IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i10p4497-d1656333.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Methodology for Identifying Critical Success Factors and Performance Measurement for Sustainable Schools

Author

Listed:
  • İhsan Hekimoğlu

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Yıldız Technical University, Istanbul 34349, Türkiye)

  • Doğan Özgen

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Yıldız Technical University, Istanbul 34349, Türkiye)

  • Ceyda Şen

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Yıldız Technical University, Istanbul 34349, Türkiye)

Abstract

There are conflicting findings in the literature regarding the factors that influence school success. This uncertainty complicates the effective allocation of resources. The present study aims to identify critical success factors (CSFs) for schools by incorporating the perspectives of various stakeholders and addressing this gap in the literature. Additionally, a comprehensive performance measurement model is developed to ensure the sustainability of success. A three-phase complementary methodology was employed with 330 participants, including school administrators, students, and parents, from 23 high schools in Istanbul. Fuzzy cognitive mapping (FCM) was utilized to identify critical success factors (CSFs) by calculating centrality index values. Additionally, a SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats) analysis was conducted to assess the institutional context, and a balanced scorecard (BSC) was developed for performance measurement. According to the results from FCM and SWOT analysis, the factors related to teachers, students, and school physical conditions were identified as the most critical success factors. The BSC model was employed in four high schools, yielding performance scores of 81.12 and 92.52, 67.89, 77.58, respectively. With its unique methodological approach integrating three analytical techniques, this study highlights the critical role of teacher experience, student quality, and appealing physical conditions in school success. It offers school administrators a scientifically grounded, practical performance evaluation tool. This study is significant as it establishes a foundation for monitoring large-scale investment performance in schools, encompassing Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) dimensions, and providing a basis for sustainability initiatives within educational institutions.

