IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i12p5276-d1674019.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Influence of Building Envelope Modeling Parameters on Energy Simulation Results

Author

Listed:
  • Simon Muhič

    (Institute for Renewable Energy and Efficient Exergy Use, INOVEKS d.o.o., Cesta 2. grupe odredov 17, 1295 Ivančna Gorica, Slovenia
    Faculty of Industrial Engineering Novo Mesto, Šegova ulica 112, 8000 Novo Mesto, Slovenia
    Rudolfovo—Science and Technology Centre Novo Mesto, Podbreznik 15, 8000 Novo Mesto, Slovenia)

  • Dimitrije Manić

    (The Innovation Center of the Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Belgrade, Kraljice Marije 16, 11120 Belgrade, Serbia)

  • Ante Čikić

    (Department of Mechatronics, University North, 104. Brigade 3, 42000 Varaždin, Croatia)

  • Mirko Komatina

    (Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Belgrade, Kraljice Marije 16, 11120 Belgrade, Serbia)

Abstract

This study investigates the influence of input values for building energy model parameters on simulation results, with the aim of improving the reliability and sustainability of energy performance assessments. Dynamic simulations were conducted in TRNSYS for three theoretical multi-residential buildings, varying parameters such as referent model dimensions, infiltration rates, envelope thermophysical properties, and interior thermal capacitance. The case study, based in Slovenia, demonstrates that glazing-related parameters, particularly the solar heat gain coefficient (g-value), exert the most significant influence—reducing the g-value from 0.62 to 0.22 decreased simulated heating ( q H,nd ) and cooling ( q C,nd ) demands by 25% and 95%, respectively. In contrast, referent dimensions for modeled floor area proved least influential. For Building III (BSF = 0.36), dimensional variations altered results by less than ±1%, whereas, for Building I (BSF = 0.62), variations reached up to ±20%. In general, lower shape factors yield more robust energy models that are less sensitive to input deviations. These findings are critical for promoting resource-efficient simulation practices and ensuring that energy modeling contributes effectively to sustainable building design. Understanding which inputs warrant detailed attention supports more targeted and meaningful simulation workflows, enabling more accurate and impactful strategies for building energy efficiency and long-term environmental performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Simon Muhič & Dimitrije Manić & Ante Čikić & Mirko Komatina, 2025. "Influence of Building Envelope Modeling Parameters on Energy Simulation Results," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-17, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5276-:d:1674019
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5276/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5276/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Menezes, Anna Carolina & Cripps, Andrew & Bouchlaghem, Dino & Buswell, Richard, 2012. "Predicted vs. actual energy performance of non-domestic buildings: Using post-occupancy evaluation data to reduce the performance gap," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 355-364.
    2. Oldewurtel, Frauke & Sturzenegger, David & Morari, Manfred, 2013. "Importance of occupancy information for building climate control," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 521-532.
    3. Johra, Hicham & Heiselberg, Per, 2017. "Influence of internal thermal mass on the indoor thermal dynamics and integration of phase change materials in furniture for building energy storage: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 19-32.
    4. Zakula, Tea & Bagaric, Marina & Ferdelji, Nenad & Milovanovic, Bojan & Mudrinic, Sasa & Ritosa, Katia, 2019. "Comparison of dynamic simulations and the ISO 52016 standard for the assessment of building energy performance," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    5. Connolly, D. & Lund, H. & Mathiesen, B.V. & Leahy, M., 2010. "A review of computer tools for analysing the integration of renewable energy into various energy systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(4), pages 1059-1082, April.
    6. Al-Sanea, Sami A. & Zedan, M.F., 2012. "Effect of thermal bridges on transmission loads and thermal resistance of building walls under dynamic conditions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 584-593.
    7. Li, Yanfei & O'Neill, Zheng & Zhang, Liang & Chen, Jianli & Im, Piljae & DeGraw, Jason, 2021. "Grey-box modeling and application for building energy simulations - A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guo, Yurun & Wang, Shugang & Wang, Jihong & Zhang, Tengfei & Ma, Zhenjun & Jiang, Shuang, 2024. "Key district heating technologies for building energy flexibility: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PB).
