IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i16p7411-d1725724.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Global Sustainability Performance and Regional Disparities: A Machine Learning Approach Based on the 2025 SDG Index

Author

Listed:
  • Sadullah Çelik

    (Department of Mathematics, Columbian College of Arts & Sciences, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA
    Department of International Trade and Finance, Nazilli Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Aydın Adnan Menderes University, Aydın 09000, Turkey)

  • Ömer Faruk Öztürk

    (Department of Public Finance, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Uşak University, Uşak 64000, Turkey)

  • Ulas Akkucuk

    (Department of Management, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Bogaziçi University, Istanbul 34342, Turkey)

  • Mahmut Ünsal Şaşmaz

    (Department of Public Finance, Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, Uşak University, Uşak 64000, Turkey)

Abstract

Sustainability performance varies significantly across countries, yet global assessments overlook the underlying structural trends. This study bridges this gap using machine learning to uncover meaningful clustering in global sustainability outcomes based on the 2025 Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) Index. We applied K-Means clustering to group 166 countries into five standardized indicators: SDG score, spillover effects, regional score, population size, and recent progress. The five-cluster solution was confirmed by the Elbow and Silhouette procedures, with ANOVA and MANOVA tests subsequently indicating statistically significant cluster differences. For the validation and interpretation of the results, six supervised learning algorithms were employed. Random Forest, SVM, and ANN performed best in classification accuracy (97.7%) with perfect ROC-AUC scores (AUC = 1.0). Feature importance analysis showed that SDG and regional scores were most predictive of cluster membership, while population size was the least. This supervised–unsupervised hybrid approach offers a reproducible blueprint for cross-country benchmarking of sustainability. It also offers actionable insights for tailoring policy to groups of countries, whether high-income OECD nations, emerging markets, or resource-scarce countries. Our findings demonstrate that machine learning is a useful tool for revealing structural disparities in sustainability and informing cluster-specific policy interventions toward the 2030 Agenda.

