IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i11p4992-d1667361.html

Influence of Creative Tourist Experiences and Engagement on Gen Z’s Environmentally Responsible Behavior: A Moderated Mediation Model

Author

Listed:
  • Wenjun Lu

    (College of Graduate Studies, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand
    Faculty of Business Administration, Nanning University, Nanning 530004, China)

  • Pimlapas Pongsakornrungsilp

    (Department of Tourism and Prochef, Center of Excellence for Tourism Business Management and Creative Economy, School of Management, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand)

  • Sukhuman Klamsaengsai

    (Department of Tourism and Prochef, Center of Excellence for Tourism Business Management and Creative Economy, School of Management, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand)

  • Kanokkan Ketkaew

    (Department of Digital Marketing, Center of Excellence for Tourism Business Management and Creative Economy, School of Management, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand)

  • Sasawalai Tonsakunthaweeteam

    (Department of Digital Marketing, Center of Excellence for Tourism Business Management and Creative Economy, School of Management, Walailak University, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand)

  • Long Li

    (School of Business, Nanning Vocational and Technical University, Nanning 530000, China)

Abstract

In the contemporary Chinese tourism market, Generation Z constitutes a key consumer segment whose environmentally responsible behavior (ERB) is crucial to achieving the sustainable development of destinations. Drawing on the self-regulation of attitude theory and the cognitive–affective–conative (CAC) framework, in this research, we examined the influence of emotional factors on ERB among Generation Z tourists. In particular, we investigated the effect of creative tourism experiences (CTEs) on ERB, with tourist engagement (TE) and place attachment (PAT) serving as mediators. Data from 639 valid online questionnaires were analyzed through structural equation modeling (SEM). The results show that CTE and TE significantly impact ERB, while TE and PAT mediate the relationship between CTE and ERB. Moreover, self-efficacy (SE) positively moderates both the direct and indirect effects. Given the limited integration of the self-regulation of attitude theory and the CAC framework in ERB research, these results provide novel insights and valuable recommendations for the sustainable development of creative tourism.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenjun Lu & Pimlapas Pongsakornrungsilp & Sukhuman Klamsaengsai & Kanokkan Ketkaew & Sasawalai Tonsakunthaweeteam & Long Li, 2025. "Influence of Creative Tourist Experiences and Engagement on Gen Z’s Environmentally Responsible Behavior: A Moderated Mediation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-26, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:4992-:d:1667361
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/4992/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/4992/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Caixia Hou & Mengmeng Zhang & Mengmeng Wang & Hanliang Fu & Mengjie Zhang, 2021. "Factors Influencing Grazing Behavior by Using the Consciousness-Context-Behavior Theory—A Case Study from Yanchi County, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-16, October.
    2. Shuyue Huang & Hwan-Suk Chris Choi, 2019. "Developing and validating a multidimensional tourist engagement scale (TES)," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(7-8), pages 469-497, June.
    3. Ching-Cheng Shen & Dan Wang & Jennifer Pasion Loverio & Hsi-Lin Liu & Hsing-Yi Wang, 2022. "Influence of Attachment Theory on Pro-Environmental Behavior and Well-Being: A Case of Organic Agricultural Tourism in Taiwan Hualien and Taitung," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-16, November.
    4. Xiaoli Zhou & Chengcai Tang & Xingyang Lv & Bo Xing, 2020. "Visitor Engagement, Relationship Quality, and Environmentally Responsible Behavior," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-17, February.
    5. Lei Zhou & Jing Zhao & Jinghao Wang, 2024. "Place Attachment or Novel Experience? Enablers of Recreationists’ Environmentally Responsible Behavior in Scenic Spots," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(2), pages 21582440241, May.
    6. Meijing Zhou & Hu Yu, 2022. "Exploring How Tourist Engagement Affects Destination Loyalty: The Intermediary Role of Value and Satisfaction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-17, January.
