IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i12p5528-d1679968.html

Economic, Environmental, and Sociopolitical Aspects of Waste Incineration: A Scoping Review

Author

Listed:
  • Peter W. Tait

    (School of Medicine and Psychology, College of Science and Medicine, Australian National University, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia
    Public Health Association of Australia, Deakin, ACT 2600, Australia)

  • Joe Salmona

    (School of Medicine and Psychology, College of Science and Medicine, Australian National University, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia)

  • Mahakaran Sandhu

    (School of Medicine and Psychology, College of Science and Medicine, Australian National University, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia)

  • Thomas Guscott

    (School of Medicine and Psychology, College of Science and Medicine, Australian National University, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia)

  • Jonathon King

    (School of Medicine and Psychology, College of Science and Medicine, Australian National University, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia)

  • Victoria Williamson

    (School of Medicine and Psychology, College of Science and Medicine, Australian National University, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia)

Abstract

Objective: To examine the economic, environmental, and sociopolitical aspects of waste-to-energy incineration (WtE-I) and to provide recommendations for the Australian context. Methods: A scoping review of the literature published from 2016 to 2024 was conducted, adhering to the PRISMA guidelines. Results: This review identifies WtE-I as a dual-purpose tool for energy production and waste management. However, its environmental profile is unclear, with potential significant environmental and health risks due to the emission of toxins and heavy metals and diminished air quality. The economic feasibility of WtE-I varies, with high initial costs and operational expenses offset by subsidies, revenue from energy, and material recovery. Public opposition to WtE-I is prevalent, driven by health concerns, and this raises important environmental justice issues, especially for marginalised communities. Conclusions: The present study provides economic, environmental, and sociopolitical recommendations against WtE-I. When compared to landfill, WtE-I demonstrates economic and environmental benefits. The transition to a circular economy with renewables-derived electricity attenuates the benefits of WtE-I. This, combined with grassroots opposition to WtE-I and its violations of social justice, renders future WtE-I projects unjustifiable. Public health practitioners need to promote primary waste reduction, recycling/composting, and other non-incinerator waste management practices in Australia.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter W. Tait & Joe Salmona & Mahakaran Sandhu & Thomas Guscott & Jonathon King & Victoria Williamson, 2025. "Economic, Environmental, and Sociopolitical Aspects of Waste Incineration: A Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-14, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5528-:d:1679968
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5528/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5528/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Beatriz S. Bandarra & Sónia Silva & Joana L. Pereira & Rui C. Martins & Margarida J. Quina, 2022. "A Study on the Classification of a Mirror Entry in the European List of Waste: Incineration Bottom Ash from Municipal Solid Waste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-19, August.
    2. Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír & Fan, Yee Van & Tan, Raymond R. & Jiang, Peng, 2020. "Minimising the present and future plastic waste, energy and environmental footprints related to COVID-19," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    3. Aldersey-Williams, J. & Rubert, T., 2019. "Levelised cost of energy – A theoretical justification and critical assessment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 169-179.
    4. Zhou, Ziqiao & Zhang, Lin, 2022. "Sustainable waste management and waste to energy: Valuation of energy potential of MSW in the Greater Bay Area of China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    5. Samuel O. Alamu & Ayodeji Wemida & Tiyobistiya Tsegaye & Gbekeloluwa Oguntimein, 2021. "Sustainability Assessment of Municipal Solid Waste in Baltimore USA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-12, February.
    6. Silva, Leo Jaymee de Vilas Boas da & Santos, Ivan Felipe Silva dos & Mensah, Johnson Herlich Roslee & Gonçalves, Andriani Tavares Tenório & Barros, Regina Mambeli, 2020. "Incineration of municipal solid waste in Brazil: An analysis of the economically viable energy potential," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 1386-1394.
    7. David Moher & Alessandro Liberati & Jennifer Tetzlaff & Douglas G Altman & The PRISMA Group, 2009. "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement," PLOS Medicine, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(7), pages 1-6, July.
    8. Yu-Tsang Lu & Yuh-Ming Lee & Chien-Yu Hong, 2017. "Inventory Analysis and Social Life Cycle Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Waste-to-Energy Incineration in Taiwan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-18, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karenine Máximo Oliveira Landim & Domenico Ceglia & Elias Pereira Lopes Júnior & Sérgio Henrique de Oliveira Lima, 2025. "A Systematic Review of Urban Solid Waste Management to Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions: A Quantitative and Qualitative Approach," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(5), pages 7474-7512, October.
