IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i12p5458-d1678310.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ergonomics Management Evaluation Model for Supply Chain: An Axiomatic Design Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Iván Francisco Rodríguez-Gámez

    (Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, Autonomous University of Ciudad Juarez, Del Charro Ave. 450N, Ciudad Juarez 32310, Chihuahua, Mexico
    Department of Industrial Engineering, Sonora Institute of Technology, 5 de Febrero 818 Sur Col. Centro, Ciudad Obregon 85000, Sonora, Mexico)

  • Aide Aracely Maldonado-Macías

    (Department of Industrial Engineering and Manufacturing, Autonomous University of Ciudad Juarez, Del Charro Ave. 450N, Ciudad Juarez 32310, Chihuahua, Mexico)

  • Ernesto Alonso Lagarda-Leyva

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Sonora Institute of Technology, 5 de Febrero 818 Sur Col. Centro, Ciudad Obregon 85000, Sonora, Mexico)

  • Juan Luis Hernández-Arellano

    (Department of Design, Autonomous University of Ciudad Juarez, Del Charro Ave. 450N, Ciudad Juarez 32310, Chihuahua, Mexico)

  • Yordán Rodríguez

    (National School of Public Health, University of Antioquia, Medellin 050010, Colombia)

  • Arnulfo Naranjo-Flores

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Sonora Institute of Technology, 5 de Febrero 818 Sur Col. Centro, Ciudad Obregon 85000, Sonora, Mexico)

Abstract

Organizations worldwide are moving towards sustainability in the supply chains (SCs). Ergonomics management (EM) in SCs can contribute to their social sustainability (SS) by providing a fair, safe, and healthy environment. The literature recognizes the lack of an ergonomics management evaluation model (EMEM) for SCs contributing to SS. This research aims to propose an EMEM applicable to SCs. A continuous improvement approach with five constructs: Plan, Do, Check, Act, and Leadership and Worker participation (L&WP) was conducted, including nineteen domains, and the axiomatic design methodology was deployed. Design ranges (DRs) were defined by 34 experts from Latin America. System ranges (SRs) were assessed by self-assessments of EM practices to obtain the information content axiom in one case study of the Mexican salt industry. A new ergonomics management index for the supply chain (EMISC) and a corresponding scale were implemented. According to this scale, the index was found to be low, indicating a poor ergonomics management index (EMI) for the supplier link across the nineteen domains. The proposed EMEM effectively obtains an EMI of the supply chain (SC) by link and entirely. The model identifies opportunities to improve ergonomics practices for companies participating in sustainable supply chains (SSC).