    7. Zeng Yu & Sofian Rosbi & Mohammad Harith Amlus, 2024. "Mechanisms of Media Persuasion and Positive Internet Word-of-Mouth Driving Green Purchasing Behavior: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-22, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhenbin Wang & Hui Zhang & Chaoyi Cao & Sridar Ramachandran, 2025. "A cognitive appraisal of the City Walk travel trend, considering city image, visitor engagement, place attachment, and behavioural intention," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Sanqiang Du & Yunxiang Cheng & Dong An, 2023. "Determinants of Herders’ Satisfaction with the Grassland Ecosystem Compensation Policy: A Case Study of Gansu Province, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-18, November.
    3. Dan Wang & Ching-Cheng Shen & Hsi-Lin Liu, 2023. "Exploring the Impact of Group Tourists’ Citizenship Behavior on Engagement: The Intimacy as a Mediating Variable," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-14, September.
    4. Jiang, Jingxian & Ellis, Gary D. & Ettekal, Andrea V. & Nelson, Chad, 2022. "Situational engagement experiences: Measurement options and theory testing," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 223-236.
    5. Hong Tian & Xinyu Liu, 2022. "Pro-Environmental Behavior Research: Theoretical Progress and Future Directions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-16, May.
    6. Han, Xiaoyun & Zheng, Yundan & Prentice, Catherine & Chen, Shuping, 2024. "Firm engagement: Scale development and verification," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    7. Zanete Garanti & Shiva Ilkhanizadeh & Sotiroula Liasidou, 2024. "Sustainable Place Branding and Visitors’ Responses: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-15, April.
    8. Mihai F. Băcilă & Raluca Ciornea & Luiza M. Souca & Alexandra M. Drule, 2022. "Content Analysis on Sustainability Dimensions in DMOs’ Social Media Videos Advertising the World’s Most Visited Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-25, September.
    9. Ribeiro, Thiago de Luca Sant'ana & Costa, Benny Kramer & Ferreira, Manuel Portugal & Freire, Otávio Bandeira de Lamônica, 2023. "Value co-creation in tourism and hospitality: A systematic literature review," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 985-999.
    10. Xiaojuan Rao & Hongliang Qiu & Alastair M. Morrison & Wei Wei, 2022. "Linking Perceived Environmental CSR to Residents’ Environmental Citizenship Behavior in Rural Tourism: The Mediating Role of Resident–Environment Relationship Quality," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-19, December.
    11. Lee, Won Seok & Tang, Ruohan & Moon, Joonho & Song, Myungkeun, 2022. "The structural relationship between a low-cost carrier’s service experience, corporate social responsibility, brand love, and reuse intention: The case of Southwest Airlines," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    12. Michael G. Goldsby & Donald F. Kuratko & David B. Audretsch, 2024. "Site entrepreneurship: desolation to destination," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 63(3), pages 971-992, October.
    13. Shekhar, 2022. "Mapping Research on Food Tourism: A Review Study," Paradigm, , vol. 26(1), pages 50-69, June.
    14. Wenting Wang & Sixue Wu, 2024. "Analyzing User Psychology and Behavior in Short-Form Video Shopping Platforms: An Integrated TAM and ISS Model Approach," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(4), pages 21582440241, October.
    15. Virginica Rusu & Cristian Rusu & Nicolás Matus & Federico Botella, 2023. "Tourist Experience Challenges: A Holistic Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-32, August.
    16. Miguel Orden-Mejía & Mauricio Carvache-Franco & Paola Palomino-Flores & Orly Carvache-Franco & Mónica Torres-Naranjo & Wilmer Carvache-Franco & María Alejandro-Lindao, 2025. "Demand Segmentation for Sustainable Adventure Destination Management: A Study of Santa Elena, Ecuador," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-23, October.
    17. Sorcaru, Iulian Adrian & Muntean, Mihaela-Carmen & Manea, Ludmila-Daniela & Nistor, Rozalia, 2024. "From social norms to pro-environmental behavior: The role of destination social responsibility for families traveling with children," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    18. Maria Antoniadou & Georgios Chrysochoou & Rafael Tzanetopoulos & Elena Riza, 2023. "Green Dental Environmentalism among Students and Dentists in Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-24, June.
    19. Ja-Shen Chen & Piyanoot Kamalanon & Thanyamai P. Janupiboon, 2022. "Company websites and mobile apps versus social media: which service experience creates more customer value for online travel agencies?," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 16(4), pages 1081-1110, December.
    20. Mariana Carvalho & Elisabeth Kastenholz & Maria João Carneiro, 2021. "Interaction as a Central Element of Co-Creative Wine Tourism Experiences—Evidence from Bairrada , a Portuguese Wine-Producing Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-20, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:4992-:d:1667361. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.