IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i11p5012-d1667911.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predicting Soil Organic Carbon Stocks Under Native Forests and Grasslands in the Dry Chaco Region of Argentina

Author

Listed:
  • Iván Daniel Filip

    (Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia (CIT), Formosa, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Ruta 11 km 1164, Formosa 3600, Argentina
    Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Ruta 89 km 227, Las Breñas H3722, Argentina)

  • Pablo Luis Peri

    (Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Ciudad de Buenos Aires C1033AAE, Argentina
    Unidad Academica Rio Gallegos, Departamento de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral (UNPA), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Río Gallegos 9400, Argentina)

  • Natalia Banegas

    (Instituto de Investigación Animal del Chaco Semiárido (IIACS-CIAP-INTA), Chañar Pozo s/n, San Miguel de Tucumán 4113, Argentina
    Facultad de Agronomía, Zootecnia y Veterinaria (FAZ-UNT), Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, Avenida Gral. Roca 1900, San Miguel de Tucumán 4000, Argentina)

  • José Nasca

    (Independent Researcher, Terratio, San Miguel de Tucumán 4000, Argentina)

  • Mónica Sacido

    (Independent Researcher, Pujato 3764, Roldan 2134, Argentina)

  • Claudia Faverin

    (Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Ruta 226 km 73,5, cc 276, Balcarce 7620, Argentina
    Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Funes 3350, Mar del Plata 7600, Argentina)

  • Ronaldo Vibart

    (Grasslands Research Centre, AgResearch Ltd., Tennent Drive, Private Bag 11008, Palmerston North 4442, New Zealand)

Abstract

Soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks play an important role in ecosystem functioning and climate regulation. These stocks are declining in many tropical dry forests due to land-use change and degradation. Data on topsoil (0–300 mm) organic C stocks from six experiments conducted in the Dry Chaco region, the world’s largest dry tropical forest, were used to test the predictive performance of the Rothamsted Carbon Model (RothC) after its implementation in an object-oriented graphical programming language. RothC provided promising predictions (i.e., precise and accurate) of the SOC stocks under two representative land covers in the region, native forest and Rhodes grass [relative prediction error (RPE) < 10%, concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) > 0.9, modelling efficiency (MEF) > 0.7]. Comparatively, model predictions of the SOC stocks under degraded Rhodes grass swards were suboptimal. The predictions were sensitive to C inputs; under native forests and Rhodes grass, a high C input improved the predictive performance of the model by reducing the mean bias and increasing the MEF values, compared with mean and low C inputs. Larger datasets and revisiting some of the underlying assumptions in the SOC modelling will be required to improve the model’s performance, particularly under the degraded Rhodes grass land cover.