Suggested Citation

  • Sadullah Çelik & Ömer Faruk Öztürk & Ulas Akkucuk & Mahmut Ünsal Şaşmaz, 2025. "Global Sustainability Performance and Regional Disparities: A Machine Learning Approach Based on the 2025 SDG Index," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-28, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7411-:d:1725724
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7411/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7411/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sachs,Jeffrey D. & Kroll,Christian & Lafortune,Guillame & Fuller,Grayson & Woelm,Finn, 2022. "Sustainable Development Report 2022," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781009210034, November.
    2. Alberto García-Rodríguez & Matias Núñez & Miguel Robles Pérez & Tzipe Govezensky & Rafael A Barrio & Carlos Gershenson & Kimmo K Kaski & Julia Tagüeña, 2025. "Sustainable visions: unsupervised machine learning insights on global development goals," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(3), pages 1-20, March.
    3. Sadullah Çelik & Bilge Doğanlı & Mahmut Ünsal Şaşmaz & Ulas Akkucuk, 2025. "Accuracy Comparison of Machine Learning Algorithms on World Happiness Index Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-27, April.
    4. Mahmut Unsal Sasmaz & Emre Sakar & Yunus Emre Yayla & Ulas Akkucuk, 2020. "The Relationship between Renewable Energy and Human Development in OECD Countries: A Panel Data Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-16, September.
    5. Sachs,Jeffrey D. & Kroll,Christian & Lafortune,Guillame & Fuller,Grayson & Woelm,Finn, 2022. "Sustainable Development Report 2022," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781009210089, November.
    6. Fengmei Ma & Heming Wang & Asaf Tzachor & César A. Hidalgo & Heinz Schandl & Yue Zhang & Jingling Zhang & Wei-Qiang Chen & Yanzhi Zhao & Yong-Guan Zhu & Bojie Fu, 2025. "The disparities and development trajectories of nations in achieving the sustainable development goals," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-20, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zoltan Varga & Marek Bobcek & Zsolt Conka & Ervin Racz, 2025. "Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Dye-Sensitized Solar Cell Efficiency for Manufacturing Process Optimization," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-20, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Junuguru Srinivas & Naveen Kolloju & Akanksha Singh & Siriman Naveen & Sudhaveni Naresh, 2024. "The COVID-19 Pandemic and Its Impact on Sustainable Development Goals-2030," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(4), pages 15485-15498, December.
    2. Fareri, Silvia & Apreda, Riccardo & Mulas, Valentina & Alonso, Ruben, 2023. "The worker profiler: Assessing the digital skill gaps for enhancing energy efficiency in manufacturing," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    3. Kyoko Sasaki & Wendy Stubbs & Megan Farrelly, 2023. "The relationship between corporate purpose and the sustainable development goals in large Japanese companies," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(5), pages 2475-2489, September.
    4. TRIARCHI Eirini & KOLIAS Georgios & KYPRIOTELIS Efstratios, 2023. "Exploring the Role of Institutional Governance in Climate Action in the Western Balkans Economies," European Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Bucharest Economic Academy, issue 02, June.
    5. Gamze Sart, 2022. "Impact of Higher Education and Globalization on Sustainable Development in the New EU Member States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-13, September.
    6. Christoph Funk & Elena Tönjes & Ramona Teuber & Lutz Breuer, 2024. "Reading between the lines: The intersection of research attention and sustainable development goals," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(5), pages 4545-4566, October.
    7. de Moura, Fernanda Senra & Barbrook-Johnson, Peter, 2022. "Using data-driven systems mapping to contextualise complexity economics insights," INET Oxford Working Papers 2022-27, Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford.
    8. Rakotoarimanana Zy Misa Harivelo & Rakotoarimanana Zy Harifidy, 2022. "A Review of Environmental Protection and Sustainable Development in Madagascar," J, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-20, November.
    9. Audronė Urmanavičienė & Eglė Butkevičienė, 2023. "The Role of Work Integration Social Enterprises in Achieving Sustainable Development Goals during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Case Study of Lithuania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-21, February.
    10. Caterina Losacco & Gianluca Pugliese & Lucrezia Forte & Vincenzo Tufarelli & Aristide Maggiolino & Pasquale De Palo, 2025. "Digital Transition as a Driver for Sustainable Tailor-Made Farm Management: An Up-to-Date Overview on Precision Livestock Farming," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-36, June.
    11. Sangho Chae & Igor Filatotchev & Seongtae Kim & Byung-Gak Son, 2025. "Small worlds within global supply chains: implications for multinational enterprises’ environmental, social, and governance controversies," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 56(6), pages 807-818, August.
    12. Stefana Matović & Dunja Demirović Bajrami & Tamara Gajić & Milica Lakić & Darko Martinov & Srđan Šuput & Adriana Radosavac & Ružica Đervida, 2024. "Beyond Numbers: Challenges in Measuring SDG4 Targets—Serbia’s Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-24, November.
    13. Delpy, Léo, 2024. "Protection or pressure? reciprocity in informal social protection in southern Madagascar," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 34(C).
    14. Abbas, Shujaat & Sinha, Avik & Saha, Tanaya & Shah, Muhammad Ibrahim, 2023. "Response of mineral market to renewable energy production in the USA: Where lies the sustainable energy future," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    15. Ali Osman Uymaz & Serdar Arslan & Nuri Celiker & Sergen Gursoy, 2025. "Analysing the Impact of the COVID‐19 Pandemic on the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) From the Perspective of Decent Work: A Comparison of the Pre‐ and Post‐COVID‐19 Periods," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 37(6), pages 1267-1294, August.
    16. Mohammad Mizenur Rahaman & Shamima Akter & Md Alamgir Hossain & Adiba Rahman Bushra Chowdhury & Renhong Wu, 2024. "Green accounting and reporting in Bangladesh’s pharmaceutical and textile industries: A holistic perspective," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(9), pages 1-22, September.
    17. Fang Zhang & Jianjun Zhang & Xiao Wang, 2025. "Evaluation of Multi-Dimensional Coordinated Development in the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration Under the SDGs Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-27, August.
    18. World Bank Group, 2023. "Cambodia Country Climate and Development Report," World Bank Publications - Reports 40467, The World Bank Group.
    19. Torrisi, Orsola, 2024. "Violent instability and modern contraception: Evidence from Mali," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    20. Hirose, Junichi & Kotani, Koji & Managi, Shunsuke, 2023. "Do autonomy and inquisitiveness contribute to SDGs? Implications from the matrilineal island of Palau," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 303-318.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7411-:d:1725724. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.