IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i12p5441-d1677845.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring the Spatiotemporal Associations Between Ride-Hailing Demand, Visual Walkability, and the Built Environment: Evidence from Chengdu, China

Author

Listed:
  • Rui Si

    (School of Architecture, Harbin Institute of Technology Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518055, China
    Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Urban Planning and Simulation Decision, Shenzhen 518055, China)

  • Yaoyu Lin

    (School of Architecture, Harbin Institute of Technology Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518055, China
    Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Urban Planning and Simulation Decision, Shenzhen 518055, China)

Abstract

Ride-hailing services have reshaped urban commuting patterns, yet the spatiotemporal mechanisms linking built environment features to ride-hailing demand remain underexplored. Existing studies often overlook the joint effects of origin–destination visual walkability. This study integrates ride-hailing GPS trajectories and geospatial data to quantify mobility patterns and built-environment indicators in Chengdu, China. A dual analytical framework combining global regression and localized modeling was applied to disentangle spatial–temporal influences of urban form and socioeconomic factors. The results reveal that population density, floor–area ratio, and housing prices positively correlate with demand, while road density and distance to city center exhibit negative associations. Visual walkability metrics show divergent effects: psychological greenery and pavement visibility reduce ride-hailing usage, whereas outdoor enclosure enhances it. Temporal analysis identifies time-dependent impacts of built environment variables on main urban area travel. Housing price effects demonstrate spatial globality, while population density and city-center proximity exhibit geographically bounded correlations. Notably, improved visual walkability in specific zones reduces reliance on ride-hailing by facilitating sustainable alternatives. These findings provide empirical support for optimizing urban infrastructure and land-use policies to promote equitable mobility systems. The proposed methodology offers a replicable framework for assessing transportation–land-use interactions, informing targeted interventions to achieve metropolitan sustainability goals through coordinated spatial planning and pedestrian-centric design.

