IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i10p4542-d1657007.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Scientists’ Views on Sustainable Healthy Diets: A Reflection Process Towards a Multi-Disciplinary Consensus

Author

Listed:
  • Carmen Lozano-Cabedo

    (Department of Sociology II, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • Marta Moreno

    (Department of Sociology II, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • Cecilia Díaz-Méndez

    (Department of Sociology, Universidad de Oviedo, 33007 Oviedo, Spain)

  • Raquel Ajates

    (Department of Sociology II, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (UNED), 28040 Madrid, Spain)

  • Miguel Ángel Navas-Martín

    (National School of Health, Carlos III Health Institute (ISCIII), 28023 Madrid, Spain
    Faculty of Health Sciences, Mid-Atlantic University (UNAM), 35017 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain)

Abstract

Achieving a Sustainable Healthy Diet (SHD) is one of the goals of public policy programmes to improve human health and the health of the planet. It is a complex objective that requires the participation of all actors in the food system. One group is scientists who are involved in the study of food in a variety of disciplines. This paper aims to analyse the views that Spanish researchers from different disciplines have on the concept of an SHD and the factors that, in their opinion, hinder or facilitate its promotion in Spain. We carried out a Delphi survey structured in three rounds with scientists from Agricultural Sciences, Natural Sciences, Health Sciences, and Social Sciences. The results show that the experts are in agreement that an SHD is based on nutritious food, with low environmental impact, secure, safe, and accessible. They believe that the main obstacle to promoting SHDs comes from the power of the food processing and distribution industry to influence the system and the difficulties governments face in promoting SHDs. They stress that the main areas for action are food education, regulation of the food system, and changing the framework of governance and the relations between actors in the food system. The process of reaching consensus shows important overlaps between disciplines, especially between experts from Social and Human Sciences and Health Sciences, while those in Natural and Exact Sciences tend to be at the opposite extreme to those in Agricultural Sciences.

