IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i10p4697-d1660052.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrating DEA and AHP for Optimizing Rural Road Network Planning Under the Common Prosperity Framework: A Case Study of Yueqing City

Author

Listed:
  • Yesen Lu

    (Zhejiang Provincial Transportation Planning and Design Institute Co., Ltd., Hangzhou 314050, China)

  • Hualong Huang

    (Zhejiang Jiaogong Hongtu Transportation Construction Co., Ltd., Hangzhou 310013, China)

  • Zhihua Zhang

    (Zhejiang Jiaogong Hongtu Transportation Construction Co., Ltd., Hangzhou 310013, China)

  • Qiugang Tao

    (Institute of Intelligent Transportation System, College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Jinrui Gong

    (Institute of Intelligent Transportation System, College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

  • Zhenyu Mei

    (Institute of Intelligent Transportation System, College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China)

Abstract

Transportation infrastructure serves a pivotal role in driving regional development. This study proposes a decision-making framework for rural road network planning within the context of China’s common prosperity initiative. An integrated model combining Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is developed, where DEA is employed to identify technically efficient planning alternatives and AHP is used to rank these alternatives based on social and environmental benefits. Applying the model to the case of Yueqing City, Zhejiang Province, the findings reveal that common prosperity-oriented schemes, particularly the Scheme, which emphasizes full industrial coverage and balanced equity, achieve a superior balance among construction costs, industrial coverage, regional equity, and carbon emissions. Theoretically, this research advances transportation planning by incorporating equity-focused metrics, such as the Gini coefficient, into efficiency analyses, thus promoting a socially sustainable approach to infrastructure development. Practically, the proposed method offers a systematic and actionable tool for local governments to optimize rural transportation networks in support of common prosperity and balanced regional growth. The resulting framework not only identifies technically efficient and equitable layouts but also offers planners a transparent tool for balancing cost, social equity, and environmental impact in future rural infrastructure projects.

