IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i15p6994-d1715324.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Change Management in Aviation Organizations: A Multi-Method Theoretical Framework for External Environmental Uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • Ilona Skačkauskienė

    (Department of Management, Faculty of Business Management, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Sauletekio Ave. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania)

  • Virginija Leonavičiūtė

    (Department of Management, Faculty of Business Management, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Sauletekio Ave. 11, LT-10223 Vilnius, Lithuania)

Abstract

In today’s dynamic and highly uncertain environment, organizations, particularly in the aviation sector, face increasing challenges that demand resilient, flexible, and data-driven change management decisions. Responding to the growing need for structured approaches to managing complex uncertainties—geopolitical tensions, economic volatility, social shifts, rapid technological advancements, environmental pressures and regulatory changes—this research proposes a theoretical change management model for aviation service providers, such as airports. Integrating three analytical approaches, the model offers a robust, multi-method approach for supporting sustainable transformation under uncertainty. Normative analysis using Bayesian decision theory identifies influential external environmental factors, capturing probabilistic relationships, and revealing causal links under uncertainty. Prescriptive planning through scenario theory explores alternative future pathways and helps to identify possible predictions, offer descriptive evaluation employing fuzzy comprehensive evaluation, and assess decision quality under vagueness and complexity. The proposed four-stage model—observation, analysis, evaluation, and response—offers a methodology for continuous external environment monitoring, scenario development, and data-driven, proactive change management decision-making, including the impact assessment of change and development. The proposed model contributes to the theoretical advancement of the change management research area under uncertainty and offers practical guidance for aviation organizations (airports) facing a volatile external environment. This framework strengthens aviation organizations’ ability to anticipate, evaluate, and adapt to multifaceted external changes, supporting operational flexibility and adaptability and contributing to the sustainable development of aviation services. Supporting aviation organizations with tools to proactively manage systemic uncertainty, this research directly supports the integration of sustainability principles, such as resilience and adaptability, for long-term value creation through change management decision-making.

