & Ting Li, 2025. "Research on Government–Enterprise Collaborative Recycling Strategies: An Examination of Consumer Value Perception in the Context of Carbon Generalized System of Preferences," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-28, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7462-:d:1727032
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7462/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7462/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wenjie Huang & Jason Nguyen & Chung-Li Tseng & Wenlin Chen & Samuel N. Kirshner, 2024. "Pride or Guilt? Impacts of Consumers’ Socially Influenced Recycling Behaviors on Closed-Loop Supply Chains," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 26(6), pages 2067-2084, November.
    2. Peng Li & Di Wu, 2021. "A Multi-Echelon Network Design in a Dual-Channel Reverse Supply Chain Considering Consumer Preference," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-24, April.
    3. Sara Saberi & Mahtab Kouhizadeh & Joseph Sarkis & Lejia Shen, 2019. "Blockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 57(7), pages 2117-2135, April.
    4. Jianling Jiao & Yana Shuai & Jingjing Li, 2024. "Incentive effects of subsidy policies on Chinese municipal solid waste recycling considering price competition: Subsidies for residents or recyclers?," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(11), pages 27529-27551, November.
    5. Xin Chen & Jiannan Li & Decai Tang & Ziqian Zhao & Valentina Boamah, 2024. "Correction: Stackelberg game analysis of government subsidy policy in green product market," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(6), pages 16333-16333, June.
    6. An Hai Ta & Leena Aarikka-Stenroos & Lauri Litovuo, 2022. "Customer Experience in Circular Economy: Experiential Dimensions among Consumers of Reused and Recycled Clothes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, January.
    7. Zhang, Juan & Gou, Qinglong & Liang, Liang & Huang, Zhimin, 2013. "Supply chain coordination through cooperative advertising with reference price effect," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 345-353.
    8. Tina Fawcett & Yael Parag, 2010. "An introduction to personal carbon trading," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(4), pages 329-338, July.
    9. Hong, Xianpei & Xu, Lei & Du, Peng & Wang, Wenjuan, 2015. "Joint advertising, pricing and collection decisions in a closed-loop supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 12-22.
    10. Fawcett, Tina, 2010. "Personal carbon trading: A policy ahead of its time?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(11), pages 6868-6876, November.
    11. Pietro Giovanni, 2014. "Environmental collaboration in a closed-loop supply chain with a reverse revenue sharing contract," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 220(1), pages 135-157, September.
    12. Martinho, Graça & Pires, Ana & Portela, Gonçalo & Fonseca, Miguel, 2015. "Factors affecting consumers’ choices concerning sustainable packaging during product purchase and recycling," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 58-68.
    13. Ding, Rui & Wang, Xianjia & Liu, Yang & Zhao, Jinhua & Gu, Cuiling, 2023. "Evolutionary games with environmental feedbacks under an external incentive mechanism," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    14. Somi Yu & Jieun Lee, 2019. "The Effects of Consumers’ Perceived Values on Intention to Purchase Upcycled Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-20, February.
    15. Bian, Junsong & Zhao, Xuan, 2020. "Tax or subsidy? An analysis of environmental policies in supply chains with retail competition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(3), pages 901-914.
    16. Qiuchen Wu & Yuyan Wang & T.C.E. Cheng & Yulin Sun, 2025. "Optimal decisions and coordination of a supply chain in the hybrid recycling mode with traceability and fairness concern," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 63(14), pages 5292-5316, July.
    17. Cheng, Xiu & Long, Ruyin & Chen, Hong & Yang, Jiahui, 2019. "Does social interaction have an impact on residents’ sustainable lifestyle decisions? A multi-agent stimulation based on regret and game theory," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    18. Hongxia Sun & Kexin Wang & Xinjian Du, 2025. "Cooperative emission reduction behaviour of supply chain enterprises under cap-and-trade and government subsidies," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 2549-2579, January.
    19. Yingchun Cheng & Jianhua Wang, 2024. "Decision-Making in Remanufacturing Supply Chains: Game Theory Analysis of Recycling Models and Consumer Value Perception," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-20, November.