    2. Tiziano Dalla Mora & Lorenzo Teso & Laura Carnieletto & Angelo Zarrella & Piercarlo Romagnoni, 2021. "Comparative Analysis between Dynamic and Quasi-Steady-State Methods at an Urban Scale on a Social-Housing District in Venice," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-22, August.
    3. Azar, Elie & Nikolopoulou, Christina & Papadopoulos, Sokratis, 2016. "Integrating and optimizing metrics of sustainable building performance using human-focused agent-based modeling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 926-937.
    4. Naylor, Sophie & Gillott, Mark & Lau, Tom, 2018. "A review of occupant-centric building control strategies to reduce building energy use," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 1-10.
    5. Ohlsson, K.E. Anders & Olofsson, Thomas, 2021. "Benchmarking the practice of validation and uncertainty analysis of building energy models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    6. Wang, Qinpeng & Augenbroe, Godfried & Kim, Ji-Hyun & Gu, Li, 2016. "Meta-modeling of occupancy variables and analysis of their impact on energy outcomes of office buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 166-180.
    7. Wang, Wei & Chen, Jiayu & Huang, Gongsheng & Lu, Yujie, 2017. "Energy efficient HVAC control for an IPS-enabled large space in commercial buildings through dynamic spatial occupancy distribution," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 305-323.
    8. Yang, Zheng & Becerik-Gerber, Burcin, 2015. "A model calibration framework for simultaneous multi-level building energy simulation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 415-431.
    9. Zhan, Sicheng & Lei, Yue & Jin, Yuan & Yan, Da & Chong, Adrian, 2022. "Impact of occupant related data on identification and model predictive control for buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    10. Chaudhary, Gaurav & New, Joshua & Sanyal, Jibonananda & Im, Piljae & O’Neill, Zheng & Garg, Vishal, 2016. "Evaluation of “Autotune” calibration against manual calibration of building energy models," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 115-134.
    11. Corcoran, Lloyd & Saikia, Pranaynil & Ugalde-Loo, Carlos E. & Abeysekera, Muditha, 2025. "An effective methodology to quantify cooling demand in the UK housing stock," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 380(C).
    12. Wang, Wei & Hong, Tianzhen & Li, Nan & Wang, Ryan Qi & Chen, Jiayu, 2019. "Linking energy-cyber-physical systems with occupancy prediction and interpretation through WiFi probe-based ensemble classification," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 55-69.
    13. Després, Jacques & Hadjsaid, Nouredine & Criqui, Patrick & Noirot, Isabelle, 2015. "Modelling the impacts of variable renewable sources on the power sector: Reconsidering the typology of energy modelling tools," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 486-495.
    14. Zhongping Liu & Baisong Su & Qingjing Ji & Yan Hu, 2024. "Local Iterative Calculation Method and Fault Analysis of Short-Circuit Current in High-Voltage Grid with Large-Scale New Energy Equipment Integration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-17, December.
    15. Villa-Arrieta, Manuel & Sumper, Andreas, 2018. "A model for an economic evaluation of energy systems using TRNSYS," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 765-777.
    16. Olamilekan E. Tijani & Sylvain Serra & Patrick Lanusse & Rachid Malti & Hugo Viot & Jean-Michel Reneaume, 2025. "Grey-Box Modelling of District Heating Networks Using Modified LPV Models," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-32, March.
    17. Dominković, D.F. & Bačeković, I. & Sveinbjörnsson, D. & Pedersen, A.S. & Krajačić, G., 2017. "On the way towards smart energy supply in cities: The impact of interconnecting geographically distributed district heating grids on the energy system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 941-960.
    18. Damianakis, Nikolaos & Mouli, Gautham Ram Chandra & Bauer, Pavol & Yu, Yunhe, 2023. "Assessing the grid impact of Electric Vehicles, Heat Pumps & PV generation in Dutch LV distribution grids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 352(C).
    19. Iolanda Saviuc & Herbert Peremans & Steven Van Passel & Kevin Milis, 2019. "Economic Performance of Using Batteries in European Residential Microgrids under the Net-Metering Scheme," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-28, January.
    20. Maria Taljegard & Lisa Göransson & Mikael Odenberger & Filip Johnsson, 2021. "To Represent Electric Vehicles in Electricity Systems Modelling—Aggregated Vehicle Representation vs. Individual Driving Profiles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-25, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5276-:d:1674019. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.