Suggested Citation

  • Carmen Lozano-Cabedo & Marta Moreno & Cecilia Díaz-Méndez & Raquel Ajates & Miguel Ángel Navas-Martín, 2025. "Scientists’ Views on Sustainable Healthy Diets: A Reflection Process Towards a Multi-Disciplinary Consensus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-26, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4542-:d:1657007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4542/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4542/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David Gustafson & Alona Gutman & Whitney Leet & Adam Drewnowski & Jessica Fanzo & John Ingram, 2016. "Seven Food System Metrics of Sustainable Nutrition Security," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-17, February.
    2. Béné, Christophe & Oosterveer, Peter & Lamotte, Lea & Brouwer, Inge D. & de Haan, Stef & Prager, Steve D. & Talsma, Elise F. & Khoury, Colin K., 2019. "When food systems meet sustainability – Current narratives and implications for actions," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 116-130.
    3. Ramon Bernal & Leire San-Jose & Jose Luis Retolaza, 2019. "Improvement Actions for a More Social and Sustainable Public Procurement: A Delphi Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-15, July.
    4. Moragues-Faus, Ana & Sonnino, Roberta & Marsden, Terry, 2017. "Exploring European food system vulnerabilities: Towards integrated food security governance," Environmental Science & Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 184-215.
    5. Jill Nicholls & Adam Drewnowski, 2021. "Toward Sociocultural Indicators of Sustainable Healthy Diets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-9, June.
    6. Rebecca Som Castellano, 2015. "Alternative food networks and food provisioning as a gendered act," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 32(3), pages 461-474, September.
    7. Wentholt, M.T.A. & Rowe, G. & König, A. & Marvin, H.J.P. & Frewer, L.J., 2009. "The views of key stakeholders on an evolving food risk governance framework: Results from a Delphi study," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 539-548, December.
    8. Marta Farré-Ribes & Carmen Lozano-Cabedo & Encarnación Aguilar-Criado, 2019. "The Role of Knowledge in Constructing the Quality of Olive Oil in Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-19, July.
    9. Jessica Duncan & Priscilla Claeys, 2018. "Politicizing food security governance through participation: opportunities and opposition," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 10(6), pages 1411-1424, December.
    10. Claire Lamine & Danièle Magda & Marie-Josèphe Amiot, 2019. "Crossing Sociological, Ecological, and Nutritional Perspectives on Agrifood Systems Transitions: Towards a Transdisciplinary Territorial Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thomas Allen & Paolo Prosperi & Bruce Cogill & Martine Padilla & Iuri Peri, 2019. "A Delphi Approach to Develop Sustainable Food System Metrics," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 141(3), pages 1307-1339, February.
    2. Christophe Béné & Jessica Fanzo & Harold A Achicanoy & Mark Lundy, 2022. "Can economic development be a driver of food system sustainability? Empirical evidence from a global sustainability index and a multi-country analysis," PLOS Sustainability and Transformation, Public Library of Science, vol. 1(5), pages 1-25, May.
    3. Claire Lamine & Danièle Magda & Marie-Josèphe Amiot, 2019. "Crossing Sociological, Ecological, and Nutritional Perspectives on Agrifood Systems Transitions: Towards a Transdisciplinary Territorial Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-18, March.
    4. Francesca Galli & Aniek Hebinck & Brídín Carroll, 2018. "Addressing food poverty in systems: governance of food assistance in three European countries," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 10(6), pages 1353-1370, December.
    5. Mayton, Holly & Beal, Ty & Rubin, Julia & Sanchez, Alejandra & Heller, Martin & Hoey, Lesli & de Haan, Stef & Duong, Thanh Thi & Huynh, Tuyen & Burra, Dharani Dhar & Khoury, Colin K. & Jones, Andrew D, 2020. "Conceptualizing sustainable diets in Vietnam: Minimum metrics and potential leverage points," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    6. Clapp, Jennifer & Moseley, William G. & Burlingame, Barbara & Termine, Paola, 2022. "Viewpoint: The case for a six-dimensional food security framework," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    7. Nína M. Saviolidis & Gudrun Olafsdottir & Mariana Nicolau & Antonella Samoggia & Elise Huber & Laura Brimont & Matthew Gorton & David von Berlepsch & Hildigunnur Sigurdardottir & Margherita Del Prete , 2020. "Stakeholder Perceptions of Policy Tools in Support of Sustainable Food Consumption in Europe: Policy Implications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-24, September.
    8. Mequanint B. Melesse & Marrit Berg & Christophe Béné & Alan Brauw & Inge D. Brouwer, 2020. "Metrics to analyze and improve diets through food Systems in low and Middle Income Countries," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 12(5), pages 1085-1105, October.
    9. Theocharidis, Dimitris & Karanikolas, Pavlos & Tsiboukas, Konstantinos, 2018. "Farmers' responses to stressors of an agri-food system: a Greek case study," Agricultural Economics Review, Greek Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 0(Issue 2).
    10. Maria Contesse & Jessica Duncan & Katharine Legun & Laurens Klerkx, 2024. "(Un)intended lock-in: Chile’s organic agriculture law and the possibility of transformation towards more sustainable food systems," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 41(1), pages 167-187, March.
    11. Leach, Melissa & Nisbett, Nicholas & Cabral, Lídia & Harris, Jody & Hossain, Naomi & Thompson, John, 2020. "Food politics and development," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    12. Daniel López-García & Manuel González de Molina, 2021. "An Operational Approach to Agroecology-Based Local Agri-Food Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-18, July.
    13. Aintzira Oñederra-Aramendi & Mirene Begiristain-Zubillaga & Mamen Cuellar-Padilla, 2023. "Characterisation of food governance for alternative and sustainable food systems: a systematic review," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 11(1), pages 1-32, December.
    14. Estelle Fourat & Eric Blanchart & Miriam Cué Rio & Maria J Darias & Arona Diedhiou & Isabelle Droy & Frédéric Jacob & Pierre Janin & Marjorie Le Bars & Alissia Lourme-Ruiz & Insaf Mekki & Philippe Mér, 2024. "Holistic approaches to assess the sustainability of food systems in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review," PLOS Sustainability and Transformation, Public Library of Science, vol. 3(7), pages 1-14, July.
    15. Adriana Ruiz-Almeida & Marta G. Rivera-Ferre, 2019. "Internationally-based indicators to measure Agri-food systems sustainability using food sovereignty as a conceptual framework," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 11(6), pages 1321-1337, December.
    16. Fanzo, Jessica & Haddad, Lawrence & Schneider, Kate R. & Béné, Christophe & Covic, Namukolo M. & Guarin, Alejandro & Herforth, Anna W. & Herrero, Mario & Sumaila, U. Rashid & Aburto, Nancy J. & Amuyun, 2021. "Viewpoint: Rigorous monitoring is necessary to guide food system transformation in the countdown to the 2030 global goals," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    17. José Alex Gualotuña Parra & Ana M. Tarquis & Juan B. Grau Olivé & Federico Colombo Speroni & Antonio Saa-Requejo, 2021. "An Analytical Approach to Assess the Influence of Expert Panel Answer on Decision Making: The Case of Sustainable Land Use in Ribadavia Banda Norte, Salta (Argentina)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-17, June.
    18. Jeongae You & Woosuk Kim & Hyun-Suk Lee & Minjung Kwon, 2021. "Best Content Standards in Sports Career Education for Adolescents: A Delphi Survey of Korean Professional Views," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-13, June.
    19. Beulah Pretorius & Jane Ambuko & Effie Papargyropoulou & Hettie C. Schönfeldt, 2021. "Guiding Nutritious Food Choices and Diets along Food Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-19, August.
    20. Tianran Ding & Wouter Achten, 2023. "Coupling agent-based modeling with territorial LCA to support agricultural land-use planning," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/359527, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4542-:d:1657007. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.