Suggested Citation

  • Ilona Skačkauskienė & Virginija Leonavičiūtė, 2025. "Change Management in Aviation Organizations: A Multi-Method Theoretical Framework for External Environmental Uncertainty," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-20, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:6994-:d:1715324
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/15/6994/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/15/6994/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Svein Bråthen & Karoline L. Hoff, 2020. "Economic Impact Assessment of Regulatory Changes: A Case Study of a Proposed New ICAO Standard for Contaminated Runways," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-27, July.
    2. Ricardo Jorge Raimundo & Maria Emilia Baltazar & Sandra P. Cruz, 2023. "Sustainability in the Airports Ecosystem: A Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-18, August.
    3. Jielin Li & Cyril Chol Chol Deng & Jiye Xu & Zhongjian Ma & Pei Shuai & Liangbing Zhang, 2023. "Safety Risk Assessment and Management of Panzhihua Open Pit (OP)-Underground (UG) Iron Mine Based on AHP-FCE, Sichuan Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-23, March.
    4. Saikat Chatterjee & Partha Protim Das & Shankar Chakraborty, 2025. "A novel integrated multi-criteria decision making approach for solving delivery drone selection problem," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 62(1), pages 119-148, March.
    5. Holzer, Jorge & Olson, Lars J., 2021. "Precautionary buffers and stochastic dependence in environmental policy," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    6. Mark P. Healey & Gerard P. Hodgkinson, 2024. "Overcoming strategic persistence: Effects of multiple scenario analysis on strategic reorientation," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 45(8), pages 1423-1445, August.
    7. Oliver, John J. & Parrett, Emma, 2018. "Managing future uncertainty: Reevaluating the role of scenario planning," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 339-352.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ni, Yuanming & Steinshamn, Stein I. & Kvamsdal, Sturla F., 2022. "Negative shocks in an age-structured bioeconomic model and how to deal with them," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 15-30.
    2. Liangxing Jin & Pingting Liu & Wenbing Yao & Junjie Wei, 2024. "A Comprehensive Evaluation of Resilience in Abandoned Open-Pit Mine Slopes Based on a Two-Dimensional Cloud Model with Combination Weighting," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-26, April.
    3. Xianhui Mao & Ankui Hu & Rui Zhao & Fei Wang & Mengkun Wu, 2023. "Evaluation and Application of Surrounding Rock Stability Based on an Improved Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation Method," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-19, July.
    4. John J. Oliver, 2023. "Scenario planning: Reflecting on cases of actionable knowledge," Futures & Foresight Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 5(3-4), September.
    5. Tang Wang & Dirk Libaers & Hao Jiao, 2025. "CEO power and strategic persistence: evidence from post-IPO firms in China," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 64(4), pages 2197-2222, April.
    6. Christopher W. H. Davis & Antonie J. Jetter & Philippe J. Giabbanelli, 2022. "Automatically Generating Scenarios from a Text Corpus: A Case Study on Electric Vehicles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-21, June.
    7. Musadag El Zein & Taghi Karimipanah & Arman Ameen, 2025. "Airports—Energy and Sustainability Perspectives," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-26, March.
    8. Sarah Hubbard, 2025. "Environmental Social Governance (ESG) Reporting for Large US Airports," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-54, May.
    9. Filiz Mizrak & Levent Polat & Sezin Acik Tasar, 2024. "Applying Entropy Weighting and 2-Tuple Linguistic T-Spherical Fuzzy MCDM: A Case Study of Developing a Strategic Sustainability Plan for Istanbul Airport," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-28, December.
    10. George Cairns & George Wright, 2020. "A reflection on the mass production of scenarios in response to COVID‐19," Futures & Foresight Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2(3-4), September.
    11. Harry Suharman & Nurul Hidayah, 2021. "Essentials of Intellectual Capital to Create Higher Education Sustainable Competitive Advantage: Environment Uncertainty as a Moderating Variable in Indonesia Private Universities," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(1), pages 382-391.
    12. Tser-Yieth Chen & Chi-Jui Huang, 2019. "A Two-Tier Scenario Planning Model of Environmental Sustainability Policy in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-21, April.
    13. Viktoriia Ivannikova & Maksym Zaliskyi & Oleksandr Solomentsev & Ivan Ostroumov & Nataliia Kuzmenko, 2025. "Statistical Data Processing Technologies for Sustainable Aviation: A Case Study of Ukraine," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-33, June.
    14. Junnan Wu & Xin Liu & Dianqi Pan & Yichen Zhang & Jiquan Zhang & Kai Ke, 2023. "Research on Safety Evaluation of Municipal Sewage Treatment Plant Based on Improved Best-Worst Method and Fuzzy Comprehensive Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-15, May.
    15. Wojciech Duliński, 2025. "An Assessment of Relation Between Sustainability and Architectural Representativeness of Passenger Airport Terminals in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-26, January.
    16. Bolognesi, Thomas & Pflieger, Géraldine, 2024. "Do you perceive interdependencies among human activities related to water? Drivers and effects on preferences for participation and regulation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    17. Ricarda B. Bouncken & Sascha Kraus, 2025. "Strategic pragmatism orientation: a framework for navigating recurring crises and the ‘zeitenwende’ with stability and agility," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 19(7), pages 1929-1947, July.
    18. Maria Sartzetaki & Aristi Karagkouni & Dimitrios Dimitriou, 2025. "Enterprise Strategic Management Upon Sustainable Value Creation: A Fuzzy Topis Evaluation Tool for Transport and Supply Chain Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-18, May.
    19. Young Won Park & Paul Hong, 2022. "A Research Framework for Sustainable Digital Innovation: Case Studies of Japanese Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-13, July.
    20. Nader, Joelle & El-Khalil, Raed & Nassar, Elma & Hong, Paul, 2022. "Pandemic planning, sustainability practices, and organizational performance: An empirical investigation of global manufacturing firms," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:6994-:d:1715324. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.