IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i10p4309-d1652465.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Empirical Analysis of the Impact of the Green Economy on the Spatial Diversity of Entrepreneurship at the Poviats Level in Poland: Preliminary Study

Author

Listed:
  • Grzegorz Drozdowski

    (Department of Economics and Finance, Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce, 25-369 Kielce, Poland)

  • Paweł Dziekański

    (Department of Economics and Finance, Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce, 25-369 Kielce, Poland)

  • Andrzej Pawlik

    (Department of Economics and Finance, Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce, 25-369 Kielce, Poland)

  • Izabella Kęsy

    (Institute of Management, Economics and Logistics, Pomeranian Higher School in Starogard Gdanski, 83-250 Starogard Gdański, Poland)

Abstract

Sustainable development combines economic, social, and environmental aspects in pursuit of long-term stability and prosperity. Entrepreneurship plays a key role in achieving these goals, and the green economy is becoming an important part of the transformation into a more sustainable future. Companies that apply the principles of the green economy contribute to regional development and better use of territorial capital. In the process of development, the regional economy faces growing local needs, changes in the quality of life and climate, and shrinking natural resources. The answer to the problems of the region can be a green economy and entrepreneurship. This article aims to analyze and assess the spatial variation of pre-entrepreneurship in poviats in Poland in the context of the green economy. The study aims to understand how different local factors influence the development of pre-entrepreneurship in the conditions of green transformation. In addition, the paper will attempt to identify spatial disparities in the implementation of green economy initiatives. The CRITIC-TOPSIS method was used to construct the synthetic measure. The results of the analysis are presented for the years 2010, 2013, 2014, and 2021. The measure of synthetic entrepreneurship ranged from 0.24 to 0.48 in 2010 and 0.24 to 0.52 in 2021, the measure of the green economy: 0.35–0.54 and 0.34–0.57. Individual elements of the territorial capital ofthepoviats determine their ability to function. Natural resources are important factors in the process of development and the transition toward a green economy. They affect the standard of living, the social situation, public safety, and the quality of the environment. Supporting less developed regions in entrepreneurship and the green economy through dedicated infrastructure and innovation programmes should be a key action. Local governments should promote investment in green technologies and sustainable infrastructure to reduce disparities between regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Grzegorz Drozdowski & Paweł Dziekański & Andrzej Pawlik & Izabella Kęsy, 2025. "Empirical Analysis of the Impact of the Green Economy on the Spatial Diversity of Entrepreneurship at the Poviats Level in Poland: Preliminary Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-24, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4309-:d:1652465
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4309/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4309/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Enas Taha Sayed & Abdul Ghani Olabi & Abdul Hai Alami & Ali Radwan & Ayman Mdallal & Ahmed Rezk & Mohammad Ali Abdelkareem, 2023. "Renewable Energy and Energy Storage Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-26, February.
    2. Nada Denona Bogovic & Zvonimira Sverko Grdic, 2020. "Transitioning to a Green Economy—Possible Effects on the Croatian Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-19, November.
    3. Zoltán J. Ács & Erkko Autio & László Szerb, 2015. "National Systems of Entrepreneurship: Measurement issues and policy implications," Chapters, in: Global Entrepreneurship, Institutions and Incentives, chapter 28, pages 523-541, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Joanna Godlewska & Edyta Sidorczuk-Pietraszko, 2019. "Taxonomic Assessment of Transition to the Green Economy in Polish Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-25, September.
    5. Ni, Mengying & Liu, Zimin & Zhang, Zhuang, 2025. "Greening through economic complexity: New evidence from Chinese cities," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 2063-2090.
    6. Brodny, Jarosław & Tutak, Magdalena, 2023. "Assessing regional implementation of Sustainable Development Goal 9 “Build resilient infrastructure, promote sustainable industrialization and foster innovation” in Poland," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    7. Chen, Ping & Xi, JunYa & Li, Yuming & Ozturk, Ilhan & Ullah, Sana & Hafeez, Muhammad, 2024. "How do mineral resources trade and financial development affect green entrepreneurship in resource-rich economies?," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    8. Natalia Vukovic & Vladimir Pobedinsky & Sergey Mityagin & Andrei Drozhzhin & Zhanna Mingaleva, 2019. "A Study on Green Economy Indicators and Modeling: Russian Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-13, August.
