IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i14p6491-d1702447.html

Green Investment Strategies and Pricing Decisions in a Supply Chain Considering Blockchain Technology

Author

Listed:
  • Songshi Shao

    (Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering College, Naval University of Engineering, Wuhan 430033, China)

  • Yutong Li

    (Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering College, Naval University of Engineering, Wuhan 430033, China)

  • Xu Cheng

    (Department of Basic, Naval University of Engineering, Wuhan 430033, China)

  • Jinzhu Qu

    (Shanghai Marine Electronic Equipment Research Institute, Shanghai 201108, China)

Abstract

With rising environmental awareness, numerous firms are transitioning to green investment, such as low-carbon production. However, the consumer adoption of low-carbon products remains low due to transparency concerns. Many firms are leveraging blockchain to address information asymmetry in the supply chain, thereby building consumer confidence in low-carbon products. The purpose of this work is to provide decision support for business firms by analyzing the strategic choices regarding the manufacturer’s green investment and the e-retailer’s adoption of blockchain technology. Three strategy combinations are considered, including the baseline strategy combination without green investment and blockchain technology (NN), the strategy combination with only green investment (LN), and the strategy combination with both green investment and blockchain technology (LB). The optimal pricing and green level decisions are derived, and the conditions under which green investment and blockchain technology are beneficial to the supply chain members are examined. The findings suggest that the e-retailer can obtain the highest profit without adopting blockchain technology if it holds a substantial or extremely low market share, if the consumers’ low-carbon preference is at a low to medium level, or if the consumer green trust coefficient is high when the manufacturer implements the green investment strategy. When consumers exhibit a weak preference for low-carbon products, the strategy combination NN is optimal for the supply chain members. The strategy combination LB becomes optimal if the consumer green trust coefficient is near or below the moderate threshold, if the market share of a channel is neither extremely high nor low, or if consumers exhibit a strong preference for low-carbon products.

