IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i14p6491-d1702447.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Green Investment Strategies and Pricing Decisions in a Supply Chain Considering Blockchain Technology

Author

Listed:
  • Songshi Shao

    (Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering College, Naval University of Engineering, Wuhan 430033, China)

  • Yutong Li

    (Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering College, Naval University of Engineering, Wuhan 430033, China)

  • Xu Cheng

    (Department of Basic, Naval University of Engineering, Wuhan 430033, China)

  • Jinzhu Qu

    (Shanghai Marine Electronic Equipment Research Institute, Shanghai 201108, China)

Abstract

With rising environmental awareness, numerous firms are transitioning to green investment, such as low-carbon production. However, the consumer adoption of low-carbon products remains low due to transparency concerns. Many firms are leveraging blockchain to address information asymmetry in the supply chain, thereby building consumer confidence in low-carbon products. The purpose of this work is to provide decision support for business firms by analyzing the strategic choices regarding the manufacturer’s green investment and the e-retailer’s adoption of blockchain technology. Three strategy combinations are considered, including the baseline strategy combination without green investment and blockchain technology (NN), the strategy combination with only green investment (LN), and the strategy combination with both green investment and blockchain technology (LB). The optimal pricing and green level decisions are derived, and the conditions under which green investment and blockchain technology are beneficial to the supply chain members are examined. The findings suggest that the e-retailer can obtain the highest profit without adopting blockchain technology if it holds a substantial or extremely low market share, if the consumers’ low-carbon preference is at a low to medium level, or if the consumer green trust coefficient is high when the manufacturer implements the green investment strategy. When consumers exhibit a weak preference for low-carbon products, the strategy combination NN is optimal for the supply chain members. The strategy combination LB becomes optimal if the consumer green trust coefficient is near or below the moderate threshold, if the market share of a channel is neither extremely high nor low, or if consumers exhibit a strong preference for low-carbon products.

Suggested Citation

  • Songshi Shao & Yutong Li & Xu Cheng & Jinzhu Qu, 2025. "Green Investment Strategies and Pricing Decisions in a Supply Chain Considering Blockchain Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-23, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:14:p:6491-:d:1702447
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/14/6491/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/14/6491/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Huafei Chen & Lu Yin & Eren Özceylan, 2023. "Research on the Coordination of Fresh Food Supply Chain Based on the Perspective of Blockchain and Low Carbon," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2023, pages 1-20, February.
    2. Lu, Qihui & Liao, Changhua & Chen, Xiangfeng, 2024. "The blockchain adoption strategies of online retailer in a dual-channel supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    3. Jianhua Zhu & Taiwen Feng & Ying Lu & Wenbo Jiang, 2024. "Using blockchain or not? A focal firm's blockchain strategy in the context of carbon emission reduction technology innovation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 3505-3531, May.
    4. Matsui, Kenji, 2024. "Should competing suppliers with dual-channel supply chains adopt agency selling in an e-commerce platform?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(2), pages 587-604.
    5. Cao, Cejun & He, Yufan & Liu, Yang & Huang, Hao & Zhang, Fanshun, 2025. "Blockchain technology adoption mechanism for semiconductor chip supply chains considering information disclosure under cost-sharing contract," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    6. Liao, Changhua & Lu, Qihui & Ghamat, Salar & Cai, Helen Huifen, 2025. "Blockchain adoption and coordination strategies for green supply chains considering consumer privacy concern," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 323(2), pages 525-539.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiaole Han & Leong-Mow Gooi, 2025. "Multi-Level Determinants of Sustainable Blockchain Technology Adoption in SCM: Individual, Organisational, and Societal Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-56, March.
    2. Zhu, Haoruo & Ni, Yaodong & Xiao, Yongbo, 2025. "Information sharing across competing platforms with varying information capabilities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 323(1), pages 125-138.
    3. Kalayci, Eda & Becker, Jan U. & Barrot, Christian, 2024. "Understanding customers’ choice for digital D2C versus multi-brand operations," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 100(2), pages 256-273.
    4. Xinfeng Chang & Zihe Yang & Abdullah, 2024. "Digital economy, innovation factor allocation and industrial structure transformation—A case study of the Yangtze River Delta city cluster in China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(4), pages 1-16, April.
    5. Kong, Xiang T.R. & Huang, Rui & Kang, Kai & Xu, Suxiu, 2025. "Combinatorial Group-Buying double auction for recycled remanufacturing products of construction waste," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    6. Li, Jin & Wang, Haoyu & Shi, Victor & Sun, Qi, 2024. "Manufacturer's choice of online selling format in a dual-channel supply chain with green products," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 318(1), pages 131-142.
    7. Zhang, Yuanyuan & Fu, Shaochuan & Fan, Shucheng & Ma, Fangfang, 2025. "Game strategy analysis on E-commerce platform supply chain with shared logistics service: A chaos perspective," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 499(C).
    8. Li, Yongjian & Chu, Mingsen & Bai, Xuanming, 2024. "To fight or not? product introduction and channel selection in the presence of a platform’s private label," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    9. Miao, Zhaowei & Peng, Hengming & Lan, Yongquan, 2025. "The role of online platform selling mode in recycling channel selection: A game-theoretic analysis of profit and environmental impact," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    10. Lu, Wei & Ji, Xiang & Wu, Jie, 2025. "Retailer’s information sharing and manufacturer’s channel expansion in the live-streaming E-commerce era," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 320(3), pages 527-543.
    11. Gong, Canran & Ignatius, Joshua & Song, Huaming & Chai, Junwu & Day, Steven James, 2024. "The Impact of Platform’s Information Sharing on Manufacturer Encroachment and Selling Format Decision," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 317(1), pages 141-155.
    12. Hu, Shu & Fu, Ke, 2025. "Equilibrium analysis of the seller’s fulfillment channels and sales channels," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 320(3), pages 544-558.
    13. Li Hou & Shidao Geng & Wenjie Kong, 2025. "Competition and Cooperation in Ride-Sharing Platforms: A Game Theoretic Analysis of C2C and B2C Aggregation Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-32, January.
    14. Amankou, Kunomboua Anicet Cyrille & Guchhait, Rekha & Sarkar, Biswajit & Dem, Himani, 2024. "Product-specified dual-channel retail management with significant consumer service," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    15. Chen, Yuan & Feng, Yunting & Lai, Kee-Hung & Zhu, Qinghua, 2025. "Value of blockchain for scope 3 carbon disclosure: The moderating role of data processing technologies," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    16. Peng, Xiankun & Xiang, Zehua & Ji, Ting, 2025. "Platform's premium store brand introduction and sales mode selection strategies with the cost-advantageous manufacturer," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    17. Noriaki Matsushima & Mark J. Tremblay, 2024. "Network compatibility and incumbent pricing regimes," ISER Discussion Paper 1265, Institute of Social and Economic Research, The University of Osaka.
    18. Mao, Zhaofang & Yuan, Ruiying & Shen, Zuo-Jun Max, 2025. "Strategic interactions between manufacturer channel choice and platform entry in a dual-market system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    19. Gaoke Wu & Wensheng Yang & Xinru Hou & Mengze Chen, 2025. "Selection of Live‐Streaming Sales Methods for the Manufacturer and Streamer: The Role of the MCN Institution," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 46(4), pages 2540-2561, June.
    20. Zhang, Qi & Zhu, Xide & Lin, Gui-Hua, 2024. "Green technological licensing strategies with fixed-fee among rival firms under emissions trading scheme," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 318(1), pages 110-130.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:14:p:6491-:d:1702447. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.