    9. Huang, Weiting & He, Jia, 2023. "Impact of energy intensity, green economy, and natural resources development to achieve sustainable economic growth in Asian countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    10. Hu Mei & Zicheng Ma & Shiwen Jiao & Xiaoyu Chen & Xinyue Lv & Zehui Zhan, 2017. "The Sustainable Personality in Entrepreneurship: The Relationship between Big Six Personality, Entrepreneurial Self-Efficacy, and Entrepreneurial Intention in the Chinese Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-23, September.
    11. Ana Tur-Porcar & Norat Roig-Tierno & Anna Llorca Mestre, 2018. "Factors Affecting Entrepreneurship and Business Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-12, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Paweł Dziekański & Adam Wyszkowski & Piotr Prus & Andrzej Pawlik & Mansoor Maitah & Magdalena Wrońska, 2022. "Zero Waste as a Determinant of Shaping Green Economy Processes on the Example of Communes of Eastern Poland in 2010–2020," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-24, December.
    2. Piotr Misztal & Paweł Dziekański, 2023. "Green Economy and Waste Management as Determinants of Modeling Green Capital of Districts in Poland in 2010–2020," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-25, January.
    3. Menghua Deng & Junfei Chen & Feifei Tao & Jiulong Zhu & Min Wang, 2022. "On the Coupling and Coordination Development between Environment and Economy: A Case Study in the Yangtze River Delta of China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-20, January.
    4. José Alberto Martínez-González & Urszula Kobylinska & Desiderio Gutiérrez-Taño, 2021. "Exploring Personal and Contextual Variables of the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor through the Rasch Mathematical Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(16), pages 1-23, August.
    5. Zbysław Dobrowolski & Grzegorz Drozdowski & Laeeq Razzak Janjua & Mirela Panait & Jacek Szołtysek, 2025. "Econometric Analysis of BRICS Countries’ Activities in 1990–2022: Seeking Evidence of Sustainability," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-24, January.
    6. Yuliya Frolova & Suad A. Alwaely & Olga Nikishina, 2021. "Knowledge Management in Entrepreneurship Education as the Basis for Creative Business Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-15, January.
    7. Christina Theodoraki & Karim Messeghem & Mark P. Rice, 2018. "A social capital approach to the development of sustainable entrepreneurial ecosystems: an explorative study," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 153-170, June.
    8. R. Sandra Schillo & Ajax Persaud & Meng Jin, 2016. "Entrepreneurial readiness in the context of national systems of entrepreneurship," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 46(4), pages 619-637, April.
    9. Nuanphromsakul, Kajohnjak & Szczepańska-Woszczyna, Katarzyna & Kot, Sebastian & Chaveesuk, Singha & Chaiyasoonthorn, Wornchanok, 2022. "Sustainability of Rubber Farmers Cooperatives: Empirical Evaluation of Determining Factors," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 14(4), December.
    10. Rajko Tomaš, 2022. "Measurement of the Concentration of Potential Quality of Life in Local Communities," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 163(1), pages 79-109, August.
    11. Jean-Michel Sahut & Luca Iandoli & Frédéric Teulon, 2021. "The age of digital entrepreneurship," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(3), pages 1159-1169, February.
    12. Hossein Yousefi & Saheb Ghanbari Motlagh & Mohammad Montazeri, 2022. "Multi-Criteria Decision-Making System for Wind Farm Site-Selection Using Geographic Information System (GIS): Case Study of Semnan Province, Iran," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-27, June.
    13. Christina Theodoraki & Alexis Catanzaro, 2022. "Widening the borders of entrepreneurial ecosystem through the international lens," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 383-406, April.
    14. Chen, Liang & Guo, Yirong, 2023. "The drivers of sustainable development: Natural resources extraction and education for low-middle- and high-income countries," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(PB).
    15. Marcelo Royo-Vela & Jonathan Cuevas Lizama, 2022. "Creating Shared Value: Exploration in an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-23, July.
    16. Balázs Páger, 2014. "The entrepreneurial performance of the Central and Eastern European regions," ERSA conference papers ersa14p1631, European Regional Science Association.
    17. Ferreira, Joao J. & Fernandes, Cristina I. & Veiga, Pedro Mota & Caputo, Andrea, 2022. "The interactions of entrepreneurial attitudes, abilities and aspirations in the (twin) environmental and digital transitions? A dynamic panel data approach," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    18. José Fernández Donoso & Fernando Hernández, 2018. "MIDE Digital 2018 Antofagasta," Serie Working Papers 45, Universidad del Desarrollo, School of Business and Economics.
    19. José Fernández Donoso & Fernando Hernández, 2018. "MIDE Digital 2018 Araucanía," Serie Working Papers 58, Universidad del Desarrollo, School of Business and Economics.
    20. Joanna Godlewska & Edyta Sidorczuk-Pietraszko, 2019. "Taxonomic Assessment of Transition to the Green Economy in Polish Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-25, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4309-:d:1652465. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.