Suggested Citation

  • İhsan Hekimoğlu & Doğan Özgen & Ceyda Şen, 2025. "A Methodology for Identifying Critical Success Factors and Performance Measurement for Sustainable Schools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-28, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4497-:d:1656333
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4497/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4497/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brummet, Quentin, 2014. "The effect of school closings on student achievement," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 108-124.
    2. Erik G. Hansen & Stefan Schaltegger, 2018. "Sustainability Balanced Scorecards and their Architectures: Irrelevant or Misunderstood?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 150(4), pages 937-952, July.
    3. Xiaochong Li & Wenwen Dang & Yanxi Li, 2025. "Can ESG Performance Promote Corporate Green Transformation? Evidence from Green OFDI in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-24, April.
    4. Murat Gunduz & Mohammed Almuajebh, 2020. "Critical Success Factors for Sustainable Construction Project Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-17, March.
    5. Kunruthai Meechang & Kenji Watanabe, 2023. "Modeling to Achieve Area Business Continuity Management Implementation via a Fuzzy Cognitive Map," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-22, September.
    6. Ewa Multan & Marzena Wójcik-Augustyniak & Bartosz Sobotka & Jakub Bis, 2023. "Application of Performance and Efficiency Indicators in Measuring the Level of Success of Public Universities in Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-21, September.
    7. Ahmed Farouk Kineber & Ayodeji Oke & John Aliu & Mohammed Magdy Hamed & Eguonor Oputu, 2023. "Exploring the Adoption of Cyber (Digital) Technology for Sustainable Construction: A Structural Equation Modeling of Critical Success Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-28, March.
    8. Ali M. Al-Bahi & Mohamed S. Abd-Elwahed & Abdelfattah Y. Soliman, 2021. "Implementation of Sustainability Indicators in Engineering Education Using a Combined Balanced Scorecard and Quality Function Deployment Approaches," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-28, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Blesse, Sebastian & Diegmann, André, 2022. "The place-based effects of police stations on crime: Evidence from station closures," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    2. Mark Chin & Thomas J. Kane & Whitney Kozakowski & Beth E. Schueler & Douglas O. Staiger, 2019. "School District Reform in Newark: Within- and Between-School Changes in Achievement Growth," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 72(2), pages 323-354, March.
    3. Carlson, Deven & Lavertu, Stéphane, 2016. "Charter school closure and student achievement: Evidence from Ohio," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 31-48.
    4. Fanta Barry & Marie Sawadogo & Maïmouna Bologo (Traoré) & Igor W. K. Ouédraogo & Thomas Dogot, 2021. "Key Barriers to the Adoption of Biomass Gasification in Burkina Faso," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-14, June.
    5. Thompson, Paul N., 2021. "Is four less than five? Effects of four-day school weeks on student achievement in Oregon," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    6. Tawse, Alex & Tabesh, Pooya, 2023. "Thirty years with the balanced scorecard: What we have learned," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 123-132.
    7. Evita Milana & Frank Ulrich, 2022. "Do open innovation practices in firms promote sustainability?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(6), pages 1718-1732, December.
    8. Dennis Vegter & Jos van Hillegersberg & Matthias Olthaar, 2021. "Performance Measurement Systems for Circular Supply Chain Management: Current State of Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-18, November.
    9. Astrid Marie Jorde Sandsør & Torberg Falch & Bjarne Strøm, 2022. "Long‐run Effects of Local Government Mergers on Educational Attainment and Income," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 84(1), pages 185-213, February.
    10. Ahmed S. El Touny & Ahmed H. Ibrahim & Hossam H. Mohamed, 2021. "An Integrated Sustainable Construction Project’s Critical Success Factors (ISCSFs)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-26, August.
    11. Thompson, Paul N., 2016. "School district and housing price responses to fiscal stress labels: Evidence from Ohio," Journal of Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 54-72.
    12. Jennifer Adolph & Markus Beckmann, 2024. "Corporate sustainability strategy: From definitional ambiguity toward conceptual clarification," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(5), pages 4708-4729, July.
    13. Min Li & Tsung-Chih Hsiao & Chih-Cheng Chen, 2020. "Exploring the Factors of Cooperation between Artists and Technologists in Creating New Media Art Works: Based on AHP," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-22, September.
    14. Beuchert, Louise & Humlum, Maria Knoth & Nielsen, Helena Skyt & Smith, Nina, 2018. "The short-term effects of school consolidation on student achievement: Evidence of disruption?," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 31-47.
    15. Stephen Lipscomb & Joshua Haimson & Albert Y. Liu & John Burghardt & David R. Johnson & Martha Thurlow, "undated". "Preparing for Life After High School: The Characteristics and Experiences of Youth in Special Education. Findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study 2012. Volume 2: Comparisons Across Dis," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 42643a6d0ee049f8af74a6cc2, Mathematica Policy Research.
    16. Chen, Anqi & Li, Yongyou, 2024. "Long-term effects of early-life education intervention on children’s outcomes: Evidence from school consolidation in rural China," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    17. Amri, Tariq Al & Otaibi, Naif Al & Marey-Perez, Manuel, 2023. "The Major Obstacles and Factors Facing Green Building in the KSA: A Background Study," OSF Preprints a352b, Center for Open Science.
    18. Krongthong Heebkhoksung & Wanchai Rattanawong & Varin Vongmanee, 2023. "A New Paradigm of a Sustainability-Balanced Scorecard Model for Sport Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-19, July.
    19. Figlio, D. & Karbownik, K. & Salvanes, K.G., 2016. "Education Research and Administrative Data," Handbook of the Economics of Education,, Elsevier.
    20. Albert Y. Liu & Johanna Lacoe & Stephen Lipscomb & Joshua Haimson & David R. Johnson & Martha L. Thurlow, "undated". "Preparing for Life after High School: The Characteristics and Experiences of Youth in Special Education, Volume 3: Comparisons Over Time," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 891e7c8646b7474da58e04ac2, Mathematica Policy Research.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4497-:d:1656333. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.