IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i12p5528-d1679968.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic, Environmental, and Sociopolitical Aspects of Waste Incineration: A Scoping Review

Author

Listed:
  • Peter W. Tait

    (School of Medicine and Psychology, College of Science and Medicine, Australian National University, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia
    Public Health Association of Australia, Deakin, ACT 2600, Australia)

  • Joe Salmona

    (School of Medicine and Psychology, College of Science and Medicine, Australian National University, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia)

  • Mahakaran Sandhu

    (School of Medicine and Psychology, College of Science and Medicine, Australian National University, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia)

  • Thomas Guscott

    (School of Medicine and Psychology, College of Science and Medicine, Australian National University, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia)

  • Jonathon King

    (School of Medicine and Psychology, College of Science and Medicine, Australian National University, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia)

  • Victoria Williamson

    (School of Medicine and Psychology, College of Science and Medicine, Australian National University, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia)

Abstract

Objective: To examine the economic, environmental, and sociopolitical aspects of waste-to-energy incineration (WtE-I) and to provide recommendations for the Australian context. Methods: A scoping review of the literature published from 2016 to 2024 was conducted, adhering to the PRISMA guidelines. Results: This review identifies WtE-I as a dual-purpose tool for energy production and waste management. However, its environmental profile is unclear, with potential significant environmental and health risks due to the emission of toxins and heavy metals and diminished air quality. The economic feasibility of WtE-I varies, with high initial costs and operational expenses offset by subsidies, revenue from energy, and material recovery. Public opposition to WtE-I is prevalent, driven by health concerns, and this raises important environmental justice issues, especially for marginalised communities. Conclusions: The present study provides economic, environmental, and sociopolitical recommendations against WtE-I. When compared to landfill, WtE-I demonstrates economic and environmental benefits. The transition to a circular economy with renewables-derived electricity attenuates the benefits of WtE-I. This, combined with grassroots opposition to WtE-I and its violations of social justice, renders future WtE-I projects unjustifiable. Public health practitioners need to promote primary waste reduction, recycling/composting, and other non-incinerator waste management practices in Australia.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter W. Tait & Joe Salmona & Mahakaran Sandhu & Thomas Guscott & Jonathon King & Victoria Williamson, 2025. "Economic, Environmental, and Sociopolitical Aspects of Waste Incineration: A Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-14, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5528-:d:1679968
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5528/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5528/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5528-:d:1679968. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.