IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i13p5679-d1683364.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Microcirculation Optimization Model for Public Transportation Networks in Low-Density Areas Considering Equity—A Case of Lanzhou

Author

Listed:
  • Liyun Wang

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

  • Minan Yang

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, China
    School of Transportation, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

  • Xin Li

    (School of Transportation, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

  • Yongsheng Qian

    (School of Transportation, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

Abstract

With the increase in urban–rural disparities in China, rural public transportation systems in low-density areas face unique challenges, especially in the contexts of sparse population, complex topography, and uneven resource allocation; research on public transportation in low-density areas has had less attention compared to high-density urban areas. Therefore, how to solve the dilemma of public transportation service provision in low-density rural areas due to sparse population and long travel distances has become an urgent problem. In this paper, a dynamic optimization model based on a two-layer planning framework was constructed. The upper layer optimized the topology of multimodal transportation nodes through the Floyd shortest path algorithm to generate a composite network of trunk roads and feeder routes; the lower layer adopted an improved Logit discrete choice model, integrating the heterogeneous utility parameters, such as time cost, economic cost, and comfort, to simulate and realize the equilibrium allocation of stochastic users. It was found that the dynamic game mechanism based on the “path optimization–fairness measurement” can optimize the travel time, mode, route, and bus stop selection of rural residents. At the same time, the mechanism can realize the fair distribution of rural transportation network subjects (people–vehicles–roads). This provides a dynamic, multi-scenario macro policy reference basis for the optimization of a rural transportation network layout.

Suggested Citation

  • Liyun Wang & Minan Yang & Xin Li & Yongsheng Qian, 2025. "A Microcirculation Optimization Model for Public Transportation Networks in Low-Density Areas Considering Equity—A Case of Lanzhou," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-22, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5679-:d:1683364
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5679/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/5679/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sharav, Nir & Givoni, Moshe & Shiftan, Yoram, 2019. "What transit service does the periphery need? A case study of Israel’s rural country," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 320-333.
    2. Wei Hu & Lin Li & Mo Su, 2019. "Spatial Inequity of Multi-Level Healthcare Services in a Rapid Expanding Immigrant City of China: A Case Study of Shenzhen," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-16, September.
    3. Druckman, A. & Jackson, T., 2008. "Measuring resource inequalities: The concepts and methodology for an area-based Gini coefficient," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(2), pages 242-252, April.
    4. Petersen, Tim, 2016. "Watching the Swiss: A network approach to rural and exurban public transport," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 175-185.
    5. Wang, Judith Y. T. & Yang, Hai & Lindsey, Robin, 2004. "Locating and pricing park-and-ride facilities in a linear monocentric city with deterministic mode choice," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 38(8), pages 709-731, September.
    6. Karner, Alex, 2016. "Planning for transportation equity in small regions: Towards meaningful performance assessment," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 46-54.
    7. Bhattarai, Santosh & Golias, Mihalis M. & Mishra, Sabyasachee & Talebian, Ahmadreza, 2020. "Multidimensional resource allocation for freight transportation project planning and decision making," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 95-110.
    8. Miao Du & Yuhua Zhao & Tao Fang & Linyu Fan & Minghua Zhang & Hong Huang & Kun Mei, 2022. "Evaluating the Inequality of Medical Resource Allocation Based on Spatial and Non-Spatial Accessibility: A Case Study of Wenzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-15, July.
    9. Alan T. Murray & Rex Davis, 2001. "Equity in Regional Service Provision," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(4), pages 557-600, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jin Li & Jie Li & Jian Huang, 2022. "Research on the Equity and Optimal Allocation of Basic Medical Services in Guangzhou in the Context of COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-15, November.
    2. Martens, Karel & Golub, Aaron & Robinson, Glenn, 2012. "A justice-theoretic approach to the distribution of transportation benefits: Implications for transportation planning practice in the United States," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(4), pages 684-695.
    3. Samani, Ali Riahi & Talebian, Ahmadreza & Mishra, Sabyasachee & Golias, Mihalis, 2025. "Evaluating consumer shopping, delivery demands, and last-mile preferences: An integrated MDCEV-HCM approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    4. Jairo Ortega & János Tóth & Tamás Péter & Sarbast Moslem, 2020. "An Integrated Model of Park-And-Ride Facilities for Sustainable Urban Mobility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-15, June.
    5. Zhang, Jie & Wang, David Z.W. & Meng, Meng, 2018. "Which service is better on a linear travel corridor: Park & ride or on-demand public bus?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 803-818.
    6. Lu, Changxiang & Ye, Yong & Fang, Yongjun & Fang, Jiaqi, 2023. "An optimal control theory approach for freight structure path evolution post-COVID-19 pandemic," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    7. Xu, Shu-Xian & Liu, Tian-Liang & Huang, Hai-Jun & Liu, Ronghui, 2018. "Mode choice and railway subsidy in a congested monocentric city with endogenous population distribution," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 413-433.
    8. Xinyuan Chen & Ruyang Yin & Qinhe An & Yuan Zhang, 2021. "Modeling a Distance-Based Preferential Fare Scheme for Park-and-Ride Services in a Multimodal Transport Network," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-14, March.
    9. Guo, Shuocheng & Kontou, Eleftheria, 2021. "Disparities and equity issues in electric vehicles rebate allocation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    10. Lichtin, Florian & Smith, E. Keith & Axhausen, Kay W. & Bernauer, Thomas, 2024. "“How much should public transport services be expanded, and who should pay? Experimental evidence from Switzerland”," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 64-74.
    11. Qian, Zhen (Sean) & Rajagopal, Ram, 2014. "Optimal occupancy-driven parking pricing under demand uncertainties and traveler heterogeneity: A stochastic control approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 144-165.
    12. Xiaojuan Yu & Vincent A.C. van den Berg, 2024. "Human-driven vehicles’ cruising versus autonomous vehicles’ back- and-forth congestion: The effects on traveling, parking and congestion," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 24-032/VIII, Tinbergen Institute.
    13. Ryan, Jean & Martens, Karel, 2023. "Defining and implementing a sufficient level of accessibility: What’s stopping us?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    14. Krapp, Agustina & Barajas, Jesus & Wennink, Audrey, 2021. "Equity-oriented Criteria for Project Prioritization in Regional Transportation Planning," SocArXiv xcbhy, Center for Open Science.
    15. Cavallaro, Federico & Bruzzone, Francesco & Nocera, Silvio, 2020. "Spatial and social equity implications for High-Speed Railway lines in Northern Italy," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 327-340.
    16. Yujie Yang & Weixin Luan & Yunan Xue, 2019. "Sustainability and Environmental Inequality: Effects of Animal Husbandry Pollution in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-16, August.
    17. Heyer, Johanna & Palm, Matthew & Niemeier, Deb, 2020. "Are we keeping up? Accessibility, equity and air quality in regional planning," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    18. Matisziw, Timothy C. & Murray, Alan T. & Kim, Changjoo, 2006. "Strategic route extension in transit networks," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 171(2), pages 661-673, June.
    19. Jephcote, Calvin & Chen, Haibo & Ropkins, Karl, 2016. "Implementation of the Polluter-Pays Principle (PPP) in local transport policy," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 58-71.
    20. Chenyuan Qin & Min Liu & Xin Guo & Jue Liu, 2022. "Human Resources in Primary Health-Care Institutions before and after the New Health-Care Reform in China from 2003 to 2019: An Interrupted Time Series Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-10, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:5679-:d:1683364. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.