IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i16p7259-d1722119.html

Risk Assessment of Microalgae Carbon Sequestration Projects Under Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Environment

Author

Listed:
  • Qinghua Mao

    (School of Economics and Management, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, China)

  • Guihan Dong

    (School of Economics and Management, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, China)

  • Yang Xiao

    (School of Economics and Management, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, China)

  • Hao Wu

    (Hebei Key Laboratory of Heavy Metal Deep-Remediation in Water and Resource Reuse, School of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, China)

  • Yaqing Gao

    (School of Economics and Management, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, China)

  • Jiacheng Fan

    (School of Economics and Management, Yanshan University, Qinhuangdao 066004, China)

Abstract

Microalgae-based carbon sequestration is promising for implementing carbon neutrality and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. However, as the technology remains in its early developmental stages, it presents a range of risks that may deter potential investors. To address these risks, this study proposes a group-based decision-making framework for the risk evaluation of microalgae carbon sequestration projects. Fifteen risk indicators are identified and categorized into four groups, including economic, technical, market, and environmental. To handle uncertainty and vagueness in the assessment, the framework uses trapezoidal fuzzy numbers and hesitant fuzzy linguistic sets to evaluate benchmark values. An expert credibility model is developed to assign weights to expert opinions by combining the subjective RANCOM method and the objective centroid method, both adapted for a fuzzy linguistic environment. A generalized aggregation operator is then used to combine expert evaluations. This operator integrates weighted and ordered averaging techniques and converts probabilistic linguistic terms into trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. The final risk level is determined using a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method. The results indicate a medium-high level of risk, with a similarity score of 0.960. This suggests that while microalgae carbon sequestration holds great promise, effective planning and risk management are essential. For project managers and investors, this proposed framework helps quantify risk. It provides practical guidance for improving decision-making and strengthening project management.

