IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i9p3542-d1381553.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of ESG Performance on Green Innovation among Traditional Energy Enterprises—Evidence from Listed Companies in China

Author

Listed:
  • Meijia Ren

    (School of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Jinsheng Zhou

    (Key Laboratory of Mine Ecological Effects and Systematic Restoration, Ministry of Natural Resources, Beijing 100081, China)

  • Jingjian Si

    (School of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Guoyu Wang

    (School of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Chunyu Guo

    (School of Economics and Management, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

To address escalating environmental challenges and the energy crisis, traditional energy companies must initiate green transformations and enhance green innovation. ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) performance is vital for gauging enterprises’ sustainable development. Therefore, this study explores the relationship between the ESG performance of traditional energy companies and their extent of green innovation. It aims to investigate whether improving ESG performance can lead to enhanced green innovation within these companies. Therefore, this paper employs a fixed effect model to analyze the impact of ESG performance on green innovation among traditional energy companies, specifically focusing on those listed in the Chinese A-share market from 2013 to 2022. The results indicate that ESG performance significantly promotes green innovation within traditional energy companies. The mechanism test’s findings reveal that ESG performance impacts green innovation via three key pathways: innovation investment, external monitoring, and government subsidies. Furthermore, further analysis reveals that the intense market competition environment positively moderates the effect of ESG performance enhancement on the extent of green innovation. This implies that, by improving their ESG performance, traditional energy companies can enhance their green innovation and green transformation efforts. Moreover, this impact is particularly pronounced among state-owned enterprises.