Suggested Citation

  • Iván Daniel Filip & Pablo Luis Peri & Natalia Banegas & José Nasca & Mónica Sacido & Claudia Faverin & Ronaldo Vibart, 2025. "Predicting Soil Organic Carbon Stocks Under Native Forests and Grasslands in the Dry Chaco Region of Argentina," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-18, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:5012-:d:1667911
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/5012/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/5012/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nasca, J.A. & Feldkamp, C.R. & Arroquy, J.I. & Colombatto, D., 2015. "Efficiency and stability in subtropical beef cattle grazing systems in the northwest of Argentina," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 85-96.
    2. Baldassini, Pablo & Paruelo, José María, 2020. "Deforestation and current management practices reduce soil organic carbon in the semi-arid Chaco, Argentina," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    3. Tedeschi, Luis Orlindo, 2006. "Assessment of the adequacy of mathematical models," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 89(2-3), pages 225-247, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Percy, A. Jemila & Edwin, M., 2023. "Studies on the performance and emission characteristics of a dual fuel VCR engine using producer gas as secondary fuel: An optimization approach using response surface methodology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PA).
    2. Amin, M.G. Mostofa & Šimůnek, Jirka & Lægdsmand, Mette, 2014. "Simulation of the redistribution and fate of contaminants from soil-injected animal slurry," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 17-29.
    3. Confalonieri, Roberto & Acutis, Marco & Bellocchi, Gianni & Donatelli, Marcello, 2009. "Multi-metric evaluation of the models WARM, CropSyst, and WOFOST for rice," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(11), pages 1395-1410.
    4. Michael Bortlik & Bernd Heinrich & Daniel Lohninger, 2024. "Service Re-Selection for Disruptive Events in Mobile Environments: A Heuristic Technique for Decision Support at Runtime," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 1063-1090, June.
    5. María Gabriela Pizarro Inostroza & Francisco Javier Navas González & Vincenzo Landi & José Manuel León Jurado & Juan Vicente Delgado Bermejo & Javier Fernández Álvarez & María del Amparo Martínez Mart, 2020. "Software-Automatized Individual Lactation Model Fitting, Peak and Persistence and Bayesian Criteria Comparison for Milk Yield Genetic Studies in Murciano-Granadina Goats," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-21, September.
    6. Steppe, Kathy & De Pauw, Dirk J.W. & Lemeur, Raoul, 2008. "Validation of a dynamic stem diameter variation model and the resulting seasonal changes in calibrated parameter values," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 218(3), pages 247-259.
    7. Kuo Jiang & Hong Zeng & Zefan Wu & Jianping Sun & Cai Chen & Bing Han, 2023. "Study on the Effect of Parameter Sensitivity on Engine Optimization Results," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-16, December.
    8. Stirling, Sofía & Fariña, Santiago & Pacheco, David & Vibart, Ronaldo, 2021. "Whole-farm modelling of grazing dairy systems in Uruguay," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    9. Phelan, David C. & Harrison, Matthew T. & McLean, Greg & Cox, Howard & Pembleton, Kieth G. & Dean, Geoff J. & Parsons, David & do Amaral Richter, Maria E. & Pengilley, Georgie & Hinton, Sue J. & Moham, 2018. "Advancing a farmer decision support tool for agronomic decisions on rainfed and irrigated wheat cropping in Tasmania," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 113-124.
    10. Bryant, Jeremy & Lopez-Villalobos, Nicolas & Holmes, Colin & Pryce, Jennie & Rossi, Jose & Macdonald, Kevin, 2008. "Development and evaluation of a pastoral simulation model that predicts dairy cattle performance based on animal genotype and environmental sensitivity information," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 97(1-2), pages 13-25, April.
    11. Ojeda, Jonathan J. & Volenec, Jeffrey J. & Brouder, Sylvie M. & Caviglia, Octavio P. & Agnusdei, Mónica G., 2018. "Modelling stover and grain yields, and subsurface artificial drainage from long-term corn rotations using APSIM," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 154-171.
    12. Correndo, Adrian A. & Hefley, Trevor J. & Holzworth, Dean P. & Ciampitti, Ignacio A., 2021. "Revisiting linear regression to test agreement in continuous predicted-observed datasets," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    13. Turner, Benjamin L., 2020. "Model laboratories: A quick-start guide for design of simulation experiments for dynamic systems models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 434(C).
    14. Benjamin L. Turner & Vincent Tidwell & Alexander Fernald & José A. Rivera & Sylvia Rodriguez & Steven Guldan & Carlos Ochoa & Brian Hurd & Kenneth Boykin & Andres Cibils, 2016. "Modeling Acequia Irrigation Systems Using System Dynamics: Model Development, Evaluation, and Sensitivity Analyses to Investigate Effects of Socio-Economic and Biophysical Feedbacks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-30, October.
    15. José M. Paruelo & Miguel Sierra, 2023. "Sustainable intensification and ecosystem services: how to connect them in agricultural systems of southern South America," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 13(1), pages 198-206, March.
    16. Lynch, R. & Kelly, A.K. & Kenny, D.A. & Crosson, P., 2020. "Development and evaluation of a dynamic simulation model of reproductive performance in pasture based suckler beef systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    17. Luis Javier R. Barron & Aitor Andonegi & Gonzalo Gamboa & Eneko Garmendia & Oihana García & Noelia Aldai & Arantza Aldezabal, 2021. "Sustainability Assessment of Pasture-Based Dairy Sheep Systems: A Multidisciplinary and Multiscale Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-17, April.
    18. Mosciaro, María Jesús & Seghezzo, Lucas & Texeira, Marcos & Paruelo, José & Volante, José, 2023. "Where did the forest go? Post-deforestation land use dynamics in the Dry Chaco region in Northwestern Argentina," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    19. Yury B. Melnikov & Yelena A. Onokhina & Sergey A. Shitikov, 2018. "Improving the Adequacy of Economic Models," Journal of New Economy, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 19(1), pages 94-106, February.
    20. Ségolène Maucourt & Frédéric Fortin & Claude Robert & Pierre Giovenazzo, 2021. "Genetic Progress Achieved during 10 Years of Selective Breeding for Honeybee Traits of Interest to the Beekeeping Industry," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-14, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:5012-:d:1667911. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.