Suggested Citation

  • Rui Si & Yaoyu Lin, 2025. "Exploring the Spatiotemporal Associations Between Ride-Hailing Demand, Visual Walkability, and the Built Environment: Evidence from Chengdu, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-30, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5441-:d:1677845
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5441/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5441/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Haoran & Chen, Jinyu & Li, Wenjing & Song, Xuan & Shibasaki, Ryosuke, 2020. "Mobile phone GPS data in urban ride-sharing: An assessment method for emission reduction potential," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    2. Wang, Donggen & Cao, Xinyu, 2017. "Impacts of the built environment on activity-travel behavior: Are there differences between public and private housing residents in Hong Kong?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 25-35.
    3. Zhang, Chuanchuan & Jia, Shen & Yang, Rudai, 2016. "Housing affordability and housing vacancy in China: The role of income inequality," Journal of Housing Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 4-14.
    4. repec:cdl:itsdav:qt82w2z91j is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Mark R. Stevens, 2017. "Response to Commentaries on “Does Compact Development Make People Drive Less?”," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 83(2), pages 151-158, April.
    6. Tian Li & Peng Jing & Linchao Li & Dazhi Sun & Wenbo Yan, 2019. "Revealing the Varying Impact of Urban Built Environment on Online Car-Hailing Travel in Spatio-Temporal Dimension: An Exploratory Analysis in Chengdu, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-17, March.
    7. Hu, Lirong & He, Shenjing & Han, Zixuan & Xiao, He & Su, Shiliang & Weng, Min & Cai, Zhongliang, 2019. "Monitoring housing rental prices based on social media:An integrated approach of machine-learning algorithms and hedonic modeling to inform equitable housing policies," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 657-673.
    8. Wenbo Zhang & Satish V. Ukkusuri & Jian John Lu, 2017. "Impacts of urban built environment on empty taxi trips using limited geolocation data," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(6), pages 1445-1473, November.
    9. Mark R. Stevens, 2017. "Does Compact Development Make People Drive Less?," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 83(1), pages 7-18, January.
    10. Neves, Andre & Brand, Christian, 2019. "Assessing the potential for carbon emissions savings from replacing short car trips with walking and cycling using a mixed GPS-travel diary approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 130-146.
    11. Yi Lu & Guibo Sun & Chinmoy Sarkar & Zhonghua Gou & Yang Xiao, 2018. "Commuting Mode Choice in a High-Density City: Do Land-Use Density and Diversity Matter in Hong Kong?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-13, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jixiang Liu & Longzhu Xiao, 2024. "Socioeconomic differences in effect size: predicting commuting mode choice of migrants and locals using a light gradient boosting approach," Transportation, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 1-24, February.
    2. Lin, Tao & Guan, Xiaodong & Wang, Donggen, 2024. "How does social network mediate/moderate the effects of the built environment on travel behavior?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    3. Chetan Doddamani & M. Manoj, 2023. "Analysis of the influences of built environment measures on household car and motorcycle ownership decisions in Hubli-Dharwad cities," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 205-243, February.
    4. Carozzi, Felipe & Roth, Sefi, 2023. "Dirty density: Air quality and the density of American cities," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    5. Mouratidis, Kostas & Ettema, Dick & Næss, Petter, 2019. "Urban form, travel behavior, and travel satisfaction," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 306-320.
    6. Li, Xiaomeng & Neal, Zachary P., 2022. "Are larger cities more central in urban networks: A meta-analysis," OSF Preprints y3s69, Center for Open Science.
    7. Faizeh Hatami & Jean-Claude Thill, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Evaluation of the Built Environment’s Impact on Commuting Duration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-19, June.
    8. Ding, Chuan & Cao, Xinyu (Jason) & Næss, Petter, 2018. "Applying gradient boosting decision trees to examine non-linear effects of the built environment on driving distance in Oslo," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 107-117.
    9. Bindong Sun & Rui Guo & Chun Yin, 2023. "Inequity on suburban campuses: University students disadvantaged in self‐improvement travel," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 54(2), pages 404-420, June.
    10. Bautista-Hernández, Dorian Antonio & Trejo Nieto, Alejandra, 2024. "Who uses transit in the journey to work? Multimodality, equity, and planning implications in México City," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    11. Chun Yin & Bindong Sun, 2020. "Does Compact Built Environment Help to Reduce Obesity? Influence of Population Density on Waist–Hip Ratio in Chinese Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-16, October.
    12. Gao, Jiong & Ma, Shoufeng & Zou, Hongyang & Du, Huibin, 2023. "How does population agglomeration influence the adoption of new energy vehicles? Evidence from 290 cities in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    13. Guan, Xiaodong & Wang, Donggen, 2019. "Influences of the built environment on travel: A household-based perspective," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 710-724.
    14. Nazari, Fatemeh & Mohammadian, Abolfazl (Kouros), 2023. "Modeling vehicle-miles of travel accounting for latent heterogeneity," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 45-53.
    15. Schmid, Basil & Becker, Felix & Axhausen, Kay W. & Widmer, Paul & Stein, Petra, 2023. "A simultaneous model of residential location, mobility tool ownership and mode choice using latent variables," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    16. Boeing, Geoff & Riggs, William, 2022. "Converting One-Way Streets to Two-Way Streets to Improve Transportation Network Efficiency and Reduce Vehicle Distance Traveled," SocArXiv fyhbc, Center for Open Science.
    17. Zhao, Chuyun & Tang, Jinjun & Zeng, Yu & Li, Zhitao & Gao, Fan, 2023. "Understanding the spatio-temporally heterogeneous effects of built environment on urban travel emissions," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    18. Manville, Michael & King, Hannah & Matute, Juan & Lau, Theodore, 2024. "Neighborhood change and transit ridership: Evidence from Los Angeles and Orange Counties," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    19. Charles Raux & Ayana Lamatkhanova & Lény Grassot, 2021. "Does the built environment shape commuting? The case of Lyon (France)," Post-Print halshs-03010833, HAL.
    20. Zhenbao Wang & Xin Gong & Yuchen Zhang & Shuyue Liu & Ning Chen, 2023. "Multi-Scale Geographically Weighted Elasticity Regression Model to Explore the Elastic Effects of the Built Environment on Ride-Hailing Ridership," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-22, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5441-:d:1677845. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.