IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i10p4669-d1659449.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling Geothermal Energy Extraction from Low-Enthalpy Oil and Gas Fields Using Pump-Assisted Production: A Case Study of the Waihapa Oilfield

Author

Listed:
  • Rohit Duggal

    (School of Engineering and Computer Science, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington 6011, New Zealand)

  • John Burnell

    (GNS Science Ltd., Lower Hutt 5011, New Zealand)

  • Jim Hinkley

    (School of Engineering and Computer Science, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington 6011, New Zealand)

  • Simon Ward

    (Ian R Brown Associates Ltd., Lower Hutt 5010, New Zealand)

  • Christoph Wieland

    (Faculty of Engineering Sciences, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45141 Essen, Germany
    Gas- und Wärme-Institut Essen e.V., 45356 Essen, Germany)

  • Tobias Massier

    (TUMCREATE Ltd., Singapore 138602, Singapore)

  • Ramesh Rayudu

    (School of Engineering and Computer Science, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington 6011, New Zealand)

Abstract

As the energy sector transitions toward decarbonisation, low-to-intermediate temperature geothermal resources in sedimentary basins—particularly repurposed oil and gas fields—have emerged as promising candidates for sustainable heat and power generation. Despite their widespread availability, the development of these systems is hindered by gaps in methodology, oversimplified modelling assumptions, and a lack of integrated analyses accounting for long-term reservoir and wellbore dynamics. This study presents a detailed, simulation-based framework to evaluate geothermal energy extraction from depleted petroleum reservoirs, with a focus on low-enthalpy resources (<150 °C). By examining coupling reservoir behaviour, wellbore heat loss, reinjection cooling, and surface energy conversion, the framework provides dynamic insights into system sustainability and net energy output. Through a series of parametric analyses—including production rate, doublet spacing, reservoir temperature, and field configuration—key performance indicators such as gross power, pumping requirements, and thermal breakthrough are quantified. The findings reveal that: (1) net energy output is maximised at optimal flow rate (~70 kg/s for a 90 °C reservoir), beyond which increased pumping offsets thermal gains; (2) doublet spacing has a non-linear impact on reinjection cooling, with larger distances reducing thermal interference and pumping energy; (3) reservoirs with higher temperatures (<120°C) offer significantly better thermodynamic and hydraulic performance, enabling pump-free or low-duty operations at higher flow rates; and (4) wellbore thermal losses and reinjection effects are critical in determining long-term viability, especially in low-permeability or shallow fields. This work demonstrates the importance of a coupled, site-specific modelling in assessing the geothermal viability of petroleum fields and provides a foundation for future techno-economic and sustainability assessments. The results inform optimal design strategies and highlight scenarios where the geothermal development of oil and gas fields can be both technically and energetically viable.

