IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i9p3863-d1388757.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental Impact Assessment of Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Power Generation System Based on Life Cycle Assessment—A Case Study in China

Author

Listed:
  • Yilin Shen

    (Institute of Urban & Rural Mining, Changzhou University, Changzhou 213164, China
    National-Local Joint Engineering Research Center of Biomass Refining and High-Quality Utilization, Changzhou University, Changzhou 213164, China)

  • Yantao Yang

    (Institute of Urban & Rural Mining, Changzhou University, Changzhou 213164, China
    National-Local Joint Engineering Research Center of Biomass Refining and High-Quality Utilization, Changzhou University, Changzhou 213164, China)

  • Lei Song

    (Institute of Urban & Rural Mining, Changzhou University, Changzhou 213164, China
    National-Local Joint Engineering Research Center of Biomass Refining and High-Quality Utilization, Changzhou University, Changzhou 213164, China)

  • Tingzhou Lei

    (Institute of Urban & Rural Mining, Changzhou University, Changzhou 213164, China
    National-Local Joint Engineering Research Center of Biomass Refining and High-Quality Utilization, Changzhou University, Changzhou 213164, China)

Abstract

To progress towards the “dual carbon” goal and reduce the cost and increase the efficiency of solid oxide fuel cells, this study conducts a full life cycle analysis of solid oxide fuel cells, in which the environmental impact caused by the operating devices’ manufacturing, fuel gas catalyst reforming, single-cell manufacturing, cell stack manufacturing, and energy consumption and emissions are systematically analysed. In this study, we establish an assessment model for solid oxide fuel cells by using the cut-off criterion. The results show that 96.5% of the global warming potential in the use of solid oxide fuel cells comes from the stack operating subsystem. The stack manufacturing subsystem, operating device manufacturing subsystem, and waste stack processing subsystem all contribute greatly to acidification, accounting for 32.89%, 44%, and 35.82% of the total acidification, respectively. These three subsystems also contribute significantly to eutrophication, contributing 23.11%, 22.03%, and 42.15%, respectively. Compared with traditional thermal power generation systems, solid oxide fuel cell power generation systems have slightly higher overall environmental benefits, and the reductions in greenhouse gas emissions and acidification potential reach 6.22% and 18.52%, respectively. The research results have guiding significance and reference value for subsequent energy-saving and emission reduction design and improvement efforts for solid oxide fuel cells.

