IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i13p6066-d1693227.html

Are Sustainable Supply Chains Managing Scope 3 Emissions? A Systematic Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Miriam Borchardt

    (Department of Production Engineering, Polytechnic School, Vale do Rio dos Sinos University (UNISINOS), São Leopoldo 93022-750, Brazil)

  • Giancarlo Pereira

    (Department of Production Engineering, Paulista University (UNIP), São Paulo 04026-002, Brazil)

  • Gabriel Milan

    (Department of Production Engineering, Polytechnic School, Vale do Rio dos Sinos University (UNISINOS), São Leopoldo 93022-750, Brazil)

  • Elisabeth Pereira

    (Department of Economics, Management, Industrial Engineering and Tourism, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal)

  • Leandro Lima

    (Department of Production Engineering, Polytechnic School, Vale do Rio dos Sinos University (UNISINOS), São Leopoldo 93022-750, Brazil)

  • Renata Bianchi

    (Department of Production Engineering, Polytechnic School, Vale do Rio dos Sinos University (UNISINOS), São Leopoldo 93022-750, Brazil)

  • Annibal Scavarda do Carmo

    (Department of Production Engineering, Fluminense Federal University, Niterói 24210-201, Brazil)

Abstract

The sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) literature does not directly address Scope 3 emissions despite their role as primary drivers of greenhouse gas emissions. This study aims to provide an overview of the main themes through which the SSCM literature has considered Scope 3 emissions and identify further avenues for research. A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted. Scopus and Web of Science were the databases considered. Sixty-one papers were included in the analysis. Most papers focus on assessing and estimating Scope 3 emissions, followed by papers that discuss the reporting of Scope 3 emissions. These papers shed light on how firms may not report Scope 3 emissions if the information is negative to improve investors’ perception of the firm. The last group of papers discusses practices and strategies to manage Scope 3 emissions. The main challenge identified in establishing strategies to manage Scope 3 emissions is engagement with stakeholders, as, generally, only one or two tiers of the value chain cooperate. This study is the first to organize the literature on Scope 3 emissions under the lens of SSCM. If supply chains are to become more sustainable, focal enterprise coordination must be effective and leverage practices such as Scope 3 emissions metrics and measurement, data sharing, and green product development for all stakeholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Miriam Borchardt & Giancarlo Pereira & Gabriel Milan & Elisabeth Pereira & Leandro Lima & Renata Bianchi & Annibal Scavarda do Carmo, 2025. "Are Sustainable Supply Chains Managing Scope 3 Emissions? A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-22, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:6066-:d:1693227
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/6066/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/6066/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anquetin, Théophile & Coqueret, Guillaume & Tavin, Bertrand & Welgryn, Lou, 2022. "Scopes of carbon emissions and their impact on green portfolios," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    2. Radonjič, Gregor & Tompa, Saša, 2018. "Carbon footprint calculation in telecommunications companies – The importance and relevance of scope 3 greenhouse gases emissions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 361-375.
    3. Matthew J. Spaniol & Evita Danilova-Jensen & Martin Nielsen & Carl Gyldenkærne Rosdahl & Clara Jasmin Schmidt, 2024. "Defining Greenwashing: A Concept Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-17, October.
    4. Frederik Dahlmann & Jens K. Roehrich, 2019. "Sustainable supply chain management and partner engagement to manage climate change information," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(8), pages 1632-1647, December.
    5. Kaijun Gan & Silin Ye, 2024. "Window Dressing in Impression Management: Does Negative Media Coverage Drive Corporate Green Production?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-22, January.
    6. Greg Hall & Kate Liu & Lukasz Pomorski & Laura Serban, 2023. "Supply Chain Climate Exposure," Financial Analysts Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 79(1), pages 58-76, January.
    7. Wenkang Yi & Hongli Liang & Zhaofu Yang, 2025. "The Choice of Carbon Labels and the Impact of Ambiguity Under Market Differences Based on a Game Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-31, April.
    8. Frederik Dahlmann & Layla Branicki & Stephen Brammer, 2019. "Managing Carbon Aspirations: The Influence of Corporate Climate Change Targets on Environmental Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(1), pages 1-24, August.
    9. Yinka Lydia Emmanuel & Olayinka Adenikinju & Mishelle Doorasamy & Tajueden John Ayoola & Abiodun Oyebamiji Oladejo & Jerry D. Kwarbai & Adegbola Olubukola Otekunrin, 2023. "Carbon Emission Disclosure and Financial Performance of Quoted Nigerian Financial Services Companies," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 13(6), pages 628-635, November.