Suggested Citation

  • Songshi Shao & Yutong Li & Xu Cheng & Jinzhu Qu, 2025. "Green Investment Strategies and Pricing Decisions in a Supply Chain Considering Blockchain Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-23, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:14:p:6491-:d:1702447
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/14/6491/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/14/6491/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yang, Zaoli & Shang, Wen-Long & Miao, Lin & Gupta, Shivam & Wang, Zhengli, 2024. "Pricing decisions of online and offline dual-channel supply chains considering data resource mining," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    2. Jianhua Zhu & Taiwen Feng & Ying Lu & Wenbo Jiang, 2024. "Using blockchain or not? A focal firm's blockchain strategy in the context of carbon emission reduction technology innovation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 3505-3531, May.
    3. Liao, Changhua & Lu, Qihui & Ghamat, Salar & Cai, Helen Huifen, 2025. "Blockchain adoption and coordination strategies for green supply chains considering consumer privacy concern," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 323(2), pages 525-539.
    4. Huafei Chen & Lu Yin & Eren Özceylan, 2023. "Research on the Coordination of Fresh Food Supply Chain Based on the Perspective of Blockchain and Low Carbon," Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, Hindawi, vol. 2023, pages 1-20, February.
    5. Lu, Qihui & Liao, Changhua & Chen, Xiangfeng, 2024. "The blockchain adoption strategies of online retailer in a dual-channel supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    6. Matsui, Kenji, 2024. "Should competing suppliers with dual-channel supply chains adopt agency selling in an e-commerce platform?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 312(2), pages 587-604.
    7. Cao, Cejun & He, Yufan & Liu, Yang & Huang, Hao & Zhang, Fanshun, 2025. "Blockchain technology adoption mechanism for semiconductor chip supply chains considering information disclosure under cost-sharing contract," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Akbarzadeh Sarabi, Mohammad & Taleizadeh, Ata Allah & Bhattacharya, Arijit, 2026. "Towards blockchain-enabled circular closed-loop supply chain and impact of consumers’ distrust in price, product greenness sensitivity and carbon tax and subsidy," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 328(1), pages 105-121.
    2. Xiaole Han & Leong-Mow Gooi, 2025. "Multi-Level Determinants of Sustainable Blockchain Technology Adoption in SCM: Individual, Organisational, and Societal Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-56, March.
    3. Li, Qing & Hadj-Hamou, Khaled & Rekik, Yacine, 2026. "Blockchain traceability valuation for perishable agricultural products: Balancing economic benefit and social impact," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    4. Liao, Changhua & Lu, Qihui & Li, Yanglei & Shi, Victor, 2026. "Platform-led or firm-led? An analysis of artificial intelligence development strategies in agricultural supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    5. Liao, Changhua & Lu, Qihui & Chen, Xiangfeng & Xie, Shenghao, 2025. "The impact of consumer data sharing on an e-tailer’s private label strategy," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    6. Zhu, Haoruo & Ni, Yaodong & Xiao, Yongbo, 2025. "Information sharing across competing platforms with varying information capabilities," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 323(1), pages 125-138.
    7. Kalayci, Eda & Becker, Jan U. & Barrot, Christian, 2024. "Understanding customers’ choice for digital D2C versus multi-brand operations," Journal of Retailing, Elsevier, vol. 100(2), pages 256-273.
    8. Zhang, Justin Zuopeng & Dou, Junpeng & Liu, Yulong David & Nazrul, Asif & Behl, Abhishek, 2025. "Building resilient circular supply chains with blockchain: Exploring the impact of relationships and capabilities," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    9. Tao, Jiayi & Jiang, Wei & Chao, Angela C. & Zhou, Qin, 2025. "Optimal pricing and complex analysis for green e-commerce platform supply chains," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 201(P3).
    10. Mahmoud Abdelrahman & K. Nadia Papamichail & Ramy Hammady & Yusuf Kurt & Wael Abdallah & Leo Shixiong Liu & Sebastian Kapser, 2025. "Organisational Culture and Knowledge Management Systems Adoption: Examining Employee Usage in Multinational Corporations," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 26(3), pages 439-467, September.
    11. Antonius Setyadi & Suharno Pawirosumarto & Alana Damaris, 2025. "Rethinking Sustainable Operations: A Multi-Level Integration of Circularity, Localization, and Digital Resilience in Manufacturing Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-47, July.
    12. Pu, Xujin & Dai, Mingzhuo & Zhang, Jianqiang & Zhang, Wen, 2025. "Product selling, social utility and virtual tips in live streaming," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    13. Sun, Hongxia & Wang, Zhijie & Yan, Ke & Cheng, T.C.E. & Hua, Guowei, 2025. "How to arrange production and carbon emissions reduction? Thoughts towards remanufacturing authorization, risk aversion and carbon cap-and-trade," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    14. Xinfeng Chang & Zihe Yang & Abdullah, 2024. "Digital economy, innovation factor allocation and industrial structure transformation—A case study of the Yangtze River Delta city cluster in China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(4), pages 1-16, April.
    15. Wu, Wenqi & Li, Ming & Yang, Yishu & Huang, Beijia & Wang, Shuo & Huang, George Q., 2025. "Optimal deposit-return strategies for the recycling of spent electric automobile battery: Manufacturer, retailer, or consumer," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 92-103.
    16. Kong, Xiang T.R. & Huang, Rui & Kang, Kai & Xu, Suxiu, 2025. "Combinatorial Group-Buying double auction for recycled remanufacturing products of construction waste," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    17. Li, Jin & Wang, Haoyu & Shi, Victor & Sun, Qi, 2024. "Manufacturer's choice of online selling format in a dual-channel supply chain with green products," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 318(1), pages 131-142.
    18. Reza Maihami & Devika Kannan & Mohammad Fattahi & Chunguang Bai, 2025. "Supply disruptions and the problem of pricing, advertising, and sourcing strategies in a retail duopoly market," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 344(1), pages 217-266, January.
    19. Zhang, Yuanyuan & Fu, Shaochuan & Fan, Shucheng & Ma, Fangfang, 2025. "Game strategy analysis on E-commerce platform supply chain with shared logistics service: A chaos perspective," Applied Mathematics and Computation, Elsevier, vol. 499(C).
    20. Xie, Fengjie & Shen, Xiaoyang & Wang, Siyi, 2025. "Pricing decisions and stability analysis in blockchain-enabled cross-border dual-channel supply chain," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 199(P1).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:14:p:6491-:d:1702447. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.