Suggested Citation

  • Yesen Lu & Hualong Huang & Zhihua Zhang & Qiugang Tao & Jinrui Gong & Zhenyu Mei, 2025. "Integrating DEA and AHP for Optimizing Rural Road Network Planning Under the Common Prosperity Framework: A Case Study of Yueqing City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-17, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4697-:d:1660052
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4697/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4697/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R Ramanathan, 2005. "Estimating energy consumption of transport modes in India using DEA and application to energy and environmental policy," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 56(6), pages 732-737, June.
    2. Maparu, Tuhin Subhra & Mazumder, Tarak Nath, 2017. "Transport infrastructure, economic development and urbanization in India (1990–2011): Is there any causal relationship?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 319-336.
    3. Kao, Chiang, 2014. "Network data envelopment analysis: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 239(1), pages 1-16.
    4. Park, Soonchan, 2020. "Quality of transport infrastructure and logistics as source of comparative advantage," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 54-62.
    5. Boris Prevolšek & Maja Borlinič Gačnik & Črtomir Rozman, 2023. "Applying Integrated Data Envelopment Analysis and Analytic Hierarchy Process to Measuring the Efficiency of Tourist Farms: The Case of Slovenia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-18, February.
    6. Chiang Kao, 2014. "Efficiency Decomposition in Network Data Envelopment Analysis," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Wade D. Cook & Joe Zhu (ed.), Data Envelopment Analysis, edition 127, chapter 0, pages 55-77, Springer.
    7. Nichalin S. Summerfield & Amit V. Deokar & Mei Xu & Weiwei Zhu, 2021. "Should drivers cooperate? Performance evaluation of cooperative navigation on simulated road networks using network DEA," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 72(5), pages 1042-1057, May.
    8. Shamdasani, Yogita, 2021. "Rural road infrastructure & agricultural production: Evidence from India," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Khezrimotlagh, Dariush & Kaffash, Sepideh & Zhu, Joe, 2022. "U.S. airline mergers’ performance and productivity change," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    2. Chen, Ya & Pan, Yongbin & Liu, Haoxiang & Wu, Huaqing & Deng, Guangwei, 2023. "Efficiency analysis of Chinese universities with shared inputs: An aggregated two-stage network DEA approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    3. Qingyou Yan & Fei Zhao & Xu Wang & Tomas Balezentis, 2021. "The Environmental Efficiency Analysis Based on the Three-Step Method for Two-Stage Data Envelopment Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-14, October.
    4. Ruchuan Zhang & Aijun Li & Davo Ayuba Dahoro, 2024. "A new approach for vehicle-health system measurement by network data envelopment analysis and an application in the USA," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(6), pages 14693-14727, June.
    5. Sungwook Jung & Jaeho Shin & Changhee Kim, 2025. "A study on the operational and competitive efficiency of National Oil Companies using two-stage network DEA model," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 269-283, March.
    6. Xiao, Huijuan & Wang, Daoping & Qi, Yu & Shao, Shuai & Zhou, Ya & Shan, Yuli, 2021. "The governance-production nexus of eco-efficiency in Chinese resource-based cities: A two-stage network DEA approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    7. Meng, Fanyong & Xiong, Beibei, 2021. "Logical efficiency decomposition for general two-stage systems in view of cross efficiency," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(2), pages 622-632.
    8. Wan, Qunchao & Chen, Jin & Yao, Zhu & Yuan, Ling, 2022. "Preferential tax policy and R&D personnel flow for technological innovation efficiency of China's high-tech industry in an emerging economy," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    9. Ming-Fu Hsu & Ying-Shao Hsin & Fu-Jiing Shiue, 2022. "Business analytics for corporate risk management and performance improvement," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 315(2), pages 629-669, August.
    10. Moraes, Ricardo Kalil & Wanke, Peter Fernandes & Faria, João Ricardo, 2021. "Unveiling the endogeneity between social-welfare and labor efficiency: Two-stage NDEA neural network approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    11. Kao, Chiang, 2018. "Multiplicative aggregation of division efficiencies in network data envelopment analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(1), pages 328-336.
    12. Kremantzis, Marios Dominikos & Beullens, Patrick & Kyrgiakos, Leonidas Sotirios & Klein, Jonathan, 2022. "Measurement and evaluation of multi-function parallel network hierarchical DEA systems," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    13. Koronakos, Gregory & Sotiros, Dimitris & Despotis, Dimitris K. & Kritikos, Manolis N., 2022. "Fair efficiency decomposition in network DEA: A compromise programming approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    14. Pejman Peykani & Roya Soltani & Cristina Tanasescu & Seyed Ehsan Shojaie & Alireza Jandaghian, 2025. "The Robust Malmquist Productivity Index: A Framework for Measuring Productivity Changes over Time Under Uncertainty," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-27, May.
    15. Andrey V. Lychev & Svetlana V. Ratner & Vladimir E. Krivonozhko, 2023. "Two-Stage Data Envelopment Analysis Models with Negative System Outputs for the Efficiency Evaluation of Government Financial Policies," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-21, December.
    16. Sabri Boubaker & Tu D. Q. Le & Riadh Manita & Thanh Ngo, 2025. "Balancing bank profits and nonperforming loans: a multiple objective programming approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 346(2), pages 839-860, March.
    17. Yen-Tung Wu & Chia-Yen Lee, 2024. "Does Marginal Productivity of Product Mix Matter? Data Envelopment Analysis for Marginal Profit Consistency in Taiwan’s Life Insurance Industry," SN Operations Research Forum, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-25, March.
    18. Mazandaran Negar Foroghi & Karimi Balal & Shahverdiani Shadi, 2025. "Ranking the Financial Inefficiency Factors of Companies with the Combined Approach of Data Envelopment Analysis and Neural Network," Studia Universitatis „Vasile Goldis” Arad – Economics Series, Sciendo, vol. 35(2), pages 65-85.
    19. Ha Che-Ngoc & Thach Nguyen-Ngoc & Thao Nguyen-Trang, 2025. "A Novel Window Analysis and Its Application to Evaluating High-Frequency Trading Strategies," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 65(2), pages 795-818, February.
    20. Kao, Chiang, 2019. "Inefficiency identification for closed series production systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 275(2), pages 599-607.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4697-:d:1660052. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.