IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i13p5936-d1689218.html

Exploring How Corporate Maturity Moderates the Value Relevance of ESG Disclosures in Sustainable Reporting: Evidence from Bangladesh’s Developing Market

Author

Listed:
  • Saleh Mohammed Mashehdul Islam

    (School of Business, Ahsanullah University of Science and Technology, Dhaka 1208, Bangladesh)

Abstract

This study investigated how corporate maturity—measured through firm age and lifecycle stage—moderates the value relevance of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) disclosures in a frontier market context, using Bangladesh as a case study. Drawing on panel data from 2011–2012 to 2023–2024 for 86 publicly listed non-financial firms, the study employed a modified Ohlson valuation framework, panel regression analysis, and multiple robustness techniques (2SLS, PSM). ESG disclosure was measured using a researcher-developed index aligned with international reporting standards (GRI, SASB, TCFD, UN SDGs). ESG disclosures are positively associated with firm value, but this relationship is significantly moderated by corporate maturity. Younger firms exhibit a stronger valuation effect from ESG transparency, driven by higher signaling and legitimacy needs. In contrast, mature firms experience a diminished marginal benefit, reflecting routine compliance rather than strategic differentiation. These findings challenge the uniform application of ESG assessment models and suggest the need for lifecycle-adjusted disclosure ratings, particularly in nascent regulatory environments like Bangladesh. Investors and regulators should tailor ESG evaluation criteria by firm age and industry sustainability exposure. Younger firms, often overlooked, may carry outsized ESG signaling value in emerging markets. Enhancing ESG transparency among younger firms can foster greater stakeholder trust, support inclusive growth, and strengthen social accountability in emerging economies. This study contributes to the ESG literature by introducing corporate maturity as a key moderating variable in value relevance analysis. It provides new empirical insights from a developing economy and proposes lifecycle-based adaptations to global ESG rating methodologies.