Suggested Citation

  • Iván Francisco Rodríguez-Gámez & Aide Aracely Maldonado-Macías & Ernesto Alonso Lagarda-Leyva & Juan Luis Hernández-Arellano & Yordán Rodríguez & Arnulfo Naranjo-Flores, 2025. "Ergonomics Management Evaluation Model for Supply Chain: An Axiomatic Design Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-47, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5458-:d:1678310
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5458/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5458/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kulak, Osman & Kahraman, Cengiz, 2005. "Multi-attribute comparison of advanced manufacturing systems using fuzzy vs. crisp axiomatic design approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(3), pages 415-424, March.
    2. Jorge A. Rodríguez & Cristina Giménez Thomsen & Daniel Arenas & Mark Pagell, 2016. "NGOs’ Initiatives to Enhance Social Sustainability in the Supply Chain: Poverty Alleviation through Supplier Development Programs," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 52(3), pages 83-108, July.
    3. World Commission on Environment and Development,, 1987. "Our Common Future," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780192820808.
    4. Brandenburg, Marcus & Govindan, Kannan & Sarkis, Joseph & Seuring, Stefan, 2014. "Quantitative models for sustainable supply chain management: Developments and directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(2), pages 299-312.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schöll, Michaela, 2017. "Three Essays on Sustainable Supply Chain Management – Towards Sustainable Supplier Selection and Sustainable Sourcing," EconStor Theses, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, number 172463.
    2. Handson Claudio Dias Pimenta & Peter Ball & Konstantinos Salonitis, 2021. "Supply chain environmental and social sustainability practice diffusion: Bibliometrics, content analysis and conceptual framework," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(6), pages 1870-1890, November.
    3. Sebastjan Lazar & Dorota Klimecka-Tatar & Matevz Obrecht, 2021. "Sustainability Orientation and Focus in Logistics and Supply Chains," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-20, March.
    4. Dubey, Vivek Kumar & Chavas, Jean-Paul & Veeramani, Dharmaraj, 2018. "Analytical framework for sustainable supply-chain contract management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 240-261.
    5. Dayal S. Prasad & Rudra P. Pradhan & Kunal Gaurav & Partha P. Chatterjee & Inderpal Kaur & Saurav Dash & Sagar Nayak, 2018. "Analysing the critical success factors for implementation of sustainable supply chain management: an Indian case study," DECISION: Official Journal of the Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, Springer;Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, vol. 45(1), pages 3-25, March.
    6. Barbosa-Póvoa, Ana Paula & da Silva, Cátia & Carvalho, Ana, 2018. "Opportunities and challenges in sustainable supply chain: An operations research perspective," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 268(2), pages 399-431.
    7. Jyoti Dhingra Darbari & Devika Kannan & Vernika Agarwal & P. C. Jha, 2019. "Fuzzy criteria programming approach for optimising the TBL performance of closed loop supply chain network design problem," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 273(1), pages 693-738, February.
    8. Varsei, Mohsen & Polyakovskiy, Sergey, 2017. "Sustainable supply chain network design: A case of the wine industry in Australia," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 66(PB), pages 236-247.
    9. Josef-Peter Schöggl & Morgane M. C. Fritz & Rupert J. Baumgartner, 2016. "Sustainability Assessment in Automotive and Electronics Supply Chains—A Set of Indicators Defined in a Multi-Stakeholder Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(11), pages 1-20, November.
    10. Eleonora Bottani & Giorgia Casella & Majcol Nobili & Letizia Tebaldi, 2022. "An Analytic Model for Estimating the Economic and Environmental Impact of Food Cold Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-16, April.
    11. Volker Frehe & Frank Teuteberg, 2017. "Information and communication technology in green logistics: status quo and research gaps," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 67(2), pages 65-96, April.
    12. Gold, Stefan & Schleper, Martin C., 2017. "A pathway towards true sustainability: A recognition foundation of sustainable supply chain management," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 425-429.
    13. Fritz, Morgane MC & Ruel, Salomée & Kallmuenzer, Andreas & Harms, Rainer, 2021. "Sustainability management in supply chains: the role of familiness," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    14. Peng Jia & Kannan Govindan & Tsan-Ming Choi & Sivakumar Rajendran, 2015. "Supplier Selection Problems in Fashion Business Operations with Sustainability Considerations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-17, February.
    15. CHEN, Helen S.Y., 2020. "Designing Sustainable Humanitarian Supply Chains," OSF Preprints m82ar, Center for Open Science.
    16. Denise Ravet, 2011. "Lean production: the link between supply chain and sustainable development in an international environment," Post-Print hal-00691666, HAL.
    17. Mara Del Baldo, 2012. "Corporate social responsibility and corporate governance in Italian SMEs: the experience of some “spirited businesses”," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 16(1), pages 1-36, February.
    18. Michael Howes & Liana Wortley & Ruth Potts & Aysin Dedekorkut-Howes & Silvia Serrao-Neumann & Julie Davidson & Timothy Smith & Patrick Nunn, 2017. "Environmental Sustainability: A Case of Policy Implementation Failure?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-17, January.
    19. Parnphumeesup, Piya & Kerr, Sandy A., 2011. "Stakeholder preferences towards the sustainable development of CDM projects: Lessons from biomass (rice husk) CDM project in Thailand," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(6), pages 3591-3601, June.
    20. Chin-Shan Lu & Kuo-Chung Shang & Chi-Chang Lin, 2016. "Examining sustainability performance at ports: port managers’ perspectives on developing sustainable supply chains," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(8), pages 909-927, November.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5458-:d:1678310. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.