    20. Xin Chen & Jiannan Li & Decai Tang & Ziqian Zhao & Valentina Boamah, 2024. "Stackelberg game analysis of government subsidy policy in green product market," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(5), pages 13273-13302, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dogterom, Nico & Ettema, Dick & Dijst, Martin, 2018. "Behavioural effects of a tradable driving credit scheme: Results of an online stated adaptation experiment in the Netherlands," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 52-64.
    2. Xiwen Fu & Shuxin Wang, 2022. "How to Promote Low-Carbon Cities with Blockchain Technology? A Blockchain-Based Low-Carbon Development Model for Chinese Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-17, October.
    3. Wensi Zhang & Jing Xiao & Lingfei Cai, 2020. "Joint Emission Reduction Strategy in Green Supply Chain under Environmental Regulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-24, April.
    4. Tinglong Zhang & Xiongfei Guo & Jin Hu & Ningning Wang, 2020. "Cooperative advertising models under different channel power structure," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 291(1), pages 1103-1125, August.
    5. Michael Krapp & Johannes B. Kraus, 2019. "Coordination contracts for reverse supply chains: a state-of-the-art review," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 89(7), pages 747-792, September.
    6. Hui Li & Chuanxu Wang & Meng Shang & Wei Ou, 2017. "Pricing, Carbon Emission Reduction, Low-Carbon Promotion and Returning Decision in a Closed-Loop Supply Chain under Vertical and Horizontal Cooperation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-26, November.
    7. Junfei Ding & Wen Zhang & Xujin Pu, 2025. "Optimal reverse channel for end‐of‐life vehicle closed‐loop supply chains," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 46(1), pages 529-544, January.
    8. Fabio Bothner, 2021. "Personal Carbon Trading—Lost in the Policy Primeval Soup?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-16, April.
    9. Fan, Dian & Chen, Shaoqing, 2024. "No pain, no gain? Simulation of carbon reduction potential and socioeconomic effects of voluntary carbon trading in China during 2021–2060," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 375(C).
    10. Hua, Meina & Lai, Ivan Ka Wai & Tang, Huajun, 2019. "Analysis of advertising and a points-exchange incentive in a reverse supply chain for unwanted medications in households based on Game Theory," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 259-268.
    11. Francesco Fuso Nerini & Tina Fawcett & Yael Parag & Paul Ekins, 2021. "Personal carbon allowances revisited," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 4(12), pages 1025-1031, December.
    12. Lang Liu & Lulu Wang & Taisheng Huang & Jinhui Pang, 2022. "The Differential Game of a Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Manufacturer Competition Considering Goodwill," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-18, May.
    13. Shuang Ma & Linda L. Zhang, 2024. "Optimizing joint operations decision-making involving substitute products: a Stackelberg game model and nested PSO," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 343(1), pages 373-399, December.
    14. Wen Cheng & Qian Li & Qunqi Wu & Yahong Jiang & Fei Ye, 2024. "Cooperative Promotion and Wholesale Price Discount Incentives in a Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Dynamic Returns," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(3), pages 21582440241, August.
    15. Pietro De Giovanni & Georges Zaccour, 2022. "A selective survey of game-theoretic models of closed-loop supply chains," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 314(1), pages 77-116, July.
    16. Xiaoyuan Qi & Ying Han & Baoling Jin, 2023. "Evolutionary game equilibrium in the downstream carbon market: Evidence from the household size in China," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(5), pages 2814-2834, July.
    17. An, Kangxin & Zhang, Shihui & Huang, Hai & Liu, Yuan & Cai, Wenjia & Wang, Can, 2021. "Socioeconomic impacts of household participation in emission trading scheme: A Computable General Equilibrium-based case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    18. Haitao Chen & Zhaohui Dong & Gendao Li & Hetian Zhao, 2020. "Joint Advertisement and Trade-In Marketing Strategy in Closed-Loop Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-17, March.
    19. Anna-Katharina Kothe & Alexander Kuptel & Roman Seidl, 2021. "Simulating Personal Carbon Trading (PCT) with an Agent-Based Model (ABM): Investigating Adaptive Reduction Rates and Path Dependence," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-15, November.
    20. Liang Shen & Fei Lin & Yuyan Wang & Xin Su & Hua Li & Rui Zhou, 2022. "Advertising Decisions of Platform Supply Chains Considering Network Externalities and Fairness Concerns," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(13), pages 1-21, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7462-:d:1727032. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.