IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i15p6974-d1714683.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contextual Study of Technostress in Higher Education: Psychometric Evidence for the TS4US Scale from Lima, Peru

Author

Listed:
  • Guillermo Araya-Ugarte

    (Facultad de Negocios, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas, Lima 15023, Peru)

  • Miguel Armesto-Céspedes

    (Facultad de Negocios, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas, Lima 15023, Peru)

  • Nicolás Contreras-Barraza

    (Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Administrativas, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparaíso 2372129, Chile)

  • Alejandro Vega-Muñoz

    (Centro de Investigación en Educación de Calidad para la Equidad, Universidad Central de Chile, Santiago 8330601, Chile
    Facultad de Ciencias Empresariales, Universidad Arturo Prat, Iquique 1110939, Chile)

  • Guido Salazar-Sepúlveda

    (Departamento de Ingeniería Industrial, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Católica de la Santísima Concepción, Concepción 4090541, Chile
    Facultad de Ingeniería y Negocios, Universidad de Las Américas, Concepción 4090940, Chile)

  • Nelson Lay

    (Facultad de Educación y Ciencias Sociales, Universidad Andrés Bello, Viña del Mar 2520461, Chile)

Abstract

Sustainable education requires addressing the challenges posed by digital transformation, including technostress among university students. This study evaluates technostress levels in higher education through the validation of the TS4US scale and its implications for sustainable learning environments. A cross-sectional study was conducted with 328 university students from four districts in Lima, Peru, using an online survey to measure technostress. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed to assess the psychometric properties of the TS4US scale, resulting in a refined model with two latent factors and thirteen validated items. Findings indicate that 28% of students experience high technostress levels, while 5% report very high levels, though no significant associations were found between technostress and sociodemographic variables such as campus location, employment status, gender, and academic level. The TS4US instrument had been previously validated in Chile; this study confirms its structure in a new sociocultural context, reinforcing its cross-cultural applicability. These results highlight the need for sustainable strategies to mitigate technostress in higher education, including institutional support, digital literacy programs, and policies fostering a balanced technological environment. Addressing technostress is essential for promoting sustainable education (SDG4) and enhancing student well-being (SDG3). This study directly contributes to the achievement of Sustainable Development Goals 3 (Good Health and Well-being) and 4 (Quality Education) by providing validated tools and evidence-based recommendations to promote mental health and equitable access to digital education in Latin America. Future research should explore cross-country comparisons and targeted interventions, including digital well-being initiatives and adaptive learning strategies, to ensure a resilient and sustainable academic ecosystem.

Suggested Citation

  • Guillermo Araya-Ugarte & Miguel Armesto-Céspedes & Nicolás Contreras-Barraza & Alejandro Vega-Muñoz & Guido Salazar-Sepúlveda & Nelson Lay, 2025. "Contextual Study of Technostress in Higher Education: Psychometric Evidence for the TS4US Scale from Lima, Peru," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-19, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:6974-:d:1714683
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/15/6974/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/15/6974/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:6974-:d:1714683. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.