    2. İlkay Unay-Gailhard & Mark A. Brennen, 2022. "How digital communications contribute to shaping the career paths of youth: a review study focused on farming as a career option," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(4), pages 1491-1508, December.
    3. Mahin Ghafari & Vali Baigi & Zahra Cheraghi & Amin Doosti-Irani, 2016. "The Prevalence of Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in Iranian Pregnant Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-10, June.
    4. Santos Urbina & Sofía Villatoro & Jesús Salinas, 2021. "Self-Regulated Learning and Technology-Enhanced Learning Environments in Higher Education: A Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-12, June.
    5. Nadine Desrochers & Adèle Paul‐Hus & Jen Pecoskie, 2017. "Five decades of gratitude: A meta‐synthesis of acknowledgments research," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 68(12), pages 2821-2833, December.
    6. Maryono, Maryono & Killoes, Aditya Marendra & Adhikari, Rajendra & Abdul Aziz, Ammar, 2024. "Agriculture development through multi-stakeholder partnerships in developing countries: A systematic literature review," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    7. Alene Sze Jing Yong & Yi Heng Lim & Mark Wing Loong Cheong & Ednin Hamzah & Siew Li Teoh, 2022. "Willingness-to-pay for cancer treatment and outcome: a systematic review," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 23(6), pages 1037-1057, August.
    8. Sarah H. Son-Theroux & Olivera J. Bogunovic, 2025. "Meeting Carer Health Information Needs in Mental Health: An Integrative Review," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 34(5), pages 244-254, June.
    9. Agnieszka A. Tubis & Katarzyna Grzybowska, 2022. "In Search of Industry 4.0 and Logistics 4.0 in Small-Medium Enterprises—A State of the Art Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-26, November.
    10. García-Poole, Chloe & Byrne, Sonia & Rodrigo, María José, 2019. "How do communities intervene with adolescents at psychosocial risk? A systematic review of positive development programs," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 194-209.
    11. Qing Ye & Bao-Xin Qian & Wei-Li Yin & Feng-Mei Wang & Tao Han, 2016. "Association between the HFE C282Y, H63D Polymorphisms and the Risks of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease, Liver Cirrhosis and Hepatocellular Carcinoma: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 5,758 Cases and 14,741 Controls," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-17, September.
    12. Bishal Mohindru & David Turner & Tracey Sach & Diana Bilton & Siobhan Carr & Olga Archangelidi & Arjun Bhadhuri & Jennifer A. Whitty, 2020. "Health State Utility Data in Cystic Fibrosis: A Systematic Review," PharmacoEconomics - Open, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 13-25, March.
    13. Neal R. Haddaway & Matthew J. Page & Chris C. Pritchard & Luke A. McGuinness, 2022. "PRISMA2020: An R package and Shiny app for producing PRISMA 2020‐compliant flow diagrams, with interactivity for optimised digital transparency and Open Synthesis," Campbell Systematic Reviews, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(2), June.
    14. Ding Zhu & Mindan Wu & Yuan Cao & Shihua Lin & Nanxia Xuan & Chen Zhu & Wen Li & Huahao Shen, 2018. "Heated humidification did not improve compliance of positive airway pressure and subjective daytime sleepiness in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: A meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(12), pages 1-16, December.
    15. Pelai, Ricardo & Hagerman, Shannon M. & Kozak, Robert, 2020. "Biotechnologies in agriculture and forestry: Governance insights from a comparative systematic review of barriers and recommendations," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    16. Cocco, Edoardo & Hashimoto, Yuji Z. & Chopin, Julien, 2025. "Child sexual abuse in the catholic church: A scoping review of characteristics, prevalence, and explanatory factors," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    17. Wesam Salah Alaloul & Muhammad Altaf & Muhammad Ali Musarat & Muhammad Faisal Javed & Amir Mosavi, 2021. "Systematic Review of Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Cost Analysis for Pavement and a Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-38, April.
    18. Joesri Mohamad Saber & Kardina Kamaruddin, 2025. "A Bibliometric Analysis of Training, Competencies, and Job Readiness in the Hotel and Tourism Industry: Trends and Future Directions," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(14), pages 282-297, February.
    19. Mekuriaw Nibret Aweke & Elsa Awoke Fentie & Muluken Chanie Agimas & Lemlem Daniel Baffa & Ever Siyoum Shewarega & Aysheshim Kassahun Belew & Esmael Ali Muhammad & Berhanu Mengistu, 2025. "Folic acid supplementation during preconception period in sub-Saharan African countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(1), pages 1-24, January.
    20. Claudia Peters & Agnessa Kozak & Albert Nienhaus & Anja Schablon, 2020. "Risk of Occupational Latent Tuberculosis Infection among Health Personnel Measured by Interferon-Gamma Release Assays in Low Incidence Countries—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-16, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5528-:d:1679968. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.