IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i12p5575-d1681079.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The SuLo Framework: A Systematic Literature Review of Drivers and Barriers to Sustainable Logistics Practices

Author

Listed:
  • Sara Turki Abu Tabanjeh

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, TU Dortmund University, 44227 Dortmund, Germany)

  • Christoph Pott

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, TU Dortmund University, 44227 Dortmund, Germany)

  • Christopher Reining

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, TU Dortmund University, 44227 Dortmund, Germany
    Fraunhofer Institute for Material Flow and Logistics IML, 44227 Dortmund, Germany)

Abstract

This contribution presents the SuLo (Sustainable Logistics) framework developed through a systematic literature review of the drivers and barriers to implementing sustainable sustainability in logistics, with a focus on warehousing. As global trade expands, logistics operations face increasing pressure to balance economic efficiency with environmental and social responsibility. Warehousing plays a crucial role in supply chains, contributing significantly to energy consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. Despite growing interest in sustainable logistics, research on sustainable warehousing remains fragmented. This paper synthesizes the existing literature to identify key drivers, barriers, and best practices for sustainable warehousing. The findings reveal that regulatory policies, cost savings, and stakeholder expectations are primary drivers, while high implementation costs, lack of awareness, and operational complexity hinder progress. A structured framework is proposed to guide sustainability integration, incorporating renewable energy, waste reduction, automation, and employee well-being initiatives. The study highlights the necessity of a holistic approach that aligns environmental, economic, and social dimensions. While challenges remain, sustainable warehousing offers long-term benefits, including reduced environmental impact, improved operational efficiency, and enhanced corporate reputation. In conclusion, future research should explore empirical case studies and technological innovations, particularly artificial intelligence, to further advance sustainability in warehousing.