Suggested Citation

  • Saleh Mohammed Mashehdul Islam, 2025. "Exploring How Corporate Maturity Moderates the Value Relevance of ESG Disclosures in Sustainable Reporting: Evidence from Bangladesh’s Developing Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-21, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5936-:d:1689218
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5936/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5936/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sayema Sultana & Norhayah Zulkifli & Dalilawati Zainal, 2018. "Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) and Investment Decision in Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-19, June.
    2. Fatemi, Ali & Glaum, Martin & Kaiser, Stefanie, 2018. "ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 45-64.
    3. Gunnar Friede & Timo Busch & Alexander Bassen, 2015. "ESG and financial performance: aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies," Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(4), pages 210-233, October.
    4. Chen, Zhongfei & Xie, Guanxia, 2022. "ESG disclosure and financial performance: Moderating role of ESG investors," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    5. María Mar Miralles-Quirós & José Luis Miralles-Quirós & Luis Miguel Valente Gonçalves, 2018. "The Value Relevance of Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance: The Brazilian Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-15, February.
    6. Zahra Adardour & Slimane Ed-Dafali & Muhammad Mohiuddin & Omar El Mortagi & Hicham Sbai & Brahim Bouzahir, 2025. "Exploring the drivers of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosure in an emerging market context using a mixed methods approach," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-23, December.
    7. Robert G. Eccles & Ioannis Ioannou & George Serafeim, 2014. "The Impact of Corporate Sustainability on Organizational Processes and Performance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(11), pages 2835-2857, November.
    8. Rashedul Hasan & Mohammad Dulal Miah & M. Kabir Hassan, 2022. "The nexus between environmental and financial performance: Evidence from gulf cooperative council banks," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 2882-2907, November.
    9. Stanislav Edward Shmelev & Elisa Gilardi, 2025. "Sustainable Business as a Force for Good in the Context of Climate Change: An Econometric Modelling Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-35, February.
    10. Denis Cormier & Michel Magnan, 2015. "The Economic Relevance of Environmental Disclosure and its Impact on Corporate Legitimacy: An Empirical Investigation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(6), pages 431-450, September.
    11. Alessio Faccia & Francesco Manni & Fabian Capitanio, 2021. "Mandatory ESG Reporting and XBRL Taxonomies Combination: ESG Ratings and Income Statement, a Sustainable Value-Added Disclosure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-17, August.
    12. Slimane Ed‐Dafali & Zahra Adardour & Atar Derj & Adil Bami & Khaled Hussainey, 2025. "A PRISMA‐Based Systematic Review on Economic, Social, and Governance Practices: Insights and Research Agenda," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(2), pages 1896-1916, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fereydooni, Ali & Barak, Sasan & Asaad Sajadi, Seyed Mehrzad, 2024. "A novel online portfolio selection approach based on pattern matching and ESG factors," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    2. Li, WeiWei & Padmanabhan, Prasad & Huang, Chia-Hsing, 2024. "ESG and debt structure: Is the nature of this relationship nonlinear?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    3. Eduardo Duque-Grisales & Javier Aguilera-Caracuel, 2021. "Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Scores and Financial Performance of Multilatinas: Moderating Effects of Geographic International Diversification and Financial Slack," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 168(2), pages 315-334, January.
    4. Veeravel, V & Murugesan, Vijaya Prabhagar & Narayanamurthy, Vijayakumar, 2024. "Does ESG disclosure really influence the firm performance? Evidence from India," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 193-202.
    5. Davoodi, Shayan & Fereydooni, Ali & Rastegar, Mohammad Ali, 2024. "Can portfolio construction considering ESG still gain high profits?," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(PA).
    6. Eleonora P. Stancheva-Todorova, 2025. "Esg Ratings And Indexes: Benefits And Limitations," Economy & Business Journal, International Scientific Publications, Bulgaria, vol. 19(1), pages 64-81.
    7. Se‐Hee Jeong & Jeong‐Ji Han & Soyoung Jun & Shawn Kim & Jong Woo Kim, 2025. "Investor Responses to ESG News Sentiment: Exploring Differential Effects and Industry Moderation," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(3), pages 3944-3964, May.
    8. Tiantian Meng & Dan Lu & Danni Yu & M. H. Yahya & Mohd Ashhari Zariyawati, 2024. "Is executive compensation aligned with the company’s ESG objectives? Evidence from Chinese listed companies based on the PSM-DID approach," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    9. Emanuele Teti & Alberto Dell'Acqua & Paolo Bonsi, 2022. "Detangling the role of environmental, social, and governance factors on M&A performance," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5), pages 1768-1781, September.
    10. Murat Doğan & Muhammed Aslam Chelery Komath & Özlem Sayilir, 2025. "Credit rating prediction with ESG data using data mining methods," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    11. Samuel Jebaraj Benjamin & Pallab Kumar Biswas, 2022. "Does winning a CSR Award increase firm value?," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(3), pages 313-329, September.
    12. Foteini I. Pagkalou & Konstantinos I. Liapis & Eleftherios I. Thalassinos, 2024. "Defining the Total CSR Z-Score: A Methodological Approach Using Regulations, Standards and Guidelines Through Application to the Greek Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-28, November.
    13. Sakhr Bani-Khaled & Graça Azevedo & Jonas Oliveira, 2025. "Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors and firm value: A systematic literature review of theories and empirical evidence," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 15(1), pages 228-260, June.
    14. Matanle, Peter & Li, Yang & Fakharuzi, Zhamayne & Shin, Yejin & Bradley, Jonathan & McCafferty, Jim, 2025. "Learning from Japan by Avoiding its Mistakes! Assessing the ‘S’ in ESG and its Impact on Financial Performance in Large South Korean Corporations," OSF Preprints jk9hp_v1, Center for Open Science.
    15. Hyun-Jung Nam & Mehmet Huseyin Bilgin & Doojin Ryu, 2024. "Firm value, ownership structure, and strategic approaches to ESG activities," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 14(1), pages 187-226, March.
    16. DasGupta, Ranjan & Roy, Arup, 2023. "Firm environmental, social, governance and financial performance relationship contradictions: Insights from institutional environment mediation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    17. Lei Ruan & Heng Liu, 2021. "Environmental, Social, Governance Activities and Firm Performance: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-16, January.
    18. Marie, Mohamed & Qi, Baolei & Elgammal, Mohammed & Elnahass, Marwa, 2024. "A more sustainable future: Can politically connected CEOs spur the nexus between ESG performance and firm financial performance?," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    19. Iulia Lupu & Gheorghe Hurduzeu & Gabriela tigu & Georgiana Cosoveanu & Radu Ion Filip, 2025. "ESG Reporting and Systemic Risk: Evidence from European Markets," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 27(70), pages 869-869, August.
    20. Amir Gholami & Peter A. Murray & John Sands, 2022. "Environmental, Social, Governance & Financial Performance Disclosure for Large Firms: Is This Different for SME Firms?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-21, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5936-:d:1689218. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.