Suggested Citation

  • Qinghua Mao & Guihan Dong & Yang Xiao & Hao Wu & Yaqing Gao & Jiacheng Fan, 2025. "Risk Assessment of Microalgae Carbon Sequestration Projects Under Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-26, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7259-:d:1722119
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7259/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/16/7259/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Irina Vinogradova-Zinkevič, 2024. "Centroidous Method for Determining Objective Weights," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-23, July.
    2. Adenle, Ademola A. & Haslam, Gareth E. & Lee, Lisa, 2013. "Global assessment of research and development for algae biofuel production and its potential role for sustainable development in developing countries," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 182-195.
    3. Govindan, Kannan & Jepsen, Martin Brandt, 2016. "ELECTRE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(1), pages 1-29.
    4. Macharis, Cathy & Springael, Johan & De Brucker, Klaas & Verbeke, Alain, 2004. "PROMETHEE and AHP: The design of operational synergies in multicriteria analysis.: Strengthening PROMETHEE with ideas of AHP," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(2), pages 307-317, March.
    5. Liu, Bingsheng & Liu, Song & Xue, Bin & Lu, Shijian & Yang, Yang, 2021. "Formalizing an integrated decision-making model for the risk assessment of carbon capture, utilization, and storage projects: From a sustainability perspective," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    6. Fu, Chao & Yang, Jian-Bo & Yang, Shan-Lin, 2015. "A group evidential reasoning approach based on expert reliability," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 246(3), pages 886-893.
    7. Corrente, Salvatore & Greco, Salvatore & Rezaei, Jafar, 2024. "Better decisions with less cognitive load: The Parsimonious BWM," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    8. Rahman, Farahiyah Abdul & Aziz, Md Maniruzzaman A. & Saidur, R. & Bakar, Wan Azelee Wan Abu & Hainin, M.R & Putrajaya, Ramadhansyah & Hassan, Norhidayah Abdul, 2017. "Pollution to solution: Capture and sequestration of carbon dioxide (CO2) and its utilization as a renewable energy source for a sustainable future," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 112-126.
    9. Min Thura Mon & Roengchai Tansuchat & Woraphon Yamaka, 2024. "CCUS Technology and Carbon Emissions: Evidence from the United States," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-18, April.
    10. Gao, Jianwei & Guo, Fengjia & Li, Xiangzhen & Huang, Xin & Men, Huijuan, 2021. "Risk assessment of offshore photovoltaic projects under probabilistic linguistic environment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 172-187.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Corrente, Salvatore & Greco, Salvatore & Zappalà, Silvano, 2025. "Deck of Cards Method for Hierarchical, Robust and Stochastic Ordinal Regression," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 327(3), pages 937-956.
    2. Eduardo Fernández & José Rui Figueira & Jorge Navarro, 2023. "A theoretical look at ordinal classification methods based on comparing actions with limiting boundaries between adjacent classes," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 325(2), pages 819-843, June.
    3. Ioannis Falkonakis & Saeid Lotfian & Baran Yeter, 2024. "Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis of an Innovative Additive Manufacturing Technique for Onboard Maintenance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-18, April.
    4. Jun Sheng Teh & Yew Heng Teoh & Heoy Geok How & Thanh Danh Le & Yeoh Jun Jie Jason & Huu Tho Nguyen & Dong Lin Loo, 2021. "The Potential of Sustainable Biomass Producer Gas as a Waste-to-Energy Alternative in Malaysia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-31, April.
    5. Waseem Yousaf & Muhammad Sajjad Hussain & Anam Aziz, 2021. "The Role of Green Energy on Reducing the Carbon Emission in ASEAN Countries," iRASD Journal of Energy and Environment, International Research Alliance for Sustainable Development (iRASD), vol. 2(1), pages 34-39, June.
    6. Ghorbani, Bahram & Mehrpooya, Mehdi & Ghasemzadeh, Hossein, 2018. "Investigation of a hybrid water desalination, oxy-fuel power generation and CO2 liquefaction process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 1105-1119.
    7. Yongchuan Tang & Deyun Zhou & Zichang He & Shuai Xu, 2017. "An improved belief entropy–based uncertainty management approach for sensor data fusion," International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, , vol. 13(7), pages 15501477177, July.
    8. Maity, Jyoti Prakash & Hou, Chia-Peng & Majumder, Dip & Bundschuh, Jochen & Kulp, Thomas R. & Chen, Chien-Yen & Chuang, Lu-Te & Nathan Chen, Ching-Nen & Jean, Jiin-Shuh & Yang, Tsui-Chu & Chen, Chien-, 2014. "The production of biofuel and bioelectricity associated with wastewater treatment by green algae," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 94-103.
    9. Choudhary, Devendra & Shankar, Ravi, 2012. "An STEEP-fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS framework for evaluation and selection of thermal power plant location: A case study from India," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 510-521.
    10. Feng Dong & Yuling Pan, 2020. "Evolution of Renewable Energy in BRI Countries: A Combined Econometric and Decomposition Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-18, November.
    11. Chao Fu & Wenjun Chang, 2024. "A Markov Chain-Based Group Consensus Method with Unknown Parameters," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 33(5), pages 1019-1048, October.
    12. Francis Marleau Donais & Irène Abi-Zeid & E. Owen D. Waygood & Roxane Lavoie, 2021. "A Framework for Post-Project Evaluation of Multicriteria Decision Aiding Processes from the Stakeholders’ Perspective: Design and Application," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 30(5), pages 1161-1191, October.
    13. Shahryar Rashidi & Seyed Shariatipour & Mohammadreza Bagheri, 2025. "CO2 Storage Site Selection: A Comprehensive Review of Current Approaches," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 15(4), pages 487-510, August.
    14. Trong Vinh Bui & Hong Hai Dao & Huynh Thong Nguyen & Quoc Dung Ta & Hai Nam Nguyen Le & Phuc Kieu & Cao Lan Mai & Trung Dung Tran & Huu Son Nguyen & Hoang Dung Nguyen & Trung Tin Huynh, 2025. "A Critical Review on the Opportunities and Challenges of Offshore Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-21, October.
    15. Qureshi, Muhammad Imran & Qayyum, Shazia & Nassani, Abdelmohsen A. & Aldakhil, Abdullah Mohammed & Qazi Abro, Muhammad Moinuddin & Zaman, Khalid, 2019. "Management of various socio-economic factors under the United Nations sustainable development agenda," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    16. Majda Ivić & Jelena Kilić & Katarina Rogulj & Nikša Jajac, 2020. "Decision Support to Sustainable Parking Management—Investment Planning through Parking Fines to Improve Pedestrian Flows," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-19, November.
    17. Yazdi, Mohammad & Khan, Faisal & Abbassi, Rouzbeh & Quddus, Noor & Castaneda-Lopez, Homero, 2022. "A review of risk-based decision-making models for microbiologically influenced corrosion (MIC) in offshore pipelines," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    18. Maimuna Khatari & A. A. Zaidan & B. B. Zaidan & O. S. Albahri & M. A. Alsalem, 2019. "Multi-Criteria Evaluation and Benchmarking for Active Queue Management Methods: Open Issues, Challenges and Recommended Pathway Solutions," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(04), pages 1187-1242, July.
    19. Emre Çalişkan & Erdem Aksakal & Saliha Çetinyokuş & Tahsin Çetinyokuş, 2019. "Hybrid Use of Likert Scale-Based AHP and PROMETHEE Methods for Hazard Analysis and Consequence Modeling (HACM) Software Selection," International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making (IJITDM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(05), pages 1689-1715, September.
    20. Fernández, Eduardo & Navarro, Jorge & Solares, Efrain, 2022. "A hierarchical interval outranking approach with interacting criteria," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(1), pages 293-307.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:16:p:7259-:d:1722119. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.