Suggested Citation

  • Sara Turki Abu Tabanjeh & Christoph Pott & Christopher Reining, 2025. "The SuLo Framework: A Systematic Literature Review of Drivers and Barriers to Sustainable Logistics Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-33, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5575-:d:1681079
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5575/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5575/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elliott, Steven R., 2005. "Sustainability: an economic perspective," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 44(3), pages 263-277.
    2. Sundarakani, Balan & de Souza, Robert & Goh, Mark & Wagner, Stephan M. & Manikandan, Sushmera, 2010. "Modeling carbon footprints across the supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 128(1), pages 43-50, November.
    3. Beamon, Benita M., 1998. "Supply chain design and analysis:: Models and methods," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(3), pages 281-294, August.
    4. Sime Curkovic & Robert Sroufe, 2011. "Using ISO 14001 to promote a sustainable supply chain strategy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(2), pages 71-93, February.
    5. Piera Centobelli & Roberto Cerchione & Emilio Esposito, 2018. "Environmental Sustainability and Energy-Efficient Supply Chain Management: A Review of Research Trends and Proposed Guidelines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-36, January.
    6. Moshe Kress, 2016. "Operational Logistics," Management for Professionals, Springer, edition 2, number 978-3-319-22674-3, December.
    7. Efrat Eizenberg & Yosef Jabareen, 2017. "Social Sustainability: A New Conceptual Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-16, January.
    8. Bartolini, M. & Bottani, E. & Grosse, E. H., 2019. "Green warehousing: systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 112369, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    9. Baker, Peter & Canessa, Marco, 2009. "Warehouse design: A structured approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 193(2), pages 425-436, March.
    10. Sadia Samar Ali & Rajbir Kaur & Shahbaz Khan, 2023. "Evaluating sustainability initiatives in warehouse for measuring sustainability performance: an emerging economy perspective," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 324(1), pages 461-500, May.
    11. Michiel C. Zijp & Reinout Heijungs & Ester Van der Voet & Dik Van de Meent & Mark A. J. Huijbregts & Anne Hollander & Leo Posthuma, 2015. "An Identification Key for Selecting Methods for Sustainability Assessments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-23, March.
    12. Joeri Rogelj & Michel den Elzen & Niklas Höhne & Taryn Fransen & Hanna Fekete & Harald Winkler & Roberto Schaeffer & Fu Sha & Keywan Riahi & Malte Meinshausen, 2016. "Paris Agreement climate proposals need a boost to keep warming well below 2 °C," Nature, Nature, vol. 534(7609), pages 631-639, June.
    13. Aymen Sajjad & Gabriel Eweje & David Tappin, 2020. "Managerial perspectives on drivers for and barriers to sustainable supply chain management implementation: Evidence from New Zealand," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(2), pages 592-604, February.
    14. Moshe Kress, 2016. "The Foundation of Operational Logistics," Management for Professionals, in: Operational Logistics, edition 2, chapter 0, pages 33-59, Springer.
    15. Cesar Ramirez & Alvaro Luiz Neuenfeldt Júnior & Julio Cezar Siluk & Lucas De Ataíde, 2022. "A literature overview about warehouse management," International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 42(2), pages 153-175.
    16. Elena Giovannoni & Giacomo Fabietti, 2013. "What Is Sustainability? A Review of the Concept and Its Applications," Springer Books, in: Cristiano Busco & Mark L. Frigo & Angelo Riccaboni & Paolo Quattrone (ed.), Integrated Reporting, edition 127, chapter 2, pages 21-40, Springer.
    17. Muhammad Amad Saeed & Wolfgang Kersten, 2019. "Drivers of Sustainable Supply Chain Management: Identification and Classification," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-23, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Raffeq S. Alim, 2025. "Marketing Strategy Transformation of Micro-Small and Medium Enterprises in Bangsamoro Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao: A Convergent Design," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 12(1), pages 614-631, January.
    2. Zia Ullah & Susana Álvarez-Otero & Mohammed Ali Bait Ali Sulaiman & Muhammad Safdar Sial & Naveed Ahmad & Miklas Scholz & Khaoula Omhand, 2021. "Achieving Organizational Social Sustainability through Electronic Performance Appraisal Systems: The Moderating Influence of Transformational Leadership," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-14, May.
    3. Nikita Osintsev & Aleksandr Rakhmangulov, 2025. "Supply Chain Sustainability Drivers: Identification and Multi-Criteria Assessment," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-45, February.
    4. Saeid Alaei & Seyed Hossein Razavi Hajiagha & Hannan Amoozad Mahdiraji & Jose Arturo Garza-Reyes, 2023. "Unveiling the role of sustainable supply chain drivers toward knowledge-based economy via a novel permutation approach: implications from an emerging economy," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 1231-1250, September.
    5. Piera Centobelli & Roberto Cerchione & Eugenio Oropallo & Wael Hassan El‐Garaihy & Tamer Farag & Khalid Hassan Al Shehri, 2022. "Towards a sustainable development assessment framework to bridge supply chain practices and technologies," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(4), pages 647-663, August.
    6. Tognetti, Alice & Grosse-Ruyken, Pan Theo & Wagner, Stephan M., 2015. "Green supply chain network optimization and the trade-off between environmental and economic objectives," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 170(PB), pages 385-392.
    7. Büşra Ayan & Elif Güner & Semen Son-Turan, 2022. "Blockchain Technology and Sustainability in Supply Chains and a Closer Look at Different Industries: A Mixed Method Approach," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(4), pages 1-39, December.
    8. Francesco Polese & Carmen Gallucci & Luca Carrubbo & Rosalia Santulli, 2021. "Predictive Maintenance as a Driver for Corporate Sustainability: Evidence from a Public-Private Co-Financed R&D Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-21, May.
    9. Bricha, Naji & Nourelfath, Mustapha, 2015. "Protection of warehouses and plants under capacity constraint," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 93-104.
    10. Amin Ullah Khan & Yousaf Ali, 2021. "Sustainable supplier selection for the cold supply chain (CSC) in the context of a developing country," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(9), pages 13135-13164, September.
    11. Hayrullah Kahya, 2023. "A Contribution to Social Sustainability Efforts in Turkey in the Context of Migration: Uyum Çocuk (Harmonization Child) Platform," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-19, September.
    12. Sara Perotti & Lorenzo Bruno Prataviera & Marco Melacini, 2022. "Assessing the environmental impact of logistics sites through CO2eq footprint computation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(4), pages 1679-1694, May.
    13. Kamran Khan & Katarzyna Szopik Depczyńska & Izabela Dembińska & Giuseppe Ioppolo, 2022. "Most Relevant Sustainability Criteria for Urban Infrastructure Projects—AHP Analysis for the Gulf States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-18, November.
    14. Konrad Lewczuk & Michał Kłodawski & Paweł Gepner, 2021. "Energy Consumption in a Distributional Warehouse: A Practical Case Study for Different Warehouse Technologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-25, May.
    15. Wang, Bingzheng & Lu, Xiaofei & Zhang, Cancan & Wang, Hongsheng, 2022. "Cascade and hybrid processes for co-generating solar-based fuels and electricity via combining spectral splitting technology and membrane reactor," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 782-799.
    16. Alexander C. Abajian & Tamma Carleton & Kyle C. Meng & Olivier Deschênes, 2025. "Quantifying the global climate feedback from energy-based adaptation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-15, December.
    17. Aibo Li & Ke Ma & Shanyue Jin, 2025. "Digitization and Internal Governance: The Power to Drive the Impact of Supply Chain Efficiency on Corporate Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-22, June.
    18. Scott, James & Ho, William & Dey, Prasanta K. & Talluri, Srinivas, 2015. "A decision support system for supplier selection and order allocation in stochastic, multi-stakeholder and multi-criteria environments," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 226-237.
    19. Tomislav Letnik & Katja Hanžič & Giuseppe Luppino & Matej Mencinger, 2022. "Impact of Logistics Trends on Freight Transport Development in Urban Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-18, December.
    20. Ankitha Vijayakumar & Muhammad Nateque Mahmood & Argaw Gurmu & Imriyas Kamardeen & Shafiq Alam, 2024. "Social sustainability assessment of road infrastructure: a systematic literature review," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 58(2), pages 1039-1069, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5575-:d:1681079. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.