Suggested Citation

  • Rohit Duggal & John Burnell & Jim Hinkley & Simon Ward & Christoph Wieland & Tobias Massier & Ramesh Rayudu, 2025. "Modelling Geothermal Energy Extraction from Low-Enthalpy Oil and Gas Fields Using Pump-Assisted Production: A Case Study of the Waihapa Oilfield," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-33, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4669-:d:1659449
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4669/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4669/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alessandro Franco & Maurizio Vaccaro, 2020. "Sustainable Sizing of Geothermal Power Plants: Appropriate Potential Assessment Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-19, May.
    2. Green, Sidney & McLennan, John & Panja, Palash & Kitz, Kevin & Allis, Richard & Moore, Joseph, 2021. "Geothermal battery energy storage," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 777-790.
    3. Liu, Xiaolei & Falcone, Gioia & Alimonti, Claudio, 2018. "A systematic study of harnessing low-temperature geothermal energy from oil and gas reservoirs," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 346-355.
    4. Tomislav Kurevija & Domagoj Vulin, 2011. "High Enthalpy Geothermal Potential of the Deep Gas Fields in Central Drava Basin, Croatia," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 25(12), pages 3041-3052, September.
    5. Bujakowski, Wiesław & Tomaszewska, Barbara & Miecznik, Maciej, 2016. "The Podhale geothermal reservoir simulation for long-term sustainable production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 420-430.
    6. Hu, Zixu & Xu, Tianfu & Feng, Bo & Yuan, Yilong & Li, Fengyu & Feng, Guanhong & Jiang, Zhenjiao, 2020. "Thermal and fluid processes in a closed-loop geothermal system using CO2 as a working fluid," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 351-367.
    7. Santos, L. & Dahi Taleghani, A. & Elsworth, D., 2022. "Repurposing abandoned wells for geothermal energy: Current status and future prospects," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 1288-1302.
    8. Eyerer, S. & Schifflechner, C. & Hofbauer, S. & Bauer, W. & Wieland, C. & Spliethoff, H., 2020. "Combined heat and power from hydrothermal geothermal resources in Germany: An assessment of the potential," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    9. Ezekiel, Justin & Ebigbo, Anozie & Adams, Benjamin M. & Saar, Martin O., 2020. "Combining natural gas recovery and CO2-based geothermal energy extraction for electric power generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 269(C).
    10. Shejiao Wang & Jiahong Yan & Feng Li & Junwen Hu & Kewen Li, 2016. "Exploitation and Utilization of Oilfield Geothermal Resources in China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-13, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Duggal, R. & Rayudu, R. & Hinkley, J. & Burnell, J. & Wieland, C. & Keim, M., 2022. "A comprehensive review of energy extraction from low-temperature geothermal resources in hydrocarbon fields," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    2. Zuo, Yinhui & Sun, Yigao & Zhang, Luquan & Zhang, Chao & Wang, Yingchun & Jiang, Guangzheng & Wang, Xiaoguang & Zhang, Tao & Cui, Longqing, 2024. "Geothermal resource evaluation in the Sichuan Basin and suggestions for the development and utilization of abandoned oil and gas wells," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    3. Martina Tuschl & Tomislav Kurevija, 2023. "Revitalization Modelling of a Mature Oil Field with Bottom-Type Aquifer into Geothermal Resource—Reservoir Engineering and Techno-Economic Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-27, September.
    4. Chappidi, Srinivas & Kumar, Ankesh & Singh, Jogender, 2025. "Techno-economic assessment of geothermal energy extraction from abandoned oil and gas fields using hybrid U-shaped closed-loop system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 321(C).
    5. Yu Wang & Tianfu Xu & Yuxiang Cheng & Guanhong Feng, 2022. "Prospects for Power Generation of the Doublet Supercritical Geothermal System in Reykjanes Geothermal Field, Iceland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-15, November.
    6. Abdirizak Omar & Mouadh Addassi & Volker Vahrenkamp & Hussein Hoteit, 2021. "Co-Optimization of CO 2 Storage and Enhanced Gas Recovery Using Carbonated Water and Supercritical CO 2," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-21, November.
    7. Zolfaghari, Seyed Mohammad & Soltani, M. & Hosseinpour, Morteza & Nathwani, Jatin, 2023. "Comprehensive analysis of geothermal energy integration with heavy oil upgrading in hot compressed water," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 345(C).
    8. Lin, Zi & Liu, Xiaolei & Lao, Liyun & Liu, Hengxu, 2020. "Prediction of two-phase flow patterns in upward inclined pipes via deep learning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    9. Macenić, M. & Kurevija, T. & Medved, I., 2020. "Novel geothermal gradient map of the Croatian part of the Pannonian Basin System based on data interpretation from 154 deep exploration wells," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    10. Sowizdzal, Anna, 2018. "Geothermal energy resources in Poland – Overview of the current state of knowledge," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 4020-4027.
    11. Esmaeilpour, Morteza & Gholami Korzani, Maziar & Kohl, Thomas, 2022. "Impact of thermosiphoning on long-term behavior of closed-loop deep geothermal systems for sustainable energy exploitation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 1247-1260.
    12. Cheng, Sharon W.Y. & Kurnia, Jundika C. & Ghoreishi-Madiseh, Seyed Ali & Sasmito, Agus P., 2019. "Optimization of geothermal energy extraction from abandoned oil well with a novel well bottom curvature design utilizing Taguchi method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    13. Hawkar Ali Abdulhaq & János Geiger & István Vass & Tivadar M. Tóth & Tamás Medgyes & Gábor Bozsó & Balázs Kóbor & Éva Kun & János Szanyi, 2025. "Predicting Thermal Performance of Aquifer Thermal Energy Storage Systems in Depleted Clastic Hydrocarbon Reservoirs via Machine Learning: Case Study from Hungary," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-22, May.
    14. Yang, Hongwei & Li, Jun & Zhang, Hui & Jiang, Jiwei & Guo, Boyun & Gao, Reyu & Zhang, Geng, 2022. "Thermal behavior prediction and adaptation analysis of a reelwell drilling method for closed-loop geothermal system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 320(C).
    15. Golmohamadi, Hessam & Larsen, Kim Guldstrand & Jensen, Peter Gjøl & Hasrat, Imran Riaz, 2022. "Integration of flexibility potentials of district heating systems into electricity markets: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    16. Harshini, R.D.G.F. & Chaudhuri, A. & Ranjith, P.G, 2024. "Harnessing the heat below: Efficacy of closed-loop systems in the cooper basin, Australia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 312(C).
    17. Yang, Weifei & Xiao, Changlai & Zhang, Zhihao & Liang, Xiujuan, 2022. "Identification of the formation temperature field of the southern Songliao Basin, China based on a deep belief network," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 32-42.
    18. Pokhrel, Sajjan & Sasmito, Agus P. & Sainoki, Atsushi & Tosha, Toshiyuki & Tanaka, Tatsuya & Nagai, Chiaki & Ghoreishi-Madiseh, Seyed Ali, 2022. "Field-scale experimental and numerical analysis of a downhole coaxial heat exchanger for geothermal energy production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 521-535.
    19. Magdalena Tyszer & Wiesław Bujakowski & Barbara Tomaszewska & Bogusław Bielec, 2020. "Geothermal Water Management Using the Example of the Polish Lowland (Poland)—Key Aspects Related to Co-Management of Drinking and Geothermal Water," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-13, May.
    20. Ma, Weiwu & Wang, Yadan & Wu, Xiaotian & Liu, Gang, 2020. "Hot dry rock (HDR) hydraulic fracturing propagation and impact factors assessment via sensitivity indicator," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 2716-2723.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4669-:d:1659449. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.