    10. Théophile Anquetin & Guillaume Coqueret & Bertrand Tavin & Lou Welgryn, 2022. "Scopes of carbon emissions and their impact on green portfolios," Post-Print hal-04144612, HAL.
    11. André Martinuzzi & Markus Hametner & Andreas Windsperger & Nadine Brunnhuber, 2023. "A Framework for Assessing the Climate Impacts of Research and Innovation Projects and Programmes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-24, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Katia Colaneri & Alessandra Cretarola & Edoardo Lombardo & Daniele Mancinelli, 2025. "Design and hedging of unit linked life insurance with environmental factors," Papers 2509.05676, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2025.
    2. Bei Liu & Chengwu Li & Yin Zhong, 2025. "Challenging to Change? Examining the Link Between Public Participation and Greenwashing Based on Organizational Inertia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-20, February.
    3. Etienne Raynal & Stéphane Loisel, 2026. "Risk averse asset allocation in a context of climate change with reinforcement learning and hidden Markov models," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 1-31, June.
    4. Katrina Lintukangas & Heli Arminen & Anni-Kaisa Kähkönen & Elina Karttunen, 2023. "Determinants of Supply Chain Engagement in Carbon Management," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 186(1), pages 87-104, August.
    5. Katia Colaneri & Federico D'Amario & Daniele Mancinelli, 2025. "Carbon-Penalised Portfolio Insurance Strategies in a Stochastic Factor Model with Partial Information," Papers 2511.19186, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2026.
    6. Benchora, Inessa & Leroy, Aurélien & Raffestin, Louis, 2025. "Is monetary policy transmission green?," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    7. Sukono & Riza Andrian Ibrahim & Adhitya Ronnie Effendie & Moch Panji Agung Saputra & Igif Gimin Prihanto & Astrid Sulistya Azahra, 2025. "Multi-Objective Optimization with a Closed-Form Solution for Capital Allocation in Environmental Energy Stock Portfolio," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-20, September.
    8. Chen, Junlong & Han, Zuli & Liu, Jiali, 2025. "The R&D and sharing of emission reduction technology with uncertainty and carbon tax under inter-chain competition," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    9. Karol Dabrowski & Katarzyna Skrzypek & Daria Moskwa - Beczkowska, 2025. "Orders for Sustainability Reports – A New Phenomenon in Manufacturing Companies in the Metal and Automotive Industries," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 659-673.
    10. Guerrero-Escobar, Santiago & Hernández-del-Valle, Gerardo & Hernández-Vega, Marco, 2025. "The stock market effects of committing and setting GHG targets: evidence from the science-based targets initiative," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    11. Philipp Wetzel & Erik Hofmann, 2020. "Toward a Multi-Sided Model of Service Quality for Logistics Service Providers," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-24, October.
    12. Wullianallur Raghupathi & Dominik Molitor & Viju Raghupathi & Aditya Saharia, 2023. "Identifying Key Issues in Climate Change Litigation: A Machine Learning Text Analytic Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-30, December.
    13. Giovanni Felici & Daniele Codato & Alberto Lanzavecchia & Massimo De Marchi & Maria Cristina Lavagnolo, 2025. "Retail Development and Corporate Environmental Disclosure: A Spatial Analysis of Land-Use Change in the Veneto Region (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-17, July.
    14. Hu, Zinan & Borjigin, Sumuya, 2025. "Climate information disclosure quality and systemic risk in the U.S. banking industry," Journal of Financial Stability, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    15. Douglas A. Adu & Antoinette Flynn & Colette Grey, 2022. "Executive compensation and sustainable business practices: The moderating role of sustainability‐based compensation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(3), pages 698-736, March.
    16. Dara G. Schniederjans & Mehrnaz Khalajhedayati, 2021. "Competitive sustainability and stakeholder engagement: Exploring awareness, motivation, and capability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 808-824, February.
    17. Lei, Ni & Miao, Qin & Yao, Xin, 2023. "Does the implementation of green credit policy improve the ESG performance of enterprises? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    18. Marco A. Hernandez Vega & Eduardo Martínez González, 2025. "Do climate policies incentivize firms to commit to setting a GHG emissions target?," Working Papers 2025-08, Banco de México.
    19. Jeremy Galbreath & Chia‐Yang Chang & Daniel Tisch, 2023. "The impact of a proactive environmental strategy on environmentally sustainable practices in service firms: The moderating effect of information use value," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 5420-5434, December.
    20. David Bendig & Andreas Wagner & Kevin Lau, 2023. "Does it pay to be science‐based green? The impact of science‐based emission‐reduction targets on corporate financial performance," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(1), pages 125-140, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:6066-:d:1693227. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.