IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i10p4473-d1655746.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Co-Firing of Pine Biomass and Waste Coal in 100 and 600 MW Power Plants: A Sustainable Approach to Reduce GHG Emissions

Author

Listed:
  • Prakashbhai R. Bhoi

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA 30460, USA)

  • Surja Sarkar

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA 30460, USA)

Abstract

Climate change is a global issue that has gained much attention recently. Co-firing biomass with coal/waste coal reduces the electricity sector’s GHG emissions sustainably. This study uses commercial software to model waste coal and biomass co-firing in 100 MW and 600 MW power plants. The objective is to assess the effects of fluid types (subcritical and supercritical), plant capacities (100 MW and 600 MW), boiler types (pulverized coal and circulating fluidized bed boilers), biomass and waste coal co-firing ratios (0:100, 20:80, 40:60, 60:40, 80:20, and 100:0), and carbon capture and storage efficiencies (0%, 90%, 95%, and 97%) on performance parameters such as net plant efficiency, heat rate, net plant CO 2 and SO 2 , and particulate matter emissions. The feedstocks selected for this investigation include anthracite waste coal and loblolly pine biomass. As the biomass fraction increases from 0% to 100%, co-fired power plants net efficiency increases by 3–8%. Supercritical plants had a 6% higher net plant efficiency than the subcritical plants. The study found that the biomass’s high heating value decreased the fuel flow rate and reduced plant CO 2 emissions by 10–16%. With 100% biomass power plant feed and 90% carbon capture and storage efficiency, CO 2 emissions drop by 83% and SO 2 and PM emissions drop to zero.

Suggested Citation

  • Prakashbhai R. Bhoi & Surja Sarkar, 2025. "The Co-Firing of Pine Biomass and Waste Coal in 100 and 600 MW Power Plants: A Sustainable Approach to Reduce GHG Emissions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-22, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4473-:d:1655746
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4473/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4473/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4473-:d:1655746. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.