Suggested Citation

  • Meijia Ren & Jinsheng Zhou & Jingjian Si & Guoyu Wang & Chunyu Guo, 2024. "The Impact of ESG Performance on Green Innovation among Traditional Energy Enterprises—Evidence from Listed Companies in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-16, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:9:p:3542-:d:1381553
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/9/3542/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/9/3542/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Balsalobre-Lorente, Daniel & Sinha, Avik & Murshed, Muntasir, 2023. "Russia-Ukraine conflict sentiments and energy market returns in G7 countries: Discovering the unexplored dynamics," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    2. Jiang, Wei & Dong, Lingfei & Chen, Yunfei, 2023. "Time-frequency connectedness among traditional/new energy, green finance, and ESG in pre- and post-Russia-Ukraine war periods," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    3. Zhang, Dongyang, 2022. "Green financial system regulation shock and greenwashing behaviors: Evidence from Chinese firms," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    4. Chang, Xin & Chen, Yangyang & Wang, Sarah Qian & Zhang, Kuo & Zhang, Wenrui, 2019. "Credit default swaps and corporate innovation," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(2), pages 474-500.
    5. Quan, Xiaofeng & Zhang, Ke & Zhong, Rui & Zhu, Yuxiang, 2023. "Political corruption and green innovation," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    6. Ma, Yechi & Sha, Yezhou & Wang, Zilong & Zhang, Wenjing, 2023. "The effect of the policy mix of green credit and government subsidy on environmental innovation," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    7. William Dilla & Diane Janvrin & Jon Perkins & Robyn Raschke, 2019. "Do environmental responsibility views influence investors’ use of environmental performance and assurance information?," Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 10(3), pages 476-497, June.
    8. Wang, Lanfang & Wang, Yue & Zhou, Jing, 2022. "Political connection,government R&D subsidies and innovation efficiency: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 48(C).
    9. Yu, Fang (Frank), 2008. "Analyst coverage and earnings management," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(2), pages 245-271, May.
    10. Liu, Wei & Chen, Xiao & Zhang, Jihong, 2023. "The Russia-Ukraine conflict and the automotive energy transition: Empirical evidence from China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    11. Eliwa, Yasser & Aboud, Ahmed & Saleh, Ahmed, 2021. "ESG practices and the cost of debt: Evidence from EU countries," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Uma Shankar Yadav & Indrajit Ghosal & Anupam Pareek & Kritika Khandelwal & Ajay Kumar yadav & Chandra Chakraborty, 2024. "Impact of entrepreneurial orientation and ESG on environmental performance: moderating impact of digital transformation and technological innovation as a mediating construct using Sobel test," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-41, December.
    2. Lei Xi & Ziyi Guo, 2024. "The Impact of Top Management Team Heterogeneity on Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance and Corporate Green Innovation: Evidence from Chinese Manufacturing Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-21, December.
    3. Yan Ma & Pei Liu & Haonan Chen, 2024. "Corporate ESG Performance, Green Innovation, and Green New Quality Productivity: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-21, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhang, Dongyang, 2023. "Does green finance really inhibit extreme hypocritical ESG risk? A greenwashing perspective exploration," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    2. Mohapatra, Swati & Kumar, Ashish & Mohapatra, Malaya Ranjan & Srivastava, Vikas, 2025. "Does CEO duality moderate environmental, social, and governance performance-earnings management relationship? Evidence from emerging markets," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    3. Xiaoran Huang & Zheng Qiao & Lei Zhang, 2021. "The real effects of institutional spatial concentration," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 50(4), pages 1113-1167, December.
    4. Keigo Fujikura & Akitsu Oe, 2023. "The Influence of Firms’ Pragmatic Legitimacy on Investors’ Perceptions of Their Environmental Protection Activities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-18, September.
    5. Tao Chen & Shinichi Kamiya & Pingyi Lou & Andreas Milidonis, 2023. "Analyst coverage, executive compensation and corporate risk‐taking: Evidence from property–casualty insurance firms," Journal of Risk & Insurance, The American Risk and Insurance Association, vol. 90(4), pages 899-939, December.
    6. Jiang, Jiaoliang & Chen, Yulin, 2021. "How does labor protection influence corporate risk-taking? Evidence from China," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    7. Xiao, Xiang & Ge, Ge & Yu, Ziqin, 2024. "Inhibition or inducement: ESG rating changes and earnings management – Based on the perspective of external supervision," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    8. Yingxue Gao & Yan Chen, 2024. "Watchdogs or Enablers? Analyzing the Role of Analysts in ESG Greenwashing in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-28, May.
    9. Zhang, Mengzhi & He, Wenjian, 2025. "Encouraging or inhibiting: Can analyst attention reduce corporate greenwashing behavior?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 943-962.
    10. Zhang, Zeyi & Luo, Xuehua & Du, Jiating & Xu, Baoliang, 2024. "Substantive or strategic: Government R&D subsidies and green innovation," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 67(PA).
    11. Jiaying Li & Ying Fu & Ying Wu, 2024. "Advertising and Corporate Green Innovation: From the Perspective of Greenwashing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-14, November.
    12. Wu, Keping & Kong, Dongmin & Yang, Wei, 2024. "Does environmental, social, and governance rating affect firms’ real earnings management," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 67(PA).
    13. Khorshidvand, Behrooz & Guitouni, Adel & Govindan, Kannan & Soleimani, Hamed & Talebi, Leila & Sibdari, Soheil, 2025. "Optimizing pricing for sustainable government-subsidized omnichannel closed-loop supply chains," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    14. Wenqing Zhang & Jingrong Dong, 2023. "The Polarization Effect and Mechanism of China’s Green Finance Policy on Green Technology Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-26, June.
    15. Wang, Zhen & Tang, Pei, 2024. "Substantive digital innovation or symbolic digital innovation: Which type of digital innovation is more conducive to corporate ESG performance?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 93(PB), pages 1212-1228.
    16. Yang, Minhua & Ma, Linkun & Gu, Yan & Wu, Wenfeng, 2025. "The impacts of green bonds on the green innovation: Evidence from the corporate green transformation in China," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 65(C).
    17. Long, Houyin & Lai, Guansen & Jiang, Jiaoliang & Liu, Ruonan, 2025. "The impact of top-down amplification of economic growth targets on CSR performance-evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    18. Ali, Shoaib & Naveed, Muhammad & Yousaf, Imran & Khattak, Muhammad Sualeh, 2024. "From cryptos to consciousness: Dynamics of return and volatility spillover between green cryptocurrencies and G7 markets," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    19. Xueyan Dong & Jingyu Gao & Sunny Li Sun & Kangtao Ye, 2021. "Doing extreme by doing good," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 38(1), pages 291-315, March.
    20. Leye Li & Louise Yi Lu & Dongyue Wang, 2022. "External labour market competitions and stock price crash risk: evidence from exposures to competitor CEOs’ award‐winning events," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(S1), pages 1421-1460, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:9:p:3542-:d:1381553. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.