Suggested Citation

  • Yilin Shen & Yantao Yang & Lei Song & Tingzhou Lei, 2024. "Environmental Impact Assessment of Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Power Generation System Based on Life Cycle Assessment—A Case Study in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-14, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:9:p:3863-:d:1388757
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/9/3863/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/9/3863/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Strazza, C. & Del Borghi, A. & Costamagna, P. & Traverso, A. & Santin, M., 2010. "Comparative LCA of methanol-fuelled SOFCs as auxiliary power systems on-board ships," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(5), pages 1670-1678, May.
    2. Rillo, E. & Gandiglio, M. & Lanzini, A. & Bobba, S. & Santarelli, M. & Blengini, G., 2017. "Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of biogas-fed Solid Oxide Fuel Cell (SOFC) plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 585-602.
    3. Lee, Young Duk & Ahn, Kook Young & Morosuk, Tatiana & Tsatsaronis, George, 2015. "Environmental impact assessment of a solid-oxide fuel-cell-based combined-heat-and-power-generation system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 455-466.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Khaled M. A. Salim & Ruhanita Maelah & Hawa Hishamuddin & Amizawati Mohd Amir & Mohd Nizam Ab Rahman, 2022. "Two Decades of Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment of Solid Oxide Fuel Cells (SOFCs): A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Mehmeti, Andi & McPhail, Stephen J. & Ulgiati, Sergio, 2018. "Life cycle inventory data and metrics for high-temperature fuel cells: A streamlined decision-support tool and case study application," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 1195-1205.
    3. Tanveer, Waqas Hassan & Abdelkareem, Mohammad Ali & Kolosz, Ben W. & Rezk, Hegazy & Andresen, John & Cha, Suk Won & Sayed, Enas Taha, 2021. "The role of vacuum based technologies in solid oxide fuel cell development to utilize industrial waste carbon for power production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    4. Christian Moretti & Blanca Corona & Viola Rühlin & Thomas Götz & Martin Junginger & Thomas Brunner & Ingwald Obernberger & Li Shen, 2020. "Combining Biomass Gasification and Solid Oxid Fuel Cell for Heat and Power Generation: An Early-Stage Life Cycle Assessment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-24, June.
    5. Smith, Lucy & Ibn-Mohammed, Taofeeq & Yang, Fan & Reaney, Ian M. & Sinclair, Derek C. & Koh, S.C. Lenny, 2019. "Comparative environmental profile assessments of commercial and novel material structures for solid oxide fuel cells," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 1300-1313.
    6. Al-Khori, Khalid & Bicer, Yusuf & Koç, Muammer, 2021. "Comparative techno-economic assessment of integrated PV-SOFC and PV-Battery hybrid system for natural gas processing plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    7. Khalid Al-Khori & Sami G. Al-Ghamdi & Samir Boulfrad & Muammer Koç, 2021. "Life Cycle Assessment for Integration of Solid Oxide Fuel Cells into Gas Processing Operations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-19, August.
    8. Stropnik, R. & Sekavčnik, M. & Ferriz, A.M. & Mori, M., 2018. "Reducing environmental impacts of the ups system based on PEM fuel cell with circular economy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 824-835.
    9. Di Florio, Giuseppe & Macchi, Edoardo Gino & Mongibello, Luigi & Baratto, Maria Camilla & Basosi, Riccardo & Busi, Elena & Caliano, Martina & Cigolotti, Viviana & Testi, Matteo & Trini, Martina, 2021. "Comparative life cycle assessment of two different SOFC-based cogeneration systems with thermal energy storage integrated into a single-family house nanogrid," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    10. Polverino, Pierpaolo & Sorrentino, Marco & Pianese, Cesare, 2017. "A model-based diagnostic technique to enhance faults isolability in Solid Oxide Fuel Cell systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 1198-1214.
    11. Sorce, A. & Greco, A. & Magistri, L. & Costamagna, P., 2014. "FDI oriented modeling of an experimental SOFC system, model validation and simulation of faulty states," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 894-908.
    12. Konečná, Eva & Teng, Sin Yong & Máša, Vítězslav, 2020. "New insights into the potential of the gas microturbine in microgrids and industrial applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    13. Gómez, Sergio Yesid & Hotza, Dachamir, 2016. "Current developments in reversible solid oxide fuel cells," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 155-174.
    14. Lee, Young Duk & Ahn, Kook Young & Morosuk, Tatiana & Tsatsaronis, George, 2018. "Exergetic and exergoeconomic evaluation of an SOFC-Engine hybrid power generation system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 810-822.
    15. Xie, Junen & Yan, Peigang & Liu, Yang & Liu, Zekuan & Xiu, Xinyan & Xu, Shiyi & Fang, Jiwei & Li, Chengjie & Qin, Jiang, 2024. "Analysis of the thermodynamic performance of the SOFC-GT system integrated solar energy based on reverse Brayton cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 308(C).
    16. Ding, Xiaoyi & Lv, Xiaojing & Weng, Yiwu, 2019. "Coupling effect of operating parameters on performance of a biogas-fueled solid oxide fuel cell/gas turbine hybrid system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    17. Mehrabian, M.J. & Khoshgoftar Manesh, M.H., 2023. "4E, risk, diagnosis, and availability evaluation for optimal design of a novel biomass-solar-wind driven polygeneration system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(P2).
    18. Park, Chybyung & Jeong, Byongug & Zhou, Peilin, 2022. "Lifecycle energy solution of the electric propulsion ship with Live-Life cycle assessment for clean maritime economy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 328(C).
    19. Yang, Fei & Gu, Jianmin & Ye, Luhan & Zhang, Zuoxiang & Rao, Gaofeng & Liang, Yachun & Wen, Kechun & Zhao, Jiyun & Goodenough, John B. & He, Weidong, 2016. "Justifying the significance of Knudsen diffusion in solid oxide fuel cells," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 242-246.
    20. Ramadhani, Farah & Hussain, M.A. & Mokhlis, Hazlie & Fazly, Muhamad & Ali, Jarinah Mohd., 2019. "Evaluation of solid oxide fuel cell based polygeneration system in residential areas integrating with electric charging and hydrogen fueling stations for vehicles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 1373-1388.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:9:p:3863-:d:1388757. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.